设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
汪 翔  
原创,版权所有,未经许可不得转载  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/3000/ > 复制 > 收藏本页
网络日志正文
商业思考: 奢侈品市场的投资机会 2013-10-25 06:34:59

奢侈品市场的投资机会


对于像我这样的普通人,奢侈品真的是太奢侈。当我帮助一位朋友完成了几笔近四万美元一个“哈马斯”小包的交易之后,我还是不明白:中国人真的是有钱啊?!

人家有钱,我们羡慕得流口水也没有用。那么,如果我们更多的了解一下奢侈品市场的行情,或许,在人家花钱享受的时候,我们也能自得其乐的从中赚一笔。

下面的文章,读起来有点趣味:让我们对于奢侈品市场的商业运行状况和应该有与不应该有的运行逻辑,有个了解一点点的机会。

Coach公司的命运,在最近几年有点尴尬。股价也在股市大行情蒸蒸日上的时候,嫣嫣耷耷。市盈率不高,盈利成长在美国这个主市场停滞。虽然在中国这样的新兴市场还在高歌猛进。但是,是不是该像很多其他公司一样,在中国市场放手一搏?还是继续以保守的姿态,稳扎稳打?最近也让公司之外的分析师们烦恼和不安。水中的人不急,岸上的人却急得也想跳到水里去。

这两者之一的选择,在一定程度上也是一场博弈:中国市场对于奢侈品的需求,是不是已经冷却?和就此之后的一蹶不振?特别是在反腐斗争正如火如荼的时候?

个人看来,中国的反腐败运动,也只可能是短期的坚决。中国的集权专制体制,从根本上决定了,它不可能最终将国家治理得像美国这样廉洁。中国人已经实验了几千年了,到头来还依然只是短期效果显著,长期依然我行我素。

在世界上的任何地方,只要有人就有私心和私利。只要有权力的独裁和独断,就有使用权力的徇私舞弊。历史如此,未来也会依然如此。在只需要对上负责的中国体制下,在成为公务员就是最好的职业选择的客观存在下,你不腐败都无法生存,又谈何彻底根除腐败呢?

所以,对于奢侈品的需求,在中国市场,在短期“萧条”之后,还会再次繁荣昌盛起来。于是乎,Coach也自然会有继续在中国市场大赚特赚的时候了。

只是,该公司在美国到处开“Outlet”的做法,虽然短期销售上去了,但却让自己慢慢中成为不伦不类的品牌:奢侈品吧,又太大众化?!大众化吧,又价格过高点,太奢侈了点?!这种中间路线是不是能够独树一帜的做出一番长久的大业绩来?就是目前让人糊涂的一点。

无论如何,如果你对于商业有兴趣,读读下面的文章,会对你有益。


Coach: Ripe For Takeover?

Oct 24 2013, 13:49 

"International sales decreased slightly…"

That's a sentence you do not want to see when you are looking at a company which is viewed by many as a significant player in the booming global luxury goods sector. And yet, there it is, in Coach's (COH) first quarter report released a few days ago. To be fair, the slight decrease in sales was due to rare and large currency fluctuations. The dollar rose by 27% against the yen in the last year, an extreme move not often seen with major currencies. On a constant currency basis, international sales rose 9% in the quarter, which is reasonable but not a barn burner. A bright spot wasChinawhere sales boomed 35%. So there was some good news behind the headline.

Despite the recent Q1 disappointment, Coach's net income and free cash flow margins remain strong. Its main problem is not profitability but the fact thatNorth Americacontributes 67% of total revenues and has essentially gone ex-growth.

If you put Coach in the bucket of luxury goods companies (which are mostly European), it is clear that Coach is badly underperforming. Sector peers LVMH (LVMHF), Burberry (BBRYF), Richemont (CFR.VX) and others have zoomed ahead with sales, profits and stock prices not far from their all time highs. The main reasons for their greater success have been their more aggressive expansion intoAsiaand stronger brand management.

But if you put Coach in a more general bucket of consumer and apparel companies, then it is doing better than some and worse than others. The issue, however, is that the company's future will be largely determined by which bucket it puts itself in. As a luxury goods company, it can maintain some pricing power and it will preserve or raise its margins and market value. It could also merge with or be acquired by one of the Europeans. But as a general consumer company, its brand will get tarnished. Its margins will continue to erode and so will its valuation.

Coach's problems can therefore be summed as follows:

- An insufficient geographic footprint outside theU.S.

- A large North American presence which has stalled.

- A brand that is in danger of falling out of the "luxury" sector.

The store opening program can be accelerated overseas if there is sufficient confidence that the luxury boom will continue. Coach has a strong balance sheet and is generating positive free cash flow. In theory, therefore, it has important untapped reserves which it can deploy to open stores at an accelerated rate.

North Americawill be more difficult to fix, given intense competition from the likes of Michael Kors (KORS) and Kate Spade (FNP). Here, design appeal and brand management are key to an eventual recovery. Coach faces the risk of what the French call "Cardinisation", the fate met by the Pierre Cardin brand when it became so ubiquitous that it lost its luxury stamp.

In this sense, the fact that 60% of Coach's North American sales occurin factory outlets is positively troubling. Sales at these outlets come at better margins because of lower costs and higher volumes but they damage the brand and could reclassify it outside of the luxury sector. And that could be the beginning of a death spiral for pricing.

A quicker fix would be to sell the company to another luxury goods firm. An acquirer who already has a large presence in Asia andEuropecould quickly boost Coach's overseas revenues and lower its costs. Conversely, Coach's largeUSpresence could be of benefit to an acquirer looking to grow its own American sales. One problem is that a buyer may initially look to strengthen the brand by closing some factory outlets. This couldreduce North American volumes in the near term, a consideration which may depress any proposed takeover premium.

So is this a good price to buy the stock?

Yes, because international sales growth will soon return and for the possibility of a takeover.

No, because branding issues andNorth Americaare unlikely to be resolved in the next quarter.

All in, it is a buy for speculative portfolios. More conservative investors should look to buy at a lower price if the company takes steps to avoid further erosion of its margins and to move its brand upscale.

  

BMW, Louis Vuitton, Swatch: Can the Boom Continue?

by SAMI KARAM

Diamonds are forever. What about growth in the luxury sector?

A few months after Porsche teamed up with RIM to offer the Porsche Blackberry, Tonino Lamborghini recently announced the introduction of three gold plated cell phones (priced $1,850 to $2,750) and of an Android tablet ($2,300) aimed at the Russian market. This story neatly captures the current state of play in the global luxury industry: a prestigious European brand flashing a status product at a BRIC consumer. Notwithstanding the gloom emanating from daily European headlines, the continent’s luxury sector has been riding an unprecedented expansion. With their aggregate 70% market share in global luxury goods, a slew of European companies have been living their best years ever.

The Best of Times

Sales have risen strongly at BMW. And at LVMH, the French parent of Louis Vuitton, Dom Perignon, Bulgari and Tag Heuer. And at Hermes and Burberry. And at Swatch Group, the Swiss parent of Breguet, Glashütte, Blancpain and Omega. In the two years 2010-11, BMW increased its sales by over 17% annually. LVMH increased theirs by an average 14%, Hermes by 18%, and Swatch by 22%. With record margins and cash flows, these results are oddly incongruous with a global economy limping and stumbling out of (or through, or back into) the 2008 financial crisis.

Sales Growth

2010

2011

Q1 2012

BMW

19.3%

13.8%

14.1%

Burberry

26.7%

23.7%


Hermes

18.9%

18.3%

17.6%

LVMH

13.0%

14.0%

14.0%

SwatchGroup

21.8%

21.7%


Tiffany

11.0%

18.0%

8.0%

Burberry fiscal year ends in March; FY 2011 and 2012 shown here.

Hermes, LVMH, Swatch, Tiffany: organic growth, ex- currency impact and acquisitions


The boom has been fuelled by rising demand in the BRIC countries and, to a lesser extent, in theUnited States. In 2011, sales in Asia (includingJapan) were 28% of total revenues at BMW, 35% at LVMH, and as much as 54% at Swatch. At LVMH in 2011, sales in Asia ex-Japan and in theUSgrew by 27% and 18% year-on-year, respectively. For BMW,Asiarepresented 22.5% of unit sales in 2011, up from 10.6% in 2007.

If the rich, per F. Scott Fitzgerald, are different from you and me, then the suppliers and courtiers who pander assiduously to their vanity or sense of perfectionism, the purveyors of the finest consumer products on earth, are certainly different from the average consumer company. Whether by sheer luck or brilliant foresight, luxury goods companies now find themselves at the nexus of two main drivers of demand. First, the global rich, whose numbers have been increasing, are less sensitive to the economic cycle. They have big reserves of savings and can spend on luxury items even if their incomes falter for a year or two. Most will continue to consume luxury unless the economy is hit by a severe downturn. One of the reasons that BMW is bullish on the future is its expectation that the number of millionaires will continue to rise in developed markets as well as in the BRIC countries andTurkeyandSouth Korea(identified as the BRIKT +Chinain a BMW presentation).

Second, the newly rich and middle class in emerging markets have embraced luxury products with a vengeance. Like the Japanese in the 1990s, shoppers in the BRIC countries are today’s most profligate luxury customers. Chinese buyers discovered luxury brands years ago and they have been buying with gusto. Significantly, their buying power and obsession with luxury is felt far beyond their borders. According to the Boston Consulting Group, travelers from emerging markets (tourists and business people) account for a large share of global luxury sales, even if some of these sales are recorded inParis,New YorkorTokyo. BCG says that the Chinese spend as much on luxury while away as they do at home.

Barring a global recession, these two groups, the rich everywhere and the middle class in emerging markets, will continue to spend on luxury products and, increasingly, on luxury services. These are undoubtedly the best of times for the luxury sector. The question then becomes: what will derail the boom? A shift in demographics could do it.

A Brief Digression on Demographics and Markets

In general, the world is full of coincidences but it would be foolish to accept all of them at face value. Sometimes it makes sense to ask questions to find out whether two concurrent events are really a coincidence or whether they are related. Among coincidences that we should not take at face value are important reversals in markets which occur at the same time as demographic inflection points. For example, the Japanese stock market peaked in 1990, the same year that the number of Japanese turning 40 also peaked. It could be a coincidence but then theUSstock market peaked in 2000, the same year that the number of Americans turning 40 also peaked. It could be another coincidence or alternatively, there could be a poorly understood dynamic underlying the stock market, a dynamic directly linked to demographics, aging and investing etc. (The Chinese stock market peaked in 2007, one to five years after the number of Chinese turning 40 hit its own peak).

Demographics are generally ignored or underestimated by market participants. They are often seen as far-removed inputs in the economy which eventually manifest themselves through other measures. For example, an investor may ignore the change in demographics in a given area or region or country, confident in the knowledge that any significant shift will eventually appear in monthly retail or housing data or other economic indicators. The only problem with this thinking is a large gap in timing. Monthly status updates from the economy are mostly embedded in market prices by the time they are released. By contrast, an analysis of demographic trends can help make a forecast several months or even years before significant changes filter through the monthly economic data.

Dependency Ratios

One demographic measure which should certainly be examined in its relation to markets is the dependency ratio which measures the number of dependents per working adult (it is the sum of people under 14 and over 65, divided by the number of people aged 15-64). The table (compiled from a UN 2010 report) shows the ratio (per 100 people) for various countries and regions. A declining ratio is generally positive for the economy because income earners have fewer dependents and can divert dollars to investing and spending.

The world’s dependency ratio which fell steadily from 1970 to 2010 will be essentially flat until 2020-30 and will start to rise beyond 2030. In theUSandEurope, the ratio hit bottom around 2010 and will rise in future decades. But inJapan, it hit bottom in 1990 and has been rising ever since. Perhaps this explains in partJapan’s lost decade which turned into two lost decades.


1950

1970

1990

2000

2010

2015

2020

2030

2050











World

65

75

64

59

52

52

52

53

58











Brazil

80

85

66

54

48

45

44

46

59

Russia

54

52

50

44

39

43

48

54

67

India

68

80

72

64

55

52

50

47

48

China

63

77

51

48

38

38

40

45

64











Europe

52

56

50

48

46

50

54

61

75

Japan

68

45

43

47

56

65

70

75

96

USA

54

62

52

51

50

53

56

64

67











Africa

81

91

91

84

78

76

73

67

59

In the BRIC countries, the dependency ratio is still falling inBrazilandIndia, but it is near bottom and is set to rise inRussiaandChina. And inAfrica, the ratio will continue to fall for a long time.

As the ratio rises, there will be fewer dollars to spend on discretionary items because more of these dollars will have to be redirected to taking care of dependents, whether this is done directly through assisting family members or indirectly through charities or government social programs.

Which brings us back to luxury goods, in some ways the quintessential discretionary items. Will a rise in the dependency ratio in developed countries, inRussiaand inChinalead to a slowdown for the sector?

Japan

Looking into the future, the case ofJapancan be informative. It was not long ago that the Japanese were avid buyers of luxury goods, both at home and while traveling. But a 2009 study by McKinsey found that the Japanese appetite for luxury goods has been on the wane since 2001 (in volume terms) and it noted that their purchases started to decline (in currency terms) in mid-2006, two full years before the onset of the financial crisis.

Whether by coincidence or causality (the latter in my opinion), the demographic data fits well with this turn of events. Because of a low birth rate and an ageing population,Japan’s dependency ratio, 0.43 in 1990, rose modestly to 0.47 by 2000 and more briskly to 0.56 by 2010. It is on its way to 0.7 in 2020.

Nonetheless, heavy investing by luxury companies over several decades means that the Japanese luxury market remains the second largest in the world, after that of theUnited States. LVMH has 360 stores inJapan, a country 10% smaller thanCalifornia, vs. 621 for all of theUS.

BRICs

The dependency ratio is bottoming inRussiaandChinabut it will only rise slowly for the next 10 to 15 years. This suggests that, barring other developments, the luxury sector could continue to do well, but its growth rate may taper off. Of all the BRIC countries, India’s ratio looks the most promising and it offers the best longer term profile if its policymakers can set the country on a path to reap the demographic dividend resulting from a decline in its fertility rate. Although luxury companies have a presence inIndia, their footprint is much smaller than inChinaandJapan. For example, Louis Vuitton has over 50 stores inJapan, 39 stores inChinaand 4 inIndia.

IntoAfrica

Africawill see a steady decline of its dependency ratio in the 21st century. Luxury companies have a small to nonexistent presence on the continent. Swatch Group records a minuscule 0.6% of its sales there. Louis Vuitton has three stores, of which two inSouth Africaand one inMorocco, but none in oil-richAngolaorNigeria. Porsche has seven ‘Porsche Centres’ in Africa, of which three in South Africa and one each in Angola, Nigeria, Egypt and Ghana. But it has 42 ‘Centres’ inChina, 23 inRussiaand 8 inBrazil. Although store count is an incomplete measure (because of sales through third party outlets), a larger number of own-brand stores denotes a greater confidence in the stability and growth of a given market. IfAfricais the next economic frontier, these are indeed very early days for luxury goods companies on the continent.

They should sit up and take note. A team led by Hinh T. Dinh, Chief Economist at the World Bank, recently examinedAfrica’s prospects as a new manufacturing hub.Dinh writes:

“The ongoing redistribution of cost advantages in labor-intensive manufacturing presents an opportunity for Sub-SaharanAfricato start producing many light manufactures, enhance private investment and create millions of jobs.

According to new evidence, feasible, low-cost, sharply focused policy initiatives aimed at enhancing private investment could launch the region on a path to becoming competitive in light manufacturing.

These initiatives would complement progress on broader investment reforms and could foster industrialization and raise the market share of domestically produced goods in rapidly growing local markets for light manufacturers.”

Rise of Experiential Luxury

In its report, BCG estimated that sales of the global luxury sector amounted to $660 billion in goods (including luxury cars) and another $770 billion in services. BCG also highlighted a gradual shift in customer preference from owning luxury (goods) to experiencing luxury (services). Experiential luxury includes spa services, safaris, luxury travel, fine dining, special art auctions and other services. BCG deems this subsector to be growing by 12% per year while the market for luxury goods grows by 3 to 7%.

A key driver of experiential luxury is the aging of the population in North America, Europe,JapanandChina. As people get older, they are less interested in owning expensive watches and handbags and more interested in valuable experiences. Some luxury product companies are trying to position accordingly. In its considerable portfolio, LVMH now also counts Cheval Blanc, a high-end hotel in Courchevel. But these efforts are so far embryonic.

So can the boom last? Yes, but projecting into the future the strategy of the past ten years will not be enough. The reversal of the dependency ratio in several BRIC countries and the rise of experiential luxury in developed markets pose the biggest challenges. Luxury goods companies will have to adapt their geographic and product footprint accordingly. In the near-term, wider concerns about the global economy override demographic developments. But in the longer term,Indiaand Africa look like promising frontiers while the rest of the world (includingChina) grapples with an older population and a rising number of dependents.

浏览(1260) (0) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
汪翔 ,49岁
来自: 美国
注册日期: 2009-10-24
访问总量: 4,357,155 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
汪翔 文集地址
最新发布
· 中国,可以说不吗?
· 中国应该以老大的身份应对俄罗斯
· 那些脑残的中国人,无救
· 乌克兰的死结与台湾的生存
· 女人拥有尊严,任重道远
· 悲剧,原本可以避免
· 彭丽媛女士,是你站出来的时候
友好链接
· 刘以栋:刘以栋的博客
分类目录
【《科幻:智慧女神》】
· 科幻:《智慧女神》(3)欲望
· 科幻:《智慧女神》 (2) 情人
· 科幻:《智慧女神》(1) 诞生
【元宇宙世界】
· 元宇宙:FB 完蛋了还是正在酝酿
【《短篇小说》】
· 感恩节,雪城出轨(下)
· 感恩节,雪城出轨(中)
· 感恩节,雪城出轨(上)
· 求婚
【《国安一号》(科幻小说)】
· 完美的制度(结尾)
· 釜底抽薪
· 秉性使然
· 竭嘶底里
· 铿锵玫瑰
· 人间炼狱
· 不宣而战
· 暗度陈仓
· 精准打击
· 鼹鼠出击
【相聚樱花盛开时】
· 相聚樱花盛开时(20)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(19)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(18)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(17)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(16)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(15)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(14)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(13)
【相聚樱花盛开时】
· 相聚樱花盛开时(12)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(11)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(10)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(9)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(8)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(7)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(5)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(4)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(3)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(2)
【《美国生活》】
· 悲剧,原本可以避免
· 人傻钱多的经典案例
· 拥枪文化之三:卢刚事件
· 拥枪在美国之二:生意红火
· 拥枪在美国之一:无处不在
· 新科诺贝尔经济学奖获奖者给你谈
· 教育投资的目的
· 学美国搞地产税,抑制炒房?
· 我们是谁?
· 我们真的这么穷吗?
【《面书观察》】
· 面书会成为下一个苹果吗?
【《苹果观察》】
· 乔布斯的商战
· 投资者在歧视苹果公司吗?
· Penney的CEO到底误读了什么?
· 是不是苹果真的出了麻烦?
· 大跌之后的苹果价值再评价
· 苹果大跌之后是不是机会?
· 苹果跌了,谁对了?
· 科技产品新周期循环开始了?
· 再议苹果的投资价值
· 到了该买点苹果股票的时候了
【《美国之最》】
· 美国电影巨星你知多少
· 2012年代价最大的新产品败笔
· 美国单位面积销售最好的零售店
· 美国人最讨厌的行当和机构
· 穷人的钱也很好赚
· 美国最舍得在广告上花钱的公司
· 即将消失的十大品牌
· 医院安全指数最高的十大州
· 维稳做得最好和最差的十大国家
· 美国犯罪率最高的十大都市
【《美国经商日志》】
· 新闻周刊:如何寻找下一个Facebo
· 是什么能让国家、企业长治久安?
· 美国的商业诚信是如何打造的
· 商业思考:亚马逊在忽悠投资者?
· 商业思考: 奢侈品市场的投资机
· 商业思考:最低薪太低与快餐店连
· 商业思考:美国糖果市场的佼佼者
· 美国零售业开始了中国模式?
· 流量最大的十大网站
· 成者萧何败者萧何
【读书与孩子教育】
· 药家鑫教给了我们什么?
· 越来越多的美国人不读书了
· 美国人为什么喜欢读书
· 数码书革命如何影响我们的生活
· 读书、无书读与数码电子书
【《股市投资杂谈》】
· 股票对冲策略之一
· 股市泡沫时代如何赚钱
· 谷歌十年的股价变化,验证了十年
· 投资的逻辑:灾难与机会
· 股市投资的猫狗之道
· 亚马逊建第二总部,带来机会
· Snapchat 来了,赌一场?
· 马云的帝王梦能走多远?
· 投资价值分析; COH 与 KORS
· 股市进入泡沫还是余威继续强盛
【海龟与海带话题】
· 祖国,你够格被称为母亲吗?
· 故乡、祖国与自作多情
· 海龟(15):如果懦夫也能生存
· 海龟(14):石油、中国、人民币
· 海龟(13):付出的和获得的
· 海龟(12):钱学森曾经想叛国吗
· 海龟(11):官员博士多与钱学森
· 海龟(10):如果幼稚能够无罪
· 海龟(9):钱学森的尴尬
· 海龟(8):钱学森不访美的困惑
【杂谈】
· 川普真的输了!急了,坐不住了。
· 白人至上之祸
· 以柔克刚川普无策
· 不靠谱的总统
· 欲加之罪与自欺欺人
· 霸道能打天下
· 人类智商何在?
· 川普贸易战的底线在哪?
· 读不懂的美国
· 2018年诺贝尔奖的小遐思
【《中国企业家画像》】
· 国内经营美容院的成功秘密
· 值得给中国的私有企业贷款吗?
· 具有犹太商人素质的企业家?
· 骄雄、赌徒、愚昧,还是天才的企
· 精明的企业家,还是唯利是图的小
· 中国企业家应该是什么样的
· 中国企业家画像之一:孙汉本
· 经营的逻辑与兰世立的“智慧”
【《犹太经商天才》:目录和序言】
· 《犹太经商天才》(连载) 003
· 《犹太经商天才》(连载)002
· 《犹太经商天才》(连载) 001
【金融危机】
· 《高盛欺诈门》(8)∶打错的“算
· 《高盛欺诈门》(7)∶零和博弈的
· 《高盛欺诈门》(6)∶来自股东的
· 读不懂的中国逻辑(1)
· 《高盛欺诈门》(5)∶陷阱
· 《高盛欺诈门》(4):冰山一角
· 《高盛欺诈门》(3):恨又离不
· 《高盛欺诈门》(2):症结
· 《高盛欺诈门》(1):序幕
· 理解高盛欺诈,请先读读《危机与
【地产淘金】
· 炒房案例之一:南京
· 外资新设房企数大增 千亿美元购
· 该是投资银行股的时候了吗?
· 中国楼市观察(1)
· 地产淘金的最佳时机到了吗?
· 房价突然跌一半,穷人更惨
· 买房、租房与靠房市发财
【我的中国】
· 中国,可以说不吗?
· 中国应该以老大的身份应对俄罗斯
· 那些脑残的中国人,无救
· 乌克兰的死结与台湾的生存
· 女人拥有尊严,任重道远
· 彭丽媛女士,是你站出来的时候
· 谷爱凌创造的多赢与割韭菜
· 贸易战,中国的出路何在
· 贸易战,中国真的输掉了
· 中国学术精英之奇葩
【我的书架】
· 今年诺奖得主的代表作《逃离》全
· 《乔布斯的商战》(目录)
· 《乔布斯的商战》出版,感谢读者
· 张五常:人民币在国际上升值会提
· 《博弈华尔街》,让你再一次感悟
· 《危机与败局》目录
· 《危机与败局》出版发行
· 下雪的早晨 (艾青)
· 《奥巴马智取白宫》被选参加法兰
· 下架文章
【《战神林彪传》】
· 《战神林彪传》第二章 (2)
· 《战神林彪传》第二章(1)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(5)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(4)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(3)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(2)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(1)
【《犹太经商天才》】
· 《犹太经商天才》: 2.生不逢时
· 第一章:苦命的孩子(1)
【阿里巴巴与雅虎之战】
· 福布斯:马云和他的敌人们
· 阿里巴巴与雅虎之战(2)
· 阿里巴巴与雅虎之战(1)
【《哈佛小子林书豪》】
· 从林书豪身上学到的人生十课之一
· 《哈佛小子林书豪》之二
· 《哈佛小子林书豪》之一
【华裔的战歌】
· 中国不应对骆家辉抱太大的幻想
· 华裔政界之星——刘云平(2)
· 华裔政界之星——刘云平(1)
· 心安则身安,归不归的迷思
· 华裔的战歌(5):谁造就了"
· 华裔的战歌(4):关注社会与被
· 华裔的战歌(3):“全A”情结与失
· 华裔的战歌(2):犹太裔比我们
· 华裔的战歌(1) 华裔在美生存现状
【国美大战】
· 企业版的茉莉花革命与公司政治
· 国美之战,不得不吸取的十条教训
· 谁来拯救国美品牌
· 国美股权之争:两个男人的战争
· 现在是投资国美的最佳时机吗?
· “刺客”邹晓春起底
· 邹晓春:已经做好最坏的打算
· 愚昧的陈晓与窃笑的贝恩
· 贝恩资本的真面目(附图片)
· 陈晓为什么“勾结”贝恩资本
【《乔布斯的故事》】
· 苹果消息跟踪:如果苹果进入电视
· 乔布斯故事之十四:嬉皮士
· 乔布斯的故事之十三 犹太商人
· 乔布斯的故事之十二:禅心
· 乔布斯的故事之十一:精神导师
· 乔布斯故事之十:大学选择
· 乔布斯的故事之九:个性的形成
· 乔布斯的故事之八:吸食大麻
· 乔布斯的故事之七:胆大妄为
· 乔布斯的故事之六:贪玩的孩子
【中国美容业】
· 国内日化品牌屡被收购 浙江本土
· 外资日化品牌再下一城 丁家宜外
· 强生收购大宝 并购价刷新中国日
· 从两千元到一百亿的寻梦之路
【加盟店经营】
· 转载:太平洋百货撤出北京市场
· Franchise Laws Protect Investo
· Groupon拒绝谷歌收购内幕
· GNC 到底值多少钱?
· 杨国安对话苏宁孙为民:看不见的
· 张近东:苏宁帝国征战史
· 连锁加盟店成功经营的四大要素
· 加盟店经营管理的五大核心问题
· 高盛抢占新地盘 10月将入股中国
【《解读日本》】
· 东京人不是冷静 是麻木冷漠!
· 日本灾难给投资者带来怎样的机会
· 日本地震灾难对世界经济格局的影
· 美国对日本到底信任几何?
· 大地震带来日元大升值的秘密
· 日本原来如此不堪一击
· 灾难面前的日本人民(3)
· 灾难面前的日本人民(2)
· 灾难面前的日本人民(1)
【《乔布斯的商战》】
· 苹果给你上的一堂价值投资课
· 纪念硅谷之父诺伊斯八十四岁诞辰
· 乔布斯的商战(6): 小富靠勤、中
· 乔布斯的商战(5): 搏击命运,机
· 乔布斯的商战(4):从巨富到赤
· 乔布斯的商战(1):偶然与必然
· 让成功追随梦想:悼念乔布斯
【《鹞鹰》(谍战小说,原创)】
· 《鹞鹰》(谍战小说,原创)
【盛世危言】
· 美国长期信用等级下调之后?
· 建一流大学到底缺什么?
· 同样是命,为什么这些孩子的就那
· 中国式“贫民富翁”为何难产
· 做人,你敢这厶牛吗?
· 言论自由与第一夫人变猴子
· “奈斯比特现象”(下)
· “奈斯比特现象”(上)
· 理性从政和智慧当官
· 中国对美五大优势
【第一部 《逃离》】
· 朋友,后会有期
· 师兄,人品低劣
· 开心,老友相见
· 拯救,有心无力
· 别了,无法回头
· 对呀,我得捞钱
· 哭吧,烧尽激情
· 爱情,渐行渐远
· 再逢,尴尬面对
· 不错,真的成熟
【《毒丸》(谍战)】
· 毒丸(13)
· 毒丸(12)
· 毒丸(11)
· 毒丸(10)
· 毒丸(9)
· 毒丸(8)
· 毒丸(7)
· 毒丸(6)
· 毒丸(5)
· 毒丸(4)
【《美国小镇故事》】
· 拜金女(五):免费精子
· 拜金女(四):小女孩的忧伤
· 拜金女(三):丑小鸭变白天鹅
· 拜金女(二):艰难移民路
· 拜金女(一):恶名在外
· 拯救罗伯特(四之四)
· 奇葩的穆斯林(下)
· 奇葩的穆斯林(上)
· 拯救罗伯特(四之三)
· 拯救罗伯特(四之二)
【《追风》(战争小说)】
· 追风:第二十五章
· 追风:第二十四章
· 追风:第二十三章
· 追风:第二十二章
· 追风:第二十一章
· 追风:第二十章
· 追风:第十九章
· 追风:第十八章
· 追风:第十七章
· 追风:第十六章
【菜园子】
· 春天到了,你的大蒜开长了吗?(
· 春天到了,该种韭菜了
· 室内种花,注意防癌
· 我的美国菜园子(3)
· 我的美国菜园子(2)
· 我的美国菜园子(1)
【《爱国是个啥?》】
· 爱国(1): 爱国心是熏陶出来的
【美国投资移民】
· 美国投资移民议题(2)
· 美国投资移民议题(1)
【理性人生】
· 关于汽车保险,你不能不知的
· 感恩之感
· 失败男人背后站着怎样的女人(2
· 什么是男人的成功?
· 失败男人背后站着怎样的女人(1
· 转载:巴菲特的财富观
· 痛悼79年湖北高考理科状元蒋国兵
【《格林伯格传》】
· 114亿人民币的损失该怪谁
· 基于避孕套的哲理
· 成功投资八大要领
· 企业制度的失败是危机的根源
· 斯皮策买春,错在哪?
【《奥巴马大传》】
· 一日省
· 追逐我的企盼
· 保持积极乐观的生活态度
· 陌生的微笑
· 奥巴马营销角度谈心理
· 神奇小子奥巴马
· 相信奇迹、拥抱奇迹、创造奇迹
· 什么样的人最可爱:献给我心中的
· 希拉里和奥巴马将帅谈
· 是你教会了别人怎样对待你
【参考文章】
· 美国最省油的八种汽车
· 美国房市最糟糕的十大州
· 美国历史上最富有的十位总统
· 世界十大债务大国
· 新鲜事:巴菲特投资IBM
· 星巴克的五美元帮助产生就业机会
· 转载: 苹果前CEO:驱逐乔布斯非
· 华尔街日报:软件将吃掉整个世界
· 林靖东: 惠普与乔布斯的“后PC时
· 德国是如何成为欧洲的中国的
【开博的领悟】
· 打造强国需要不同声音
存档目录
2022-03-01 - 2022-03-17
2022-02-07 - 2022-02-28
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-01
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-14
2019-06-17 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-09 - 2019-05-16
2018-12-02 - 2018-12-13
2018-11-04 - 2018-11-30
2018-10-08 - 2018-10-08
2018-05-02 - 2018-05-07
2018-04-04 - 2018-04-19
2018-03-07 - 2018-03-10
2018-02-05 - 2018-02-22
2017-12-23 - 2017-12-23
2017-11-06 - 2017-11-28
2017-10-09 - 2017-10-30
2017-09-01 - 2017-09-29
2017-08-11 - 2017-08-31
2017-06-19 - 2017-06-19
2017-05-08 - 2017-05-23
2017-04-22 - 2017-04-22
2017-03-02 - 2017-03-02
2017-02-01 - 2017-02-25
2017-01-29 - 2017-01-29
2015-03-02 - 2015-03-02
2014-12-13 - 2014-12-13
2014-09-20 - 2014-09-20
2014-06-10 - 2014-06-10
2014-05-14 - 2014-05-27
2013-12-06 - 2013-12-06
2013-11-01 - 2013-11-29
2013-10-16 - 2013-10-27
2013-09-25 - 2013-09-26
2013-08-27 - 2013-08-28
2013-05-08 - 2013-05-08
2013-04-03 - 2013-04-13
2013-03-06 - 2013-03-24
2013-02-02 - 2013-02-27
2013-01-07 - 2013-01-31
2012-12-01 - 2012-12-30
2012-11-07 - 2012-11-30
2012-10-02 - 2012-10-31
2012-09-03 - 2012-09-26
2012-08-03 - 2012-08-30
2012-07-06 - 2012-07-29
2012-06-01 - 2012-06-21
2012-05-02 - 2012-05-30
2012-04-02 - 2012-04-26
2012-03-01 - 2012-03-30
2012-02-02 - 2012-02-29
2012-01-01 - 2012-01-26
2011-12-02 - 2011-12-30
2011-11-15 - 2011-11-29
2011-10-06 - 2011-10-21
2011-09-07 - 2011-09-23
2011-08-04 - 2011-08-31
2011-05-01 - 2011-05-01
2011-04-01 - 2011-04-16
2011-03-01 - 2011-03-31
2011-02-07 - 2011-02-24
2011-01-23 - 2011-01-24
2010-12-06 - 2010-12-22
2010-11-09 - 2010-11-28
2010-09-01 - 2010-09-28
2010-08-12 - 2010-08-31
2010-05-02 - 2010-05-20
2010-04-01 - 2010-04-30
2010-03-02 - 2010-03-31
2010-01-14 - 2010-01-29
2009-12-01 - 2009-12-22
2009-11-01 - 2009-11-30
2009-10-24 - 2009-10-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. CyberMedia Network /Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.