设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
Pascal的博客  
“朝廷不是让我隐蔽吗?”“你也不看看,这是什么时候了?!”  
网络日志正文
我跟班农等最强烈呼吁改称CCP病毒-文贵 2020-03-20 16:29:57

     亲爱的兄弟姐妹们 

     我们一定要明白这是共产党的病毒 

     可不是中国人的病毒 

     川普总统一定会改过来的 

   他不是已经改过来了吗?!

     绝对不能叫中国病毒 中国人病毒 

     他一定会改过来的 我深信不疑 


     三天前我跟班农先生有一个通话 

     我跟他提出很严肃的要求 

     你必须要跟你的组织 你们的人呼吁 

     绝对不能把这个共产党病毒

     跟我们中国人连在一起 

     甚至都不能叫中国病毒 ...... 

     我坚决抗议!


     Kyle Bass先生大量发推文喊话 

     这是 CCP Virus !

     绝不能让任何人以任何手段

     把十四亿中国人民变成全世界的敌人 

     你们不知道有多可怕 

     一旦把中国人变成冠状病毒代名词 

     海外华人们 我告诉你们 

     全世界所有其他民族都会围猎中国人 

     这是一条高压线 绝对不能碰 谁也不能碰!

     谁要是敢碰这条高压线 谁就是我们的敌人!


image.png

 

      始自 1:16:53

https://livestream.com/accounts/27235681/events/8197481/videos/203206576


image.png



image.png

image.png


image.png


image.png

Image


image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

Image result for inty 直播

image.png

image.png

image.png


image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png


Image


image.png

image.png

美国华盛顿邮报专栏作家乔希·罗金(Josh Rogin)20日发表文章表示,

应该分清中共和中国,新冠病毒的始作俑者是中共这个政权而不是中国

人。

文章中提到,美国反对中共政府改写新冠状病毒传播历史,混淆视听,

引导舆论,但不能助长种族主义或辱华及对华裔美国人的伤害。作者

给出的方法就是将中国人民和中国共产党区别讨论。

特朗普总统坚持称新冠状病毒为“中国病毒”是因为中共政府故意散播

该病毒源于美国的谣言,以逃避其自身的责任。这根本不是种族主义者

的问题,因为病毒是来自中国,这就是我的原因,我只是想让它更精

确……“,特朗普总统在周三的提问中说道。根据世界卫生组织的指导,

美国亚裔新闻工作者协会要求新闻机构不要再使用“中国病毒”一词,

并警告说,以疾病的地理起源地命名会给当地人带来耻辱。当然,大部

分使用“中国病毒”或“武汉病毒”的人都不是种族主义者,也不排除

有一部分种族主义者。

但是必须指出的是,中共做出的行动加剧了病毒的传播。是中共将病毒

爆发的消息隐瞒了数周,用政治压力让武汉医生噤声,把一些新闻记者

关押,甚至关闭了首次公开新冠状病毒基因序列的上海实验室。而中国

人民在这场疫情中表现出了英雄的一面,中国的医生、研究人员及新闻

记者等冒着生命危险与病毒抗争,并警告世界病毒的危险性。同时,

中国人也是疫情的受害者,由于中共的刻意隐瞒和极权统治,在中国

已经造成千千万万的悲剧发生。

美国国家民主基金会研究与分析副总裁说,在一个政府控制言论自由的

体制内,中国人说的任何话都没有意义…而今中共有组织的策划和发布

虚假信息,证明集权专制的政府是不能相信的,这种制度也是不可接受

的。以此区别对待中国人和中共至关重要。

用种族主义来分化美国人是中共的一项策略。他们经常种族主义指控以

反驳那些批评中共政府的言论,他们还通过指责美国的种族主义来转移

中国国内的极端种族主义行动—将数百万的新疆人民关进再教育集中营。

美国大多数人民还没有适应这种称呼上的变化带来的影响。但在澳大利

亚,已经有了多年的讨论。例如,澳大利亚战略政策研究所发过一篇

报告来指导如何避免进入种族主义陷阱。报告中说,中国人民和中国

政府不能一概而论,需要明确区分,并注意不要在国内疏远华裔或者

华人。也因此澳大利亚指控CCP(中共)参与其国内政治活动,而不是

中国。所以,在美国也应该注意称呼上的影响,不要助长了那些种族

主义者气焰。

经历了2016大选俄罗斯干预、911后穆斯林被妖魔化等这些事情,美国

人民应该学习到一些东西,不能被外部的势力煽动内部分歧和民族主义

情绪,不要被虚假消息蒙蔽双眼。在这场人类的危机中,华人和华裔

需要我们的支持,并为我们的行动提供强大的力量。

总之,不能再说“中国病毒”了。不是因为使用它让我们变成种族主义

者,而是不能因为它而陷入中共分化美国人民注意力的陷阱。最后,

用“中共病毒(CCP virus)”更精确,这才是它该有的名字。

原文链接   https://www.washingtonpost.com/

  *******************************

image.png

 Crewmen of the U.S. aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt prepare their aircraft Tuesday, April 10,2018 in international waters off South China Sea. The aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is sailing through the disputed South China Sea in the latest display of America's military might after China built a string of islands …

image.png

Chinese state media on Tuesday rather unsubtly decided this would be a good time to chat with a panel of “experts” about the possibility of using an electromagnetic pulse weapon (EMP) against American ships that enter portions of the South China Sea illegally claimed by Beijing.

The timing suggests it was a bit of saber-rattling by a Communist Party nervous about its power and prestige after the Wuhan virus disaster, but some degree of escalation in the South China Sea has long been a concern for the U.S. Navy and ships from across the free world.


To put it bluntly, 

an EMP strike on U.S. warships would involve 

detonating a small nuclear warhead above them, 


but China’s state-run Global Times threw in some speculation about “low-energy laser devices” to keep their saber from rattling too loudly:


谷歌译文:

中国官方媒体周二相当含蓄地认为,这是与“专家”小组进行会谈的好时机,该专家小组可能会对在北京非法要求进入南海部分进入的美国船只使用电磁脉冲武器(EMP) 。

时机表明,这是共产党对武汉病毒灾难后的实力和威望感到不安的sa刀,但长期以来,南海在某种程度上的升级一直是美国海军和来自世界各地的舰船关注的问题。 自由的世界。

image.png

但中国国营《环球时报》引发了一些关于“低能激光设备”的

猜测,以防止其军刀过大地晃动。


The Tactical High-power Operational Responder (THOR) is an electromagnet capable of bringing down several enemy UAVs simultaneously by frying their electronics.

image.png

Image result for EMP weapen

Image result for emp weapon

Image result for emp weapon

Image result for emp weapon

Image result for emp weapon

90% of U.S. population could be wiped out by a doomsday EMP weapon

image.png


周二(3月17日),中共通过其官媒含蓄地威胁,将使用电磁脉冲武器(EMP),攻击其所声称的“非法”穿越南海的美国军舰。美媒评论说,中共此举的目的之一,是为挽回其因中共肺炎而摧毁的所谓“威望”。

中共官媒《环球时报》周二援引中共军事专家的话报导,中共军方应使用非致命性的电磁脉冲及激光武器将美国军舰驱逐出有争议的海域。

周二,美军太平洋舰队在推特上宣布,美国海军“罗斯福号”(USS Theodore Roosevelt)航空母舰打击群、“美利坚号”(USS America)两栖攻击舰及其带领的远征打击群,正在南海进行演习。

太平洋舰队在一份关于演习的报告中说,这两个打击群的训练演习包括飞行演习、防空测试和地面支援任务演习。

报告称,海军陆战队在美舰“碉堡山号”(USS Bunker Hill)上进行了一次包含模拟访问、登船、搜索和扣押在内的军事演习。

中共声称对南海拥有90%的主权,尽管几年前国际法院的裁决已驳回该主张。大规模的军事演习在直接挑战中共的宣称。《环球时报》称,美军的演习标志着,在过去的一周中美舰已三次“入侵”中共的领海。

五角大楼已经一再表示将南海视为国际水域,并经常在该水域自由航行。

另外,3月10日及3月13日,美舰也曾穿越南海。

曾在中共导弹部队任职的中共军事评论员宋中平说,中共军方可以选择使用电磁脉冲武器及其它先进武器来对付美舰穿越南海。

他说,使用常规武器可能会引发冲突,不是好办法,而使用包括激光在内的电磁脉冲武器可能会暂时瘫痪美舰的武器控制系统。这不会产生明显的冲突,但可以发出强烈的警告。电磁武器发射的能量脉冲会干扰电子设备。

宋中平声称,2月17日发生的涉及一架美国海军P-8A海上巡逻机的激光事件,是该机对一艘中共军舰进行多次近距离侦察后发生的。

宋中平评论说:“这是一个很好的例子,可以更多地应用。”

一些分析人士认为,这篇带有威胁性的报导表明,中共可能准备在南海采取某种挑衅行动。

美媒布莱巴特新闻(Breitbart News)3月17日评论说,中共官媒发表这篇报导的时机也表明,在发生中共病毒的灾难后,已对自己的权力和威望感到紧张的中共有点剑拔弩张,但南海局势某种程度的升级,长期以来一直是美国海军和来自自由世界的船只所担心的。

该文还指出,《环球时报》对二月激光事件和其它类似事件的描述很不诚实,就像中共描述美国陆军实验室研发了中共病毒的谎言一样。中共2月17日对美国海军飞机的激光攻击是无端的,也是不专业、不安全的,明显违反了北京所认可的该地区的海商法和安全行为政策。

To counter US’ repeated trespasses into Chinese territorial waters, the Chinese military has the option of using new approaches, including the deployment of electromagnetic weapons, Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and commentator, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

Firing at US warships is not a good choice unless the US fires first, and that would result in the start of a China-US military conflict, Song said, noting that bumping into US ships might also not be a good counter, as lessons have been learned from the Black Sea bumping incident between the Soviet Union and US in 1988.

But the use of electromagnetic weapons, including low-energy laser devices, could be viable, as they can temporarily paralyze US ships’ weapon and control systems without visible conflict but can send a strong warning, according to Song.

Electromagnetic weapons can emit electromagnetic waves that can potentially jam electronic devices of target vessels and will not cause casualties, military observers said.

The US accused a Chinese destroyer of using lasers on February 17 on its patrol aircraft near Guam, even though it was the US aircraft that had initially conducted repeated close-in reconnaissance that interrupted the Chinese fleet’s normal navigation and training. This is a good example and could be applied more, Song said.

This is almost as dishonest a framing of the February laser incident, and others like it, as the Chinese fairy tale about a U.S. Army lab developing the coronavirus. The Chinese laser attack on a U.S. Navy aircraft flying over international waters on February 17 was unprovoked, unprofessional, unsafe, and a clear violation of both maritime law and safe-conduct policies for the region endorsed by Beijing.

These EMP threats were prompted by the most recent series of U.S. Freedom of Navigation operations (FONOP) in the South China Sea, which essentially involve sailing through waters claimed by China to demonstrate that international freedom of navigation will be protected. The Chinese are particularly exercised by the presence of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and its strike group in the region, and while the Global Times did not explicitly mention it, the USS Theodore Roosevelt’s visit to Vietnam was deeply troubling to Beijing.

“This is the third time in just a week US warships are known to have trespassed into the South China Sea: US guided missile destroyer McCampbell on March 10 trespassed into China’s territorial waters in the Xisha Islands, and amphibious assault ship America and littoral combat ship Gabrielle Giffords sailed in operations in the South China Sea on Friday,” the Global Times complained.

“Xisha Islands” is China’s name for the Paracel Islands, which the guided-missile destroyer USS McCampbell sailed near on March 10. Vietnam and Taiwan both have claims in the Paracels. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) claimed it “warned” the American ship to leave, while the U.S. Navy said the ship completed its “security and stability operations” normally.

USS America and USS Gabrielle Giffords conducted joint operations in the South China Sea on Friday to test unified command and control and practice tactical maneuvers. The ships do not appear to have ventured into the waters claimed by China.

“By combining America’s lethality provided by the Navy-Marine Corps Team with the speed and maneuverability of a littoral combat ship, we’re forging new ways to operate together in one of the most important regions in the world,” Expeditionary Strike Group 7 commander Rear Adm. Fred Kacher said.

The PLA pulled a few deliberately provocative maneuvers of its own on Monday, sending a flight of warplanes across the Taiwan Strait in a rare night exercise. The Taiwanese scrambled their own fighters to “shadow, intercept, and disperse the Communist warplanes,” according to Taiwan’s defense ministry.

The South China Morning Post quoted analysts who said Beijing wanted to send one of its periodic threats to Taiwan while also demonstrating the coronavirus epidemic has not weakened the PLA:

“In addition to enhancing all-weather capability of its military fleet, the communist warplanes’ fly-by is aimed at sending out the message that it is business as usual with PLA war games despite the coronavirus outbreak in mainland China,” said Alexander Huang Chieh-cheng, a professor of international affairs and strategic studies at Tamkang University in Taipei.

He said the PLA’s night drill was also aimed at testing the response of forces such as the United States and telling them that the mainland’s air force can carry out night-time combat operations.

“Of course, it is also aimed at intimidating Taiwan,” Huang said.

The Global Times portrayed the night exercise as a warning to Taiwan that will become more frequent if “secessionist forces remain stubborn and continue their secessionist activities.”

The Chinese state newspaper curiously quoted only Taiwanese sources about the incident, but slipped in a comment from an unnamed “military expert” who said Monday’s flight was unprecedented proof that the PLA “is fully capable of launching military operations on the island at any time of a day.”


image.png


Chinese military experts on Tuesday suggested the use of non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, including low-energy laser devices, in expelling US warships that have been repeatedly intruding into the South China Sea in the past week.

Ships from the Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier strike group and America amphibious assault ship expeditionary strike group sailed together in the South China Sea on Sunday for expeditionary strike force drills, the US Pacific Fleet said on its Twitter account on Monday.

This is the third time in just a week US warships are known to have trespassed into the South China Sea: US guided missile destroyer McCampbell on March 10 trespassed into China's territorial waters in the Xisha Islands, and amphibious assault ship America and littoral combat ship Gabrielle Giffords sailed in operations in the South China Sea on Friday.

To counter US' repeated trespasses into Chinese territorial waters, the Chinese military has the option of using new approaches, including the deployment of electromagnetic weapons, Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and commentator, told the Global Times on Tuesday.

Firing at US warships is not a good choice unless the US fires first, and that would result in the start of a China-US military conflict, Song said, noting that bumping into US ships might also not be a good counter, as lessons have been learned from the Black Sea bumping incident between the Soviet Union and US in 1988.


But the use of electromagnetic weapons, including low-energy laser devices, could be viable, as they can temporarily paralyze US ships' weapon and control systems without visible conflict but can send a strong warning, according to Song.

Electromagnetic weapons can emit electromagnetic waves that can potentially jam electronic devices of target vessels and will not cause casualties, military observers said.

The US accused a Chinese destroyer of using lasers on February 17 on its patrol aircraft near Guam, even though it was the US aircraft that had initially conducted repeated close-in reconnaissance that interrupted the Chinese fleet's normal navigation and training. This is a good example and could be applied more, Song said.

The US side is using "freedom of navigation" as an excuse to repeatedly enter the South China Sea to flex its muscles and cause trouble, which are acts of hegemony that violate international law, threatening peace and stability in the region, People's Liberation Army (PLA) Southern Theater Command spokesperson Li Huamin said after the US naval activities on March 10, noting that the US warship was expelled by Chinese naval and aerial forces.

China has undisputed sovereignty over the islands in the South China Sea and nearby waters, and the Chinese military remains highly vigilant at all times. It will take any necessary measure to safeguard national sovereignty, peace and stability in the South China Sea, Li said after that incident.

The PLA has yet to announce its response to the US activities on Friday and Sunday.


Image result for 戴旭上校演讲激动

Image result for 戴旭上校

image.png


image.png


image.png

image.png


image.png

image.png


Image result for 罗援少将演讲 击沉两艘航母

image.png

Image result for 击沉航空母舰

Image result for 击沉航空母舰


Image result for one second after movie


image.png

image.png


image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png


image.png

image.png

 

image.png

image.png


Image







浏览(1426) (5) 评论(8)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:Pascal 回复 一冰 留言时间:2020-03-21 13:45:19

Inline image

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq4LkcjH8Fo

回复 | 0
作者:一冰 留言时间:2020-03-21 08:28:56

其实叫中国病毒也无所谓,因为来源的确是那里。

西班牙流感,日本水俣病,不都是地名。

回复 | 0
作者:一冰 留言时间:2020-03-21 08:28:07

消失一千多万用户,但不是死那么多吧。

回复 | 0
作者:Pascal 留言时间:2020-03-21 01:48:28

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1241102435952857089

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

回复 | 0
作者:Pascal 留言时间:2020-03-21 00:13:31

Inline image

Image result for guy sorman

I hold Xi Jinping guilty of starting the coronavirus pandemic, which began in the Chinese city of Wuhan and has now caused thousands of deaths around the world and an economic recession that will ravage all of us for years. My accusation is well-founded and well-documented. Early last December, a young doctor at a Wuhan hospital discovered the first case of illness caused by a heretofore unknown virus. He immediately established the link with an earlier epidemic that had begun in the same place and under the same circumstances, in 2002–2003: SARS, a viral pneumonia. The doctor, Li Wenliang, 37 years old, who died in February from exposure to the patients whom he cared for, had immediately posted his diagnosis on the hospital’s internal website in order to inform his colleagues. He was called before a disciplinary council of the local Communist Party and forced to repent and confess, in writing, that he had spread rumors harmful to the glory of the Party. A month later—a month too late—after further suppressing evidence from brave medical professionals, the Party recognized the explosive nature of the epidemic, which could have been confined to Wuhan but was now spreading throughout China, and then the world.

What is Xi Jinping guilty of? Though he did not invent the ideology of the lie, which is the true Constitution of China’s Communist Party, he has considerably reinforced it since taking power. We must therefore consider that the Party bureaucrats, driven by fear and ambition, are chiefly servile agents. In a regime as centralized as China’s, there is only one undeniably guilty party—the president. We can be sure that Xi is aware of his responsibility, since he has launched a dual propaganda offensive aimed at the Chinese people and at the international community. The point was at first to persuade the Chinese people that they, led by the Party, were about to win a great victory against the epidemic, and that this victorious struggle was a model for the rest of the world. To transform defeats into victories is characteristic of totalitarian regimes.

The diplomatic offensive is bolder still. Party hardliners have threatened to cut off U.S. access to pharmaceuticals. They would have the world believe that the virus is not of Chinese origin, but was planted in Wuhan by the United States military. Here, again, we recognize a familiar method of totalitarian regimes: a very big lie leaves fewer traces than a little false witness. Chinese opinion having been muzzled, it’s hard to know what the people think, but social networks provide clues—contempt, hatred, and despondency in the face of Xi’s dictatorship.

Should we in the West remain spectators of the tragedy? We do not have the means to bring Xi before any international tribunal, but many Chinese, the first victims of this epidemic, would thank us if we referred him. Should we not thoroughly reconsider our relations with the Beijing dictatorship, at the level of governments, churches, media, and tourists? The looming economic recession illustrates how our dependence on Chinese suppliers was a poorly calculated risk; it is time to reroute our supply chains and to spread them around the world. It has been truly frightening in the current crisis to discover that most American medications are manufactured in China. (Legislation has been introduced in Washington to begin the process of repatriating American pharmaceutical manufacturing.)

Beyond such changes in economic strategy, which call for a new form of globalization, it is high time to denounce the threat posed by Xi and the Communist Party. Like useful idiots, we have not only helped the Party prosper but, even worse, we have given up on our humanitarian, democratic, and spiritual values in doing so. Some take this renunciation to be a form of respect for Chinese civilization, but they are wrong. The Chinese know what democracy is: Liu Xiaobo, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, died defending it. The Chinese know about God: several million are Christians and Muslims, while others are secretly loyal to China’s ancient religions, Buddhism and Taoism. We tremble at the prospect of recognition of the Chinese regime by the Vatican; this would be a pact with the devil. Let us, finally, dare to say it and to act accordingly: the Chinese Communist Party under Xi is America’s main military adversary, one that acts by espionage, by the ongoing conquest of the China Sea, and by the manipulation of North Korea’s puppet regime.

The time has come to say to Xi: “Enough!” In doing so, we will do right by ourselves and by hundreds of millions of Chinese, who will applaud.

Image result for 新浪网

Image

Image

回复 | 0
作者:Pascal 留言时间:2020-03-20 18:41:49

Image

Image

Image result for 舒予twitter

https://twitter.com/pEkzgoXMvXPPPgB/status/1241132491492089856

回复 | 1
作者:Pascal 留言时间:2020-03-20 17:07:18

Inline image

回复 | 1
作者:文庙 留言时间:2020-03-20 16:56:30

中共把CCTV上的拿掉了,但自己给的证据跑不了!

[24小时]国内焦点 科学家发现新型冠状病毒 更新时间:2018-04-05 23:32 来源:央视网 视频简介:国内焦点,科学家发现新型冠状病毒。 栏目名称:24小时

http://tv.cctv.com/2018/04/05/VIDE9RUDynaxH6cGkEAZah6k180405.shtml

https://twitter.com/shajiabiji/status/1220747981147627520

回复 | 3
我的名片
Pascal
注册日期: 2014-10-22
访问总量: 8,519,017 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 都有谁一口咬死普京会傻到屠杀上
· 都有谁一口咬定音乐厅乌克兰杀人
· 急电国安.举报央广重大泄密内奸.
· 哪里是尼克松1969年拯救了中国.
· 参战珍宝岛苏军曝.我英雄解放军
· 我潜伏万维的任务-传播我爹指控
· 我爹熊颜大悦抢先报道美制裁中共
分类目录
【他山之石】
· 都有谁一口咬死普京会傻到屠杀上
· 都有谁一口咬定音乐厅乌克兰杀人
· 急电国安.举报央广重大泄密内奸.
· 哪里是尼克松1969年拯救了中国.
· 参战珍宝岛苏军曝.我英雄解放军
· 我潜伏万维的任务-传播我爹指控
· 我爹熊颜大悦抢先报道美制裁中共
· 境外势力生生唱衰了体老老家贵州
· 天大好消息!最新研究接种新冠疫
· 基因揭示.汉族与中东北非19国民
存档目录
2024-03-01 - 2024-03-28
2024-02-01 - 2024-02-29
2024-01-01 - 2024-01-31
2023-12-01 - 2023-12-31
2023-11-01 - 2023-11-30
2023-10-01 - 2023-10-31
2023-09-01 - 2023-09-30
2023-08-01 - 2023-08-31
2023-07-01 - 2023-07-31
2023-06-01 - 2023-06-30
2023-05-01 - 2023-05-31
2023-04-01 - 2023-04-30
2023-03-01 - 2023-03-31
2023-02-01 - 2023-02-28
2023-01-01 - 2023-01-31
2022-12-01 - 2022-12-31
2022-11-01 - 2022-11-30
2022-10-01 - 2022-10-31
2022-09-01 - 2022-09-29
2022-08-01 - 2022-08-31
2022-07-01 - 2022-07-31
2022-06-01 - 2022-06-30
2022-05-01 - 2022-05-31
2022-04-02 - 2022-04-29
2022-03-01 - 2022-03-31
2022-02-01 - 2022-02-28
2022-01-01 - 2022-01-31
2021-12-01 - 2021-12-31
2021-11-01 - 2021-11-30
2021-10-01 - 2021-10-31
2021-09-01 - 2021-09-30
2021-08-01 - 2021-08-31
2021-07-01 - 2021-07-31
2021-06-01 - 2021-06-30
2021-05-01 - 2021-05-31
2021-04-01 - 2021-04-30
2021-03-01 - 2021-03-31
2021-02-01 - 2021-02-28
2021-01-01 - 2021-01-31
2020-12-01 - 2020-12-31
2020-11-01 - 2020-11-30
2020-10-01 - 2020-10-31
2020-09-01 - 2020-09-30
2020-08-01 - 2020-08-31
2020-07-01 - 2020-07-31
2020-06-01 - 2020-06-30
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-31
2020-04-01 - 2020-04-30
2020-03-02 - 2020-03-31
2020-02-01 - 2020-02-29
2020-01-01 - 2020-01-31
2019-12-01 - 2019-12-31
2019-11-01 - 2019-11-30
2019-10-01 - 2019-10-31
2019-09-01 - 2019-09-30
2019-08-01 - 2019-08-31
2019-07-01 - 2019-07-31
2019-06-01 - 2019-06-30
2019-05-01 - 2019-05-30
2019-04-01 - 2019-04-30
2019-03-01 - 2019-03-31
2019-02-01 - 2019-02-28
2019-01-02 - 2019-01-31
2018-12-01 - 2018-12-31
2018-11-01 - 2018-11-30
2018-10-01 - 2018-10-31
2018-09-02 - 2018-09-24
2018-08-01 - 2018-08-31
2018-07-04 - 2018-07-31
2018-06-01 - 2018-06-30
2018-05-01 - 2018-05-31
2018-04-01 - 2018-04-30
2018-03-02 - 2018-03-31
2018-02-01 - 2018-02-28
2018-01-10 - 2018-01-30
2017-11-01 - 2017-11-30
2017-10-01 - 2017-10-30
2017-09-22 - 2017-09-29
2017-08-02 - 2017-08-30
2017-07-01 - 2017-07-31
2017-06-02 - 2017-06-30
2017-05-02 - 2017-05-30
2017-04-01 - 2017-04-29
2017-03-01 - 2017-03-31
2017-02-02 - 2017-02-28
2017-01-02 - 2017-01-31
2016-12-03 - 2016-12-30
2016-11-05 - 2016-11-28
2016-10-01 - 2016-10-29
2016-09-01 - 2016-09-29
2016-08-01 - 2016-08-30
2016-07-01 - 2016-07-31
2016-06-02 - 2016-06-30
2016-05-01 - 2016-05-27
2016-04-01 - 2016-04-30
2016-03-01 - 2016-03-31
2016-02-04 - 2016-02-28
2016-01-01 - 2016-01-28
2015-12-03 - 2015-12-31
2015-11-03 - 2015-11-29
2015-10-02 - 2015-10-30
2015-09-10 - 2015-09-28
2015-08-02 - 2015-08-31
2015-07-01 - 2015-07-28
2015-06-02 - 2015-06-30
2015-05-01 - 2015-05-31
2015-04-02 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-02 - 2015-03-31
2015-02-02 - 2015-02-27
2015-01-03 - 2015-01-31
2014-12-01 - 2014-12-31
2014-11-01 - 2014-11-30
2014-10-26 - 2014-10-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. CyberMedia Network /Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.