设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
汪 翔  
陪人工智能一起傻  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/3000/ > 复制 > 收藏本页
我的名片
汪翔 ,34岁
来自: 美国
注册日期: 2009-10-24
访问总量: 4,612,166 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
汪翔 文集地址
最新发布
· 小盘股的苦命终结无期
· 人工智能有助中国走向民主化吗?
· 哪些人工智能科技公司最值得投资
· 中学为体,西学为用,是个啥玩意
· 美光科技(MU)的投资价值分析
· 超微电脑(SMCI)值不值得投资
· 生活在中国和美国各自的优劣之处
友好链接
· 刘以栋:刘以栋的博客
分类目录
【《股市投资杂谈》】
· 小盘股的苦命终结无期
· 哪些人工智能科技公司最值得投资
· 美光科技(MU)的投资价值分析
· 超微电脑(SMCI)值不值得投资
· 股市周期性预测
· 行为经济学与股市风险预测
· AI 催生的数据中心投资机遇
· 利率点阵图变化与股市走向
· 动物精神和对股市投资的影响
· 华尔街看走眼苹果在WWDC的表现
【《美国生活》】
· 生活在中国和美国各自的优劣之处
· 87号和93号汽油差价扩大很多,意
· 如果是华裔,早被骂的狗血喷头
· 川普:白宫还是监狱?
· 如何成为健康睿智的超级老人
· 通过南美走线美国的策略
· 财务自由的迷思
· 美国耍横,中国能不能说不?
· 人民币兑美元汇率到了该主动贬值
· 第二次次贷危机会不会到来?
【《美国经商日志》】
· 新闻周刊:如何寻找下一个Facebo
· 是什么能让国家、企业长治久安?
· 美国的商业诚信是如何打造的
· 商业思考:亚马逊在忽悠投资者?
· 商业思考: 奢侈品市场的投资机
· 商业思考:最低薪太低与快餐店连
· 商业思考:美国糖果市场的佼佼者
· 美国零售业开始了中国模式?
· 流量最大的十大网站
· 成者萧何败者萧何
【《美国之最》】
· 美国电影巨星你知多少
· 2012年代价最大的新产品败笔
· 美国单位面积销售最好的零售店
· 美国人最讨厌的行当和机构
· 穷人的钱也很好赚
· 美国最舍得在广告上花钱的公司
· 即将消失的十大品牌
· 医院安全指数最高的十大州
· 维稳做得最好和最差的十大国家
· 美国犯罪率最高的十大都市
【《苹果观察》】
· 苹果的人工智能策略与苹果股票投
· 乔布斯的商战
· 投资者在歧视苹果公司吗?
· Penney的CEO到底误读了什么?
· 是不是苹果真的出了麻烦?
· 大跌之后的苹果价值再评价
· 苹果大跌之后是不是机会?
· 苹果跌了,谁对了?
· 科技产品新周期循环开始了?
· 再议苹果的投资价值
【海龟与海带话题】
· 祖国,你够格被称为母亲吗?
· 故乡、祖国与自作多情
· 海龟(15):如果懦夫也能生存
· 海龟(14):石油、中国、人民币
· 海龟(13):付出的和获得的
· 海龟(12):钱学森曾经想叛国吗
· 海龟(11):官员博士多与钱学森
· 海龟(10):如果幼稚能够无罪
· 海龟(9):钱学森的尴尬
· 海龟(8):钱学森不访美的困惑
【杂谈】
· 川普真的输了!急了,坐不住了。
· 白人至上之祸
· 以柔克刚川普无策
· 不靠谱的总统
· 欲加之罪与自欺欺人
· 霸道能打天下
· 人类智商何在?
· 川普贸易战的底线在哪?
· 读不懂的美国
· 2018年诺贝尔奖的小遐思
【读书与孩子教育】
· 药家鑫教给了我们什么?
· 越来越多的美国人不读书了
· 美国人为什么喜欢读书
· 数码书革命如何影响我们的生活
· 读书、无书读与数码电子书
【《面书观察》】
· 面书会成为下一个苹果吗?
【金融危机】
· 美国经济进入衰退了吗?
· 《高盛欺诈门》(8)∶打错的“
· 《高盛欺诈门》(7)∶零和博弈
· 《高盛欺诈门》(6)∶来自股东
· 读不懂的中国逻辑(1)
· 《高盛欺诈门》(5)∶陷阱
· 《高盛欺诈门》(4):冰山一角
· 《高盛欺诈门》(3):恨又离不
· 《高盛欺诈门》(2):症结
· 《高盛欺诈门》(1):序幕
【我的书架】
· 今年诺奖得主的代表作《逃离》全
· 《乔布斯的商战》(目录)
· 《乔布斯的商战》出版,感谢读者
· 张五常:人民币在国际上升值会提
· 《博弈华尔街》,让你再一次感悟
· 《危机与败局》目录
· 《危机与败局》出版发行
· 下雪的早晨 (艾青)
· 《奥巴马智取白宫》被选参加法兰
· 下架文章
【我的中国】
· 人工智能有助中国走向民主化吗?
· 中学为体,西学为用,是个啥玩意
· 坚持无产阶级专政,如何执行?
· 关进笼子的:权力 vs 思想
· 神一般的坚持:四项基本原则
· 近代中国的屈辱历史从鸦片战争开
· 解放军攻打台湾:理性与后果
· 三十五年前六四镇压,付出的代价
· 1840年代的中美比较
· 中国的特别国债:强征还是忽悠
【《犹太经商天才》】
· 《犹太经商天才》: 2.生不逢时
· 第一章:苦命的孩子(1)
【阿里巴巴与雅虎之战】
· 福布斯:马云和他的敌人们
· 阿里巴巴与雅虎之战(2)
· 阿里巴巴与雅虎之战(1)
【国美大战】
· 企业版的茉莉花革命与公司政治
· 国美之战,不得不吸取的十条教训
· 谁来拯救国美品牌
· 国美股权之争:两个男人的战争
· 现在是投资国美的最佳时机吗?
· “刺客”邹晓春起底
· 邹晓春:已经做好最坏的打算
· 愚昧的陈晓与窃笑的贝恩
· 贝恩资本的真面目(附图片)
· 陈晓为什么“勾结”贝恩资本
【《乔布斯的故事》】
· 苹果消息跟踪:如果苹果进入电视
· 乔布斯故事之十四:嬉皮士
· 乔布斯的故事之十三 犹太商人
· 乔布斯的故事之十二:禅心
· 乔布斯的故事之十一:精神导师
· 乔布斯故事之十:大学选择
· 乔布斯的故事之九:个性的形成
· 乔布斯的故事之八:吸食大麻
· 乔布斯的故事之七:胆大妄为
· 乔布斯的故事之六:贪玩的孩子
【华裔的战歌】
· 印度裔和华裔在孩子教育上的差异
· 犹太人和华裔教育孩子的特点和异
· 中国不应对骆家辉抱太大的幻想
· 华裔政界之星——刘云平(2)
· 华裔政界之星——刘云平(1)
· 心安则身安,归不归的迷思
· 华裔的战歌(5):谁造就了"
· 华裔的战歌(4):关注社会与被
· 华裔的战歌(3):“全A”情结与
· 华裔的战歌(2):犹太裔比我们
【《哈佛小子林书豪》】
· 从林书豪身上学到的人生十课之一
· 《哈佛小子林书豪》之二
· 《哈佛小子林书豪》之一
【《战神林彪传》】
· 《战神林彪传》第二章 (2)
· 《战神林彪传》第二章(1)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(5)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(4)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(3)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(2)
· 《战神林彪传》第一章(1)
【中国美容业】
· 国内日化品牌屡被收购 浙江本土
· 外资日化品牌再下一城 丁家宜外
· 强生收购大宝 并购价刷新中国日
· 从两千元到一百亿的寻梦之路
【加盟店经营】
· 转载:太平洋百货撤出北京市场
· Franchise Laws Protect Investo
· Groupon拒绝谷歌收购内幕
· GNC 到底值多少钱?
· 杨国安对话苏宁孙为民:看不见的
· 张近东:苏宁帝国征战史
· 连锁加盟店成功经营的四大要素
· 加盟店经营管理的五大核心问题
· 高盛抢占新地盘 10月将入股中国
【地产淘金】
· 炒房案例之一:南京
· 外资新设房企数大增 千亿美元购
· 该是投资银行股的时候了吗?
· 中国楼市观察(1)
· 地产淘金的最佳时机到了吗?
· 房价突然跌一半,穷人更惨
· 买房、租房与靠房市发财
【《解读日本》】
· 东京人不是冷静 是麻木冷漠!
· 日本灾难给投资者带来怎样的机会
· 日本地震灾难对世界经济格局的影
· 美国对日本到底信任几何?
· 大地震带来日元大升值的秘密
· 日本原来如此不堪一击
· 灾难面前的日本人民(3)
· 灾难面前的日本人民(2)
· 灾难面前的日本人民(1)
【《犹太经商天才》:目录和序言】
· 《犹太经商天才》(连载) 003
· 《犹太经商天才》(连载)002
· 《犹太经商天才》(连载) 001
【《乔布斯的商战》】
· 苹果给你上的一堂价值投资课
· 纪念硅谷之父诺伊斯八十四岁诞辰
· 乔布斯的商战(6): 小富靠勤、中
· 乔布斯的商战(5): 搏击命运,机
· 乔布斯的商战(4):从巨富到赤
· 乔布斯的商战(1):偶然与必然
· 让成功追随梦想:悼念乔布斯
【《中国企业家画像》】
· 国内经营美容院的成功秘密
· 值得给中国的私有企业贷款吗?
· 具有犹太商人素质的企业家?
· 骄雄、赌徒、愚昧,还是天才的企
· 精明的企业家,还是唯利是图的小
· 中国企业家应该是什么样的
· 中国企业家画像之一:孙汉本
· 经营的逻辑与兰世立的“智慧”
【相聚樱花盛开时】
· 相聚樱花盛开时(12)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(11)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(10)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(9)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(8)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(7)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(5)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(4)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(3)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(2)
【相聚樱花盛开时】
· 相聚樱花盛开时(20)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(19)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(18)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(17)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(16)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(15)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(14)
· 相聚樱花盛开时(13)
【《国安一号》(科幻小说)】
· 完美的制度(结尾)
· 釜底抽薪
· 秉性使然
· 竭嘶底里
· 铿锵玫瑰
· 人间炼狱
· 不宣而战
· 暗度陈仓
· 精准打击
· 鼹鼠出击
【《短篇小说》】
· 感恩节,雪城出轨(下)
· 感恩节,雪城出轨(中)
· 感恩节,雪城出轨(上)
· 求婚
【《科幻:智慧女神》】
· 科幻:《智慧女神》(3)欲望
· 科幻:《智慧女神》 (2) 情人
· 科幻:《智慧女神》(1) 诞生
【华裔精英榜】
· 华裔,妮可·沙纳汉 好样的!
· 元宇宙:FB 完蛋了还是正在酝酿
【《鹞鹰》(谍战小说,原创)】
· 《鹞鹰》(谍战小说,原创)
【《人工智能》】
· 如何用人工智能赚钱
· 文本生成视频模型带来的投资机遇
· 智能驾驶技术:谷歌PK百度
· 人工智能对决:ChatGPT PK Gemin
· 智能驾驶技术:谷歌PK特斯拉
· 人工智能两大应用和对应商机
· 人工智能硬件双杰,台北擂台开打
· 华裔,妮可·沙纳汉 好样的!
· 印度超越中国的可能性
· 中国的特别国债:强征还是忽悠
【科幻小说:幽灵对决】
· 幽灵对决:异象与联盟
· 幽灵对决:意识的纠缠
· 科幻小说:幽灵对决: 首次攻击
【魏奎生 作品】
· 童年记忆
· 那年,那月,那思念
· 故乡的老宅
【《爱国是个啥?》】
· 爱国(1): 爱国心是熏陶出来的
【美国投资移民】
· 美国投资移民议题(2)
· 美国投资移民议题(1)
【理性人生】
· 关于汽车保险,你不能不知的
· 感恩之感
· 失败男人背后站着怎样的女人(2
· 什么是男人的成功?
· 失败男人背后站着怎样的女人(1
· 转载:巴菲特的财富观
· 痛悼79年湖北高考理科状元蒋国兵
【《格林伯格传》】
· 114亿人民币的损失该怪谁
· 基于避孕套的哲理
· 成功投资八大要领
· 企业制度的失败是危机的根源
· 斯皮策买春,错在哪?
【盛世危言】
· 美国长期信用等级下调之后?
· 建一流大学到底缺什么?
· 同样是命,为什么这些孩子的就那
· 中国式“贫民富翁”为何难产
· 做人,你敢这厶牛吗?
· 言论自由与第一夫人变猴子
· “奈斯比特现象”(下)
· “奈斯比特现象”(上)
· 理性从政和智慧当官
· 中国对美五大优势
【《奥巴马大传》】
· 一日省
· 追逐我的企盼
· 保持积极乐观的生活态度
· 陌生的微笑
· 奥巴马营销角度谈心理
· 神奇小子奥巴马
· 相信奇迹、拥抱奇迹、创造奇迹
· 什么样的人最可爱:献给我心中的
· 希拉里和奥巴马将帅谈
· 是你教会了别人怎样对待你
【参考文章】
· 美国最省油的八种汽车
· 美国房市最糟糕的十大州
· 美国历史上最富有的十位总统
· 世界十大债务大国
· 新鲜事:巴菲特投资IBM
· 星巴克的五美元帮助产生就业机会
· 转载: 苹果前CEO:驱逐乔布斯非
· 华尔街日报:软件将吃掉整个世界
· 林靖东: 惠普与乔布斯的“后PC时
· 德国是如何成为欧洲的中国的
【开博的领悟】
· 打造强国需要不同声音
【第一部 《逃离》】
· 朋友,后会有期
· 师兄,人品低劣
· 开心,老友相见
· 拯救,有心无力
· 别了,无法回头
· 对呀,我得捞钱
· 哭吧,烧尽激情
· 爱情,渐行渐远
· 再逢,尴尬面对
· 不错,真的成熟
【《毒丸》(谍战)】
· 毒丸(13)
· 毒丸(12)
· 毒丸(11)
· 毒丸(10)
· 毒丸(9)
· 毒丸(8)
· 毒丸(7)
· 毒丸(6)
· 毒丸(5)
· 毒丸(4)
【《美国小镇故事》】
· 拜金女(五):免费精子
· 拜金女(四):小女孩的忧伤
· 拜金女(三):丑小鸭变白天鹅
· 拜金女(二):艰难移民路
· 拜金女(一):恶名在外
· 拯救罗伯特(四之四)
· 奇葩的穆斯林(下)
· 奇葩的穆斯林(上)
· 拯救罗伯特(四之三)
· 拯救罗伯特(四之二)
【《追风》(战争小说)】
· 追风:第二十五章
· 追风:第二十四章
· 追风:第二十三章
· 追风:第二十二章
· 追风:第二十一章
· 追风:第二十章
· 追风:第十九章
· 追风:第十八章
· 追风:第十七章
· 追风:第十六章
【菜园子】
· 春天到了,你的大蒜开长了吗?(
· 春天到了,该种韭菜了
· 室内种花,注意防癌
· 我的美国菜园子(3)
· 我的美国菜园子(2)
· 我的美国菜园子(1)
存档目录
07/01/2024 - 07/31/2024
06/01/2024 - 06/30/2024
05/01/2024 - 05/31/2024
04/01/2024 - 04/30/2024
03/01/2022 - 03/31/2022
02/01/2022 - 02/28/2022
08/01/2019 - 08/31/2019
07/01/2019 - 07/31/2019
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019
05/01/2019 - 05/31/2019
12/01/2018 - 12/31/2018
11/01/2018 - 11/30/2018
10/01/2018 - 10/31/2018
05/01/2018 - 05/31/2018
04/01/2018 - 04/30/2018
03/01/2018 - 03/31/2018
02/01/2018 - 02/28/2018
12/01/2017 - 12/31/2017
11/01/2017 - 11/30/2017
10/01/2017 - 10/31/2017
09/01/2017 - 09/30/2017
08/01/2017 - 08/31/2017
06/01/2017 - 06/30/2017
05/01/2017 - 05/31/2017
04/01/2017 - 04/30/2017
03/01/2017 - 03/31/2017
02/01/2017 - 02/28/2017
01/01/2017 - 01/31/2017
03/01/2015 - 03/31/2015
12/01/2014 - 12/31/2014
09/01/2014 - 09/30/2014
06/01/2014 - 06/30/2014
05/01/2014 - 05/31/2014
02/01/2014 - 02/28/2014
12/01/2013 - 12/31/2013
11/01/2013 - 11/30/2013
10/01/2013 - 10/31/2013
09/01/2013 - 09/30/2013
08/01/2013 - 08/31/2013
07/01/2013 - 07/31/2013
05/01/2013 - 05/31/2013
04/01/2013 - 04/30/2013
03/01/2013 - 03/31/2013
02/01/2013 - 02/28/2013
01/01/2013 - 01/31/2013
12/01/2012 - 12/31/2012
11/01/2012 - 11/30/2012
10/01/2012 - 10/31/2012
09/01/2012 - 09/30/2012
08/01/2012 - 08/31/2012
07/01/2012 - 07/31/2012
06/01/2012 - 06/30/2012
05/01/2012 - 05/31/2012
04/01/2012 - 04/30/2012
03/01/2012 - 03/31/2012
02/01/2012 - 02/29/2012
01/01/2012 - 01/31/2012
12/01/2011 - 12/31/2011
11/01/2011 - 11/30/2011
10/01/2011 - 10/31/2011
09/01/2011 - 09/30/2011
08/01/2011 - 08/31/2011
05/01/2011 - 05/31/2011
04/01/2011 - 04/30/2011
03/01/2011 - 03/31/2011
02/01/2011 - 02/28/2011
01/01/2011 - 01/31/2011
12/01/2010 - 12/31/2010
11/01/2010 - 11/30/2010
09/01/2010 - 09/30/2010
08/01/2010 - 08/31/2010
05/01/2010 - 05/31/2010
04/01/2010 - 04/30/2010
03/01/2010 - 03/31/2010
01/01/2010 - 01/31/2010
12/01/2009 - 12/31/2009
11/01/2009 - 11/30/2009
10/01/2009 - 10/31/2009
发表评论
作者:
用户名: 密码: 您还不是博客/论坛用户?现在就注册!
     
评论:
最喜欢接纳退休政客的美国企业
   

最喜欢接纳退休政客的美国企业

不要以为,只有在中国,企业家才喜欢向政治家献媚。在美国,退休之后的政治家,很多时候也能够将自己“卖出”一个好的价钱。而“购买”他们的企业,通常则是看好他们几十年从政建立起来的,背后那看不见的“哥们”关系。当然,冠冕堂皇之下,则是这些人“丰富”的管理经验和能力了。

下面是喜欢让退休之后的政治家发挥余热的几大公司名单,和他们已经收归旗下的已经退休的政治家的名字,和这些人在这些企业内所获得的良好待遇。

退休之后的政治家们,被这些公司收纳在自己的董事会之中,其后,他们就会代表公司的董事会,和自己过去建立的关系,充分发挥公关作用,来为自己所代表的公司谋取利益。真正公关效用的发挥,有的是明目张胆的通过合法的游说程序,更多的,则是通过私交在私底下通过“小动作”完成的。

作为政治家,退休前的他们,是国家的公务员,代表的是选民的利益,是为选民服务的。退休之后,他们则将原来属于选民和大众的“剩余”“价值”,用来谋取私利,而且,这种谋取,在很多时候,可能还会和公众的利益相矛盾,发生冲突。

如何制约政治家退休之后的行为,如何避免可能利益冲突的发生,还是一个值得大家深入思考的问题。

下一步该怎么做,才能够在既公平又合理的基础上,来制约他们的行为呢?

作为选民之一的我们,是不是也该关心一下呢?多思考一下这些问题,是不是比你在那里肆无忌惮的评价中国的政治,来的更实在,也更合乎你自己的身份呢?!

 

Politicians Go to These Companies to Get Rich

May 30, 2012 by 247wallst

 

The appointment of former politicians to large public companies’ boards is regularly called into question. Just recently, following the scandal at Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK) when CEO Aubrey McClendon made investments in drilling projects in which the company was involved, the issue was in the limelight again. Chesapeake, based in Oklahoma, has two powerful politicians on its board — former member of the Senate from Oklahoma, Don Nickles, and former Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating. The company’s board members used the company’s private planes for travel — a perk most governance experts frown on. Perhaps the more salient question is why the two have stayed on the board under the current circumstances. It is equally reasonable to ask why politicians, with their backgrounds unrelated to running big companies, were even appointed to the board.

Many other politicians sit on the boards of America’s largest public companies, and some aspects of their services raise troubling issues. Some are successful lobbyists because of their Washington connections. These firms could work for causes or companies that do not have identical interests to those of the corporations of the boards on which they sit. There are questions about the past ethical behavior of others of these board members. In most cases, the former politicians have no obvious backgrounds to be on public companies’ boards. A final problem is that some have done very well financially because they sit on several boards — another practice many corporate governance experts oppose.

The common thread among the directors on this list is that they have been paid very well in their roles. Most make over a quarter of a million dollars a year. Most also have stock ownerships or grants that add substantially to those payments and are usually in the millions of dollars.

24/7 Wall St. examined the boards of the largest 100 public companies in America based on sales to find politicians who are current and recently past members. To qualify, a person must be a former governor, Senator, or member of the House of Representatives. We scrutinized their past records in elected office , their current jobs, and their qualifications to be public company directors.

Research firm GMI Ratings was critical in supporting us with research for much of our analysis. Securities held by these board members at the corporations they serve include stock ownership, securities that can be acquired, exercisable options and deferred stock units. All data are from the most recent proxies.

This article should provide shareholders of public companies, both institutional and individual ones, with some guidance about why politicians are chosen for boards. It should also tell the extent to which these individuals are qualified, both ethically and in terms of work experience, to effectively do their jobs.

1. Chevron
> Board member: Chuck Hagel
> Board compensation: $301,199
> Director since: 2010
> Primary job: Distinguished Professor at Georgetown University and chairman of think-tank Atlantic Council
> Common stock ownership: 3,046 shares
> Government service: U.S. Senator from Nebraska (1997 to 2009)

From 1997 to 2009 Mr. Hagel served as a U.S. Senator from Nebraska. Hagel makes a strong addition to the Chevron (NYSE: CVX) board because of the time he spent on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Hagel was often mentioned as a candidate for the presidency, vice-presidency and Secretary of State position. Hagel is currently on the board of Zurich’s Holding Company of America, the Advisory Boards of Corsair Capital, and the Advisory Board of Deutsche Bank America.

2. General Electric (NYSE: GE)
> Board member: Sam Nunn
> Board compensation: $312,793
> Director since: 1997
> Primary job: Co-chairman and chief executive officer, Nuclear Threat Initiative
> Common stock ownership: GE stock-based: 273,878 shares
> Government service: U.S. Senator from Georgia (1972 to 1997)

Elected member the U.S. Senate in 1972, Nunn served as the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Retiring from office in 1997, Nunn was rumored to be a potential running mate for both Barack Obama and John Kerry. One of the advantages he would have brought to an election is his considerable knowledge of the Defense Department, its inner workings and procurement methods. Nunn is one of several people who sits on multiple Fortune 500 boards. He has served as a director of the Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO), Chevron and Dell (NASDAQ: DELL). Some governance experts would argue this is far too many, given the workload of these jobs.

3. Ford
> Board member: Richard A. Gephardt
> Board compensation: $224,455
> Director since: 2009
> Primary job: Gephardt Government Affairs
> Common stock ownership: 32,346 shares
> Government service: U.S. House of Representative from Missouri (1976 – Jan 2005)

Some governance experts do not think Washington lobbyists should also serve on public companies’ boards. In the U.S. House of Representatives from 1976 until January 2005, Gephardt is now one of the more visible lobbyists in DC. Gephardt’s Government Affairs’ tag line is “Strategy. Access. Results.” The “access” part would make some experts on the role of a board member uncomfortable. Gephardt was named a “top lobbyist” by a division of the Congressional Quarterly. He ran for president in 1988 and 2004.

4. Ford
> Board member: Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.
> Board compensation: New director
> Director since: February 2012
> Primary job: Chairman of the Huntsman Cancer Foundation
> Common stock ownership: 0
> Government service: Governor of Utah (2005 to 2009)

Serving as Governor of Utah for one term, Huntsman was a candidate for president just before he joined the Ford (NYSE: F) board. He was the U.S. Ambassador to China from 2009 to 2011. Huntsman was appointed to the board of Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT) in April, just about the time his run for the presidency ended. Perhaps this was a coincidence.

5. JP Morgan (NYSE: JPM)
> Board member: William H. Gray III
> Board compensation: $266,250
> Director since: 1992, stepped down at last annual meeting
> Primary job: Chairman of government lobbying and advisory firm Gray Global Strategies
> Common stock ownership: 89,061 shares
> Government service: U.S. House of Representative from Pennsylvania (1978 to 1991)

Gray represented Pennsylvania’s 2nd congressional district in the House of Representatives from 1978 until his resignation on September 1991. He was chairman of the House Committee on the Budget and House Majority Whip. Gray’s record as a public company director is less than clean. He was marked as a “Flagged (Problem) Director” by the Corporate Library due to his Visteon responsibilities leading up to the corporation’s bankruptcy. The same organization criticized him for having the largest number of board seats on the most heavily interconnected public companies. Put another way, it is a rebuke in part for the number of board seats he holds.

6. Apple
> Board member: Al Gore
> Board compensation: $260,729
> Director since: 2003.
> Primary job: executive chairman of Current TV since 2002, chairman of Generation Investment Management since 2004 and a partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers since 2007
> Common stock ownership: 100,971 shares
> Government service: U.S. Vice President (1993 to 2001)

Former vice president and Senator Gore ran for the presidency in 2000. An environmental activist, he was awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change. Gore’s connections are clearly valuable to Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), but there is nothing about his past as a politician that makes his relationship with the world’s most valuable public company troubling. Gore could be criticized because the board of Apple was attacked by governance experts for its inability to provide a clear succession plan for Steve Jobs.

7. Pfizer
> Board member: William H. Gray III
> Board compensation: $299,773
> Director since: 2000
> Primary job: Chairman of the government lobbying and advisory firm Gray Global Strategies
> Common stock ownership: 105,476 shares
> Government Service: U.S. House of Representative from Pennsylvania (1978 to 1991)

Gray was a U.S. congressman for 12 years, including his service as Budget Committee Chair and House Majority Whip. He represented Pennsylvania’s 2nd congressional district in the House of Representatives from 1978 until his resignation in September 1991. Gray’s chairmanship of lobbying firm Gray Global Strategies presents a problem. It is fair to ask whether any public company should have a board member who is paid in part to get businesses access to the federal government. Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), like most large pharmaceutical firms, is scrutinized by the federal government, making Gray’s role is even more inappropriate.

8. Dell
> Board member: William H. Gray III
> Board compensation: $300,934
> Director since: 2000
> Primary job: Chairman of the government lobbying and advisory firm Gray Global Strategies
> Common stock ownership: 87,009
> Government service: U.S. House of Representative from Pennsylvania (1978 to 1991)

This is Gray’s third appearance on the list, and his role at Dell is even more troubling than his roles at other companies. Michael Dell entered into a settlement with the SEC for “alleged failure to provide adequate disclosures with respect to the company’s commercial relationship with Intel Corporation prior to Fiscal 2008.” Dell also “agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $4 million.” Since one of Gray’s benefits as a director is, according to him, his past roles as a minister and graduate of theology schools, and, therefore, a moral compass, it is odd that he did not resign from the board when Dell was accused and then fined.

9. Prudential
> Board member: Gaston Caperton
> Board compensation: $ 240,000
> Director since: 2004
> Primary job: President of the College Board since 1999, retires in June 2012
> Common stock ownership: 15,251
> Government service: Governor of West Virginia (1988 to 1996)

Governor of West Virginia from 1988 to 1996, Caperton has been lauded for many years due to his efforts to improve education. He was instrumental in actions to build a large number of new schools in West Virginia and pressed for increases in teacher salaries. Caperton also has been a crusader for wide use of technology to provide improved education tools. Despite how admirable these efforts have been, Caperton does not have a single experience and has not held a single job that would make him an appropriate member for Prudential’s (NYSE: PRU) board.

10. Prudential
> Board member: William H. Gray, III
> Board compensation: $255,000
> Director since: January 2001 (director of Prudential Insurance since September 1991)
> Primary job: Chairman of the government lobbying and advisory firm Gray Global Strategies
> Common stock ownership: 26,824
> Government service: U.S. House of Representative from Pennsylvania (1978 to 1991)

So, Gray sits on yet another board. Among his memberships on all of them he is paid well over $ 1 million a year and has millions of dollars in stock and options. There is no information about what he makes as a lobbyist, but it is fair to assume the sum is extremely high. Gray was a U.S. Congressman for 12 years, including his service as Budget Committee Chair and House Majority Whip. He represented Pennsylvania’s 2nd congressional district in the House of Representatives.

11. Honeywell (NYSE: HON)
> Board member: Judd Gregg
> Board compensation: $401,514
> Director since: 2011
> Primary job: International adviser to the Goldman Sachs
> Common stock ownership: 6,901
> Government service: U.S. Senator from New Hampshire (1993 to 2011)

What is troubling about Gregg’s election to any board is the controversy over his role in TARP and the withdrawal, by him, of his Secretary of Commerce nomination. Among other issues about his Commerce nomination, the AP reported that Gregg “steered taxpayer money to his home state’s redevelopment of a former Air Force base even as he and his brother engaged in real estate deals there.” Gregg’s advisory role with Goldman (NYSE: GS) has been questioned because the investment bank is one of those that received TARP money. Gregg’s public service record is particularly poor for him to be a public company director.

Douglas A. McIntyre and Brian Zajac

 

 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.