To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "universal values" To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "universal values" "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments · 127 Translator:God has eyes The Centuries ago, the great thinker Rousseau and Voltaire, Diderot of heated debate and generated ill feelings. And help us to understand the truth: there is no perfect idea, great thinkers can not get rid of the limitations of the times. Based on this, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "just values" has deeply affected the care Disciples, Gu Powder group members, as well as subtle many people dare not anger nor outspoken. But they still lack the voice of opposition. Shi Sansheng I feel sorry, not against people, but seen in the network "dissidents" and more general terms, dare to refute Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinking of glorious, just blindly attack Xia Sanlu. Such "dissent", a slight understanding of the little people of the mainland strict management ideology can tell, which was fifty cents were the usual "thinking of you speak to him, he speaks to you and sophistry" approach. So, in addition to fifty cents trouble. Have not really thought people dare to stand up and loudly refuted Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view"? Of course not, there are at least the selection of "foreign policy" previous "one hundred global thinkers" who was never shot. Even foreign thinkers read understand Mr. Gu Xiaojun "fair view", as well as the local Chinese thinkers. Even the local Chinese thinkers refused to hand, not there "Foreign Policy" can "emancipate the mind the great debate" in the name, a survival of the fittest to do! Way back Shi Sansheng year has also been located the Recruitment Challenge Cup world Confucius Hole Sun and hole Confucian descenShit on Confucius's "destiny" concept is the grotesque not by the divination doctrine "debate. Unfortunately, until it is blocked, not even one person can refute Shi Sansheng global. Detract from one of the world's leading media --- "foreign policy, are not as good as Shi Sansheng my tolerance? Moreover, the Chinese culture is about "was not exposed deed goes unpunished". If foreign policy seriously affect China willing to liberal ideas of the Western world, why not schooling is a Shi Sansheng, to a real confrontation of ideas? Seriously China, the courage to stand up and self-proclaimed "big thinkers", the only one of Mr. Gu Xiaojun ear. The world to see: Mr. Gu was blocked under every possible way, his mind is still "wild fire, Springtime Renaissance. The estimated global thinkers, especially local Chinese thinkers early on Mr. Gu Xiaojun unique heart Health unforgiveness. "Foreign Policy" Why not nationality Mr. Gu Xiaojun introduce ourselves to another disciple recommend, Gu dough recommended when the title "public impartiality is the first values, Chinese thinkers shot together to field the Rush it? Sure enough, the natural rights of freedom "beat" public impartiality is the first values. That does not prove that the westerly overwhelm the Dongfeng? Foreign policy from the sidelines, fame and fortune, why not? To be honest, not even good at Habitat the Gu disciples first "Big Brother", "public impartiality is the first values," Mr. Gu Xiaojun still feel a puzzle. How eager global foreign policy thinkers wing, pointing my maze! How? Foreign policy decision-makers, you have no courage and magnanimity, dare to come to the farm, the Western ideological polemics? People cooking, CCTV, huh "Sino-French Culinary Competition. Is the so-called thinkers, not people cooking brave? The mule is a horse, he will have to pull out yo not. [Shi Sansheng Friday, October 26, 2012 5:43 China] | 
