Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese people? Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese people? "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · 135 Translator:God has eyes Despite the announcement from the "Foreign Policy" year 2012 "one hundred global thinkers" list for some time. But I Shisan Sheng has can be concluded that: "Foreign Policy" in this year's top 100 "Gu Xiaojun three words. People in the People's Liberation Army "who also hopes downright become some two hundred and fifty. Which, of course, including the Korean powder, blind powder, guarana powder, and Liu invincible followers. Read Mr. Gu Xiaojun "human meat pie" thinking: Or, the American people are kind, but also really willing to help the Chinese people, as when silly childhood determined to "save the American people living in dire straits "General. Otherwise, how would there be so many of the Flying Tigers, 14th Air team members sacrificed their precious lives? However, if the causes of World War II, really, as Mr. Gu Xiaojun said: "World War II" does these silly Pitt forced out "of the results, the goodness of the American people, is it also became a victim of the U.S. elite who? The elites of the democratic world, even this bring disaster to the tragedy of mankind as a whole can be manufactured. Said they worried about the fate of the Chinese people alone would not become a joke? Free world the essence of interests "(see Gu Xiaojun doctrine), Americans over the past century side are concerned about China, but he has also seemingly misread, misjudge China behind, whether just for their own interests? Otherwise, why in the strong intervention of the American Empire nearly a century, democracy, freedom, not only must not also a trial of strength to complicate the matter, it did not do? Sun Yat- sen support it? Stilwell sympathy for the Chinese Communists do? U.S. support of Liu invincible? A master of myth manufactured by the U.S. government? The blind Chen in the end is not a U.S. informant? Why the U.S. government is so good to him? Chen, the blind are not blind, Do Americans are blind? If Han, Ai Weiwei and his ilk, this is what / dog / fart / thinker? The world famous "foreign policy" keen on such a miserable fools who caused God. Purpose with the Chinese Communists, in order to fool the Chinese people? Idiot is Chinese thinkers. The people there are what count on? Why the wise men of the free world will only see the Chinese civilization refuse? American people really will "Grass Mud Horse" talks about even included into the textbooks to support Ai Weiwei great idea? The United States love swearing, indecent If that is the case, why not direct "Grass Mud Horse" instead of "hello"? Americans lack of acting, nor will the chief culprit of the subprime mortgage crisis, and condemned to the colonialists head of the British Empire? What you can not. Why will agree with Ai Weiwei blame social problems in China thousands of years ago, Confucius and Mencius head so preposterous "thinking" it? Why? In the end is why? The wise men of the free world do not want to see the real problem of the Chinese civilization --- "Gu Xiaojun 'such a brilliant idea? In the economy: the Spring Festival in 2008 predicted that the Chinese stock market without disaster fell continue ", hundreds of foreign policy thinkers have thought? Politics: China Council eventually, as he predicted (latest forecast is Mr. Gu own ban) is not bad. Only 9 change 7 thesis of the world few can? Its ideological: the macro as "fair values" proposed to explain why the Western capitalist elite democratic society stagnating, stop the root causes of the evolution. Microscopic put forward, such as "a mortal scam" profoundly revealed the the current FY upheaval of Chinese society intrinsic motivation. Does foreign policy: either macro or micro, your global TOP 100 thinkers may have such a character? Perhaps Shi Sansheng my ignorance, rummaged through the Chinese media at home and abroad, we have not got more than Mr. Gu Xiaojun thinkers. If foreign policy to its referral to China; If not, ask you to Gu Xiaojun doctrine introduced to the world. Okay? Only in this way. In order to prove that the foreign policy is really concerned about China, concerned about the fate of the Chinese people. Otherwise, it can only be reduced to some garbage elite liar childcare. [Shi Sansheng Friday, November 2, 2012 7:01 China] |