設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
無民主的博客  
每個人都應該關心自己的家園!  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/6957/ > 複製 > 收藏本頁
我的名片
無民主
來自: 中國
註冊日期: 2012-11-12
訪問總量: 464,601 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
我的公告欄
最新發布
· 好大的一盤棋
· 郝前鋒是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 「沒有某某某就沒有新什麼」
· 老前鋒與方方
· 老前鋒踢球門的故事
· 方方的擁躉們的無知
· 方方們在走下坡路
友好鏈接
分類目錄
【時評】
· 郝前鋒是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 老前鋒與方方
· 一草博主:方方有良心嗎?
· 對“方方日記”你得學會質疑
· 方方是在愚弄誰
· 很大很大的一盤棋
· 轉載:吹捧方方的聲音被我打壓了
· 轉載:「方方日記」無賣點 Harper
· 顧曉軍、石三生及劉剛
· 馬拉拉·優素福扎伊的槍擊
【雜談】
· 郝前鋒是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 老前鋒與方方
· 一草博主:方方有良心嗎?
· 對“方方日記”你得學會質疑
· 方方是在愚弄誰
· 很大很大的一盤棋
· 誰會拒絕“公正第一”
· 為何不倡導“公正第一”呢?
· 誰挖了我媽的老房子
· 我們需要“公正第一”
【讀書看報】
· 中央日報:新價值觀《公正第一》
· 新價值觀《公正第一》在台灣出版
· “運作諾貝爾文學獎”
· 閻連科的炒作
· 劉剛事件(四)
· 回憶與思考(二)
· 回憶與思考
· 撒切爾夫人與預言
· 推、諾獎和石三生
· 劉剛事件
【所見所聞】
· 好大的一盤棋
· 「沒有某某某就沒有新什麼」
· 老前鋒踢球門的故事
· 方方的擁躉們的無知
· 方方們在走下坡路
· 給方方的擁躉們
· 請問方方的擁躉們
· 方方的「恨國」與「良知」
· 方方是個局、誰的局?
· 於方方,一草為何裝瘋賣傻?
存檔目錄
06/01/2020 - 06/30/2020
05/01/2020 - 05/31/2020
04/01/2020 - 04/30/2020
05/01/2016 - 05/31/2016
04/01/2016 - 04/30/2016
03/01/2016 - 03/31/2016
02/01/2016 - 02/29/2016
01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016
04/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
03/01/2015 - 03/31/2015
02/01/2015 - 02/28/2015
12/01/2014 - 12/31/2014
11/01/2014 - 11/30/2014
10/01/2014 - 10/31/2014
09/01/2014 - 09/30/2014
07/01/2014 - 07/31/2014
06/01/2014 - 06/30/2014
05/01/2014 - 05/31/2014
04/01/2014 - 04/30/2014
02/01/2014 - 02/28/2014
01/01/2014 - 01/31/2014
12/01/2013 - 12/31/2013
11/01/2013 - 11/30/2013
10/01/2013 - 10/31/2013
09/01/2013 - 09/30/2013
08/01/2013 - 08/31/2013
07/01/2013 - 07/31/2013
06/01/2013 - 06/30/2013
05/01/2013 - 05/31/2013
04/01/2013 - 04/30/2013
03/01/2013 - 03/31/2013
02/01/2013 - 02/28/2013
01/01/2013 - 01/31/2013
12/01/2012 - 12/31/2012
11/01/2012 - 11/30/2012
發表評論
作者:
用戶名: 密碼: 您還不是博客/論壇用戶?現在就註冊!
     
評論:
To the world's Nobel Peace Prize laureate's third
   

To the world's Nobel Peace Prize laureate's third letter


"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
Comments•two hundred forty-seven

Translator: God has eyes

The first two letters, roughly with you for the
Nobel Peace Prize Messengers talked about Mr.
Gu Xiaojun greatest contribution in the past
year, the game's modern political with CPC
vested interests do. This one, I want to focus on
to talk about Gu Xiaojun ism Dacheng ---- elite
capitalist authoritarian socialist contend
populist.

As we all know, about the the human
sociological theory, should have at least
practical, logical. Marx, Germany fails, because it
does not have the possibility of practice, but
also not to mention what kind of logic. The
results of the practice of "socialism" from the
Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, China, North Korea,
and both left the country exhausted nation
suffered from being trampled. Mr. Gu Xiaojun
"primitive communism lies," scientific
communism balderdash "the article describes
communism implemented more self-
contradictory, no logic at all.

Before the plebs ism democratic talking about
Mr. Gu Xiaojun, let's take a look at the Central
Compilation and Translation Bureau of Marxism
in Germany in recent failure, traumatic wind and
rain all over the world Yi Jun mistress often
brilliant toppled event. Through the Yi Jun
authoritative study of Chinese Communist
Marxist Yiguanqinshou, reflects, of course, is the
failure of Marxism and incompetence.

Admittedly, from Yi Jun failure attributed to the
failure of the German horse, not be able to
directly prove Gu Xiaojun ism, "the plebs ism
democratic" is correct. However, the failure of
the Central Compilation and Translation Bureau,
at least you can prove that Marxism in China has
come to a dead - end, very difficult to continue
to flicker anymore. The occasion of the "three
years have seen the greatest changes in" period,
China's urgent need to fill vacancies poured out
of the failure of the German horse. And to fill
the vacancy, I think that the the only Mr. Gu
Xiaojun of the plebs ism democratic.

To you the wisdom of the Nobel Peace Prize
Messengers, of course, you can see the state of
the world today has become the poles side by
side adhesive --- Western elites capitalism and
authoritarian socialism in China who can do
without, but mutually exclusive each other. The
root cause of each other so, it not because the
two sides who can not prove that from the point
of view of the leaders than the other, okay?
Western elite capitalist society all these years of
economic recession, the more thriving
authoritarian China booster injection. It has also
become a CPC vested interest groups clamor
"never" best excuse. Despite the world needs the
diversity of the species. But as a human society
is allowed to the undemocratic countries lord it
over the harmful effects of World War II has
been the interpretation of the head. Sooner or
later in the total economy surpassed the U.S. as
the world's largest economies, China, seriously to
ensure continued peace, does not constitute a
threat to world civilization, they are bound to
abandon the goal to achieve communism German
Marxism. Obviously, the communist abolition of
classes and the state as a precondition. And in
order to destroy the country, only by means of
war.

From avoid future occurrence tragic war "destroy
the country" to take precautions Do you also
think that China must move towards democracy?
, Away from the wish of the war is not only you
peacemakers in the world of all peace-loving
people of the common aspiration. Can induce
the CPC toward democracy, non-none other than
Mr. Gu Xiaojun "the plebs ism democratic".
Especially to the Western elite capitalist decades
after the impact of China's transition to a
democratic society.

So, the plebs ism democratic in the end what
good is it? "The plebs ism democratic society",
Mr. Gu Xiaojun is interpreted this way:

"1, said the plebs ism democratic than elitism
democracy more advanced due to the plebs ism
democratic core values, determined by three
values "- the public impartiality, freedom,
democracy and the public impartiality, both to
find the origin and development of human
society, the fundamental, is the only means to
solve today's society and the international
community contradiction.
2, that the plebs ism democratic than elitism
democracy more care for the majority of human
society, because the plebs ism democratic the
clear 'go elitism, go elite' democracy ".
Democracy, better care for the majority of human
society. "

Of course, the about the plebs ism democratic,
Mr. Gu Xiaojun "the plebs ism democratic is the
way out for China's" populist democracy has
nothing to do with you and me, "as well as" the
plebs ism democratic "populism," the plebs how
ism democratic arrival "," Why do I need the
plebs ism democratic? "Text elaboration. Its
superiority first reading at a glance. How in the
world today, there was a theory, can break the
deadlock elite capitalism and socialism hung
side by side, provide a better path for the
peaceful evolution of human civilization? In
addition to "the plebs ism democratic", there are
other options you!

Messengers you for the Nobel Peace Prize,
recommended Mr. Gu Xiaojun! Because in
today's world, only Gu Xiaojun ism can change
China, and is changing China. If populism to the
westerly blowing believe Gu Xiaojun ism will
change the world and make a greater
contribution to the peace of all mankind by the
Nobel Prize!

[Shi Sansheng Monday, January 21, 2013 5:59 china]
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_ae4ac3850101alku.html 

 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.