The idea of "civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Peace Prize

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred eighty

Translator: God has eyes

Undeniable --- centennial Nobel Peace Prize has

been able to Achievement brilliant today, with

its great humanistic spreadvalues by the

winners. From Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent,

non-cooperation "," rich countries should cancel

the debt of poor countries, "South African

Archbishop Desmond Tutu, everyone reflects the

values advocated by the Nobel Peace Prize at a

certain time and space advanced and universal

feelings.

However, when we are faced with the Nobel

Peace Prize in the 20th century to create

brilliant, can not fail to see --- as Mahatma

Gandhi, the inheritor of the mantle of both the

Dalai Lama, Aung San Suu Kyi, or Liu Xiaobo, the

so-called "peace" ideology has been seriously

lagging behind in this day and age, simply can

not cope with the high-speed development and

complex world. Rebuttable and from these heirs

own experience, the incompetence of the so-

called "pacifist" --- the Dalai Lama into exile;

Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest;

Liu Xiaobo was sentenced. Course, to hand over

political power from the Dalai Lama, the

mainland political indifferent; comeback after

Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese civil war breaks

out specific actions of the peace who does not

promote human world peace: peace advocated by

the Nobel Peace Prize purposes, is also

experiencing insurmountable obstacles.

Being called hero. It is such an outdated

concept that has been unable to cope with the

complexity of the world pattern era, Gu Xiaojun

ideas emerged. Mr. Gu Xiaojun as a private

citizen, with $ 35 more than a political game

with the CPC theoretical articles, made the

results are not unbeatable, and Ang, Liu Ji

decades of efforts --- to ensure their own safety

successfully lead to Communist China Politics

and Law Committee and ideology downgrade.

Explore Gu Xiaojun ideological success of the

root causes, of course, first of all thanks to Gary's

flow. In the human society has entered the era

of the global village, when most countries

around the world have chosen the democratic

rule of autocratic Communist China also had to

shy promised to gradually promote the

democratic process, the former number two man

of the Chinese Communist Party, Mr. Wen Jiabao

has even threatened --- China's democracy will

come in the modern realization (Gu's view, Mr.

Wen Jiabao in fact in stupefying --- is the

democratic responsibility can not be passed to

the high quality of the people above). To break

the curse of the Chinese Communists, with Liu

Xiaobo's "colonial three hundred years" theory is

simply not possible, due to the modernization of

Mr. Liu Xiaobo colonial theory and Wen Jiabao

trap actually resonate, are shifting the

responsibility can not be democracy trouble.

With select no enmity with the Chinese

Communists --- but Mr. Gu Xiaojun by Ming

repair the cliff, dark to crossing Chencang

political theoretical articles side laid bare the

CPC's obscurant "Communism is balderdash",

"Three Represents is nonsense Hang Meng

abduction; side proposed to allow the

Communists can not be refuted "the public

impartiality first values. Chinese people, by the

decades stupefying education can go along with

the Chinese Communist Party's "never

Westernization" fallacy. But always like the big

talk of the Chinese Communist Party, in the face

of "the public impartiality" universal values, in

addition to the metamorphosis blocked suppress

Mr. Gu Xiaojun look with their own well-being for

the people "in the same direction "the public

impartiality, but perplexed, had plagiarized go

into a nonsense of" fairness and justice "in order

to confuse right and wrong.

The world to see, "the public impartiality"

universal values, has achieved numerous

victories in the past 2012 --- big enough to cause

the Politics and Law Committee, and ideology

downgrade, small enough to let Ai Weiwei, Chen

Guangcheng alone, malala international swindler

one that is the prototype. Of course, the world

should see that "the public impartiality" in the

event of the Chinese Communist Party in every

possible way blocked struggling to slightly under

pressure test edge. Where it can be obtained,

and Ang, Liu and other Nobel winners have the

same support and recognition of the people of

the world, "the public impartiality" human

society will make a greater contribution.

Today, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "gossip" democracy "to"

Civil Rights "after the advent of, I feel duty

bound to once again recommend to the Nobel

Peace Prize judges. To please judges Mo looked

this word of change over the past decade, the

Chinese Communists precisely by the

"democratic" stealing replaced by "people's

livelihood" (Weifang street, originally called

"democratic Street, Hu, Wen Party The changed

during Minsheng Street "), the only excuse for

economic development, political reform and the

introduction of the supremacy of the

maintenance of stability astray.

Needless to say, Mr. Gu Xiaojun 'democratic'

reform 'civil rights' "is a Chinese Communists

headache but can not do anything political

theory. Because the new session of the Chinese

Communist Party ringleader --- set party,

political and military power in hand, Mr. Xi

Jinping, the most like the right of the people

assigned to "talk about. Democracy is bound

within the foreseeable future, in the hands of

the Chinese Communists can be the "civil rights"

and the "right of the people assigned to" the

truth in the same direction. When Chinese

Communists deny "civil rights" tantamount to

self Zhangzui the all support it! This is also the

root cause of the "gossip" civil rights

"adventure".

Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, please use you

have no noble wisdom, carefully try to figure out

what Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideas from "the public

impartiality" to the "civil rights" wonders!

Colonialism after the demise of the great Nobel

Peace Prize whether the innovation ---- to

continue the process of civilization of human

society, the glory it? The world, as well as more

than "the public impartiality" universal values?

the public impartiality, free, more important

than the "civil rights" rights?

[Shi Sansheng Sunday, March 24, 2013 05:01

Yanbian]