To the Nobel Prize jury recommended the public impartiality

--- A letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee (9)

Translator: God has eyes

Hot these days media is the two sessions, the

news are pleasant to the eye around China

Dream, talk about fairness and justice, stressing

the rule of law. To be honest, they really want to

seriously read and learn, whether it is to look at

the newspaper or network contained, I feel so

awkward. Or to the Nobel Peace Prize jury

recommended core universal values - the public

impartiality ".

the public impartiality, the opinion of the

public, the positive side to being, is the basis of

human social, human society to maintain;

without the public impartiality, all freedom,

democracy, human rights, rule of law ... and so

on, are also some talk about (Gu Xiaojun

language). When most people think of the social

community has been missing the public

impartiality, regime change ensued, and the

development of human society has given proof,

also proved that the public impartiality is the

universal values!

the public impartiality is not fair and justice!

Fair and impartial, multi-fingered transaction;

justice, speaking karma, phase reported a

popular interpreted as good and evil. In today''s

human life, is not absolutely fair; standard of

justice, it is difficult to unify.

Point in killing bin Laden, most Americans are

just; employing suicide bombers, in terms of

high-tech weapons shells also a kind of

desperation justice. In China, housing or land

transactions helpless petition personnel not to

discuss fair? Even Shi Sansheng people to do a

set of a trap, is scared to death of his aging

mother, such as a house do not warranty if it is

really to die, who would say that is not in order

to discuss a "fairness and justice"?

So down, only fair, to discuss the "fairness and

justice", and more and more contradictions,

dissatisfaction piled the larger organic groups,

event frequency is not surprising. I believe that

we do not want this, the politicians do not want

to see!

In fact, difficult to agree on "fairness and

justice", returned to the majority of people in

society, and the public that much easier. the

public impartiality, about social orientation, and

talk about the relationship between people, but

also each individual of the society, the attitude

of others (Gu Xiaojun language) speaking. As

long as the hearts of everyone in the community

"the public impartiality", embodied in the life

and work of a conscience, as a community of

nations, and who will go to drill fair or just a

dead end?

The rule of law, I believe that everyone wants to

achieve the rule of law. From the first

Constitution of the People''s Republic of China to

the revised version of 2004 to the present, large

and small legal change has also changed darned

again and again, which is also seen that the

political elite want to have a stable and

harmonious society, otherwise there will not be

the Chinese people from China dream moment. "

But nearly a century later, is always unable to

escape the rule of law, and now rely on to

achieve the rule of law, what is to let the public

believe that the rule of law?

Mr. Gu Xiaojun Sina, End of the World blog the

blog of China both blocked forward previous

article "sensitive", looked at the pages on the

long list of Shantie notice, the basic anti-Party,

anti-government does not freedom of speech are

not to protect the site editor, can not or dare

not reflect the conscience, what shall I convince

myself that the "rule of law" is different from

"rule by law"? The judges of the Nobel Prize, for

as you can convince yourself?

Chinese idioms to bring the brain to help us

think about also by the judges of the free and

democratic world, "fairness and justice" and "rule

of law" exactly how to interact, how to achieve

fairness and justice rule of law, or how the rule

of law fairness and justice? Chinese people

walking down the great party under the

leadership of the way "to achieve the great

rejuvenation of the Chinese nation", we do not

want to leave the unnecessary detours. Said

bystander, whether to Mr. Gu Xiaojun said "the

public impartiality" Rao Hom past?

Nobel judges, and I hope you will think about

Mr. Gu Xiaojun three values "discussed Mr. Gu

Xiaojun only carry forward the public

impartiality, to the rule of law"! 1.3 billion

Chinese people''s dream of a better life, and will

have a guarantee of world peace!

--- No democracy 2013-03-06 Chongqing