設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
 
中國現代哲學家學會  
發現自己的絕對力量,它會震驚世界  
我的名片
中國現代哲學家學會
註冊日期: 2015-01-10
訪問總量: 1,591,076 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
我的公告欄
最新發布
· 中共會不會走北朝鮮的路?
· 為什麼在西方的多數華人愛美元更
· On the Dual Nature of the Abso
· 論“悟性”與“理性”在中西哲學
· The AA IS and IS NOT
· Why AA Cannot Be Falsified
· Two armies
友好鏈接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· hare:hare的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
分類目錄
【Mingcheng】
【心言】
· Free book: The Ontology of Nat
· 同學會會長關於哲學研究的對話(2
· 同學會會長關於哲學研究的對話
· 天下大勢
· 愛者共天地
· 死亡萬歲 -- 清明節留下的一縷思
· 重發: 哲學之愛從何而來?
· [中哲會]新程序啟動說明
· 哲學之愛從何而來?
【電視直播】
· USA-China in Depth (1)
· 《中哲會》TV直播頻道
【政治】
· 毛澤東的“民族解放”神話:專制
· 為什麼中國人反駁西方理論的觀點
· 台灣立足基礎-造原子彈
· 中國人缺乏理性會有什麼後果?
· 您願意選誰作為第一屆“網絡中華
· 中國未來的社會結構(2)
· 我建議在萬維上進行一次中國未來
· 川普現在唯一的願望是當個“前總
· 範例黨黨員章程
· 談中國民運的戰略與策略(範例黨
【傳統文化】
· 國學與西方思想的區別是狗尾與貂
· 必須立刻彈劾川普!
· 沒文化的鬼子
· 新年伊始中國“十馬奔騰”
· 扯住教皇不放—今天世界哪個國家
· 為什麼中國讀書人很難擺脫中國文
· 中國人的“感性邏輯”
· 也談“中國知識分子墮落”
· "現在打中國,輸贏無懸念&q
· 說!“你脫,還是不脫?!”
【深山蘭】
· 從二例看中國古代的思維方式
【其它】
· 語言與國家:俞興文明進步論的學
· 胡杰紀錄片:無人區畫展
· 美國為什麼偉大?- 只因為一個充
· 六四用一句話說
· 華人應該如何與西方人交往?(1)
· 中國人”也”是同歐洲人一樣的理
· 萬維有太多哲學誤導!
· 一月二十號白宮會發生哪一幕?
· 中國問題:文字
· 用事實駁斥中共關於朝鮮戰爭的謊
【比較政策】
· 階級分化的復甦
【一般】
· 中國為什麼不適合搞民主?
· 伯克利新名言:贏了-就是不認輸
· 什麼是今日美國社會的根本問題?
· 美國人打輸了還是朋友,中國人..
· 川普—你為什麼如此愚蠢?!
· 壓垮川普的最後一根稻草-喬治亞
· 看來川普...
· 中國對中國人的影響
· 中國文化在哪些方面體現了幼稚?
· 對中國人“批判”的看法 - 兼答
【遠方】
· 介紹一下荒誕論:遠方的孤獨
【何岸泉】
· 辯證法與放屁(ZT)
【哲學資料】
· 為相對主義辯護
· Instancology for Philosophers-
· Ten American Philosophers
· (1)馬克思和恩格思的“唯物主義
· Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapt
· 德國政府決定:在全球範圍對使用
· 為什麼人需要哲學?
· ZT:Rights
· Is your pet psychic?
· Twin Telepathy: Is there a ‘S
【中軍】
· 關於精神的問題
· 思維創新的哲學理解(下)
· 思維創新的哲學理解(上)
· 人生究竟是什麼
· 悟性創新的本性及閃失
· 悟性的創新及孩子的例證
· 怎樣進行討論
· 文字、語音、語義與創新
· 哲學研究能幹點兒啥
· 中國缺少創新的各種看法
【徒子】
· 中共會不會走北朝鮮的路?
· 為什麼在西方的多數華人愛美元更
· On the Dual Nature of the Abso
· 論“悟性”與“理性”在中西哲學
· The AA IS and IS NOT
· Why AA Cannot Be Falsified
· Two armies
· 人為什麼思考人生的意義——絕對
· Reason is Inside the Box, RW I
· WuXing Beyond Reason: Why Whol
【嘎子】
· 關於丘成桐的講話的評論
· 已經轉到嘎子博客
· <二> 原本打算單獨寫一篇
· 哲學同真理的關係以及辯證法的本
【几子】
· What Will Happen to President
· 隨想:可口可樂
· 分形與卦像:漫話混沌,科學,與
· 淺議科學實證主義
存檔目錄
02/01/2026 - 02/28/2026
01/01/2026 - 01/31/2026
12/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025
10/01/2025 - 10/31/2025
09/01/2025 - 09/30/2025
08/01/2025 - 08/31/2025
07/01/2025 - 07/31/2025
06/01/2025 - 06/30/2025
05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025
04/01/2025 - 04/30/2025
03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025
02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025
01/01/2025 - 01/31/2025
11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
08/01/2024 - 08/31/2024
07/01/2024 - 07/31/2024
05/01/2024 - 05/31/2024
03/01/2024 - 03/31/2024
02/01/2024 - 02/29/2024
01/01/2024 - 01/31/2024
12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023
11/01/2023 - 11/30/2023
10/01/2023 - 10/31/2023
09/01/2023 - 09/30/2023
08/01/2023 - 08/31/2023
07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023
06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023
02/01/2023 - 02/28/2023
01/01/2023 - 01/31/2023
12/01/2022 - 12/31/2022
11/01/2022 - 11/30/2022
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022
07/01/2022 - 07/31/2022
06/01/2022 - 06/30/2022
05/01/2022 - 05/31/2022
07/01/2021 - 07/31/2021
05/01/2021 - 05/31/2021
03/01/2021 - 03/31/2021
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021
01/01/2021 - 01/31/2021
12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020
11/01/2020 - 11/30/2020
10/01/2020 - 10/31/2020
09/01/2020 - 09/30/2020
08/01/2020 - 08/31/2020
07/01/2020 - 07/31/2020
06/01/2020 - 06/30/2020
05/01/2020 - 05/31/2020
04/01/2020 - 04/30/2020
03/01/2020 - 03/31/2020
02/01/2020 - 02/29/2020
01/01/2020 - 01/31/2020
12/01/2019 - 12/31/2019
11/01/2019 - 11/30/2019
10/01/2019 - 10/31/2019
09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019
08/01/2019 - 08/31/2019
07/01/2019 - 07/31/2019
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019
05/01/2019 - 05/31/2019
04/01/2019 - 04/30/2019
01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018
04/01/2016 - 04/30/2016
07/01/2015 - 07/31/2015
06/01/2015 - 06/30/2015
05/01/2015 - 05/31/2015
04/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
03/01/2015 - 03/31/2015
02/01/2015 - 02/28/2015
01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015
發表評論
作者:
用戶名: 密碼: 您還不是博客/論壇用戶?現在就註冊!
     
評論:
Why WuXing Is Not Trainable — An Instancological V
   

Why WuXing Is Not Trainable

— An Instancological View


Many readers ask a natural question once they encounter WuXing (悟性) in Instancology:

If WuXing is a higher cognition, why can’t it be trained like logic, skills, or techniques?

The short answer is simple:

Because WuXing is not a capability.

It is an occurrence of an instance.

To see why this matters, we must first clarify what “training” really means.

What Training Actually Is

Training always presupposes three conditions:

a pre-existing function

repeatable operations

incremental improvement through accumulation

Training works only where:

parts can be assembled

methods can be rehearsed

outcomes scale with repetition

This is why training works for:

logic

mathematics

memory

language skills

technical expertise

All of these belong to the Relative domain (RR or AR). They are functions operating inside an already-given structure.

Training does not create structure.

Training only optimizes function within structure.

This distinction is decisive.

What WuXing Is (and Is Not)

WuXing is not:

a skill

a method

a technique

a higher-level reasoning

a refined intuition built from experience

WuXing is:

the immediate grasp of a whole

the sudden appearance of meaning

the recognition of structure without derivation

the emergence of an instance as a whole

In Instancological terms:

WuXing is not a process.

WuXing is an instantiation event.

You do not arrive at WuXing step by step.

WuXing arrives when the instance appears.

Whole Before Parts: The Core Reason WuXing Is Not Trainable

Instancology’s most fundamental principle is this:

The whole precedes the parts.

Training works only where:

parts → accumulation → whole

WuXing works in the opposite direction:

whole → parts become obvious

This reversal makes training impossible.

You cannot train your way into seeing a whole that has not yet appeared.

No amount of assembling parts will force a whole into existence.

That is why:

logical rigor cannot guarantee insight

repetition cannot produce understanding

intelligence cannot manufacture realization

WuXing is not the reward of effort.

It is the event of structural appearance.

Why “Practicing WuXing” Is a Category Error

Many spiritual, philosophical, and psychological traditions claim that:

“with enough practice, enlightenment will come.”

Instancology identifies this as a category mistake.

Practice belongs to RR (Relative Relative):

habit

conditioning

repetition

optimization

WuXing belongs to the Absolute-related domain:

structure

necessity

wholeness

non-derivability

You can practice silence.

You can practice attention.

You can practice discipline.

But none of these practices produce WuXing.

At best, they remove obstacles.

They do not cause the event.

Conditions Are Not Causes

This point is subtle but crucial.

People often confuse:

creating conditions

with

producing outcomes

You may create conditions in which WuXing is more likely to occur:

honesty in thinking

refusal of self-deception

abandonment of premature explanations

endurance of uncertainty

But conditions are not causes.

WuXing does not happen because you practiced well.

It happens when the structure becomes unavoidable.

This is why WuXing cannot be scheduled, replicated, or guaranteed.

Why WuXing Feels Sudden and Unteachable

WuXing always feels sudden because:

it does not grow

it does not evolve

it does not accumulate

It appears fully formed or not at all.

That is also why WuXing cannot be transmitted by instruction.

You can explain logic.

You can teach mathematics.

You can demonstrate methods.

But WuXing cannot be handed over.

At most, one can point.

And pointing is not training.

Absolute WuXing vs Relative WuXing

Instancology distinguishes:

Relative WuXing (RW):

insight within a domain

pattern recognition

local wholeness

Absolute WuXing (AW):

grasp of structural necessity

recognition of ontological limits

direct encounter with the boundary of explanation

Neither is trainable in the strict sense.

RW may appear more frequently with experience, but it is still not produced by experience.

AW is entirely non-trainable, because it concerns what no method can reach.

Why This Is Not Pessimistic

Saying WuXing is not trainable is not discouraging.

It is liberating.

It frees WuXing from:

elitism

mystification

technique worship

false promises

WuXing does not belong to experts.

It does not belong to traditions.

It does not belong to authority.

It belongs to structure itself.

When the instance appears, WuXing appears.

When it does not, no effort can substitute.

Final Statement

WuXing is not trainable because:

training operates on functions

WuXing is the appearance of structure

structure precedes all function

the whole cannot be assembled from parts

WuXing is not achieved.

It is encountered.

And this is precisely why it is real.

 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.