設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
 
中國現代哲學家學會  
發現自己的絕對力量,它會震驚世界  
我的名片
中國現代哲學家學會
註冊日期: 2015-01-10
訪問總量: 1,536,052 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
我的公告欄
最新發布
· 真的嗎?
· 曾經滄海難為水,除卻巫山不是雲
· 《範式哲學》對誰最難?
· Why Instancology Offended 100%
· 為什麼中國今天的讀書人只知道考
· 為什麼科學家總是相信:只有科學
· 為什麼人工智能無法設計新的哲學
友好鏈接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· hare:hare的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
分類目錄
【Mingcheng】
【心言】
· Free book: The Ontology of Nat
· 同學會會長關於哲學研究的對話(2
· 同學會會長關於哲學研究的對話
· 天下大勢
· 愛者共天地
· 死亡萬歲 -- 清明節留下的一縷思
· 重發: 哲學之愛從何而來?
· [中哲會]新程序啟動說明
· 哲學之愛從何而來?
【電視直播】
· USA-China in Depth (1)
· 《中哲會》TV直播頻道
【政治】
· 毛澤東的“民族解放”神話:專制
· 為什麼中國人反駁西方理論的觀點
· 台灣立足基礎-造原子彈
· 中國人缺乏理性會有什麼後果?
· 您願意選誰作為第一屆“網絡中華
· 中國未來的社會結構(2)
· 我建議在萬維上進行一次中國未來
· 川普現在唯一的願望是當個“前總
· 範例黨黨員章程
· 談中國民運的戰略與策略(範例黨
【傳統文化】
· 國學與西方思想的區別是狗尾與貂
· 必須立刻彈劾川普!
· 沒文化的鬼子
· 新年伊始中國“十馬奔騰”
· 扯住教皇不放—今天世界哪個國家
· 為什麼中國讀書人很難擺脫中國文
· 中國人的“感性邏輯”
· 也談“中國知識分子墮落”
· "現在打中國,輸贏無懸念&q
· 說!“你脫,還是不脫?!”
【深山蘭】
· 從二例看中國古代的思維方式
【其它】
· 語言與國家:俞興文明進步論的學
· 胡杰紀錄片:無人區畫展
· 美國為什麼偉大?- 只因為一個充
· 六四用一句話說
· 華人應該如何與西方人交往?(1)
· 中國人”也”是同歐洲人一樣的理
· 萬維有太多哲學誤導!
· 一月二十號白宮會發生哪一幕?
· 中國問題:文字
· 用事實駁斥中共關於朝鮮戰爭的謊
【比較政策】
· 階級分化的復甦
【一般】
· 中國為什麼不適合搞民主?
· 伯克利新名言:贏了-就是不認輸
· 什麼是今日美國社會的根本問題?
· 美國人打輸了還是朋友,中國人..
· 川普—你為什麼如此愚蠢?!
· 壓垮川普的最後一根稻草-喬治亞
· 看來川普...
· 中國對中國人的影響
· 中國文化在哪些方面體現了幼稚?
· 對中國人“批判”的看法 - 兼答
【遠方】
· 介紹一下荒誕論:遠方的孤獨
【何岸泉】
· 辯證法與放屁(ZT)
【哲學資料】
· 為相對主義辯護
· Instancology for Philosophers-
· Ten American Philosophers
· (1)馬克思和恩格思的“唯物主義
· Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapt
· 德國政府決定:在全球範圍對使用
· 為什麼人需要哲學?
· ZT:Rights
· Is your pet psychic?
· Twin Telepathy: Is there a ‘S
【中軍】
· 關於精神的問題
· 思維創新的哲學理解(下)
· 思維創新的哲學理解(上)
· 人生究竟是什麼
· 悟性創新的本性及閃失
· 悟性的創新及孩子的例證
· 怎樣進行討論
· 文字、語音、語義與創新
· 哲學研究能幹點兒啥
· 中國缺少創新的各種看法
【徒子】
· 真的嗎?
· 曾經滄海難為水,除卻巫山不是雲
· 《範式哲學》對誰最難?
· Why Instancology Offended 100%
· 為什麼中國今天的讀書人只知道考
· 為什麼科學家總是相信:只有科學
· 為什麼人工智能無法設計新的哲學
· Why Human Life Can Last Foreve
· Compare Heidegger with Wittgen
· 人,是否應該追逐名譽?——從牛
【嘎子】
· 關於丘成桐的講話的評論
· 已經轉到嘎子博客
· <二> 原本打算單獨寫一篇
· 哲學同真理的關係以及辯證法的本
【几子】
· What Will Happen to President
· 隨想:可口可樂
· 分形與卦像:漫話混沌,科學,與
· 淺議科學實證主義
存檔目錄
02/01/2026 - 02/28/2026
01/01/2026 - 01/31/2026
12/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025
10/01/2025 - 10/31/2025
09/01/2025 - 09/30/2025
08/01/2025 - 08/31/2025
07/01/2025 - 07/31/2025
06/01/2025 - 06/30/2025
05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025
04/01/2025 - 04/30/2025
03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025
02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025
01/01/2025 - 01/31/2025
11/01/2024 - 11/30/2024
08/01/2024 - 08/31/2024
07/01/2024 - 07/31/2024
05/01/2024 - 05/31/2024
03/01/2024 - 03/31/2024
02/01/2024 - 02/29/2024
01/01/2024 - 01/31/2024
12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023
11/01/2023 - 11/30/2023
10/01/2023 - 10/31/2023
09/01/2023 - 09/30/2023
08/01/2023 - 08/31/2023
07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023
06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023
02/01/2023 - 02/28/2023
01/01/2023 - 01/31/2023
12/01/2022 - 12/31/2022
11/01/2022 - 11/30/2022
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022
07/01/2022 - 07/31/2022
06/01/2022 - 06/30/2022
05/01/2022 - 05/31/2022
07/01/2021 - 07/31/2021
05/01/2021 - 05/31/2021
03/01/2021 - 03/31/2021
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021
01/01/2021 - 01/31/2021
12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020
11/01/2020 - 11/30/2020
10/01/2020 - 10/31/2020
09/01/2020 - 09/30/2020
08/01/2020 - 08/31/2020
07/01/2020 - 07/31/2020
06/01/2020 - 06/30/2020
05/01/2020 - 05/31/2020
04/01/2020 - 04/30/2020
03/01/2020 - 03/31/2020
02/01/2020 - 02/29/2020
01/01/2020 - 01/31/2020
12/01/2019 - 12/31/2019
11/01/2019 - 11/30/2019
10/01/2019 - 10/31/2019
09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019
08/01/2019 - 08/31/2019
07/01/2019 - 07/31/2019
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019
05/01/2019 - 05/31/2019
04/01/2019 - 04/30/2019
01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018
04/01/2016 - 04/30/2016
07/01/2015 - 07/31/2015
06/01/2015 - 06/30/2015
05/01/2015 - 05/31/2015
04/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
03/01/2015 - 03/31/2015
02/01/2015 - 02/28/2015
01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015
發表評論
作者:
用戶名: 密碼: 您還不是博客/論壇用戶?現在就註冊!
     
評論:
Truth Is a System — From RR to AA
   

Truth Is a System — From RR to AA

Truth is not a sentence, a proposition, or a single correct statement.

Truth is a system—a structured progression that unfolds across levels of reality and cognition. From the perspective of Instancology, truth is neither instantly given nor arbitrarily constructed; it is systematically disclosed, moving from RR (Relative–Relative) toward AA (Absolute–Absolute).

1. Why Truth Cannot Be a Single Claim

If truth were merely a correct statement, then:

different sciences would not conflict,

philosophies would converge quickly,

and history would not be a graveyard of “once-true” doctrines.

Yet the opposite is the case. What we call “truth” changes with:

context,

framework,

cognitive tools,

and ontological depth.

This already tells us something fundamental:

truth behaves like a system, not like a point.

2. RR: Truth as Human Construction

At the RR level, truth appears as:

opinions,

conventions,

social consensus,

linguistic formulations,

ideological systems,

scientific models as tools.

Here, truth is:

negotiable,

revisable,

historically contingent.

RR-truth answers the question:

“What works, convinces, or stabilizes human interaction?”

This is where most debates occur—and also where most confusion arises, because RR-truth is often mistaken for ultimate truth.

RR is not false.

But RR is never final.

3. AR: Truth as Natural Constraint

Moving beyond human construction, AR (Absolute–Relative) introduces truth as:

natural law,

physical constraint,

biological necessity,

causal structure independent of belief.

At this level:

gravity does not negotiate,

death does not vote,

entropy does not care about ideology.

AR-truth answers the question:

“What must be the case, regardless of human agreement?”

Yet even here, truth is still inside reality.

Natural laws describe how reality behaves, not why reality exists at all.

AR is stronger than RR—but still not ultimate.

4. RA: Truth as Formless Structure

RA (Relatively Absolute) is where truth undergoes a decisive shift.

Here truth is no longer:

empirical,

experiential,

representational.

Instead, it appears as:

logic,

mathematics,

structural necessity,

non-empirical constraint.

RA-truth does not describe the world;

it conditions any possible description of the world.

Logic does not exist in nature the way trees do.

Mathematics does not occupy space-time.

Yet without them, no knowledge is possible.

RA answers the question:

“What must hold for anything to be intelligible at all?”

Still, even RA has a limit:

it explains structure, but not the existence of structure itself.

5. AA: Truth as Condition, Not Content

AA (Absolute–Absolute) is not a higher theory.

It is not a deeper law.

It is not an ultimate equation.

AA is the condition of all truth, not another truth within the system.

At AA:

explanation ends,

grounding stops,

questioning collapses—not by force, but by necessity.

AA does not say anything. AA does not represent anything. AA is that which makes saying and representing possible at all.

This is why AA:

cannot be proved,

cannot be denied,

cannot be replaced.

To demand proof of AA is already to presuppose it.

6. Truth as a Vertical System

From this perspective, truth unfolds as a vertical structure:

RR: truth as agreement and construction

AR: truth as natural necessity

RA: truth as structural condition

AA: truth as unspeakable ground

Each level:

is valid in its own domain,

fails when absolutized,

becomes coherent only within the full system.

Truth is not relative or absolute in isolation.

Truth is systematic.

7. The Core Insight

Most philosophical conflicts arise because:

RR argues against AR,

AR dismisses RA,

RA ignores AA,

and AA is mistaken for mysticism.

Instancology resolves this by recognizing that:

truth is not found by choosing a level, but by understanding the system.

The journey from RR to AA is not optional.

It is the structure of truth itself.

Final Statement

Truth is not what we say.

Not what works.

Not even what must happen.

Truth is the system through which all saying, working, and happening become possible—

a system that begins in RR and terminates, necessarily and silently, in AA.

 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.