設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
酷19的博客  
分享主流媒體不報道的信息。和大家在尋求真理的旅途上互助前行。  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/11160/ > 複製 > 收藏本頁
網絡日誌正文
全球暖化是一個騙局。美國海洋大氣總局吹哨科學家揭露NOAA造假 2017-02-05 13:21:37

本人研究這個話題超過10年。地球的溫度不是在升高。其實實在下降。有很多科學家其實在呼籲要來的不是暖化。而是小冰川時代。的確我過去幾年看到的東西其實在說明溫度在降低。而且我認為,以後會越來越冷。

美國的很多機構。包括CDC,FCC,FDA其實根本不是為美國人民服務的。他們都是銀行家的工具而已。這一點非常難以讓人置信。但如果你認真研究一下你很容易發現事實的確是那樣。很多大學偽造氣象數據其實早就不是什麼陰謀了。過去有個電郵門。就是那些科學家電郵里談如何造假被黑客貼出來了。完全不是新聞也不是陰謀。是實實在在的事情。這些東西有很多細節。如果有人有興趣我可以回去找到那些舊聞。想仔細研究的人,請在下面留言。


“NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history.”

  LEAVE A COMMENT


NASA and NOAA are using fake climate data, says Tony Heller. They are claiming record heat in areas where there are no thermometers. That’s how they made 2016 into a record warm year.

“The map above is fake,” says Tony Heller. “NOAA has almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures.”

“NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history, and this needs to end now that criminals are no longer in control of our government.”

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/











ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data


Tyler Durden's picture

by Tyler Durden

Feb 5, 2017 2:55 PM

Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warmiBritain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.

The scandal has disturbing echoes of the ‘Climategate’ affair which broke shortly before the UN climate summit in 2009, when the leak of thousands of emails between climate scientists suggested they had manipulated and hidden data. Some were British experts at the influential Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

As The Mail continues, whatever takes its place, said Dr Bates, "there needs to be a fundamental change to the way NOAA deals with data so that people can check and validate scientific results. I’m hoping that this will be a wake-up call to the climate science community – a signal that we have to put in place processes to make sure this kind of crap doesn’t happen again.

"I want to address the systemic problems. I don’t care whether modifications to the datasets make temperatures go up or down. But I want the observations to speak for themselves, and for that, there needs to be a new emphasis that ethical standards must be maintained."

 

He said he decided to speak out after seeing reports in papers including the Washington Post and Forbes magazine claiming that scientists feared the Trump administration would fail to maintain and preserve NOAA’s climate records.

 

Dr Bates said: "How ironic it is that there is now this idea that Trump is going to trash climate data, when key decisions were earlier taken by someone whose responsibility it was to maintain its integrity – and failed."

NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data.

After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.

 

Last night Mr Smith thanked Dr Bates "for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion".

 

He added: "The Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the President’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study."

 

Professor Curry, now the president of the Climate Forecast Applications Network, said last night: ‘Large adjustments to the raw data, and substantial changes in successive dataset versions, imply substantial uncertainties.’

 

It was time, she said, that politicians and policymakers took these uncertainties on board.



瀏覽(553) (4) 評論(0)
發表評論
我的名片
酷19
註冊日期: 2016-05-22
訪問總量: 51,437 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
我的公告欄
評論的原則
最新發布
· 告別萬維,拜拜
· 現場直播,小羅伯特肯尼迪。疫苗
· 今年最感人的故事
· 我告訴過你們北加faucked up,不
· 萬維網站和論壇走的是一條死路。
· 俄克拉荷馬:美國穆斯林砍女同事
· 北加會被fucked up。
分類目錄
【生活小竅門】
· 又一個不幸在汽車裡被淹死的人
【全球氣候】
· 國內最近有好些地方下了雪。今年
【論壇】
· 現場直播,小羅伯特肯尼迪。疫苗
· 我告訴過你們北加faucked up,不
· 萬維網站和論壇走的是一條死路。
· 法官Jeanine細說為啥應該把希拉
· 看看美國人如何跳舞就知道中國人
· 萬維讀者(三)
· 粱遠聲網友,雙縫實驗無論有多少
· 萬維論壇的讀者(二)
· 總統志願者獎勵機構的回信
· 萬維論壇的讀者(一)
【世界的另一面】
· 告別萬維,拜拜
· 現場直播,小羅伯特肯尼迪。疫苗
· 今年最感人的故事
· 俄克拉荷馬:美國穆斯林砍女同事
· 北加會被fucked up。
· 俄國進攻韓國。布什總統又執政了
· 實況轉播:美國近代歷史上最重要
· 最新消息:巴西警察罷工。到處都
· 看看英國讓穆斯林進去的後果
· 我乞求我的朋友買一些。
存檔目錄
2017-02-01 - 2017-02-16
2017-01-31 - 2017-01-31
2016-10-21 - 2016-10-21
2016-08-13 - 2016-08-14
2016-06-01 - 2016-06-13
2016-05-22 - 2016-05-29
 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.