设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
酷19的博客  
分享主流媒体不报道的信息。和大家在寻求真理的旅途上互助前行。  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/11160/ > 复制 > 收藏本页
网络日志正文
全球暖化是一个骗局。美国海洋大气总局吹哨科学家揭露NOAA造假 2017-02-05 13:21:37

本人研究这个话题超过10年。地球的温度不是在升高。其实实在下降。有很多科学家其实在呼吁要来的不是暖化。而是小冰川时代。的确我过去几年看到的东西其实在说明温度在降低。而且我认为,以后会越来越冷。

美国的很多机构。包括CDC,FCC,FDA其实根本不是为美国人民服务的。他们都是银行家的工具而已。这一点非常难以让人置信。但如果你认真研究一下你很容易发现事实的确是那样。很多大学伪造气象数据其实早就不是什么阴谋了。过去有个电邮门。就是那些科学家电邮里谈如何造假被黑客贴出来了。完全不是新闻也不是阴谋。是实实在在的事情。这些东西有很多细节。如果有人有兴趣我可以回去找到那些旧闻。想仔细研究的人,请在下面留言。


“NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history.”

  LEAVE A COMMENT


NASA and NOAA are using fake climate data, says Tony Heller. They are claiming record heat in areas where there are no thermometers. That’s how they made 2016 into a record warm year.

“The map above is fake,” says Tony Heller. “NOAA has almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures.”

“NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history, and this needs to end now that criminals are no longer in control of our government.”

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data-is-fake-data/











ClimateGate 2 - NOAA Whistleblower Claims World Leaders Fooled By Fake Global Warming Data


Tyler Durden's picture

by Tyler Durden

Feb 5, 2017 2:55 PM

Britain's Daily Mail reported, thousands of leaked emails revealed scientists were trying to block access to data, and using a 'trick' to conceal embarrassing flaws in their claims about global warmiBritain's Mail on Sunday today revealed astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.

The scandal has disturbing echoes of the ‘Climategate’ affair which broke shortly before the UN climate summit in 2009, when the leak of thousands of emails between climate scientists suggested they had manipulated and hidden data. Some were British experts at the influential Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

As The Mail continues, whatever takes its place, said Dr Bates, "there needs to be a fundamental change to the way NOAA deals with data so that people can check and validate scientific results. I’m hoping that this will be a wake-up call to the climate science community – a signal that we have to put in place processes to make sure this kind of crap doesn’t happen again.

"I want to address the systemic problems. I don’t care whether modifications to the datasets make temperatures go up or down. But I want the observations to speak for themselves, and for that, there needs to be a new emphasis that ethical standards must be maintained."

 

He said he decided to speak out after seeing reports in papers including the Washington Post and Forbes magazine claiming that scientists feared the Trump administration would fail to maintain and preserve NOAA’s climate records.

 

Dr Bates said: "How ironic it is that there is now this idea that Trump is going to trash climate data, when key decisions were earlier taken by someone whose responsibility it was to maintain its integrity – and failed."

NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data.

After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas demanding internal emails from the committee chairman, the Texas Republican Lamar Smith, and falsely claimed that no one had raised concerns about the paper internally.

 

Last night Mr Smith thanked Dr Bates "for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion".

 

He added: "The Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the President’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study."

 

Professor Curry, now the president of the Climate Forecast Applications Network, said last night: ‘Large adjustments to the raw data, and substantial changes in successive dataset versions, imply substantial uncertainties.’

 

It was time, she said, that politicians and policymakers took these uncertainties on board.



浏览(554) (4) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
酷19
注册日期: 2016-05-22
访问总量: 51,588 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
评论的原则
最新发布
· 告别万维,拜拜
· 现场直播,小罗伯特肯尼迪。疫苗
· 今年最感人的故事
· 我告诉过你们北加faucked up,不
· 万维网站和论坛走的是一条死路。
· 俄克拉荷马:美国穆斯林砍女同事
· 北加会被fucked up。
分类目录
【生活小窍门】
· 又一个不幸在汽车里被淹死的人
【全球气候】
· 国内最近有好些地方下了雪。今年
【论坛】
· 现场直播,小罗伯特肯尼迪。疫苗
· 我告诉过你们北加faucked up,不
· 万维网站和论坛走的是一条死路。
· 法官Jeanine细说为啥应该把希拉
· 看看美国人如何跳舞就知道中国人
· 万维读者(三)
· 粱远声网友,双缝实验无论有多少
· 万维论坛的读者(二)
· 总统志愿者奖励机构的回信
· 万维论坛的读者(一)
【世界的另一面】
· 告别万维,拜拜
· 现场直播,小罗伯特肯尼迪。疫苗
· 今年最感人的故事
· 俄克拉荷马:美国穆斯林砍女同事
· 北加会被fucked up。
· 俄国进攻韩国。布什总统又执政了
· 实况转播:美国近代历史上最重要
· 最新消息:巴西警察罢工。到处都
· 看看英国让穆斯林进去的后果
· 我乞求我的朋友买一些。
存档目录
2017-02-01 - 2017-02-16
2017-01-31 - 2017-01-31
2016-10-21 - 2016-10-21
2016-08-13 - 2016-08-14
2016-06-01 - 2016-06-13
2016-05-22 - 2016-05-29
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.