|
|
|
|
|
|
文章評論 |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-17 08:25:41 |
|
|
回西岸: 你說的是對的。 但針對他們的家屬並非濫殺無辜。
那些把情郎,愛女,兒子送上飛機到美國來撞世貿大樓的家屬們真的就沒有任何責任。加州殺人的媽媽知道的清清楚楚他的兒子在幹什麼。 這些家屬如果不是共犯, 那也是知情不舉。 怎麼就可以任他們逍遙法外。 如果其中的有一小點良心, 把事情透露一下, 可以挽救多少人的性命。 是的, 你還能政治正確, 因為死的不是你。 你可以這麼想, 但下一個可能就是你。
穆斯林人也是政治正確, 很難聽見穆斯林譴責恐怖分子的聲音。 |
|
|
|
作者:西岸 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-17 08:14:59 |
|
|
這就給恐怖分子把所謂的soft target作為目標提供了理論和“合法”依據,也使得一個國家政府,比如美國政府,被降低到了恐怖分子的檔次。 也就是通常所說的恐怖主義行為不再被認為是恐怖主義,而是合理的軍事行動。 這種事情一旦“合理”,那麼軍事強勢的一方的強勢就無法發揮,因為對方的目標並不是你的軍事,而是你的軟目標。 這就是為什麼川普這種人愚蠢的地方,如果這種事情被認為是正常的,世界上也就不會有人對巴黎的恐怖襲擊感到憤怒,和對受害者同情。所謂正義戰爭,或西方所說的Just War theory,三個標準規定了戰爭的正義性或非正義。而體現戰爭正義的目的是為了獲得同情和支持,因為不正義的戰爭如果勝利,也會用到其他人身上。而正義的戰爭因為是遵守Just War theory的,也就是有標準和規則的,就無法濫用。 而如果獲得同情和支持,你戰爭的成本就低。 這種道理川普這種水平的人是不懂的。 |
|
|
|
作者:漢卿 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-17 05:14:10 |
|
|
“株連九族”和“濫殺無辜”是同一個意思。 博主是想“消滅恐怖主義”還是要推崇“株連九族”?亂用還是“標題黨”? |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-16 21:47:41 |
|
|
開始視頻剪輯) JOSH JACOB,大學生:我是約什 - 雅各布, 佐治亞理工學院學生: 最近唐納德·特朗普提到,我們必須殺死ISIS的家屬。然而,這違反了區分平民和戰鬥員之間的國際法原則。 所以我的問題是,如何將故意殺害無辜平民使我們有別於ISIS? (完視頻剪輯) 布雷澤:特朗普先生。 TRUMP:我們必須更加強硬。我們必須要大大強於我們的已經。我們有知道是怎麼回事的人。你看看剛才的攻擊在加利福尼亞州的一天。有很多人,包括他母親,都知道事情的原委。 他們看到了一個管狀炸彈滿地都是。他們看到彈藥在所有的地方。他們知道究竟發生了什麼事情。 當撞向世界貿易中心大樓,他們把朋友,家人,女朋友送上飛機,回到沙特阿拉伯。 他們知道將發生什麼事情。他們回到家裡,他們想在電視上觀看自己的男朋友。我會非常,非常堅定的指向他們的家人。坦率地說,這會讓他們好好想想,因為他們可能不那麼在意自己的生命,但他們,不管你信不信,會在意他們的家人的生命。 (掌聲) - 作者:西西弗斯 留言時間:2015-12-16 21:19:54 證據還不夠嗎。 你想讓川普說中文嗎。 到底誰是小人。是馬屎還是狒狒 |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-16 20:26:46 |
|
|
(APPLAUSE) BASH: Senator Paul, you said ISIS grew stronger because of the hawks in your party. Do you really think that Republicans have fueled the rise of ISIS? PAUL: I think that by arming the allies of ISIS, the Islamic rebels against Assad, that we created a safe space or made that space bigger for ISIS to grow. I think those who have wanted regime change have made a mistake. When we toppled Gadhafi in Libya, I think that was a mistake. I think ISIS grew stronger, we had a failed state, and we were more at risk. I’d like to also go back to, though, another question, which is, is Donald Trump a serious candidate? The reason I ask this is, if you’re going to close the Internet, realize, America, what that entails. That entails getting rid of the First amendment, OK? It’s no small feat. If you are going to kill the families of terrorists, realize that there’s something called the Geneva Convention we’re going to have to pull out of. It would defy every norm that is America. So when you ask yourself, whoever you are, that think you’re going to support Donald Trump, think, do you believe in the Constitution? Are you going to change the Constitution? (APPLAUSE) TRUMP: So, they can kill us, but we can’t kill them? That’s what you’re saying. And as far as the Internet is concerned, we’re not talking about closing the Internet. I’m talking about parts of Syria, parts of Iraq, where ISIS is, spotting it. Now, you could close it. What I like even better than that is getting our smartest and getting our best to infiltrate their Internet, so that we know exactly where they’re going, exactly where they’re going to be. I like that better. (APPLAUSE) But we have to — who would be — I just can’t imagine somebody booing. These are people that want to kill us, folks, and you’re — you’re objecting to us infiltrating their conversations? I don’t think so. I don’t think so. (APPLAUSE) |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-16 19:58:06 |
|
|
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) JOSH JACOB, COLLEGE STUDENT: I’m Josh Jacob from Georgia Tech. Recently Donald Trump mentioned we must kill the families of ISIS members. However, this violates the principle of distinction between civilians and combatants in international law. So my question is, how would intentionally killing innocent civilians set us apart from ISIS? (END VIDEO CLIP) BLITZER: Mr. Trump. TRUMP: We have to be much tougher. We have to be much stronger than we’ve been. We have people that know what is going on. You take a look at just the attack in California the other day. There were numerous people, including the mother, that knew what was going on. They saw a pipe bomb sitting all over the floor. They saw ammunition all over the place. They knew exactly what was going on. When you had the World Trade Center go, people were put into planes that were friends, family, girlfriends, and they were put into planes and they were sent back, for the most part, to Saudi Arabia. They knew what was going on. They went home and they wanted to watch their boyfriends on television. I would be very, very firm with families. Frankly, that will make people think because they may not care much about their lives, but they do care, believe it or not, about their families’ lives. (APPLAUSE) |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-16 19:14:14 |
|
|
marsfield, 馬屎, 昨天共和黨辯論上川普親口說的, 布什三世還和他打起來了。 CNMD。 |
|
|
|
【共和黨總統參選人川普說對付恐怖分子, 就是要把他的家人也殺掉。】 如果你不能給出這句話的出處,你就是不會說人話的狒狒。信口開河,栽贓誣陷的無恥之徒。CNMD! |
|
|
|
作者:老張 |
|
留言時間:2015-12-16 17:07:27 |
|
|
中國應清掃恐怖分子,但是西亞應留下來些對付老油。後者二缺一世界更不太平, |
|
|
|
|