|
|
|
|
|
|
文章评论 |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-17 08:25:41 |
|
|
回西岸: 你说的是对的。 但针对他们的家属并非滥杀无辜。
那些把情郎,爱女,儿子送上飞机到美国来撞世贸大楼的家属们真的就没有任何责任。加州杀人的妈妈知道的清清楚楚他的儿子在干什么。 这些家属如果不是共犯, 那也是知情不举。 怎么就可以任他们逍遥法外。 如果其中的有一小点良心, 把事情透露一下, 可以挽救多少人的性命。 是的, 你还能政治正确, 因为死的不是你。 你可以这么想, 但下一个可能就是你。
穆斯林人也是政治正确, 很难听见穆斯林谴责恐怖分子的声音。 |
|
|
|
作者:西岸 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-17 08:14:59 |
|
|
这就给恐怖分子把所谓的soft target作为目标提供了理论和“合法”依据,也使得一个国家政府,比如美国政府,被降低到了恐怖分子的档次。 也就是通常所说的恐怖主义行为不再被认为是恐怖主义,而是合理的军事行动。 这种事情一旦“合理”,那么军事强势的一方的强势就无法发挥,因为对方的目标并不是你的军事,而是你的软目标。 这就是为什么川普这种人愚蠢的地方,如果这种事情被认为是正常的,世界上也就不会有人对巴黎的恐怖袭击感到愤怒,和对受害者同情。所谓正义战争,或西方所说的Just War theory,三个标准规定了战争的正义性或非正义。而体现战争正义的目的是为了获得同情和支持,因为不正义的战争如果胜利,也会用到其他人身上。而正义的战争因为是遵守Just War theory的,也就是有标准和规则的,就无法滥用。 而如果获得同情和支持,你战争的成本就低。 这种道理川普这种水平的人是不懂的。 |
|
|
|
作者:汉卿 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-17 05:14:10 |
|
|
“株连九族”和“滥杀无辜”是同一个意思。 博主是想“消灭恐怖主义”还是要推崇“株连九族”?乱用还是“标题党”? |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-16 21:47:41 |
|
|
开始视频剪辑) JOSH JACOB,大学生:我是约什 - 雅各布, 佐治亚理工学院学生: 最近唐纳德·特朗普提到,我们必须杀死ISIS的家属。然而,这违反了区分平民和战斗员之间的国际法原则。 所以我的问题是,如何将故意杀害无辜平民使我们有别于ISIS? (完视频剪辑) 布雷泽:特朗普先生。 TRUMP:我们必须更加强硬。我们必须要大大强于我们的已经。我们有知道是怎么回事的人。你看看刚才的攻击在加利福尼亚州的一天。有很多人,包括他母亲,都知道事情的原委。 他们看到了一个管状炸弹满地都是。他们看到弹药在所有的地方。他们知道究竟发生了什么事情。 当撞向世界贸易中心大楼,他们把朋友,家人,女朋友送上飞机,回到沙特阿拉伯。 他们知道将发生什么事情。他们回到家里,他们想在电视上观看自己的男朋友。我会非常,非常坚定的指向他们的家人。坦率地说,这会让他们好好想想,因为他们可能不那么在意自己的生命,但他们,不管你信不信,会在意他们的家人的生命。 (掌声) - 作者:西西弗斯 留言时间:2015-12-16 21:19:54 证据还不够吗。 你想让川普说中文吗。 到底谁是小人。是马屎还是狒狒 |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-16 20:26:46 |
|
|
(APPLAUSE) BASH: Senator Paul, you said ISIS grew stronger because of the hawks in your party. Do you really think that Republicans have fueled the rise of ISIS? PAUL: I think that by arming the allies of ISIS, the Islamic rebels against Assad, that we created a safe space or made that space bigger for ISIS to grow. I think those who have wanted regime change have made a mistake. When we toppled Gadhafi in Libya, I think that was a mistake. I think ISIS grew stronger, we had a failed state, and we were more at risk. I’d like to also go back to, though, another question, which is, is Donald Trump a serious candidate? The reason I ask this is, if you’re going to close the Internet, realize, America, what that entails. That entails getting rid of the First amendment, OK? It’s no small feat. If you are going to kill the families of terrorists, realize that there’s something called the Geneva Convention we’re going to have to pull out of. It would defy every norm that is America. So when you ask yourself, whoever you are, that think you’re going to support Donald Trump, think, do you believe in the Constitution? Are you going to change the Constitution? (APPLAUSE) TRUMP: So, they can kill us, but we can’t kill them? That’s what you’re saying. And as far as the Internet is concerned, we’re not talking about closing the Internet. I’m talking about parts of Syria, parts of Iraq, where ISIS is, spotting it. Now, you could close it. What I like even better than that is getting our smartest and getting our best to infiltrate their Internet, so that we know exactly where they’re going, exactly where they’re going to be. I like that better. (APPLAUSE) But we have to — who would be — I just can’t imagine somebody booing. These are people that want to kill us, folks, and you’re — you’re objecting to us infiltrating their conversations? I don’t think so. I don’t think so. (APPLAUSE) |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-16 19:58:06 |
|
|
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) JOSH JACOB, COLLEGE STUDENT: I’m Josh Jacob from Georgia Tech. Recently Donald Trump mentioned we must kill the families of ISIS members. However, this violates the principle of distinction between civilians and combatants in international law. So my question is, how would intentionally killing innocent civilians set us apart from ISIS? (END VIDEO CLIP) BLITZER: Mr. Trump. TRUMP: We have to be much tougher. We have to be much stronger than we’ve been. We have people that know what is going on. You take a look at just the attack in California the other day. There were numerous people, including the mother, that knew what was going on. They saw a pipe bomb sitting all over the floor. They saw ammunition all over the place. They knew exactly what was going on. When you had the World Trade Center go, people were put into planes that were friends, family, girlfriends, and they were put into planes and they were sent back, for the most part, to Saudi Arabia. They knew what was going on. They went home and they wanted to watch their boyfriends on television. I would be very, very firm with families. Frankly, that will make people think because they may not care much about their lives, but they do care, believe it or not, about their families’ lives. (APPLAUSE) |
|
|
|
作者:西西弗斯 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-16 19:14:14 |
|
|
marsfield, 马屎, 昨天共和党辩论上川普亲口说的, 布什三世还和他打起来了。 CNMD。 |
|
|
|
【共和党总统参选人川普说对付恐怖分子, 就是要把他的家人也杀掉。】 如果你不能给出这句话的出处,你就是不会说人话的狒狒。信口开河,栽赃诬陷的无耻之徒。CNMD! |
|
|
|
作者:老张 |
|
留言时间:2015-12-16 17:07:27 |
|
|
中国应清扫恐怖分子,但是西亚应留下来些对付老油。后者二缺一世界更不太平, |
|
|
|
|