哪些因素与伴侣的性满意度、性困扰和性功能相关？一项关于伴侣日记研究的系统性范围综述

What Factors are Associated with Sexual Satisfaction, Distress, and Function in Couples? A Systematic Scoping Review of Dyadic Diary Studies

—《性研究杂志》第62卷第9期，2025年12月—

<The Journal of Sex Research> Volume 62, Issue 9, December 2025

【摘要】日记法（特别是双人日记法）这种日益普遍的研究方法，能够独特地捕捉伴侣双方思想、情感和行为的波动如何影响亲密关系中的性生活结果。双人日记法能够在自然情境下，在事件发生后不久评估这些过程，并允许研究人员在考虑关系相互依赖性的同时，考察个体内部变量的波动。本系统性范围综述旨在评估双人日记研究对理解亲密关系中特定性生活结果的贡献。我们考察了与三个关键结果相关的因素——日常性满意度、性困扰和性功能。本研究纳入了57项研究，涉及3793对伴侣。所有因素均由伴侣双方分别报告。我们确定了个人因素（个体自身的经历或行为，例如情绪）、关系因素（伴侣双方的共同经历，例如冲突）和伴侣因素（伴侣的经历或行为，例如反应性）。当个体报告其个人、关系或伴侣相关经历相对于其平均水平发生变化时，这会影响他们自身以及在某些情况下影响其伴侣当天的性生活结果。我们发现，当研究的关联因素侧重于对情境因素（例如情绪）敏感且伴侣双方体验可能不同的特定关系事件（例如性活动、冲突）时，双人日记研究尤其有用。然而，日记法需要耗费大量资源，如果研究人员主要关注的是伴侣感知到的行为，则可能无需使用这种方法。我们的研究结果表明，理论家、研究人员和临床医生有必要考虑伴侣日常生活中波动的动态性，以便更好地理解和促进亲密关系中的性满意度和性功能，并减少性困扰。

[Abstract] The increasingly common dyadic diary method uniquely captures how fluctuations in the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of each member of a couple contribute to sexual outcomes within relationships. Dyadic diary methods assess these processes close in time to when they occur in a natural setting, and permit examination of within-person fluctuations in variables of interest while accounting for relational interdependence. The aim of this systematic scoping review was to assess the contribution of dyadic diary studies to understanding specific sexual outcomes in committed relationships. We examined factors associated with three key outcomes – daily sexual satisfaction, sexual distress, and sexual function. Fifty-seven records reporting on 3,793 couples were included. All factors were reported on by each member of the couple, separately. We identified personal (individual’s experiences or behaviors such as mood), relationship-focused (shared experiences of both partners such as conflict), and partner-focused (partner’s experiences or behaviors such as responsiveness) factors. When individuals reported a change in their personal, relationship-, or partner-focused experience relative to their average across days, there were implications for their own and, in some cases, their partners’ sexual outcomes that day. We found that dyadic diary studies are especially useful when the associated factors under investigation focused on specific relationship events (e.g. sexual activity, conflict) that are sensitive to contextual factors (e.g. mood) and may be experienced differently for each partner. However, diary methods are resource-intensive and may not be required when researchers are primarily interested in perceived partner behaviors. Our results suggest it may be valuable for theorists, researchers, and clinicians to consider the dynamic nature of day-to-day fluctuations in couples’ lives to better understand and promote sexual satisfaction and sexual function, and reduce sexual distress, in the context of partnered relationships.

论文原文：Julia Velten, Inês M. Tavares & Natalie O. Rosen (2025). What Factors are Associated with Sexual Satisfaction, Distress, and Function in Couples? A Systematic Scoping Review of Dyadic Diary Studies. The Journal of Sex Research, Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 1704-1721. December 2025.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2486475

（需要英文原文的朋友，请联系微信：millerdeng95或iacmsp）