设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  hare的博客
  In Reason We Trust
网络日志正文
Why Truth Is Not a Popularity Contest 2025-12-29 01:28:54

Why Truth Is Not a Popularity Contest

— An Instancology View

In every age, human societies have been tempted to equate truth with numbers. What most people believe feels safer, louder, and more “real” than what only a few perceive. Votes replace verification, applause replaces understanding, and repetition replaces insight. From an Instancology perspective, this confusion is not accidental—it is structurally inevitable once truth is mistaken for social agreement.

Instancology cuts through this confusion by asking a more fundamental question: what kind of thing is truth, ontologically? Once this is clarified, the idea that truth could be decided by popularity collapses immediately.

1. Popularity Belongs to RR; Truth Does Not

In Instancology, popularity is a phenomenon of RR (Relative–Relative):

opinions,

social consensus,

traditions,

institutions,

cultural habits,

academic fashions.

RR is the domain of human products. It is governed by imitation, authority, emotional contagion, and power structures. None of these have intrinsic access to truth.

Truth, by contrast, does not originate in RR. It belongs to deeper ontological layers:

AR (Absolute–Relative): natural reality, facts, existence itself

RA (Relative–Absolute): laws, logic, mathematics, structural necessity

AA (Absolute–Absolute): the unspeakable ontological ground of all instances

Popularity never reaches these layers. It circulates horizontally among humans; truth descends vertically from reality.

A million people can agree on an illusion. No number of people can vote a falsehood into existence.

2. History Is a Graveyard of Popular Errors

If truth were a popularity contest, history would look very different.

At various times, it was popular to believe:

the Earth was the center of the universe

heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones

disease is caused by evil spirits

slavery is natural

women lack rational capacity

absolute monarchy is divinely ordained

Popularity did not make these beliefs true.

Reality corrected them—slowly, painfully, and often against violent resistance.

Instancology explains why: truth emerges when cognition aligns with the structure of an instance, not when minds agree with each other.

Consensus measures social stability, not ontological accuracy.

3. Truth Is Discovered, Not Negotiated

A crucial Instancological distinction:

Negotiation belongs to RR

Discovery belongs to AR and RA

You can negotiate laws, morals, customs, and definitions.

You cannot negotiate:

whether gravity exists

whether contradictions hold

whether time flows

whether death occurs

Truth confronts us; it does not ask permission.

Even scientific revolutions do not succeed because they are voted in, but because reality stops cooperating with false models. Nature does not care how many people believe something. It responds only to what is.

4. Why Major Truths Are Always Minority Positions at First

Instancology predicts a counterintuitive but consistent pattern:

The deeper a truth is, the fewer people can see it initially.

Why?

RR cognition is trained by language, tradition, and habit

Deeper truths require Primitive WuXing (RW) or Absolute WuXing (AW)

These modes are rare, non-transferable, and cannot be taught by repetition

Most people operate at intuition, experience, understanding, and reason. These are powerful—but bounded. When truth lies beyond those bounds, popularity becomes a liability rather than an asset.

That is why:

pioneers are isolated

innovators are ridiculed

paradigm shifts feel “crazy” before they feel obvious

Truth does not need majority approval; majorities eventually reorganize around truth.

5. AA Makes Popularity Conceptually Meaningless

At the deepest level, AA (Absolutely Absolute) dissolves the very idea of a popularity contest.

AA is:

not an object

not a concept

not a proposition

not something that can be “believed”

AA is the unspeakable background from which all instances arise. To ask whether AA is popular is like asking whether space has opinions or whether time prefers democracy.

Popularity requires:

subjects

opinions

communication

comparison

AA precedes all of these. It is not validated; it validates everything else.

6. Why Humans Keep Confusing Popularity with Truth

Instancology also explains the psychological root of the error.

Humans are social survival organisms. Agreement feels safe. Dissent feels dangerous. Over time, the brain confuses:

what keeps me accepted

with

what is true

This confusion is amplified by:

politics

religion

ideology

academia

social media

When truth threatens identity, identity fights back—with numbers.

But reality does not yield.

7. The Instancological Conclusion

Truth is not a popularity contest because:

Popularity belongs to RR, truth does not

Consensus measures social alignment, not ontological correctness

Reality corrects belief, not the other way around

Deep truths emerge through WuXing, not voting

AA renders popularity irrelevant at the deepest level

Truth stands even if no one sees it.

Falsehood collapses even if everyone applauds it.

From an Instancology view, the question is never “How many agree?”

The only meaningful question is:

Does this align with the structure of the instance itself?

Everything else is noise.

浏览(864) (1) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
hare
注册日期: 2012-01-13
访问总量: 2,506,506 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· AI 为什么能比人类更好理解既有
· 嫉妒还是真相?
· Chatgpt: how much confidence y
· 西方知识分子的 intellectual ho
· 谁是最伟大的人?
· 台湾应该造原子弹来保卫自己
· 哲学界没有诺贝尔奖,是一件极大
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
· 中国现代哲学家学会:中国现代哲
· Madhatter:English_only的博客
分类目录
【公告】
· 声明关于人工智能帮助写作
· 川小子承认输了,“但你等着,我
· 他们能算中国人吗?
· 对待文化和语言就应像对待手机
· 关于“范例哲学”的声明
· 支持发展哲学建个人音乐网页
· 《论范例》第一版出版日期:2013
· 【论范例】建议网名改真名通知
· 【】范例电视台本周末讲座预告【
· 关于“范例电视台”的几点说明
【政治】
· 台湾应该造原子弹来保卫自己
· 维护世界秩序需不需要警察?——从
· 为什么中国人热衷社交“面子”,却
· 一个山货郎的狂妄:对无知、自大
· 为什么在中国什么都可以造假?——
· 川普与习再会——中美关系的百年恩
· 给四中全会新头目——为什么美国对
· 中国走向“大号北朝鲜”的10个社会
· 钱学森、杨振宁与爱因斯坦:科学
· 从杨振宁放弃美籍看中国读书人的
【知识分子】
· 西方知识分子的 intellectual ho
· 为什么世界往往不喜欢哲学家?
· 从世界一流人才的聚集看美国的伟
· 中国读书人为什么看不清皇权专制
· a comprehensive list of 20 b
· 从中国音乐、数学、文字、哲学、
· 为什么中国读书人不喜欢“人人平
· 知识的背叛
· 中国读书人为什么普遍拒绝普世价
· 中国缺乏哲学的“思辨思想体系”
【生活】
· 嫉妒还是真相?
· 谁是最伟大的人?
· 哲学界没有诺贝尔奖,是一件极大
· 摘抄: 为什么有些人无法适应美
· 从“姜昆加州豪宅过圣诞唱《我爱
· ‘’笼中‘’乐:好吃好喝好压抑(回
· 落霞与孤鹭齐飞,秋水与长天一色
· 谁敢举手?——AI 时代的人类自尊
· 博士诚可贵,诺奖价更高,若为真
· 在社会的大房间里,文学是画,哲
【Test】
· 中国的读书人- 政治盲人
· 学外语前个人的语言天赋量化测定
· U r invited to give your BEST
· 2020年美国大选最大的贼-川普本
· 周末思绪
· 海外华人里谁的英语最牛(3)
【绝学】
· AI 为什么能比人类更好理解既有
· Chatgpt: how much confidence y
· Below is a structured philosop
· Why Plato, Aristotle, and Inst
· The Six Tools of Epistemology
· 一切研究的方向其核心都是指明未
· Why AA Is Not Reality but the
· 《范式哲学》在中西思想史中的位
· Reaching AA from three angles
· Philosophy Isn’t Ended, It’s C
存档目录
2026-01-02 - 2026-01-26
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-30
2025-09-05 - 2025-09-28
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-10 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-13 - 2025-02-17
2023-12-20 - 2023-12-24
2023-11-08 - 2023-11-29
2023-10-01 - 2023-10-20
2023-09-03 - 2023-09-19
2023-03-21 - 2023-03-21
2023-01-07 - 2023-01-22
2022-12-04 - 2022-12-04
2022-11-27 - 2022-11-28
2022-09-11 - 2022-09-11
2022-08-07 - 2022-08-07
2022-07-11 - 2022-07-25
2022-06-01 - 2022-06-07
2022-05-05 - 2022-05-29
2022-04-01 - 2022-04-26
2022-03-02 - 2022-03-30
2022-02-12 - 2022-02-28
2022-01-02 - 2022-01-22
2021-12-01 - 2021-12-30
2021-11-03 - 2021-11-27
2021-10-01 - 2021-10-23
2021-09-11 - 2021-09-30
2021-08-05 - 2021-08-22
2021-07-04 - 2021-07-31
2021-05-09 - 2021-05-17
2021-04-18 - 2021-04-18
2021-02-01 - 2021-02-13
2021-01-04 - 2021-01-22
2020-12-17 - 2020-12-17
2020-11-09 - 2020-11-29
2020-10-23 - 2020-10-24
2020-03-21 - 2020-03-21
2020-01-19 - 2020-01-25
2019-08-04 - 2019-08-21
2019-07-04 - 2019-07-05
2019-06-28 - 2019-06-28
2019-05-14 - 2019-05-27
2019-04-06 - 2019-04-26
2019-03-03 - 2019-03-29
2019-02-02 - 2019-02-26
2019-01-01 - 2019-01-31
2018-12-02 - 2018-12-31
2018-11-02 - 2018-11-29
2018-10-01 - 2018-10-26
2018-09-02 - 2018-09-27
2018-08-01 - 2018-08-31
2018-07-01 - 2018-07-31
2018-06-02 - 2018-06-29
2018-05-01 - 2018-05-27
2018-04-05 - 2018-04-25
2018-03-01 - 2018-03-30
2018-02-06 - 2018-02-25
2018-01-06 - 2018-01-31
2017-12-01 - 2017-12-31
2017-11-04 - 2017-11-26
2017-10-27 - 2017-10-27
2017-08-25 - 2017-08-31
2017-07-11 - 2017-07-15
2017-04-02 - 2017-04-25
2017-01-18 - 2017-01-18
2016-11-15 - 2016-11-15
2016-04-04 - 2016-04-11
2016-03-01 - 2016-03-31
2016-02-14 - 2016-02-29
2016-01-08 - 2016-01-24
2015-10-08 - 2015-10-08
2015-09-03 - 2015-09-25
2015-08-03 - 2015-08-29
2015-07-27 - 2015-07-31
2015-06-12 - 2015-06-12
2015-05-16 - 2015-05-16
2015-04-25 - 2015-04-25
2015-03-03 - 2015-03-07
2015-02-14 - 2015-02-22
2015-01-03 - 2015-01-25
2014-12-08 - 2014-12-08
2014-11-12 - 2014-11-27
2014-10-01 - 2014-10-30
2014-09-04 - 2014-09-29
2014-08-04 - 2014-08-14
2014-07-13 - 2014-07-24
2014-06-15 - 2014-06-29
2014-05-04 - 2014-05-25
2014-04-21 - 2014-04-26
2014-03-01 - 2014-03-16
2014-02-02 - 2014-02-26
2014-01-01 - 2014-01-26
2013-12-01 - 2013-12-26
2013-11-27 - 2013-11-30
2013-10-12 - 2013-10-17
2013-09-03 - 2013-09-15
2013-08-07 - 2013-08-31
2013-07-13 - 2013-07-23
2013-06-05 - 2013-06-19
2013-05-06 - 2013-05-31
2013-04-02 - 2013-04-30
2013-03-14 - 2013-03-28
2013-02-02 - 2013-02-27
2013-01-04 - 2013-01-30
2012-12-03 - 2012-12-31
2012-11-01 - 2012-11-30
2012-10-01 - 2012-10-31
2012-09-01 - 2012-09-29
2012-08-01 - 2012-08-27
2012-07-01 - 2012-07-30
2012-06-02 - 2012-06-28
2012-05-03 - 2012-05-30
2012-04-04 - 2012-04-26
2012-03-01 - 2012-03-09
2012-02-02 - 2012-02-29
2012-01-12 - 2012-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.