新聞媒體的九種類型 《媒體偏見事實檢查》網頁（https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/）列出九種類型的網站（最少偏見，偏左，中間偏左，中間偏右，偏右，陰謀-偽科學，可疑來源，親科學，諷刺）。這家網頁提供了它評判左右的標準（https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/left-vs-right-bias-how-we-rate-the-bias-of-media-sources/），供大家參考。這網頁包括了大多數新聞媒體，如果誰想查一查某個新聞媒體，偏左還是偏右，極左還是極右，搞笑還是嚴肅新聞，假科學還是真科學，假消息還是陰謀論，你基本上都可以得到參考。 《媒體偏見事實檢查》網頁評論美國的美聯社和英國的路透社（www.reuters.com），是最少偏見而且事實可查的可靠新聞媒體。這裡選擇了一些著名媒體和它們孰左孰右，包括對一左（CNN）和一右（FOX）作的評價，由讀者自我評判。實際上，世界從來沒有真正中立的，《媒體偏見事實檢查》網頁的編輯們，也許都是中間偏左的。 美國新聞媒體中的三大支柱（ABC, CBS, NBC），《媒體偏見事實檢查》網頁把它們歸於中間偏左的。儘管它們的觀眾在減少，但是它們與CNN和赫芬頓郵報加起來，比中間偏右和偏右媒體加起來，顯然勢力強得多。因此，總體來講，媒體是傾向左的。 美國是自由世界，誰都有權利選擇他（她）喜歡的新聞媒體和頻道。你可以把“信誓旦旦”的搞笑媒體，當作已經驗證的事實，誰都不會在乎。有人喜歡小報（tabloid），有人喜歡大報，青菜蘿蔔，各取所需。 左派洗腦，右派也洗腦。腦子深洗後的邪教徒，選擇自殺；腦子深洗後的左右派，選擇腦子終生殘廢。 註：下面中文來自谷歌翻譯，多數是照搬的。 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 最少偏見: 這些資料來源的偏見極小，使用加重詞彙很少（試圖通過吸引情感或刻板印象來影響聽眾的措詞）。 它的報道是事實的和通常有來源的。 這些是最可靠的媒體來源。 
總體而言，由於對新聞稿的偏左編輯，我們對美聯社的評分為臨界線上的“左中偏見”。但由於對故事的平衡選擇，我們對它的總體評價為“最少偏見”。 由於適當的採集和乾淨的事實檢查記錄，我們也將他們的事實報告評為“非常高”。 總體而言，由於對信息的正確選擇，偏見最少，事實核對記錄清晰，我們根據客觀報告對路透社最偏見進行評級，對事實報告的評價為“非常高”。 偏左：這些媒體來源通過故事選擇和/或政治聯繫而對自由主義事業有中等偏重的偏見。 他們可能會使用帶有強烈含義的單詞（試圖通過訴諸情感或刻板印象來影響聽眾的措詞），發布誤導性報告，並忽略可能破壞自由主義原因的信息報告。 此類別中的某些來源可能是不可信的。 總體而言，我們對CNN的偏見是基於始終偏愛左翼的社論立場，而直接新聞報道則由於疏忽而偏左。由於電視節目主持人多次事實檢查失敗，我們也將他們評為“事實報道混合”。但是，網站上的新聞報道往往可以通過最少的事實檢查得到正確的來源。 總體而言，我們根據故事選擇和偏愛左派的社論立場，對《 HuffPost左偏愛》進行評分。由於事實檢查失敗和偽科學的推廣，我們也將其評為“事實報道混合”。 中間偏左：這些媒體來源有輕微到中等的自由主義偏見。 他們經常發布事實信息，這些信息利用加載的單詞（試圖通過訴諸情感或刻板印象來影響聽眾的措詞）來支持自由主義事業。 這些來源通常值得信賴，但可能需要進一步調查。 總的來說，我們對紐約時報左派人士的偏見是基於對單詞和故事的選擇，偏向於左派人士，但事實性強，由於適當的採購和受人尊敬的記者/編輯，因此被認為是最可靠的新聞信息來源之一。 失敗的事實檢查是在Op-Ed上進行的，不是直接的新聞報道。 中間偏右：這些媒體來源在偏見方面略有保守。 他們經常發布事實信息，這些信息利用加載的單詞（試圖通過訴諸情感或刻板印象來影響聽眾的措詞）來支持保守的原因。 這些來源通常值得信賴，但可能需要進一步調查。
總體而言，我們對《華爾街日報》右中心的偏見歸因於新聞報道的偏低以及偏右的強烈編輯立場。 由於反氣候，反科學立場以及偶發的誤導性社論，我們也將其評為“大多數”，而不是“高”。
偏右：這些媒體來源通過故事選擇和/或政治派別在某種程度上偏向保守派。他們可能會使用帶有強烈含義的單詞（試圖通過訴諸情感或刻板印象來影響聽眾的措詞），發布誤導性報告，並忽略可能破壞保守原因的信息報告。此類別中的某些來源可能是不可信的。 總體而言，我們根據偏愛保守派/自由主義者權利的社論和政策立場，對哈德森學院的“權利偏見”進行了評分。 由於適當的採購和乾淨的事實檢查記錄，我們也將他們的事實報告評為高。 我們對福克斯新聞的評價為極右偏，因為其偏愛社論的立場和故事選擇。 我們還根據資源匱乏和陰謀理論的傳播對他們進行了事實和邊界可疑的混合評估。 陰謀-偽科學 可疑來源 親科學 諷刺 以下來自https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Least Biased: These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. 
· Associated Press (apnews.com)-USA Overall, we rate the Associated Press borderline Left-Center Biased due to left-leaning editorializing, but Least Biased on the whole due to balanced story selection. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. · Reuters (www.reuters.com)-United Kingdom Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record. Left Bias：These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. · CNN (www.cnn.com)-USA Overall, we rate CNN left biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the left, while straight news reporting falls left-center through bias by omission. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks by TV hosts. However, news reporting on the website tends to be properly sourced with minimal failed fact checks. · Huffington Post (www.huffingtonpost.com)-USA Overall, we rate HuffPost Left-Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and the promotion of pseudoscience. Left-Center Bias：These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. · ABC News (abcnews.go.com)-USA · BBC News (www.bbc.com) -United Kingdom · CBS News (www.cbsnews.com) -USA · NBC News (www.nbcnews.com) -USA · New York Times (www.nytimes.com) -USA Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well-respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting. Right-Center Bias：These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. · Cato Institute (www.cato.org) · Chicago Tribune (www.chicagotribune.com) -USA Overall, we rate the Chicago Tribune Right-Center biased based on moderately right-leaning editorial positions and High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. · Forbes (www.forbes.com) -USA · New York Post (nypost.com) -USA · Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com) -USA Right Bias ：These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. · Hudson Institute (www.hudson.org) -USA Overall, we rate the Hudson Institute Right Biased based on editorial and policy positions that favor the conservative/libertarian right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. · Fox News (www.foxnews.com) -USA We rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually and borderline Questionable based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy-Pseudoscience Questionable Sources Pro-Science Satire
| 
