设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  YDX的博客
  YDX的博客
我的名片
-YDX-
注册日期: 2010-08-29
访问总量: 748,712 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
最新发布
· 给肯特州立大屠杀受难者平反不符
· 除暴安良的正义感超越国家与制度
· 以人民民主制衡封建官僚主义是反
· 为什么中国能拿乒乓球冠军却拿不
· 从杨开慧的死看历史为什么选择了
· 大众社会的操控模式与互联网时代
· 肯特州立事件的平反问题
友好链接
分类目录
【日志】
· 给肯特州立大屠杀受难者平反不符
· 除暴安良的正义感超越国家与制度
· 以人民民主制衡封建官僚主义是反
· 为什么中国能拿乒乓球冠军却拿不
· 从杨开慧的死看历史为什么选择了
· 大众社会的操控模式与互联网时代
· 肯特州立事件的平反问题
· 什么是哥特建筑--历史知识
· 尝试翻译温家宝总理的几句话
· 华裔女生偷窥、白人男生自杀事件
存档目录
06/01/2012 - 06/30/2012
05/01/2012 - 05/31/2012
04/01/2012 - 04/30/2012
03/01/2012 - 03/31/2012
02/01/2012 - 02/29/2012
01/01/2012 - 01/31/2012
12/01/2011 - 12/31/2011
11/01/2011 - 11/30/2011
10/01/2011 - 10/31/2011
09/01/2011 - 09/30/2011
08/01/2011 - 08/31/2011
07/01/2011 - 07/31/2011
06/01/2011 - 06/30/2011
05/01/2011 - 05/31/2011
04/01/2011 - 04/30/2011
03/01/2011 - 03/31/2011
02/01/2011 - 02/28/2011
01/01/2011 - 01/31/2011
12/01/2010 - 12/31/2010
11/01/2010 - 11/30/2010
10/01/2010 - 10/31/2010
09/01/2010 - 09/30/2010
08/01/2010 - 08/31/2010
发表评论
作者:
用户名: 密码: 您还不是博客/论坛用户?现在就注册!
     
评论:
朝鲜战争:美军被打得满山跑,能有闲心数杀伤多少共军吗?
   
Korean War FAQ Copyright(C) , 1998, All rights reserved. 21. How many casualties did PVA suffer? Western sources gave assertions such as "it seems reasonable to assume that China cannot have lost less than half a million men" , "China suffered at least 900,000 casualties", etc. However, such numbers were based on arbitrary estimates which were greatly inflated. For example, US estimated that in the battle of Chosin reservoir, the Marines air power killed 10,000 Chinese and wounded 5,000, the numbers were artificially high and no evidence could be found to back up these claims. From western combat histories, PVA always cease the fighting at dawn and went to cover, and their white clothing made it very hard to detect even by the Marines at close distance let alone by aircrafts. US estimated that the Marines killed a total of 25,000 PVA troops and wounded 12,500 in the Chosin battle, one has to wonder that if the Marines alone could kill 20% and wound 10% of the entire PVA 9th Army Group, why did the X Corps have to abandon Task Force MacLean and put itself in such a vulnerable situation at the Hungnam beachhead, and then bug out North Korea. For another example, 2d division historian wrote that 2d division alone had "killed more than 65,000 enemy soldiers", this was based on figures from dividual regiments, such as 9th Infantry, which claimed "total enemy casualties to be 16505, of which 2200 were counted". In the "Wonju shoot" of February 14 1951, 2d division claimed killing 5000 PVA troops with artillery alone, and wounded 3 times more. For another example, Van Fleet claimed that UN had inflicted a communist casualty of 234,000 from August to October 1951 during which truce talks were in recess, such an estimate is considered "far too high" by western historians. There are a lot of such cases, when a western historian quoted communist casualty numbers, he had to qualify it with words such as "arbitrary", "far too high", etc. From the overly inflated numbers, it seems that US generals are not accountable for their battle results, while in PLA, it is a serious misconduct to report false casualty numbers of either side, since such false reports would result in wrong calculations by the nation's leaders. On the US side, American statisticians calculated that in the 8 months ending June 25 1951, PVA suffered a casualty of 600,000 (which would imply that every PVA soldier entered Korea became a casualty), and UN suffered 290,000 (among which 78,800 were American), such gross miscalculations by Washington led to the illusion that US was winning and prolonged the war. It is understandable that US could not get a accurate estimate of the communist casualties, UN forces were on the run for escape most of the time, they could not have the chance to count their kills.
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.