設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
     
  YDX的博客
  YDX的博客
網絡日誌正文
朝鮮戰爭:美軍被打得滿山跑,能有閒心數殺傷多少共軍嗎? 2010-10-29 07:45:22

Korean War FAQ

Copyright(C) , 1998, All rights reserved.

21. How many casualties did PVA suffer?

Western sources gave assertions such as "it seems reasonable to assume that China cannot have lost less than half a million men" , "China suffered at least 900,000 casualties", etc. However, such numbers were based on arbitrary estimates which were greatly inflated.

For example, US estimated that in the battle of Chosin reservoir, the Marines air power killed 10,000 Chinese and wounded 5,000, the numbers were artificially high and no evidence could be found to back up these claims. From western combat histories, PVA always cease the fighting at dawn and went to cover, and their white clothing made it very hard to detect even by the Marines at close distance let alone by aircrafts. US estimated that the Marines killed a total of 25,000 PVA troops and wounded 12,500 in the Chosin battle, one has to wonder that if the Marines alone could kill 20% and wound 10% of the entire PVA 9th Army Group, why did the X Corps have to abandon Task Force MacLean and put itself in such a vulnerable situation at the Hungnam beachhead, and then bug out North Korea. For another example, 2d division historian wrote that 2d division alone had "killed more than 65,000 enemy soldiers", this was based on figures from dividual regiments, such as 9th Infantry, which claimed "total enemy casualties to be 16505, of which 2200 were counted". In the "Wonju shoot" of February 14 1951, 2d division claimed killing 5000 PVA troops with artillery alone, and wounded 3 times more. For another example, Van Fleet claimed that UN had inflicted a communist casualty of 234,000 from August to October 1951 during which truce talks were in recess, such an estimate is considered "far too high" by western historians. There are a lot of such cases, when a western historian quoted communist casualty numbers, he had to qualify it with words such as "arbitrary", "far too high", etc.

From the overly inflated numbers, it seems that US generals are not accountable for their battle results, while in PLA, it is a serious misconduct to report false casualty numbers of either side, since such false reports would result in wrong calculations by the nation's leaders. On the US side, American statisticians calculated that in the 8 months ending June 25 1951, PVA suffered a casualty of 600,000 (which would imply that every PVA soldier entered Korea became a casualty), and UN suffered 290,000 (among which 78,800 were American), such gross miscalculations by Washington led to the illusion that US was winning and prolonged the war.

It is understandable that US could not get a accurate estimate of the communist casualties, UN forces were on the run for escape most of the time, they could not have the chance to count their kills.
瀏覽(2062) (0) 評論(0)
發表評論
我的名片
-YDX-
註冊日期: 2010-08-29
訪問總量: 791,824 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
最新發布
· 給肯特州立大屠殺受難者平反不符
· 除暴安良的正義感超越國家與制度
· 以人民民主制衡封建官僚主義是反
· 為什麼中國能拿乒乓球冠軍卻拿不
· 從楊開慧的死看歷史為什麼選擇了
· 大眾社會的操控模式與互聯網時代
· 肯特州立事件的平反問題
分類目錄
【日誌】
· 給肯特州立大屠殺受難者平反不符
· 除暴安良的正義感超越國家與制度
· 以人民民主制衡封建官僚主義是反
· 為什麼中國能拿乒乓球冠軍卻拿不
· 從楊開慧的死看歷史為什麼選擇了
· 大眾社會的操控模式與互聯網時代
· 肯特州立事件的平反問題
· 什麼是哥特建築--歷史知識
· 嘗試翻譯溫家寶總理的幾句話
· 華裔女生偷窺、白人男生自殺事件
存檔目錄
2012-06-03 - 2012-06-03
2012-05-11 - 2012-05-11
2012-04-03 - 2012-04-15
2012-03-02 - 2012-03-29
2012-02-01 - 2012-02-28
2012-01-13 - 2012-01-31
2011-12-04 - 2011-12-28
2011-11-03 - 2011-11-24
2011-10-03 - 2011-10-29
2011-09-01 - 2011-09-25
2011-08-16 - 2011-08-31
2011-07-01 - 2011-07-27
2011-06-04 - 2011-06-29
2011-05-04 - 2011-05-31
2011-04-02 - 2011-04-28
2011-03-05 - 2011-03-28
2011-02-01 - 2011-02-28
2011-01-03 - 2011-01-27
2010-12-01 - 2010-12-31
2010-11-03 - 2010-11-30
2010-10-03 - 2010-10-30
2010-09-29 - 2010-09-30
2010-08-28 - 2010-08-29
 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.