设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  YDX的博客
  YDX的博客
网络日志正文
美国何时为排华法案道歉? 2011-09-25 21:29:39
有人在看了我的那篇1952年加州投票废除排华条款的文章后,说美国联邦政府在1943年废除了CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT (8 U.S.C. S 261 etc).,因此加州宪法排华条款即使不废除,也与联邦法冲突。

我本来不想去回应这个显然比较愚蠢的说法。如果有一条联邦法叫“中国人保护法”,那么一条与之冲突的州法可能无效。但废除了联邦CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT,就是说这条联邦法律不存在了,一条州法怎么可能与一条不存在的联邦法冲突呢?况且,在美国的体制下,各州有POLICE POWER,在这个名目下制定的法律不在联邦约束的范围。加州的COOLIE法就是在POLICE POWER的名目下。

但我们的探讨不限于此,我们可以扩大范围,假设加州的排华宪法不属于州的POLICE POWER范畴,那么它是否违反了美国的联邦宪法呢?

对这个问题,美国最高法院在 The Chinese Exclusion Case, 130 U. S. 581中做了明确的判决:"That the government of the United States,... can exclude [Chinese] from its territory is a proposition which we do not think open to controversy." 这个判例从来没有被推翻过,到今天美国各级法院还在引用。

也就是说,根据美国最高法院的判决,排华法案在不过是美国国会、或者加州可定、可不定的法律。联邦在1943年废除CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT是为了二战中获取中国的支持,更多的是象征意义,因为新法规定每年来美的华人名额只有100人。整个落砂机地区在排华法制定后60年内,没有一个华人婴儿降生,每年100人的名额解决不了广大华工的生存问题。

至于加州废除排华宪法是因为朝鲜战争的东风,这是历史定论。西方人还是尊重强者的、蔑视瘪三的。非洲 ZULU人最后虽然是败给了英国人,而且死了1万多人,但能打死一千多英国人,就一直令西方人钦佩不已。

最近,一个美国记者观察了中国从利比亚撤走国民的过程,他注意到,中国人一个个身体健实,排着整齐的队伍,红旗一展,一言不发、目不斜视地鱼贯通过,对机场出售的高级商品看都不看一眼。他感叹道,不知道应该是敬佩还是敬畏。但有一点,他认为是毫无疑问的:“我们最好是让他们站在我们一边”。

当美国更多的有识之士意识到这一点的时候,也就是美国为排华法案道歉的时候。


Read more: 美国何时为排华法案道歉? - 岳东晓的日志 - 贝壳村 - 
浏览(880) (0) 评论(8)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:黑河人 留言时间:2011-09-27 18:49:12
xux9001:

100% agreed with you. thanks! I understood something as you said it is a 150+years struggle for the right of Chinese american.

Aout that new about CA congresswoman and Canadian gov., i might be mismemoried.
回复 | 0
作者:xux9001 留言时间:2011-09-27 18:31:05
There are a few misconceptions of your views:

1. Chinese exclusion act was repealed only during in World War II. That means, for almost half century, a US person (remember, not a us citizen) with a chinese heritage was treated as a sub-human for his or her entire life. There were no slightest freedom to normal lifehood and citizenship. How can a human being living under such a draconian act as Chinese exclusions act enjoyed a life that is "way better than the Chinese living in his or her motherland?" The tremendous injury Chinese exclusion act inflicted upon Chinese Americans are beyond simple comprehension, not to mention its long lasting ferocious social impact on Chinese American of modern days. For example, Chinese males under Chinese exclusion act were not afforded the very basic human natural biological rights such as freedome to life and reproduce and having a family to pass his genes. And the suffering was designed intentionally to cause lifelong harms to Chinese American community in not only social and economic way, but more psychologically as a means to demoralize the community as a whole. This is equivalent to racial cleansing. Didn't you still see the isolations that all the Chinese males are suffering in this country??? Isn't that enough for a cause of action for relief from the supreme court of United states and a formal apology from the United State Government.

2. Again, Chinese Americans won their right through their own endeavors and for their own cause. Read the book i recommend and you will see the constant struggles that Chinese Americans in this land went through. We, Chinese Americans, in this country are simple outnumbered by the Whites, Blacks, and Latinos. This theory proves correct if you are to use Canada as an counter-example. The Dominion of Canada has about 10% of populations with Chinese heritage, which are capable of supporting a large number of ballots influencing the Canadian day-to-day political life. There is a mere 1% of Chinese populations in US, not to mentioning there is a constant flow of Chinese women volunteer to give away themselves to other races. Now, you may say this sex bias is unfound, but how about this Barack Obama. Is he a black or white? He put down his race as black during the national census. Why!!! Alas, because he considered his father the dominant race and his mother white race the submissive one in this sexual and matrimonial relationship. So, with such a infinitesmal population of Chinese Americans and constant attritions aforementioned, don't you think that every person with Chinese heritage nowadays should cheer those Chinese American as pioneers for their heroic bravery of perseverance and striving for survival? Don't you think they are the true pioneers to establish Chinese heritage in this country. Without their persistence and the foundations they built throughout those arduous years, all the Chinese American endeavors and advancement later in this country would have not been possible.
3. In conclusions, simple admit your chinese heritage. Forbide yourself from self-dividing. Have more childrens to populate this country. And united together and fight for your rights that you deserve in this country!
回复 | 0
作者:黑河人 留言时间:2011-09-27 18:10:35
谢过岳先生!您提出的是正事,是身在美国入籍或拿绿卡的人应该时刻放在心上的一件大事。目前中美关系尚可,明争暗斗而已,一旦有什么过不去的事情发生,则我们这些人一定倒霉。二战时的在美日本人不是都关进集中营了?

只是这事要有出头人。今年加州的国会众议员提出请政府学习加拿大公开道歉,但是奥巴马没有做。说明还是有阻力。愚人担心的是他根本不会道歉,而是等待着什么事情发生。本次经济危机怕是只能以某种形式的战争,重新安排债务和经济秩序才可结束。

一直注意博主在贺梅案中的的努力和成功。特表敬意!
回复 | 0
作者:破棉袄 留言时间:2011-09-27 17:14:53
和xux9001商榷:
美國的制度既有公平正義的一面,也有黑暗邪惡的一面。骆家輝的“一英里的故事”恰恰同時反映這兩個方面。骆家輝強調其正面意議,可能也有政治家的考慮。他的選民應該是白人,而不是中國人。所以他必須說出讓白人喜歡听的話。反過來,黑人政客都是從黑人選區走出來的,說話的方式就會完全不同了。
回复 | 0
作者:xux9001 留言时间:2011-09-27 16:02:35
Furthermore, every single Americans of Chinese heritage should educate him or herself of the history of Chinese Exclusion Act. Indeed, more articles should relate this important topic in the public life of Chinese Americans.

This article should always be on the front page of all the Chinese website so that there is a constant reminder for this extremely unfortunate past of American history.

The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, as Thomas Jefferson said.
回复 | 0
作者:xux9001 留言时间:2011-09-27 15:55:20
Hi:

I really appreciated this article.

To answer the question that why Chinese in this country did not fight back: it was because there were NOT enough Americans of Chinese heritage in this country. However, that is not to say that Chinese Americans did not fight back. They had fought back relentless and heroically many many times, but were simply outnumbered by the Whites. We, Chinese Americans, really has endured the most suffering in this country, far more than any other races. Everyday, we are facing injustice and prejudice.

So, friends, let's unite together and fight for the long overdue JUSTICE for the Chinese Americans. Please do not ridicule your fellow country men any more and take pride in your own heritage.

To learn more about this bitter part of Chinese American history, I would suggest the following books:

1. Driven Out: The Forgotten War Against Chinese Americans by Jean Pfaelzer.
2. The Chinese in America : A Narrative History by Iris Chang(the same author for Rape of Nanking).
回复 | 0
作者:破棉袄 留言时间:2011-09-27 13:01:07
我也不明白在美国的中国人,特别是受害人及其后代为什么不闹腾。特别像骆家晖这样的家庭,三代人都是受害人。自己出头之后,只强调“一英里的故事”来说明美国梦的正面性,而忽略了作为三代华裔的心酸泪。我想一个原因是具有中国文化背景的人,都是顺民,能活着,就不折腾。另一个原因可能是,美国的华裔历史上受排华法案的影响,和其他族裔比较起来是很惨,但是比较起来祖国家乡的父老(不管是清朝,民国和共产时期),他们简直是生活在天堂。占了这个便宜,华裔心里还是满塌实的,也就是不非叫美国政府道歉了。
回复 | 0
作者:华山 留言时间:2011-09-27 04:20:34
这件事,在美的华人还不如加拿大的华人积极。
回复 | 0
我的名片
-YDX-
注册日期: 2010-08-29
访问总量: 739,038 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 给肯特州立大屠杀受难者平反不符
· 除暴安良的正义感超越国家与制度
· 以人民民主制衡封建官僚主义是反
· 为什么中国能拿乒乓球冠军却拿不
· 从杨开慧的死看历史为什么选择了
· 大众社会的操控模式与互联网时代
· 肯特州立事件的平反问题
分类目录
【日志】
· 给肯特州立大屠杀受难者平反不符
· 除暴安良的正义感超越国家与制度
· 以人民民主制衡封建官僚主义是反
· 为什么中国能拿乒乓球冠军却拿不
· 从杨开慧的死看历史为什么选择了
· 大众社会的操控模式与互联网时代
· 肯特州立事件的平反问题
· 什么是哥特建筑--历史知识
· 尝试翻译温家宝总理的几句话
· 华裔女生偷窥、白人男生自杀事件
存档目录
2012-06-03 - 2012-06-03
2012-05-11 - 2012-05-11
2012-04-03 - 2012-04-15
2012-03-02 - 2012-03-29
2012-02-01 - 2012-02-28
2012-01-13 - 2012-01-31
2011-12-04 - 2011-12-28
2011-11-03 - 2011-11-24
2011-10-03 - 2011-10-29
2011-09-01 - 2011-09-25
2011-08-16 - 2011-08-31
2011-07-01 - 2011-07-27
2011-06-04 - 2011-06-29
2011-05-04 - 2011-05-31
2011-04-02 - 2011-04-28
2011-03-05 - 2011-03-28
2011-02-01 - 2011-02-28
2011-01-03 - 2011-01-27
2010-12-01 - 2010-12-31
2010-11-03 - 2010-11-30
2010-10-03 - 2010-10-30
2010-09-29 - 2010-09-30
2010-08-28 - 2010-08-29
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. CyberMedia Network /Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.