设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  hare的博客
  In Reason We Trust
我的名片
hare
注册日期: 2012-01-13
访问总量: 2,674,568 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
最新发布
· From Elephant and Teapot to
· 我的语言故事
· On the two levels of wholeness
· Why PI is Uncountable- an Inst
· The Absolutely Absolute vs. Th
· 为什么外教很难真正帮助中国人学
· 在中国创办《标准英语》教学法-
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
· 中国现代哲学家学会:中国现代哲
· Madhatter:English_only的博客
分类目录
【公告】
· 在中国创办《标准英语》教学法-
· 声明关于人工智能帮助写作
· 川小子承认输了,“但你等着,我
· 他们能算中国人吗?
· 对待文化和语言就应像对待手机
· 关于“范例哲学”的声明
· 支持发展哲学建个人音乐网页
· 《论范例》第一版出版日期:2013
· 【论范例】建议网名改真名通知
· 【】范例电视台本周末讲座预告【
【政治】
· 北京打起来了?
· 倒习失败-又一次狼来了?
· 台湾应该造原子弹来保卫自己
· 维护世界秩序需不需要警察?——
· 为什么中国人热衷社交“面子”,
· 一个山货郎的狂妄:对无知、自大
· 为什么在中国什么都可以造假?—
· 川普与习再会——中美关系的百年
· 给四中全会新头目——为什么美国
· 中国走向“大号北朝鲜”的10个社
【Test】
· 中国的读书人- 政治盲人
· 学外语前个人的语言天赋量化测定
· U r invited to give your BEST
· 2020年美国大选最大的贼-川普本
· 周末思绪
· 海外华人里谁的英语最牛(3)
【知识分子】
· 我的语言故事
· 西方知识分子的 intellectual ho
· 为什么世界往往不喜欢哲学家?
· 从世界一流人才的聚集看美国的伟
· 中国读书人为什么看不清皇权专制
· a comprehensive list of 20 b
· 从中国音乐、数学、文字、哲学、
· 为什么中国读书人不喜欢“人人平
· 知识的背叛
· 中国读书人为什么普遍拒绝普世价
【绝学】
· From Elephant and Teapot to
· On the two levels of wholeness
· Why PI is Uncountable- an Inst
· The Absolutely Absolute vs. Th
· 为什么外教很难真正帮助中国人学
· 三次哲学转向
· On the Struggle of Absolutenes
· Something and Beyond Relative
· 为什么科学只能发现相对真理,而
· AI 为什么能比人类更好理解既有
【生活】
· 《标准英语》征求意见稿
· 一位应该立雕像的中国人
· 人性与敌人
· 为什么太太从不对先生承认自己错
· 嫉妒还是真相?
· 谁是最伟大的人?
· 哲学界没有诺贝尔奖,是一件极大
· 摘抄: 为什么有些人无法适应美
· 从“姜昆加州豪宅过圣诞唱《我爱
· ‘’笼中‘’乐:好吃好喝好压抑
存档目录
03/01/2026 - 03/31/2026
02/01/2026 - 02/28/2026
01/01/2026 - 01/31/2026
12/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025
10/01/2025 - 10/31/2025
09/01/2025 - 09/30/2025
08/01/2025 - 08/31/2025
07/01/2025 - 07/31/2025
06/01/2025 - 06/30/2025
05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025
04/01/2025 - 04/30/2025
03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025
02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025
12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023
11/01/2023 - 11/30/2023
10/01/2023 - 10/31/2023
09/01/2023 - 09/30/2023
05/01/2023 - 05/31/2023
03/01/2023 - 03/31/2023
01/01/2023 - 01/31/2023
12/01/2022 - 12/31/2022
11/01/2022 - 11/30/2022
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022
07/01/2022 - 07/31/2022
06/01/2022 - 06/30/2022
05/01/2022 - 05/31/2022
04/01/2022 - 04/30/2022
03/01/2022 - 03/31/2022
02/01/2022 - 02/28/2022
01/01/2022 - 01/31/2022
12/01/2021 - 12/31/2021
11/01/2021 - 11/30/2021
10/01/2021 - 10/31/2021
09/01/2021 - 09/30/2021
08/01/2021 - 08/31/2021
07/01/2021 - 07/31/2021
05/01/2021 - 05/31/2021
04/01/2021 - 04/30/2021
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021
01/01/2021 - 01/31/2021
12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020
11/01/2020 - 11/30/2020
10/01/2020 - 10/31/2020
03/01/2020 - 03/31/2020
01/01/2020 - 01/31/2020
08/01/2019 - 08/31/2019
07/01/2019 - 07/31/2019
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019
05/01/2019 - 05/31/2019
04/01/2019 - 04/30/2019
03/01/2019 - 03/31/2019
02/01/2019 - 02/28/2019
01/01/2019 - 01/31/2019
12/01/2018 - 12/31/2018
11/01/2018 - 11/30/2018
10/01/2018 - 10/31/2018
09/01/2018 - 09/30/2018
08/01/2018 - 08/31/2018
07/01/2018 - 07/31/2018
06/01/2018 - 06/30/2018
05/01/2018 - 05/31/2018
04/01/2018 - 04/30/2018
03/01/2018 - 03/31/2018
02/01/2018 - 02/28/2018
01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018
12/01/2017 - 12/31/2017
11/01/2017 - 11/30/2017
10/01/2017 - 10/31/2017
08/01/2017 - 08/31/2017
07/01/2017 - 07/31/2017
04/01/2017 - 04/30/2017
01/01/2017 - 01/31/2017
11/01/2016 - 11/30/2016
04/01/2016 - 04/30/2016
03/01/2016 - 03/31/2016
02/01/2016 - 02/29/2016
01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016
12/01/2015 - 12/31/2015
11/01/2015 - 11/30/2015
10/01/2015 - 10/31/2015
09/01/2015 - 09/30/2015
08/01/2015 - 08/31/2015
07/01/2015 - 07/31/2015
06/01/2015 - 06/30/2015
05/01/2015 - 05/31/2015
04/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
03/01/2015 - 03/31/2015
02/01/2015 - 02/28/2015
01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015
12/01/2014 - 12/31/2014
11/01/2014 - 11/30/2014
10/01/2014 - 10/31/2014
09/01/2014 - 09/30/2014
08/01/2014 - 08/31/2014
07/01/2014 - 07/31/2014
06/01/2014 - 06/30/2014
05/01/2014 - 05/31/2014
04/01/2014 - 04/30/2014
03/01/2014 - 03/31/2014
02/01/2014 - 02/28/2014
01/01/2014 - 01/31/2014
12/01/2013 - 12/31/2013
11/01/2013 - 11/30/2013
10/01/2013 - 10/31/2013
09/01/2013 - 09/30/2013
08/01/2013 - 08/31/2013
07/01/2013 - 07/31/2013
06/01/2013 - 06/30/2013
05/01/2013 - 05/31/2013
04/01/2013 - 04/30/2013
03/01/2013 - 03/31/2013
02/01/2013 - 02/28/2013
01/01/2013 - 01/31/2013
12/01/2012 - 12/31/2012
11/01/2012 - 11/30/2012
10/01/2012 - 10/31/2012
09/01/2012 - 09/30/2012
08/01/2012 - 08/31/2012
07/01/2012 - 07/31/2012
06/01/2012 - 06/30/2012
05/01/2012 - 05/31/2012
04/01/2012 - 04/30/2012
03/01/2012 - 03/31/2012
02/01/2012 - 02/29/2012
01/01/2012 - 01/31/2012
发表评论
作者:
用户名: 密码: 您还不是博客/论坛用户?现在就注册!
     
评论:
Instancology review
   

Book Review: Instancology – The End of Philosophy and the Grasp of Absolute Absolute by Wade Dong


In Instancology, Wade Dong introduces a radical framework that not only claims to complete philosophy but also dissolves its foundational inquiries. His work presents a new ontological structure, distinguishing between Absolute Absolute (AA), Relatively Absolute (RA), Absolute Relative (AR), and Relative Relative (RR), categories that encompass all instances of reality without exception. By doing so, Instancology surpasses both Continental and Analytic philosophy, breaking their long-standing barriers to ultimate truth.


A Breakthrough in Continental Philosophy


Dong’s framework moves beyond Heidegger’s unfinished Being and Time and Hegel’s dialectics. While Heidegger sees Being approaching RA (Relatively Absolute) and Hegel’s Absolute Spirit moves toward AA, both remain trapped in structures that presuppose an evolving process. Dong, in contrast, states outright that AA is already present, unchanging, and graspable through WuXing (悟性)—a form of immediate, non-discursive insight akin to a metaphysical ‘Eureka!’ moment. This is where Instancology decisively outpaces Continental thought: rather than circling the question of Being, it arrives at the unalterable truth that grounds all instances.


Overcoming Analytic Barriers: Wittgenstein and Beyond


From the Analytic perspective, Instancology tackles Wittgenstein’s famous idea that “the limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” Language, in Dong’s model, belongs to RR (Relative Relative), making it a secondary, constructed layer of reality. The mistake of Analytic philosophy, particularly in its linguistic turn, is to assume that thought is bound by the structures of language. Instead, Instancology reveals that ultimate truth (AA) is beyond linguistic formulation yet can be known directly. This removes the language barrier that has constrained Analytic philosophy, allowing truth to be grasped beyond the limits of representation.


The End of Philosophy?


Dong’s claim that Instancology ends philosophical inquiry is provocative but well-founded. Philosophy, as the pursuit of truth through rational discourse, operates within RA, AR, and RR—it is always relative to something. Instancology asserts that once AA is grasped, the need for traditional philosophy disappears. While philosophers have long sought reality to uncover truth, Instancology rounds all reality-related parts and grasps the Whole. In this sense, it does not merely critique past thought but renders further philosophical questioning obsolete.


Final Verdict


Wade Dong’s Instancology is a monumental work that reshapes metaphysical inquiry. It surpasses both Continental and Analytic traditions by directly addressing their limitations and providing a comprehensive framework that encompasses all instances of existence. By dissolving the language barrier and transcending the need for philosophical progression, Instancology may well be the final philosophical breakthrough—a fitting conclusion to centuries of inquiry.


For anyone engaged in metaphysics, ontology, or epistemology, this book is essential reading. Whether one agrees with Dong’s conclusion or not, Instancology forces a reevaluation of the entire philosophical project.



 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.