设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  hare的博客
  In Reason We Trust
我的名片
hare
注册日期: 2012-01-13
访问总量: 2,480,583 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
我的公告栏
最新发布
· 维护世界秩序需不需要警察?——
· Reaching AA from three angles
· Philosophy Isn’t Ended, It’s
· Where Does the Confidence That
· 范式哲学之后,哲学向哪里去?
· 为什么中国人热衷社交“面子”,
· 摘抄: 为什么有些人无法适应美
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
· 中国现代哲学家学会:中国现代哲
· Madhatter:English_only的博客
分类目录
【公告】
· 声明关于人工智能帮助写作
· 川小子承认输了,“但你等着,我
· 他们能算中国人吗?
· 对待文化和语言就应像对待手机
· 关于“范例哲学”的声明
· 支持发展哲学建个人音乐网页
· 《论范例》第一版出版日期:2013
· 【论范例】建议网名改真名通知
· 【】范例电视台本周末讲座预告【
· 关于“范例电视台”的几点说明
【政治】
· 维护世界秩序需不需要警察?——
· 为什么中国人热衷社交“面子”,
· 一个山货郎的狂妄:对无知、自大
· 为什么在中国什么都可以造假?—
· 川普与习再会——中美关系的百年
· 给四中全会新头目——为什么美国
· 中国走向“大号北朝鲜”的10个社
· 钱学森、杨振宁与爱因斯坦:科学
· 从杨振宁放弃美籍看中国读书人的
· My gut feeling: he will get us
【Test】
· 中国的读书人- 政治盲人
· 学外语前个人的语言天赋量化测定
· U r invited to give your BEST
· 2020年美国大选最大的贼-川普本
· 周末思绪
· 海外华人里谁的英语最牛(3)
【知识分子】
· 从世界一流人才的聚集看美国的伟
· 中国读书人为什么看不清皇权专制
· a comprehensive list of 20 b
· 从中国音乐、数学、文字、哲学、
· 为什么中国读书人不喜欢“人人平
· 知识的背叛
· 中国读书人为什么普遍拒绝普世价
· 中国缺乏哲学的“思辨思想体系”
· 欲望与语言教学
· 《常数》的哲学意义
【绝学】
· Reaching AA from three angles
· Philosophy Isn’t Ended, It’s
· Where Does the Confidence That
· 范式哲学之后,哲学向哪里去?
· From Function to Whole: How RA
· 中国的王虹会是数学界的《范式哲
· Why Truth Is Not a Popularity
· This is a clean, mature articu
· From Logic to AI: The Completi
· What Instancology Does—and Do
【生活】
· 摘抄: 为什么有些人无法适应美
· 从“姜昆加州豪宅过圣诞唱《我爱
· ‘’笼中‘’乐:好吃好喝好压抑
· 落霞与孤鹭齐飞,秋水与长天一色
· 谁敢举手?——AI 时代的人类自
· 博士诚可贵,诺奖价更高,若为真
· 在社会的大房间里,文学是画,哲
· 如果我也死了,这是我的墓志铭—
· 为什么户晨风是伟大的中国人?
· 中西文化之别:从等级社会看“乞
存档目录
01/01/2026 - 01/31/2026
12/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025
10/01/2025 - 10/31/2025
09/01/2025 - 09/30/2025
08/01/2025 - 08/31/2025
07/01/2025 - 07/31/2025
06/01/2025 - 06/30/2025
05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025
04/01/2025 - 04/30/2025
03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025
02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025
12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023
11/01/2023 - 11/30/2023
10/01/2023 - 10/31/2023
09/01/2023 - 09/30/2023
05/01/2023 - 05/31/2023
03/01/2023 - 03/31/2023
01/01/2023 - 01/31/2023
12/01/2022 - 12/31/2022
11/01/2022 - 11/30/2022
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022
07/01/2022 - 07/31/2022
06/01/2022 - 06/30/2022
05/01/2022 - 05/31/2022
04/01/2022 - 04/30/2022
03/01/2022 - 03/31/2022
02/01/2022 - 02/28/2022
01/01/2022 - 01/31/2022
12/01/2021 - 12/31/2021
11/01/2021 - 11/30/2021
10/01/2021 - 10/31/2021
09/01/2021 - 09/30/2021
08/01/2021 - 08/31/2021
07/01/2021 - 07/31/2021
05/01/2021 - 05/31/2021
04/01/2021 - 04/30/2021
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021
01/01/2021 - 01/31/2021
12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020
11/01/2020 - 11/30/2020
10/01/2020 - 10/31/2020
03/01/2020 - 03/31/2020
01/01/2020 - 01/31/2020
08/01/2019 - 08/31/2019
07/01/2019 - 07/31/2019
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019
05/01/2019 - 05/31/2019
04/01/2019 - 04/30/2019
03/01/2019 - 03/31/2019
02/01/2019 - 02/28/2019
01/01/2019 - 01/31/2019
12/01/2018 - 12/31/2018
11/01/2018 - 11/30/2018
10/01/2018 - 10/31/2018
09/01/2018 - 09/30/2018
08/01/2018 - 08/31/2018
07/01/2018 - 07/31/2018
06/01/2018 - 06/30/2018
05/01/2018 - 05/31/2018
04/01/2018 - 04/30/2018
03/01/2018 - 03/31/2018
02/01/2018 - 02/28/2018
01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018
12/01/2017 - 12/31/2017
11/01/2017 - 11/30/2017
10/01/2017 - 10/31/2017
08/01/2017 - 08/31/2017
07/01/2017 - 07/31/2017
04/01/2017 - 04/30/2017
01/01/2017 - 01/31/2017
11/01/2016 - 11/30/2016
04/01/2016 - 04/30/2016
03/01/2016 - 03/31/2016
02/01/2016 - 02/29/2016
01/01/2016 - 01/31/2016
12/01/2015 - 12/31/2015
11/01/2015 - 11/30/2015
10/01/2015 - 10/31/2015
09/01/2015 - 09/30/2015
08/01/2015 - 08/31/2015
07/01/2015 - 07/31/2015
06/01/2015 - 06/30/2015
05/01/2015 - 05/31/2015
04/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
03/01/2015 - 03/31/2015
02/01/2015 - 02/28/2015
01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015
12/01/2014 - 12/31/2014
11/01/2014 - 11/30/2014
10/01/2014 - 10/31/2014
09/01/2014 - 09/30/2014
08/01/2014 - 08/31/2014
07/01/2014 - 07/31/2014
06/01/2014 - 06/30/2014
05/01/2014 - 05/31/2014
04/01/2014 - 04/30/2014
03/01/2014 - 03/31/2014
02/01/2014 - 02/28/2014
01/01/2014 - 01/31/2014
12/01/2013 - 12/31/2013
11/01/2013 - 11/30/2013
10/01/2013 - 10/31/2013
09/01/2013 - 09/30/2013
08/01/2013 - 08/31/2013
07/01/2013 - 07/31/2013
06/01/2013 - 06/30/2013
05/01/2013 - 05/31/2013
04/01/2013 - 04/30/2013
03/01/2013 - 03/31/2013
02/01/2013 - 02/28/2013
01/01/2013 - 01/31/2013
12/01/2012 - 12/31/2012
11/01/2012 - 11/30/2012
10/01/2012 - 10/31/2012
09/01/2012 - 09/30/2012
08/01/2012 - 08/31/2012
07/01/2012 - 07/31/2012
06/01/2012 - 06/30/2012
05/01/2012 - 05/31/2012
04/01/2012 - 04/30/2012
03/01/2012 - 03/31/2012
02/01/2012 - 02/29/2012
01/01/2012 - 01/31/2012
发表评论
作者:
用户名: 密码: 您还不是博客/论坛用户?现在就注册!
     
评论:
Introduction to Instancology
   

Introduction to Instancology


Instancology, or the philosophy of paradigms, offers a radical rethinking of metaphysics, epistemology, and ontology by placing the “instance” (范例) at the center of all understanding. Developed by the Chinese philosopher Wade Dong, Instancology posits that everything that exists or is known appears as an instance—neither merely a part of something greater, nor a product of mental construction, but as a concrete, self-contained expression of a deeper relational order.


At its core, Instancology challenges the Western philosophical tradition’s reliance on dualism, substance metaphysics, and abstract categories. It introduces a four-tiered relational framework:


AA (Absolute Absolute) – the unspeakable background that transcends all distinctions;


RA (Relatively Absolute) – the realm of pure laws, logic, and mathematics, unrepresented but determinative;


AR (Absolute Relative) – the domain of natural existence, including all entities that occur in nature;


RR (Relative Relative) – the world of human constructs, such as culture, technology, and language.



Each of these relational zones is not a substance or layer but a perspective defined by its mode of instancing. A mountain, a theorem, a poem, and even a dream are all instances—but each arises within a different relational mode and cannot be reduced to the others. The traditional philosophical obsession with causality, logic, and representation gives way here to a more fundamental principle: the paradigm-instance relationship, which precedes and grounds all conceptual thinking.


Instancology’s innovation lies not only in its ontological structure but also in its epistemology. It emphasizes 悟性 (WuXing)—a kind of intuitive insight or "eureka moment"—as a legitimate and essential form of knowledge, one that surpasses the empirical and rational. This allows Instancology to grasp the “whole” without relying on synthesis or analysis of parts, offering a solution to longstanding philosophical dilemmas, including the paradoxes of self-reference, the limits of reason, and the mind-body problem.


Unlike Western philosophy, which tends to move from being toward becoming or from idea to reality, Instancology begins with the instance as a self-sufficient whole and unfolds a new logic of truth from there. It does not merely add a new theory to philosophy—it proposes the end of philosophy as traditionally conceived, by reaching the top of truth: the Absolute Absolute, the final background against which all things are illuminated.


 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.