設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
孞烎Archer的博客  
共生哲學發現:人文沒科技是愚昧; 科技沒人文危險; 然科技人文無哲學, 若丟失靈魂漫無目的Flight……  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/34216/ > 複製 > 收藏本頁
網絡日誌正文
中國特色殖官主義:當代中國一切問題的總根源 2026-06-11 14:11:34

中國特色殖官主義:當代中國一切問題的總根源

Chinese Reproductive Officialdom: The Root Cause of All Contemporary Issues in China

——從馬斯剋星艦V3與長征胖5比較說開去

——Expanding the Discussion from the Comparison Between Elon Musk's Starship V3 and the Long March "Fat Five"



錢  宏(Archer Hong Qian)

 

一、 尺度的對決:星艦V3、胖五與“辦事”主體的進化這場思想的解構,始於航天工程史上最直觀的體型量化。

馬斯克的“星艦”(Starship)V3,以120米以上的巍峨身軀與150噸以上的近地軌道(LEO)運力,將中國現役最強的長征五號(俗稱“胖五”)甩開了一倍以上的絕對代差。在“胖五”粗壯的5米直徑箭體面前,星艦不僅更高、更粗,更在工程範式上展現了全復用、快迭代的壓倒性優勢。

這絕非簡單的工業參數輸贏,而是兩種“辦事”邏輯的正面交鋒。傳統敘事常將“集中力量辦大事”奉為社會主義的專利,然而SpaceX的崛起卻打破了這一意識形態的神話——馬斯克憑藉敏閱的商業嗅覺、現代資本市場的海量抽水能力,以及硅谷互聯網式的“破壞性創新”,辦成了傳統上只有超級帝國舉國體制才能勉強企及的“更大、更遠的事”。


這樣尺度的對決,揭示了一個冰冷的現實:在21世紀,集中力量辦大事的“力量源泉”和“辦事主體”已經發生了進化。自由市場與現代企業制度在特定條件下展現出的資源聚變效應,遠比舉國體制行政指令更為恐怖。

二、 名實的分裂:高超道義之名與“中國特色殖官主義”之實順着這一代差深入體制骨髓,便會發現中國航天乃至整體體制“四平八穩、不敢創新”的大企業病,根源在於一場延續兩千年的“名實分裂”。

如果讓務實的鄧小平目睹這幅對比圖,他大概會發出直擊靈魂的責問:“搞了幾十年,這算什麼優越性?”因為在真正的馬克思主義人本哲學中,“每個人的自由是一切人自由的前提”,追求的是個體的解放與全面發展。

然而,歷史的詭譎之處在於,外來的馬列詞彙在落地中國時,迅速被兩千年根深蒂固的“秦制”基因所馴化。馬克思的終極理想被置換為列寧式的先鋒隊集權,並無縫適配了本土輕車熟路的農民起義邏輯(“打土豪,分田地”)。

意識形態上的“全民所有”,在現實中如胡耀邦在1969年便一針見血指出的:“全民所有就是全民所無”。當產權的主體被抽象為宏大的“人民”時,普通個體在法理和現實中便失去了作為人的主體性(Subject)的一切資源處置權與分紅權,而成為被支配、被操縱、被榨取的對象(Ouject)。

於是,這個體制叫什麼名字已經不再重要,其要害在於“說堯舜之言,行桀紂之實”。土地公有、國家安全、戰略命脈這些占據道德制高點的“高超道義之名”,在實際運行中淪為行政壟斷、土地財政、高稅收低福利的合法外衣。龐大的國家財富通過制度化的隱形網絡,逆向抽取並供養着一個事實上的獨占者。

這正是本文所定義的總根源——中國特色殖官主義(Chinese Reproductive Officialdom,CRO)。【參看《論殖官主義(Reproductive Officialdom):政權更迭為何不能終結人民的苦難?》 http://symbiosism.com.cn/11723.html

在現代政治學與機構經濟學中,它被精確地定義為 "Extracto-Authoritarian State"(掠奪型威權國家) 與 "State Capitalist Bureaucracy"(國家資本主義官僚體制) 的人類學結合體。在“中國特色殖官主義”(CRO)的邏輯下,高超的道義或超高價值承諾(如“替天行道”“天下為公”“全心全意為人民服務”)成為權力天然的政治防彈衣。

把持國家機器的利益集團,利用權力、資本、知識上的壟斷地位,進行資源和財富的野蠻汲取,實質上在行“與民爭利”之實——“全官尋租化,全民佃戶化”,將全社會降格為其源源不斷榨取資源的“代工廠”與“人礦”,而官僚分利集團則躲在道義背後,完成了對國家資產的事實獨占。

三、 核心雙關:“殖官”的抽取與“生殖”的燃料在Chinese Reproductive Officialdom(中國特色殖官主義) 的定義中,“Reproductive” 構成了最精妙也最殘酷的雙關:它既指代“官僚體制(Officialdom)”自身的利益複製、細胞分裂與無限擴張。

CRO又指代這個機器必須極度依賴底層人口的“生物學再生產(生兒育女)”,來提供源源不斷的數據紅利、稅基、接盤俠與廉價勞動力。

一旦抓住了這個總根源,當下中國社會正在發生的所有結構性潰敗,都從“孤立的陣痛”剝離為“必然的併發症”:經濟危機(過度榨取的臨界點)——殖官主義體制註定無法產生真正的顛覆性創新,因為官僚體制的本能是“四平八穩”地守住既得利益與烏紗帽(官僚複製)。

當科技無法帶來增量時,體制只能加速在存量中榨取。轟然倒塌的房地產泡沫與地方債危機,本質上就是“殖官機器”通過土地壟斷,透支了普通家庭幾十年的勞動成果。中產階級被定向汲取殆盡,直接導致了全社會的消費性通縮。

人口塌陷(對“生殖複製”的終極罷工):中國斷崖式的生育率暴跌,不是簡單的經濟問題,而是底層民眾對“中國特色殖官主義”一場集體無意識的、最決絕的抗爭。當年輕一代看清了“全民所有即全民所無”的產權真相,意識到自己生下的孩子註定只能成為這個官僚機器的新一代“人礦”——從小接受抹殺個性的服從訓練,長大淪為996的工具人去償還國家壟斷的房貸——他們交出了最後的武器:“我們是最後一代”。

這是對“Reproductive(生殖複製)”這一體制燃料庫的釜底抽薪。

四、 精神自宮:司馬遷“貨殖論”的當代流害要理解這種“殖官主義”在民間的暢行無阻,就必須追溯中國文化深處的精神病灶。

中國社會之所以極易陷入政治犬儒與道德淪喪,心甘情願地在“裝着相信”與“精緻利己”之間切換,其思想根源可一直追溯到司馬遷在《史記·貨殖列傳》中提出的經濟學思想,以及該思想在後世被扭曲後的當代流害。

司馬遷在《貨殖列傳》中敏銳地洞察到人性的物慾,提出“天下熙熙,皆為利來;天下攘攘,皆為利往”,並劃分了經濟治理的層級:“最下者與之爭。” 這本是極具超前意識的自由放任市井經濟學雛形。

然而,兩千年來中國社會對“貨殖論”的吸收,卻剔除了其“順應自然、限制公權力”的憲政骨架,僅僅繼承了其最功利、最底層的“逐利拜金主義”與“成王敗寇觀”。

這種跛足的“貨殖論”在當代的泛濫,對中國國民性造成了致命的流害:道德的虛無與極端的實用主義:當社會將“皆為利來往”奉為唯一真理時,便主動解構了一切超越物質之上的精神追求、神聖契約與個體尊嚴。

既然統治者在用“堯舜之言”行“分贓之實”,底層民眾便以更純粹的貨殖邏輯進行對沖——“抓到錢就是好貓”。社會失去了對自由、公正等現代核心價值的感知力,退化為動物性的生存競爭。

對“強權分利”的奴性崇拜:在被扭曲的貨殖邏輯下,“官”成了全社會最大、最穩固的“殖利工具”(即官商一體、權錢交易)。

民眾非但無力不去反思“與民爭利”的體制不公,反而將“進入體制、分一杯羹、成為殖官集團的一員(考公入編)”視為階層躍升的終極成功。對財富的極度渴望直接異化為對權力的極度獻媚,全民的“貨殖”本能最終異化為對“殖官”體制的添磚加瓦。

結語:走出絞肉機的死胡同

從星艦V3與“胖五”的身高差,到胡耀邦發現的“全民所有等於全民所無”,再到司馬遷“貨殖論”的當代扭曲,中國兩千年政治與文化的閉環在這裡完成了閉合。“說堯舜之言”完成了道德催眠,“中國特色殖官主義”(Chinese Reproductive Officialdom)則利用行政與技術手段完成了財富的定向抽取,而民間泛濫的“貨殖利往”則完成了國民精神的自宮。

然而,這台設計用來進行無限抽取和無限複製的機器,如今卻生存在一個人口和資源都有限的現實世界裡。當它把“人礦”榨取到連生物學再生產(Reproduction)都難以為繼的時候,這個兩千年未變的閉環就徹底斷裂了。要打破這場辦事不如殖官、創新輸給官僚的歷史循環,僅僅有技術上的追趕是遠遠不夠的。

它需要的不僅是造出中國版的星艦,更是要在一片廢墟中,重新確立被污名的馬克思未竟的真諦——讓每一個活生生的個體,擁有不被權力非法汲取的私有產權,以及不被道義綁架的、責權明確的真正自由——走向基於全體公民生命自組織連接動態平衡的交互主體共生之新天地。



Chinese Reproductive Officialdom: The Root Cause of All Contemporary Issues in China

——Expanding the Discussion from the Comparison Between Elon Musk's Starship V3 and the Long March "Fat Five"

By Archer Hong Qian


I. The Showdown of Scale: Starship V3, the "Fat Five," and the Evolution of the Action Subject

This conceptual deconstruction begins with the most direct quantification of physical scale in the history of aerospace engineering (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 1).

Elon Musk’s Starship V3, with its towering height of over 120 meters and a low Earth orbit (LEO) payload capacity exceeding 150 tons, has pulled ahead of China’s most powerful active rocket, the Long March 5 (popularly known as the "Fat Five"), by a margin of more than a full generational gap (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 1). Standing next to the "Fat Five’s" stocky 5-meter-diameter body, Starship is not only taller and wider, but it also demonstrates an overwhelming advantage in its engineering paradigm of full reusability and rapid iteration (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 1).

This is not a simple win-or-lose scenario over industrial metrics (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 1). It is a head-on collision between two distinct operational philosophies (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 1). Traditional narratives frequently claim that "concentrating resources to accomplish grand undertakings" is an exclusive patent of socialism (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 1). Yet, the rise of SpaceX has thoroughly shattered this ideological myth (中國特色殖官主義:當... pp. 1-2). Musk has leveraged acute commercial instincts, the massive funding capacity of modern capital markets, and Silicon Valley-style "disruptive innovation" to pull off massive, far-reaching feats that traditionally only the state-run apparatus of a superpower could barely hope to achieve (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

This clash of scales lays bare a cold reality: in the 21st century, the very source of power and the primary subject responsible for executing grand undertakings have evolved (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). Under specific conditions, the resource-fusing effect demonstrated by free markets and modern corporate structures is far more formidable than the administrative edicts of a state-led system (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).


II. The Split Between Name and Reality: High Moral Rhetoric vs. The Reality of "Chinese Reproductive Officialdom"

Tracing this generational gap down to the marrow of the system reveals the root cause of the "bureaucratic, risk-averse, and innovation-fearing" enterprise disease afflicting both Chinese aerospace and the wider system (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). It stems from a two-millennium-old divergence between name and reality (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

If the pragmatic Deng Xiaoping were to look at this comparison chart today, he would likely demand a soul-searching answer: "We have been at this for decades; what exactly makes this superior?" (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2) This is because, in true Marxist humanistic philosophy, "the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all," aiming for individual liberation and comprehensive human growth (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

History, however, took a twisted turn (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). Imported Marxist-Leninist terminology was quickly domesticated by China’s deep-seated, ancient "Qin system" matrix upon arrival (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). Marx’s ultimate vision was replaced by Leninist vanguard centralization, seamlessly merging with the familiar indigenous logic of peasant rebellions: "smash the landlords and divide the land" (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

The ideological concept of "ownership by all the people" operates in reality precisely as Hu Yaobang incisively pointed out in 1969: "Ownership by all means ownership by none." (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2) When the subject of property rights is abstracted into an empty political concept like "the people," ordinary individuals lose all agency as human subjects over resource disposition and dividend distribution (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). Instead, they sink into mere objects to be dominated, manipulated, and extracted (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

Consequently, the specific name given to this system no longer matters; its crucial mechanism lies in "speaking the words of legendary sages Yao and Shun, while practicing the tyranny of despots Jie and Zhou." (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2) High-flown moral labels like public land ownership, national security, and strategic economic pillars serve as legal camouflage for administrative monopolies, land-based fiscal extraction, high taxation, and negligible social welfare (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). Vast amounts of national wealth are siphoned in reverse through institutionalized, hidden networks to sustain a de facto sole proprietor (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

This is the foundational root cause defined in this paper: Chinese Reproductive Officialdom (CRO) (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). In modern political science and institutional economics, it is precisely defined as the anthropological fusion of an "Extracto-Authoritarian State" and "State Capitalist Bureaucracy" (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2). Under the logic of CRO, lofty moral claims or hyper-value promises (such as "enforcing justice on behalf of heaven," "the world belongs to the public," or "serving the people heart and soul") function as a natural political bulletproof vest for those in power (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 2).

Interest groups controlling the state machinery exploit their monopolies over power, capital, and knowledge to conduct predatory extractions of resources and wealth (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3). In essence, they compete with the public for profit, executing a reality where "all officials engage in rent-seeking, and all citizens are turned into tenant farmers." (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3) They downgrade the whole of society into a sweatshop and a reservoir of "human ore," while the bureaucratic elite hides behind morality to finalize their absolute monopoly over national assets (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3).


III. The Core Double Entendre: The Extraction of "Officialdom" and the Fuel of "Reproduction"

Within the definition of Chinese Reproductive Officialdom, the word "Reproductive" forms a subtle yet brutal double entendre (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3):

  • It      denotes the interest replication, cellular division, and boundless      expansion of the bureaucratic apparatus (Officialdom) itself (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3).

  • CRO      also highlights the machine's absolute dependence on the biological      reproduction (childbearing) of the demographic base to supply a      continuous stream of data dividends, tax revenues, financial backstop      buyers, and cheap labor (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      3).

Once this primary root cause is grasped, all structural collapses currently occurring in Chinese society cease to look like isolated pangs and are revealed as inevitable complications (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3):

  • The      Economic Crisis (The Tipping Point of Excessive Extraction): An      extractive bureaucratic system is structurally incapable of producing      genuine, disruptive innovations (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      3). This is because the fundamental instinct of a bureaucracy is to      preserve existing privileges and official positions through risk-averse      stagnation (bureaucratic replication) (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      3). When technology fails to yield new growth, the system accelerates its      extraction from the existing pool (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      3). The imploding real estate bubble and local debt crises are direct      outcomes of this bureaucratic apparatus exploiting its land monopoly to      exhaust decades of earnings from ordinary families (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3). The targeted      draining of the middle class has led straight to systemic consumer      deflation (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3).

  • The      Population Collapse (The Ultimate Strike Against Reproductive Replication):      China's plunging birth rate is not a simple economic issue (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3). It is a collective,      subconscious, and uncompromising revolt by ordinary citizens against      Chinese Reproductive Officialdom (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      3). When the younger generation sees through the property rights      trap—realizing that any children they bear are destined to be the next      generation of "human ore," subjected to identity-erasing      compliance training from childhood only to become 996 corporate cogs to      pay off state-monopolized mortgages—they lay down their final weapon: "We      are the last generation." (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      3) This acts as a direct drain on the reproductive fuel reserves of the      system (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3).


IV. Spiritual Castration: The Modern Scourge of Sima Qian’s "Theory of Wealth"

To understand why this extractive officialdom faces so little friction from the general public, one must trace the psychological pathology deep within Chinese culture (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3). The ease with which Chinese society lapses into political cynicism and moral rot—willingly flipping between "feigned belief" and "calculated self-interest"—stems from the distortion of Sima Qian’s economic philosophy outlined in the Records of the Grand Historian: Biographies of Money-makers (Huo Zhi Lie Zhuan), and its subsequent toxic legacy (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 3).

Sima Qian observed human material desires with great clarity, noting that "the whole world swarms for profit; the whole world scrambles for profit" (中國特色殖官主義:當... pp. 3-4). He classified economic governance tiers, famously stating that "the worst approach is to compete with the people for profit." (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4) This was a remarkably advanced, early blueprint for laissez-faire market economics (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4).

However, over two millennia, Chinese society filtered out its constitutional framework—which advocated for following nature and limiting state power—and kept only its lowest, most utilitarian elements: crude materialism and a might-makes-right worldview (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). The widespread adoption of this lopsided theory has inflicted fatal damage on the national character (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4):

  1. Moral      Nihilism and Extreme Pragmatism:
         When a society treats material gain as the sole truth, it systematically      dismantles all transcendent spiritual pursuits, sacred contracts, and      individual dignity (
    中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      4). Since the rulers use the language of ancient legendary kings to mask      corruption, the public retaliates with pure pragmatic calculation: "A      cat that brings in cash is a good cat." (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4) Society loses its      capacity to perceive modern core values like liberty and justice,      devolving into animalistic survival competition (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4).

  2. Servile      Adulation of Extractive Power:
         Under this warped logic, the state bureaucracy ("the official")      becomes the largest and most stable tool for wealth generation via      rent-creation, rent-extraction, and rent-seeking (
    中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). Instead of      reflecting on the systemic injustice of the state competing with the      public for profit, citizens view entering the bureaucracy (passing the      civil service exam) as the ultimate hallmark of upward mobility (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). The intense craving      for wealth mutates into sycophancy toward power (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). The public's      intrinsic wealth-seeking drive is ultimately co-opted to reinforce the      extractive bureaucratic system, plunging the collective mind into      spiritual castration (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      4).


Conclusion: Escaping the Dead End of the Meat Grinder

From the physical gap between Starship V3 and the "Fat Five," to Hu Yaobang’s realization that public ownership equals ownership by none, to the modern distortion of Sima Qian’s economic philosophy, the two-millennium-old loop of Chinese politics and culture closes tightly once more (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). Exalted rhetoric hypnotizes the public, Chinese Reproductive Officialdom deploys administrative and technological means to extract life and property, and raw materialism pacifies the collective mind (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4).

Yet, this machine designed for infinite extraction and infinite replication must now operate in a finite world of shrinking resources and population (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). When it exhausts its "human ore" to the point where biological reproduction collapses, this ancient cycle will inevitably break (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). Attempting to match or surpass Starship's rapid iteration, cost revolution, and spirit of private adventure through intensified state pressure and strict audits is fundamentally counterproductive (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4).

  • The      Innovation Paradox: Under absolute surveillance and rigid quotas,      the optimal survival strategy shifts from exploring the unknown to      deliberate performance—faking data, engaging in meaningless internal      competition, and avoiding risks (中國特色殖官主義:當... p.      4).

  • The      Elimination of Trial and Error: Starship can repeatedly      explode because its environment respects individual freedom (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). Conversely, an      autocratic contribution model demands absolute control, treating failures      and explosions as unacceptable wastes of energy in real-time data metrics      (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4). Harsh laws and      strict audits cannot foster a breakthrough civilizational leap (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4).

Using high technology to drive historical regression transforms tools of human liberation into a digital amplifier for autocracy (賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1). Qin Shi Huang built the Great Wall and imperial highways, yet left behind intellectual persecution and the rapid downfall of his dynasty (賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1). Today's wild card is AI—it can act as a more efficient Shang Yang, but it can also magnify unchecked power, accelerating the system toward its absolute limits of growth, friction, and coercion (賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1).

To break this loop, technological catch-up alone is insufficient (賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1). The solution requires more than building a domestic replica of Starship; it demands reclaiming a fundamental truth from the ashes: every living individual must possess private property rights secure from state encroachment, alongside genuine, accountable freedom (賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1). This path leads away from the meat grinder and toward a new horizon of co-existence, rooted in the spontaneous, dynamic balance of a self-organizing citizen society (中國特色殖官主義:當... p. 4, 賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1).

Ultimately, civilizational competition is decided by who can inspire more individuals to create willingly, freely, and sustainably—not by whose algorithm is best at punishing the idle and rewarding the compliant (賽博商鞅與生殖燃料:... p. 1).


 


瀏覽(110) (0) 評論(0)
發表評論
我的名片
孞烎Archer
註冊日期: 2024-07-27
訪問總量: 582,067 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
最新發布
· 中國特色殖官主義:當代中國一切
· 孩子是大人的老師:從《參與》到
· 《校園之外》為何不同於一般青春
· PRC大陸與ROC台灣關係全新思路
· 校園之外:成長的悲歡與必要的張
· 列治文宣言——從“可用”走向“可信
· AI for All:做影響世界生態的三
分類目錄
【當代哲學】
· 中國特色殖官主義:當代中國一切
· 孩子是大人的老師:從《參與》到
· 《校園之外》為何不同於一般青春
· PRC大陸與ROC台灣關係全新思路
· 校園之外:成長的悲歡與必要的張
· 列治文宣言——從“可用”走向“可信
· AI for All:做影響世界生態的三
· “猴媽媽的籃子”能救大火?
· The Political Economy of Moral
· 論重分配的激進“道德公式”及其全
存檔目錄
2026-06-03 - 2026-06-11
2026-05-02 - 2026-05-31
2026-04-01 - 2026-04-30
2026-03-01 - 2026-03-29
2026-02-02 - 2026-02-27
2026-01-02 - 2026-01-31
2025-12-04 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-28
2025-10-01 - 2025-10-31
2025-09-01 - 2025-09-27
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-26
2025-07-01 - 2025-07-31
2025-05-06 - 2025-05-21
2025-04-02 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-01 - 2025-03-27
2025-02-12 - 2025-02-28
2025-01-01 - 2025-01-19
2024-12-03 - 2024-12-28
2024-11-09 - 2024-11-26
2024-10-07 - 2024-10-30
2024-09-04 - 2024-09-15
2024-08-03 - 2024-08-31
2024-07-26 - 2024-07-26
 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.