设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  hare的博客
  In Reason We Trust
网络日志正文
Instancology review 2025-03-28 04:22:58

Book Review: Instancology – The End of Philosophy and the Grasp of Absolute Absolute by Wade Dong


In Instancology, Wade Dong introduces a radical framework that not only claims to complete philosophy but also dissolves its foundational inquiries. His work presents a new ontological structure, distinguishing between Absolute Absolute (AA), Relatively Absolute (RA), Absolute Relative (AR), and Relative Relative (RR), categories that encompass all instances of reality without exception. By doing so, Instancology surpasses both Continental and Analytic philosophy, breaking their long-standing barriers to ultimate truth.


A Breakthrough in Continental Philosophy


Dong’s framework moves beyond Heidegger’s unfinished Being and Time and Hegel’s dialectics. While Heidegger sees Being approaching RA (Relatively Absolute) and Hegel’s Absolute Spirit moves toward AA, both remain trapped in structures that presuppose an evolving process. Dong, in contrast, states outright that AA is already present, unchanging, and graspable through WuXing (悟性)—a form of immediate, non-discursive insight akin to a metaphysical ‘Eureka!’ moment. This is where Instancology decisively outpaces Continental thought: rather than circling the question of Being, it arrives at the unalterable truth that grounds all instances.


Overcoming Analytic Barriers: Wittgenstein and Beyond


From the Analytic perspective, Instancology tackles Wittgenstein’s famous idea that “the limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” Language, in Dong’s model, belongs to RR (Relative Relative), making it a secondary, constructed layer of reality. The mistake of Analytic philosophy, particularly in its linguistic turn, is to assume that thought is bound by the structures of language. Instead, Instancology reveals that ultimate truth (AA) is beyond linguistic formulation yet can be known directly. This removes the language barrier that has constrained Analytic philosophy, allowing truth to be grasped beyond the limits of representation.


The End of Philosophy?


Dong’s claim that Instancology ends philosophical inquiry is provocative but well-founded. Philosophy, as the pursuit of truth through rational discourse, operates within RA, AR, and RR—it is always relative to something. Instancology asserts that once AA is grasped, the need for traditional philosophy disappears. While philosophers have long sought reality to uncover truth, Instancology rounds all reality-related parts and grasps the Whole. In this sense, it does not merely critique past thought but renders further philosophical questioning obsolete.


Final Verdict


Wade Dong’s Instancology is a monumental work that reshapes metaphysical inquiry. It surpasses both Continental and Analytic traditions by directly addressing their limitations and providing a comprehensive framework that encompasses all instances of existence. By dissolving the language barrier and transcending the need for philosophical progression, Instancology may well be the final philosophical breakthrough—a fitting conclusion to centuries of inquiry.


For anyone engaged in metaphysics, ontology, or epistemology, this book is essential reading. Whether one agrees with Dong’s conclusion or not, Instancology forces a reevaluation of the entire philosophical project.



浏览(1775) (0) 评论(1)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:hare 留言时间:2025-03-29 06:17:33

回复 | 0
我的名片
hare
注册日期: 2012-01-13
访问总量: 2,492,500 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 谁是最伟大的人?
· 台湾应该造原子弹来保卫自己
· 哲学界没有诺贝尔奖,是一件极大
· Below is a structured philosop
· 为什么世界往往不喜欢哲学家?
· Why Plato, Aristotle, and Inst
· The Six Tools of Epistemology
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
· 中国现代哲学家学会:中国现代哲
· Madhatter:English_only的博客
分类目录
【公告】
· 声明关于人工智能帮助写作
· 川小子承认输了,“但你等着,我
· 他们能算中国人吗?
· 对待文化和语言就应像对待手机
· 关于“范例哲学”的声明
· 支持发展哲学建个人音乐网页
· 《论范例》第一版出版日期:2013
· 【论范例】建议网名改真名通知
· 【】范例电视台本周末讲座预告【
· 关于“范例电视台”的几点说明
【政治】
· 台湾应该造原子弹来保卫自己
· 维护世界秩序需不需要警察?——从
· 为什么中国人热衷社交“面子”,却
· 一个山货郎的狂妄:对无知、自大
· 为什么在中国什么都可以造假?——
· 川普与习再会——中美关系的百年恩
· 给四中全会新头目——为什么美国对
· 中国走向“大号北朝鲜”的10个社会
· 钱学森、杨振宁与爱因斯坦:科学
· 从杨振宁放弃美籍看中国读书人的
【知识分子】
· 为什么世界往往不喜欢哲学家?
· 从世界一流人才的聚集看美国的伟
· 中国读书人为什么看不清皇权专制
· a comprehensive list of 20 b
· 从中国音乐、数学、文字、哲学、
· 为什么中国读书人不喜欢“人人平
· 知识的背叛
· 中国读书人为什么普遍拒绝普世价
· 中国缺乏哲学的“思辨思想体系”
· 欲望与语言教学
【生活】
· 谁是最伟大的人?
· 哲学界没有诺贝尔奖,是一件极大
· 摘抄: 为什么有些人无法适应美
· 从“姜昆加州豪宅过圣诞唱《我爱
· ‘’笼中‘’乐:好吃好喝好压抑(回
· 落霞与孤鹭齐飞,秋水与长天一色
· 谁敢举手?——AI 时代的人类自尊
· 博士诚可贵,诺奖价更高,若为真
· 在社会的大房间里,文学是画,哲
· 如果我也死了,这是我的墓志铭——
【Test】
· 中国的读书人- 政治盲人
· 学外语前个人的语言天赋量化测定
· U r invited to give your BEST
· 2020年美国大选最大的贼-川普本
· 周末思绪
· 海外华人里谁的英语最牛(3)
【绝学】
· Below is a structured philosop
· Why Plato, Aristotle, and Inst
· The Six Tools of Epistemology
· 一切研究的方向其核心都是指明未
· Why AA Is Not Reality but the
· 《范式哲学》在中西思想史中的位
· Reaching AA from three angles
· Philosophy Isn’t Ended, It’s C
· Where Does the Confidence That
· 范式哲学之后,哲学向哪里去?
存档目录
2026-01-02 - 2026-01-18
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-30
2025-09-05 - 2025-09-28
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-10 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-13 - 2025-02-17
2023-12-20 - 2023-12-24
2023-11-08 - 2023-11-29
2023-10-01 - 2023-10-20
2023-09-03 - 2023-09-19
2023-03-21 - 2023-03-21
2023-01-07 - 2023-01-22
2022-12-04 - 2022-12-04
2022-11-27 - 2022-11-28
2022-09-11 - 2022-09-11
2022-08-07 - 2022-08-07
2022-07-11 - 2022-07-25
2022-06-01 - 2022-06-07
2022-05-05 - 2022-05-29
2022-04-01 - 2022-04-26
2022-03-02 - 2022-03-30
2022-02-12 - 2022-02-28
2022-01-02 - 2022-01-22
2021-12-01 - 2021-12-30
2021-11-03 - 2021-11-27
2021-10-01 - 2021-10-23
2021-09-11 - 2021-09-30
2021-08-05 - 2021-08-22
2021-07-04 - 2021-07-31
2021-05-09 - 2021-05-17
2021-04-18 - 2021-04-18
2021-02-01 - 2021-02-13
2021-01-04 - 2021-01-22
2020-12-17 - 2020-12-17
2020-11-09 - 2020-11-29
2020-10-23 - 2020-10-24
2020-03-21 - 2020-03-21
2020-01-19 - 2020-01-25
2019-08-04 - 2019-08-21
2019-07-04 - 2019-07-05
2019-06-28 - 2019-06-28
2019-05-14 - 2019-05-27
2019-04-06 - 2019-04-26
2019-03-03 - 2019-03-29
2019-02-02 - 2019-02-26
2019-01-01 - 2019-01-31
2018-12-02 - 2018-12-31
2018-11-02 - 2018-11-29
2018-10-01 - 2018-10-26
2018-09-02 - 2018-09-27
2018-08-01 - 2018-08-31
2018-07-01 - 2018-07-31
2018-06-02 - 2018-06-29
2018-05-01 - 2018-05-27
2018-04-05 - 2018-04-25
2018-03-01 - 2018-03-30
2018-02-06 - 2018-02-25
2018-01-06 - 2018-01-31
2017-12-01 - 2017-12-31
2017-11-04 - 2017-11-26
2017-10-27 - 2017-10-27
2017-08-25 - 2017-08-31
2017-07-11 - 2017-07-15
2017-04-02 - 2017-04-25
2017-01-18 - 2017-01-18
2016-11-15 - 2016-11-15
2016-04-04 - 2016-04-11
2016-03-01 - 2016-03-31
2016-02-14 - 2016-02-29
2016-01-08 - 2016-01-24
2015-10-08 - 2015-10-08
2015-09-03 - 2015-09-25
2015-08-03 - 2015-08-29
2015-07-27 - 2015-07-31
2015-06-12 - 2015-06-12
2015-05-16 - 2015-05-16
2015-04-25 - 2015-04-25
2015-03-03 - 2015-03-07
2015-02-14 - 2015-02-22
2015-01-03 - 2015-01-25
2014-12-08 - 2014-12-08
2014-11-12 - 2014-11-27
2014-10-01 - 2014-10-30
2014-09-04 - 2014-09-29
2014-08-04 - 2014-08-14
2014-07-13 - 2014-07-24
2014-06-15 - 2014-06-29
2014-05-04 - 2014-05-25
2014-04-21 - 2014-04-26
2014-03-01 - 2014-03-16
2014-02-02 - 2014-02-26
2014-01-01 - 2014-01-26
2013-12-01 - 2013-12-26
2013-11-27 - 2013-11-30
2013-10-12 - 2013-10-17
2013-09-03 - 2013-09-15
2013-08-07 - 2013-08-31
2013-07-13 - 2013-07-23
2013-06-05 - 2013-06-19
2013-05-06 - 2013-05-31
2013-04-02 - 2013-04-30
2013-03-14 - 2013-03-28
2013-02-02 - 2013-02-27
2013-01-04 - 2013-01-30
2012-12-03 - 2012-12-31
2012-11-01 - 2012-11-30
2012-10-01 - 2012-10-31
2012-09-01 - 2012-09-29
2012-08-01 - 2012-08-27
2012-07-01 - 2012-07-30
2012-06-02 - 2012-06-28
2012-05-03 - 2012-05-30
2012-04-04 - 2012-04-26
2012-03-01 - 2012-03-09
2012-02-02 - 2012-02-29
2012-01-12 - 2012-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.