设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
     
  hare的博客
  In Reason We Trust
网络日志正文
Instancology review 2025-03-28 04:22:58

Book Review: Instancology – The End of Philosophy and the Grasp of Absolute Absolute by Wade Dong


In Instancology, Wade Dong introduces a radical framework that not only claims to complete philosophy but also dissolves its foundational inquiries. His work presents a new ontological structure, distinguishing between Absolute Absolute (AA), Relatively Absolute (RA), Absolute Relative (AR), and Relative Relative (RR), categories that encompass all instances of reality without exception. By doing so, Instancology surpasses both Continental and Analytic philosophy, breaking their long-standing barriers to ultimate truth.


A Breakthrough in Continental Philosophy


Dong’s framework moves beyond Heidegger’s unfinished Being and Time and Hegel’s dialectics. While Heidegger sees Being approaching RA (Relatively Absolute) and Hegel’s Absolute Spirit moves toward AA, both remain trapped in structures that presuppose an evolving process. Dong, in contrast, states outright that AA is already present, unchanging, and graspable through WuXing (悟性)—a form of immediate, non-discursive insight akin to a metaphysical ‘Eureka!’ moment. This is where Instancology decisively outpaces Continental thought: rather than circling the question of Being, it arrives at the unalterable truth that grounds all instances.


Overcoming Analytic Barriers: Wittgenstein and Beyond


From the Analytic perspective, Instancology tackles Wittgenstein’s famous idea that “the limits of my language mean the limits of my world.” Language, in Dong’s model, belongs to RR (Relative Relative), making it a secondary, constructed layer of reality. The mistake of Analytic philosophy, particularly in its linguistic turn, is to assume that thought is bound by the structures of language. Instead, Instancology reveals that ultimate truth (AA) is beyond linguistic formulation yet can be known directly. This removes the language barrier that has constrained Analytic philosophy, allowing truth to be grasped beyond the limits of representation.


The End of Philosophy?


Dong’s claim that Instancology ends philosophical inquiry is provocative but well-founded. Philosophy, as the pursuit of truth through rational discourse, operates within RA, AR, and RR—it is always relative to something. Instancology asserts that once AA is grasped, the need for traditional philosophy disappears. While philosophers have long sought reality to uncover truth, Instancology rounds all reality-related parts and grasps the Whole. In this sense, it does not merely critique past thought but renders further philosophical questioning obsolete.


Final Verdict


Wade Dong’s Instancology is a monumental work that reshapes metaphysical inquiry. It surpasses both Continental and Analytic traditions by directly addressing their limitations and providing a comprehensive framework that encompasses all instances of existence. By dissolving the language barrier and transcending the need for philosophical progression, Instancology may well be the final philosophical breakthrough—a fitting conclusion to centuries of inquiry.


For anyone engaged in metaphysics, ontology, or epistemology, this book is essential reading. Whether one agrees with Dong’s conclusion or not, Instancology forces a reevaluation of the entire philosophical project.



浏览(2079) (0) 评论(1)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:hare 留言时间:2025-03-29 06:17:33

回复 | 0
我的名片
hare
注册日期: 2012-01-13
访问总量: 2,768,746 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 中国文化最主要的问题是缺乏精神
· To Say That Artificial Intelli
· 为什么中国读书人喜欢一人之下万
· 为什么90%以上的文科学人都是人
· 人工智能的危机:混淆了思维和思
· 从哈萨比斯的虚拟细胞到人工生命
· AA与物自体有什么区别?
友好链接
· Rabbit:Stinger 的博客
· bunny2:bunny2的博客
· microsoftbug:microsoftbug的博
· InstanceTV:InstanceTV的博客
· 中国现代哲学家学会:中国现代哲
· Madhatter:English_only的博客
分类目录
【公告】
· 在中国创办《标准英语》教学法-
· 声明关于人工智能帮助写作
· 川小子承认输了,“但你等着,我
· 他们能算中国人吗?
· 对待文化和语言就应像对待手机
· 关于“范例哲学”的声明
· 支持发展哲学建个人音乐网页
· 《论范例》第一版出版日期:2013
· 【论范例】建议网名改真名通知
· 【】范例电视台本周末讲座预告【
【政治】
· 中国文化最主要的问题是缺乏精神
· 中国现在到底是个什么社会?
· 北京打起来了?
· 倒习失败-又一次狼来了?
· 台湾应该造原子弹来保卫自己
· 维护世界秩序需不需要警察?——从
· 为什么中国人热衷社交“面子”,却
· 一个山货郎的狂妄:对无知、自大
· 为什么在中国什么都可以造假?——
· 川普与习再会——中美关系的百年恩
【知识分子】
· 为什么90%以上的文科学人都是人
· 我的语言故事
· 西方知识分子的 intellectual ho
· 为什么世界往往不喜欢哲学家?
· 从世界一流人才的聚集看美国的伟
· 中国读书人为什么看不清皇权专制
· a comprehensive list of 20 b
· 从中国音乐、数学、文字、哲学、
· 为什么中国读书人不喜欢“人人平
· 知识的背叛
【生活】
· 面子国的面子王访美-川普真搞懂
· 几个观察
· 回中国的感慨
· 《标准英语》征求意见稿
· 一位应该立雕像的中国人
· 人性与敌人
· 为什么太太从不对先生承认自己错
· 嫉妒还是真相?
· 谁是最伟大的人?
· 哲学界没有诺贝尔奖,是一件极大
【Test】
· 中国的读书人- 政治盲人
· 学外语前个人的语言天赋量化测定
· U r invited to give your BEST
· 2020年美国大选最大的贼-川普本
· 周末思绪
· 海外华人里谁的英语最牛(3)
【绝学】
· To Say That Artificial Intelli
· 为什么中国读书人喜欢一人之下万
· 人工智能的危机:混淆了思维和思
· 从哈萨比斯的虚拟细胞到人工生命
· AA与物自体有什么区别?
· 为什么人工智能的发展会威胁数学
· On Numbers theory and infinity
· From Elephant and Teapot to
· On the two levels of wholeness
· Why PI is Uncountable- an Inst
存档目录
2026-10-01 - 2026-10-04
2026-09-02 - 2026-09-30
2026-08-16 - 2026-08-16
2026-03-08 - 2026-03-22
2026-02-05 - 2026-02-28
2026-01-02 - 2026-01-31
2025-12-01 - 2025-12-31
2025-11-01 - 2025-11-30
2025-10-02 - 2025-10-30
2025-09-05 - 2025-09-28
2025-08-03 - 2025-08-28
2025-07-10 - 2025-07-29
2025-06-01 - 2025-06-26
2025-05-01 - 2025-05-30
2025-04-01 - 2025-04-30
2025-03-06 - 2025-03-31
2025-02-13 - 2025-02-17
2023-12-20 - 2023-12-24
2023-11-08 - 2023-11-29
2023-10-01 - 2023-10-20
2023-09-03 - 2023-09-19
2023-03-21 - 2023-03-21
2023-01-07 - 2023-01-22
2022-12-04 - 2022-12-04
2022-11-27 - 2022-11-28
2022-09-11 - 2022-09-11
2022-08-07 - 2022-08-07
2022-07-11 - 2022-07-25
2022-06-01 - 2022-06-07
2022-05-05 - 2022-05-29
2022-04-01 - 2022-04-26
2022-03-02 - 2022-03-30
2022-02-12 - 2022-02-28
2022-01-02 - 2022-01-22
2021-12-01 - 2021-12-30
2021-11-03 - 2021-11-27
2021-10-01 - 2021-10-23
2021-09-11 - 2021-09-30
2021-08-05 - 2021-08-22
2021-07-04 - 2021-07-31
2021-05-09 - 2021-05-17
2021-04-18 - 2021-04-18
2021-02-01 - 2021-02-13
2021-01-04 - 2021-01-22
2020-12-17 - 2020-12-17
2020-11-09 - 2020-11-29
2020-10-23 - 2020-10-24
2020-03-21 - 2020-03-21
2020-01-19 - 2020-01-25
2019-08-04 - 2019-08-21
2019-07-04 - 2019-07-05
2019-06-28 - 2019-06-28
2019-05-14 - 2019-05-27
2019-04-06 - 2019-04-26
2019-03-03 - 2019-03-29
2019-02-02 - 2019-02-26
2019-01-01 - 2019-01-31
2018-12-02 - 2018-12-31
2018-11-02 - 2018-11-29
2018-10-01 - 2018-10-26
2018-09-02 - 2018-09-27
2018-08-01 - 2018-08-31
2018-07-01 - 2018-07-31
2018-06-02 - 2018-06-29
2018-05-01 - 2018-05-27
2018-04-05 - 2018-04-25
2018-03-01 - 2018-03-30
2018-02-06 - 2018-02-25
2018-01-06 - 2018-01-31
2017-12-01 - 2017-12-31
2017-11-04 - 2017-11-26
2017-10-27 - 2017-10-27
2017-08-25 - 2017-08-31
2017-07-11 - 2017-07-15
2017-04-02 - 2017-04-25
2017-01-18 - 2017-01-18
2016-11-15 - 2016-11-15
2016-04-04 - 2016-04-11
2016-03-01 - 2016-03-31
2016-02-14 - 2016-02-29
2016-01-08 - 2016-01-24
2015-10-08 - 2015-10-08
2015-09-03 - 2015-09-25
2015-08-03 - 2015-08-29
2015-07-27 - 2015-07-31
2015-06-12 - 2015-06-12
2015-05-16 - 2015-05-16
2015-04-25 - 2015-04-25
2015-03-03 - 2015-03-07
2015-02-14 - 2015-02-22
2015-01-03 - 2015-01-25
2014-12-08 - 2014-12-08
2014-11-12 - 2014-11-27
2014-10-01 - 2014-10-30
2014-09-04 - 2014-09-29
2014-08-04 - 2014-08-14
2014-07-13 - 2014-07-24
2014-06-15 - 2014-06-29
2014-05-04 - 2014-05-25
2014-04-21 - 2014-04-26
2014-03-01 - 2014-03-16
2014-02-02 - 2014-02-26
2014-01-01 - 2014-01-26
2013-12-01 - 2013-12-26
2013-11-27 - 2013-11-30
2013-10-12 - 2013-10-17
2013-09-03 - 2013-09-15
2013-08-07 - 2013-08-31
2013-07-13 - 2013-07-23
2013-06-05 - 2013-06-19
2013-05-06 - 2013-05-31
2013-04-02 - 2013-04-30
2013-03-14 - 2013-03-28
2013-02-02 - 2013-02-27
2013-01-04 - 2013-01-30
2012-12-03 - 2012-12-31
2012-11-01 - 2012-11-30
2012-10-01 - 2012-10-31
2012-09-01 - 2012-09-29
2012-08-01 - 2012-08-27
2012-07-01 - 2012-07-30
2012-06-02 - 2012-06-28
2012-05-03 - 2012-05-30
2012-04-04 - 2012-04-26
2012-03-01 - 2012-03-09
2012-02-02 - 2012-02-29
2012-01-12 - 2012-01-31
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.