Gov-funded R&D Center Boosts Taiwan as One of Four Little Dragons

 Frank Li Jan. 23, 2013 in Waterloo, Canada

 http://www.shuicheng.ca/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=61910&do=blog&id=3832

 http://www.kwcg.ca/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=61910&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=3832

Key Points

Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) is a Gov-found when Chiang Ching-kuo was in power in 1973 and later self sustained non-profit R&D institution headquartered in Taiwan, with the branches in Tokyo, Berlin, Moscow, Eindhoven and California Silicon Valley. Currently there are 5,777 members with background of 1,392 PhDs and 3,126 Masters. 

Its practice is new tech R & D and business incubator by spinning off the matured research achievements with related researchers together as independent enterprises, and to have created more than 228 start-ups and spin-offs with over 140 CEOs in the local high-tech industry, among them many are world-renowned high-tech companies, such as TSMC and  UMC. Now, it holds more than 19,890 patents.

The Gov-found non-profit model in enterprise management with no shareholders can ensure the R&Ds future oriented by avoiding the pursuit of short-term profits, and the earnings can be used for new R & D investments rather than to be distributed to the individual hands.

The ITRI has been the essential innovative force and think-tank with openLaboratory to provide full serve for small and medium sized enterprises and drive Taiwan developing as one of The Four Little Dragons.

Now, China and the United States is eagerly replicating the model in a large number of.

I hope that Canada should also establish similar R & D institutes of cities, provinces and national to provide full service both in management and technology with full cover of all busineees and to conduct R & D on cutting-edge huge market potential projects that individual enterprise cannot afford to continuously spin off more and more internationally competitive enterprises.

Today's economic achievement in Taiwan should be grateful to the humanized dictator of Chiang Ching-kuo. After inhuman democracy, the economy in Taiwan has been stagnated in ruining due to partisan players as mad dogs fought for power wthout human brain cells for doing humanized business. 

Taiwan must turn to be humanized governance by humanized people by the tech-professionals in Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), universities and outstanding entreprenurs to naturally form non-partisan civil legislature, to dump garbage partisan play into garbage bins. 

  再看看智障台灣民主玩家的貢獻

   2012年6月9日，以《台灣在踏步》為名轉載今日新聞網的文章《三條戰線同決戰 馬英九發威》，文章說：

   “20年來，台灣政治的最大麻煩就是：進程緩慢。每一個重大工程、重大決策、重大立法，都可以在政治對抗過程逡巡拖延，5年、10年不算什麼，像是證所稅、油電價問題，一拖20年以上，司空見貫。" 

   "20年，一個新生兒大學都快畢業，都可以服役、投票了，時空轉變有多大？結果，爭議還是爭議，卡住就是卡住，20年前熱騰騰，有前瞻性的案子，也都走味了。事緩則圓，對。但台灣不是，事一直緩，但都沒有圓的時候。大家爭來爭去，卡來卡去，算來算去，都是政權，最後，選舉有輸贏，但台灣只有輸，沒有贏。”

   “工程慢、決策慢、立法慢，國家步伐就慢。越來越慢。慢到這幾年近乎停滯。我們到底要把怎麼樣的台灣願景交給下一代？太難了。因為下一代都長大了。這屬於70、80後的一代人如果就是在這種緩慢、混亂的氛圍里長大，這一代人，一整代人，就會以為這個國家的本質就是如此，進程就是如此。他們會習慣。他們不知道台灣曾經生機勃勃，日子苦雖苦，但大家唱“明天會更好”唱得很踏實，因為明天總是更好。”

   從古至今，只有中國社會治理的方法可行。

   在我看來，馬克思的共產主義思想沒有錯，盧梭和孟德斯鳩的自由和民主的主張也沒有錯；都是出於好意，出於人性的初衷，因而都高尚無比的。然而，他們又都犯了錯，那就是忽視了人類的動物本性，每個人都是自私自利的，某些人甚至沒有人性，只有獸性。

   如果忽視了人類的這種本性，任何高尚的社會治理的設想，都註定失敗。而自由民主的文明社會盲目推崇的自由，恰恰是在支持沒有人性的人危害守法勤勞的好人。

   既然，西方的非人性東西如此糟糕，許多國人還在鸚鵡學舌，推崇自由和民主，某些所謂的國內智庫里的庫人也在鼓吹民主。

   都是智障啊。愚已甚亦。

   搜集有關徐教授的資料，您會發現，他的依據，都是西方的某某如何說，不理解這些說法都是來自黑暗世紀的非人類文明。中國的文明社會，根本沒有產生這些垃圾的土壤。

   徐教授只想玩西方東西，不看西方的過去和現實，不計在中國推廣這些垃圾的後果。

   愚甚，哀甚......

    再看看西方的社會精英如何評論西方和中國。    

   Maybe, due to the unbearable torture of seeing increasingly people are sacrificing to the novel coronavirus simply due to the ignorant social governance; in Apr. 12, 2020, the editor-in-chief of Bloomberg News, Dr. John Micklethwait and the political editor of the Economist, Dr. Adrian Wooldridge jointly published article The Virus Should Wake Up the West to despaired sigh: “The job of government is to protect its citizens. The pandemic reveals that key institutions in Europe and the U.S. are no longer up to the job.”

   "Since Hobbes’s time, the world has come full circle. When he wrote “Leviathan,” China rather than Europe was the center of administrative excellence. China was the world’s most powerful country with the world’s biggest city (Beijing had more than a million inhabitants), the world’s mightiest navy and the world’s most sophisticated civil service, peopled by scholar-mandarins who were selected from across a vast empire by rigorous examinations.”

   "Indeed, it was the struggle for mastery in Europe that propelled Western government forward: Europe’s monarchies seized on technological innovations — particularly new ships and weapons — to improve their chances of survival. When the Chinese invented gunpowder they used it for fireworks; Europeans used it to blow one another (and then the Chinese) out of the water.”

   "The West’s governmental advantage is now questionable: Simply ask yourself whether you would feel safer today in New York and London or in Singapore and Seoul? Asia is catching up with the West, and in some smaller countries has overtaken it, in large part because Confucian Asia in particular has taken government seriously over the past few decades while the West has allowed it to ossify.”

   Clearly, the two outstanding media professionals angrily pronounced that the civilization of the West is inhuman play of struggle for mastery by blowing one another out of the water. While the self proud of electoral democracy is not acted as that of the "rule of the people" or the "rule of the majority" at all, but it is the typical dictatorship of the inhuman low quality individuals in clown show without sense that how to create a peaceful life for their people; instead made people, themselves and their families of all lost feeling of safety.