從川普和馬斯克之間的爭論談資產階級的文化大革命(bilingual 漢英雙語)Talking about the Cultural Revolution of the Bourgeoisie from the Dispute between Trump and Musk 04/19/2025 10:28 AM EDT Joe Zhang wrote: 老王：你對川普和馬斯克之間的爭論：即所謂技術效率與川普理念的公開爭論。這兩個強硬的人的分歧性質是什麼？這種挑戰、衝突，會導致裂縫多大？什麼的效果？請賜教！ * 不敢當。 但是政治體制中必然會有爭論以至於對立和分裂，這不是特例而是普遍現象。原因首先是觀念和意識形態上的不同導致的，其次是利害分析有別，以至於對事務的輕重緩急的取捨不同。 民主黨和共和黨兩黨近250年以來長期壟斷階級和國家的統治以來， 華盛頓沼澤發出異味，深層政府暗中擺弄全民，一味討好資本家階級，狼狽為奸；其民主政治腐朽、混亂、日益敗落，即使沒有MAGA黨出現， 也會有其他資產階級的反對派走上舞台，要去肅清華盛頓沼澤和為民除害。 自從2021年一月六日人民反對選舉盜竊因而舉行起義以來，無產階級就走上了反對民、共兩黨獨裁而腐朽的統治，展露了其對立階級的力量。 這說明：美國無產階級正在逐步擺脫掉二百多年以來的不抵抗、不反對、當然更不革命的資產階級化了的無產階級身份與性質，躍躍欲試回復其原階級的革命本質。 MAGA黨不但在美國，在歐洲等其他西方國家也有資產階級追隨的趨勢，因此它具有引發一場資產階級內部分裂、西方資無之間的鬥爭在沉寂了五、六十年甚至更久的當前，發動一場資產階級的文化大革命的可能性。在革命過程中，無產階級是重中之重，是左右都不能忽視的階級，而資產階級則處於被動。 雙方爭執必然與怎樣對待無產階級的要求有關-就是說，是把資產階級的當前利益稍作調整以換取無產階級的支持呢，還是堅持利益不予調整，繼續維持一副資本家唯利是圖的醜態呢？ 這場文化大革命雖然發自資產階級，然而無產階級奪取主動權是有可能的，尤其當2026年中期選舉來臨之際，無產階級的選舉能動力量是極為可觀的。那些死不改悔的頑固資產階級不會有什麼勝算的，而開明的、進步的資產階級將會取得革命的勝利。[Mark Wain 04/19/2025] Two cartoons: 政府欺詐與虐待，假左翼的危險流沙。 
Translation: Talking about the Cultural Revolution of the Bourgeoisie from the Dispute between Trump and Musk https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTEzNzk0 https://www.facebook.com/andrew.colesville https://x.com/mwsansculotte
04/19/2025 10:28 AM EDT Joe Zhang wrote: Lao Wang: Your opinion on the dispute between Trump and Musk: the so-called public dispute between technical efficiency and Trump's ideas. What is the nature of the disagreement between these two tough guys? How big will the rift be caused by this challenge and conflict? What effect will it have? Please enlighten me! * I don't dare to accept it. However, there will inevitably be disputes, confrontations and divisions in the political system. This is not an exception but a universal phenomenon. The reason is first of all the difference in concepts and ideologies, and secondly the difference in interest analysis, which leads to different choices of priorities. Since the Democratic and Republican parties have long monopolized the rule of the class and the country for nearly 250 years, the Washington swamp has smelled bad, the deep government has secretly manipulated the whole people, blindly flattered the capitalist class, and colluded with each other; its democratic politics is corrupt, chaotic, and increasingly declining. Even if the MAGA party does not appear, there will be other bourgeois oppositions on the stage to clean up the Washington swamp and eliminate harm for the people. Since the people’s uprising against election theft on January 6, 2021, the proletariat has been on the road to opposing the dictatorial and corrupt rule of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, revealing the power of its opposing class. This shows that the American proletariat is gradually getting rid of the bourgeois proletarian identity and nature of non-resistance, non-opposition, and of course non-revolution for more than 200 years, and is eager to restore its original class’s revolutionary nature. The MAGA Party has a tendency to be followed by the bourgeoisie not only in the United States, but also in other Western countries such as Europe. Therefore, it has the possibility of triggering a split within the bourgeoisie and the struggle between Western capitalism and the proletariat, which has been silent for 50, 60 years or even longer, and launching a bourgeois cultural revolution. In the process of revolution, the proletariat is the top priority and a class that cannot be ignored by both the left and the right, while the bourgeoisie is in a passive position. The dispute between the two sides is bound to be related to how to treat the demands of the proletariat - that is, should the bourgeoisie slightly adjust its current interests in exchange for the support of the proletariat, or should it insist on not adjusting its interests and continue to maintain the ugly appearance of capitalist profiteering? Although this Cultural Revolution originated from the bourgeoisie, it is possible for the proletariat to seize the initiative, especially when the 2026 mid-term elections come, the electoral dynamic power of the proletariat is extremely considerable. Those stubborn bourgeoisie who refuse to repent will not have any chance of winning, and the enlightened and progressive bourgeoisie will win the revolution. [Mark Wain 04/19/2025] Two cartoons: Government fraud and abuse and the dangerous quicksand of the fake left. Reply 川普總統發動的這場新型的資產階級MAGA運動。一開始就擺明是為了鐵鏽帶民眾、失去工作的工人階級；要抽乾華盛頓沼澤。運動的深入擴展，真的是像一場美國式的文化大革命，令人耳目一新！運動不斷觸及舊勢力的根本利益，尤其是對深層政府進行大刀闊斧的重創，使一直虎視眈眈的舊勢力都跳出來反對、對抗。 尤其是台前總指揮奧巴馬，他深埋的地雷被引爆，與地下網絡不斷被揪出。他現在更加赤膊上陣，聲稱發動幾十萬人暴動反抗。 深層政府看中馬斯克及其商業帝國顯然是最容易攻擊的薄弱環節，把之成了箭靶。從此契入川普、馬斯克聯盟，使其分裂！馬斯克如果看不到政治的殘酷、忍受不了巨大的損失，效率部就會被削弱。 在這場新型資產階級革命面前，自稱是社會主義的假共產黨習當局，更加快加緊其民族擴張主義腳步，加劇與川普政府對抗，寸步不讓，針鋒相對。這是當前世界局勢的最大最危險的火山口。[Joe Zhang April 19, 2025 ]
|
