| |
轉載：
讓巴維權少女出局
－－顧曉軍主義：改變中國·之二千零六十七
把《只有鐵腕反腐》發在雅典學園，一叫追真求恆的網友又來跟貼與我繞。其實，我能理解他們－－我被中共意識形態與政法委及所謂的知識精英們合夥封殺，結果是越封殺名氣越大；所以，他們總想與我過過招，好向其他人炫耀。
別說是一般的網友如此，就連入門、做了我弟子的石三生、不也在文章中說過、半文盲覺得他的文章、比我寫得好嗎？
誰的文章更好，在其次；這半文盲論文章好壞，能作數嗎？是不是？
《只有鐵腕反腐》，是針對《習近平“打老虎”或逼局勢突變……》寫的，網友紅塵是我的一句話、更乾脆－－“從古到今沒有一個貪污分子和腐敗集團敢造反的”，是這個道理吧？
世上的道理，往往被這樣或那樣的原因扭曲了。比如，“維權”是自由世界向專制國家輸出的概念。那麼，自由世界是不是應該考慮專制國家的具體情況呢？
應該。但美國精英們沒有考慮。他們只知道“保護對少數失去公民權者的侵蝕”（請參考美國《外交政策》之《怎樣將民主帶到中國》作者：黃亞生），而忘記了在專制體制內大多數人的公民權都被侵蝕了。
因此，在這樣的情況下，“保護對少數失去公民權者的侵蝕”沒有意義。你美國精英們樹的“維權”典型陳光誠，與中共樹的好人典型雷鋒，有什麼兩樣？甚至，還不如！雷鋒做好事，還總有人授益；陳光誠出名、發財，與中國普通老百姓又有什麼關係呢？
黃亞生在《怎樣將民主帶到中國》中已經說了“即使最具批判性的北京知識分子也承認，陳光誠和其他異議分子的想法在中國13億中只能得到微乎其微的回應”，可自以為是的西方精英們，又打造出了“巴基斯坦維權少女馬拉拉”。
這西方精英們打造的馬拉拉，與中共打造的張海迪有何區別？張海迪是“身殘志堅”，馬拉拉是“塔利班槍口下待放的花蕾”－－張海迪高位截癱卻能開車，馬拉拉是“待放的花蕾”卻已獲“國家和平獎”。
都已獲“國家和平獎”了，還是什麼“待放的花蕾”呢？這不分明是在做戲？其實，在顧粉團向美國《外交政策》推薦“全球百位思想家”、向美國《時代周刊》推薦“年度風雲人物”，而《時代周刊》甩掉所有中國人、推出“巴維權少女”時，我已明白：中共意識形態與政法委及所謂的知識精英們，已與西方精英們聯繫好了－－打造一個弱女子的形象，從而封殺顧曉軍、封殺“公正第一”。
證明：CIBN《塔利班槍口下待放的花蕾：巴基斯坦維權少女馬拉拉》“國際在線報道：一個花季少女卻擁有成為政治家的遠大理想”。理想也能說事嗎？如果一孩子想當總統咋辦呢？
再證：香港中國通訊社的《巴維權少女被提名為諾貝爾和平獎候選人》。諾獎評委會不是明確提名均有50年的保密期的嗎？怎麼可以這樣不守信用、這麼造勢呢？是不是中西方的精英們，看到顧粉團的《向諾貝爾和平獎推薦顧曉軍(專題/中英文/更新中)》的氣勢着急了？想一步到位、既成事實？
可精英們卻忘了：顧曉軍的“公正是第一價值觀”已構成思想體系，而馬拉拉只有“成為政治家的遠大理想”。你們雖可捧紅一少女、把她捧成和平獎的獲得者，但是，你們將背上阻礙人類思想發展的罵名。顧粉團會記錄下這一切，並告訴這個世界的後人。除非遵守諾言－－讓巴維權少女出局。
顧曉軍 2013-2-1 南京
http://my.opera.com/guxiaojun/blog/show.dml/58549612
Let Pakistani human rights girl out
- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's two thousand and sixty-seven
Translator: God has eyes
Hair "iron-fisted anti-corruption" at the Athens
Academy, called chase really seeking constant of
friends came abreast of me around. In fact, I can
understand them - I was the Communist
ideology and the Politics and Law Committee,
and the so-called intellectual elite partner
blocked, the result is more blocked fame the
greater; Therefore, they always want to exchange
blows with me, good to show off to other people.
Not to mention so general users, even the entry-
do my disciples Dan Sansheng, and not also the
article said, semiliterate feel his article, I write
you?
Who better article, followed; This semiliterate
theory article is good or bad, can be operands
do? Is not it?
"Only an iron hand, anti-corruption, Xi Jinping
tigers" or mutation to force the situation ...
"written by friends Red Dust is my sentence,
more simply -" Since ancient times no one dared
to corruption of molecules and corruption Group
rebel "and the truth, right?
The truth of the world, tend to be this or that
reason distorted. For example, the "rights" is the
output of the concept of the free world to the
authoritarian state. The free world should
consider the specific circumstances of the
authoritarian state it?
Should. American elites are not considered. They
only know the "erosion protection of the minority
who lost citizenship" (please refer to United
States foreign policy, "" How to bring democracy
to China ": Yasheng Huang), and forget the
authoritarian regime within most people's
citizenship erosion a.
Accordingly, in such a case, the "protection"
meaningless minority erosion lost citizenship.
Typical American elites tree "rights" Chen
Guangcheng, and the good people of the
Chinese Communist Party tree typical Lei Feng,
What is different? Even not as good! Does good
things, but also the total was granted benefits;
Chen Guangcheng famous, fortune, and the
ordinary people in China what to do with it?
Yasheng Huang, "how to bring democracy to
China" has said "even if the most critical
intellectuals also admitted that the idea Chenof ??
and other dissidents in China's 1.3 billion can
only get a minimal response, self-righteous
Western elites, but also to create a the the
"Pakistan defenders girl malala".
Western elites to build malala, with the Chinese
Communists build Zhang Haidi What's the
difference? Zhang Haidi, "waist", malala "to be
put under the Taliban muzzle bud" - Zhang
Haidi paraplegia was able to drive, malala be
put the bud "has been" the National Peace Prize
.
Have been approved by the State Peace Prize, "to
be put the bud"? This is clearly not in a show?
In fact, in the care of the dough to the United
States' foreign policy "recommend" one hundred
global thinkers ", recommended to the United
States," the Times "Person of the Year", while
the "Times" to get rid of all the Chinese people,
launched Bavi the right girl " , I have to
understand: Ideology and Politics and Law
Committee of Communist China, and the so-
called intellectual elite who have contact with
the Western elites - and to create the image of a
weak woman, which blocked Gu Xiaojun ban "the
public impartiality".
Proof: the CIBN to be put under the Taliban
muzzle bud: Pakistani human rights activists the
girls malala "International Online reports: a
young girl, but has become the lofty ideals of
the politicians". Ideal can say things? If a child
wanted to be president supposed to do?
The card: Hong Kong China News Agency "Bavi
the right girl to be nominated for the Nobel
Peace Prize. Nobel jury is not clear the
nomination have confidentiality period of 50
years.? How can such bad faith, such a
campaign? Is not in the Western elites, see Gu
dough "Gu Xiaojun (thematic / English / update)
" momentum anxious to recommend to the Nobel
Peace Prize? One step, a fait accompli?
Elites forget: Gu Xiaojun of "the public
impartiality is the first values" constitutes a
system of thought, rather malala only "lofty
ideals become politicians. You can, although
helped popularize a girl, her name into the
Peace Prize winner, however, you will bear the
infamy hinder the development of human
thought. Gu dough will record all of this, and
tell the world to future generations. Keep their
promises - Bavi the right girl out.
Gu Xiaojun 2013-2-1 Nanjing
|
