发表评论-风萧萧-万维博客-万维读者网（电脑版）

The existing rules for legal sentencing and the manner of adjudicating cases are unsuited to the governance of human society with the inborn flaws that favoring the layers colludes with judges for greed; therefore; the power of judgment must be stripped from judges, and the verdicts must be rendered by a jury of big group of social elites based on the facts of case rather than the rules for sentencing.

Laws are man-made and the flaws must be amended in a timely manner. <<<<<<<<<<><>******<><>>>>>>>>>>

Human selfish instinct doomed difficulty of governance

Humans are inherently selfish animals driven by an innate instinct for self-interest; the survival-oriented social activities fueled by this instinct serve as the primary engine of economic development and sustain the very existence and functioning of society. Without this innate selfishness, human society could not exist. Humanity can never escape the inescapable reality that both societal progress and the realization of a good life rely on this selfish instinct as a driving force.

It is precisely because human social behavior is driven by an innate selfishness to cause most people lack rationality and act recklessly; so that human society, which prides itself on being composed of "higher animals," proves so difficult to govern; it is easy to cause bad, yet hard to do good.

翻译结果

The most alarming aspect is that many individuals act with reckless audacity, abusing public authority for private gain and corrupting the governance of society.

Europe is a place where fabricated God brainwashed people into sworn enmity of bestial genes in bloody slaughter. Its products of civilization serve merely to indulge humanity's selfish and evil instincts—a reality that extends to its judicial system.

AI Overview said that legal system is favoring for greed

People share the feeling that lawyers, judges, and legal systems can sometimes prioritize financial gain or technicalities over actual justice and common sense.

While the legal system is designed to protect rights and resolve conflicts peacefully, it is far from perfect. Critics, legal scholars, and citizens frequently point out several systemic issues:

Financial Barriers: High legal fees can make quality representation unaffordable for the average person, giving wealthy individuals or large corporations an unfair advantage.

Frivolous Lawsuits: The abuse of liability laws can sometimes lead to predatory lawsuits that strain small businesses and drive up costs for consumers.

Systemic Inefficiencies: Loopholed legislation and bureaucratic delays can drag cases out for years, causing immense emotional and financial drain on families.

Lack of Accountability: In some regions, legal professionals and judges face very little oversight, making it difficult to correct cases of misconduct or bias.

At the same time, many reform advocates, ethical lawyers, and civil rights groups work continuously to fix these flaws through legal aid programs, judicial oversight committees, and regulatory reforms.

Suicidal Empathy weaponized leads to civilizational decline

May 26 2026, I wrote Elon Musk the Suicidal Empathy destroys the world, inspired by Israeli-Canadian evolutionary behavioral scientist professor Gad Saad; who proposed the concept of Suicidal Empathy in Jan 28 2025 Joe Rogan experience, a podcast hosted by American Joe Rogan.

Nov 5 2025, Tesla Elon Musk indicates that Suicidal Empathy has been weaponized and that over-prioritizing short-term feelings over long-term structural consequences leads to civilizational decline.

In Canada; the Suicidal Empathy abused to ruin Canadian life

Collusion between judges and lawyers exploits the legal system for personal profits has been common and the situation in Canada is particularly absurd.

When illegal immigrants commit serious crimes, judges deliberately hand down lenient sentences to prevent their deportation. Lawyers then cash in by helping these convicted criminals file claims for political asylum status, then effectively forcing the Canadian public to foot the bill for their upkeep.

This kind of nefarious conduct by judges and lawyers has become widespread; which antihuman manners have been developed into a terminal cancer within the society of Canada, destroying the lives of Canadian people.

Lawyer colluds Judge greed by making people homeless

Dec 3, 2012, article B.C. woman may lose home to her lawyer reports: A woman's lawyer is poised to take her property to settle his six-figure legal bill.

"There was a three-week trial – three weeks! For my little place in the country. I mean, it just seems a little overboard and ridiculous," Fotsch said. "There were three tables of binders, with papers stacked sky high."

The fact was clear that lawyer colluding with judge repeatedly held court sessions; until they made the legal charges were enough to seize her property.

Fotsch got into predicament after being sued by her former common-law husband, even though she won the case and the court ordered him to pay her costs.

"I won, but I lost," Fotsch said. "I defended myself and now I'm losing my place."

Fotsch, 54, lives near Pemberton with her disabled son and earns a modest income. Her only asset is her home and the 12 hectares of land it sits on.

"I've worked two jobs, and I have for the last 25 years," Fotsch said. "When I was hit with this, it was just like a bomb went off in my life."

A decade ago, her common law ex-husband Leigh Wilson went after Fotsch, trying to get a piece of her property after their breakup. The case took nine years to resolve, which was years longer than her lawyer had predicted, she said.

She said she had already paid thousands in legal fees when the case finally went to trial in 2007. As it advanced, her lawyer said he wouldn't continue unless she allowed him to secure a $100,000 mortgage against her property, at 18 per cent interest per year.

Fotsch's bill just keeps climbing because of $88 per day in interest charges.

Vancouver divorce lawyer Jonas Dubas charges $300 an hour. His invoices to Fotsch include charges like $148.40 to simply call another lawyer and leave a voicemail message.

When she finally won, in 2010, the B.C. Court of Appeal ordered Fotsch's former husband to pay her court costs.

However, her ex-husband has since declared bankruptcy, so he hasn't paid and she can't force him to. Meanwhile, her legal bill has mushroomed — with $88 a day in interest charges — and has now reached $180,000.

"I have a hard time sleeping at night. I'm one that keeps my bills paid. I've always paid my bills," Fotsch said.

She said her bank refused to lend her money to pay her lawyer's fees because she already has another mortgage. Dubas has hired his own lawyer who is taking steps to foreclose on Fotsch's home.

The Law Society of B.C., the governing body for the province's legal profession, would not comment on the case, but said that in general, what Dubas did is not against the rules.