Whither AI? Part 1. https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTI2MTU5
https://www.facebook.com/andrew.colesville https://x.com/mwsansculotte
"Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO.)" The Economical Darwinism - "Fear Of Missing Out - Some of the competitors will flame out and some will do really well, and that’s just how capitalism works." https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/technology/what-exactly-are-ai-companies-trying-to-build-heres-a-guide.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mU8.OtwT.CqgSvXUOkG8-&smid=url-share AI should be taken as a tool for augment of human's un-ending pursuit of new knowledge. I defined: "AI as "Smart Encyclopedia Based on Machine Evolution" (S.E.B.O.M.E.)" https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTEyMDM0 As AI becomes a self-aggrandizing doxa, few comments are critical or open-minded. The above-mentioned comments are rare. Capital induced and ordained AI, no doubt, has to be reckoned with great care. Of course, as the sebome properties as well as essence of AI have become clear, people will understand AI's self-bragging simply as a selling point with a religious flavor. https://blog.creaders.net/u/12901/202508/522235.html One of the dangers brought out by AI is that, as mentioned above, it fails to gain enough traction that can justify its trillion-dollar investment, rendering those once magnificent data centers lawns overgrown with weeds. In order to maintain good-looking bottom lines, capitalists would put the burden of all the investment-losses to the working people as inflationary goods and services. Had the unemployment rate gone rampant because of either AI or secular movement, say 25% which would be on par with that of the Great Depression, social unrest couldn't go anywhere but up. Capitalism has been sustained continuously as long as five hundred years without being torn apart by either alien or opposing forces, will it destroy all by itself? If one doesn't believe so, one has to ask why those domestic political- and social-forces have fallen so much apart that violence and hostility among them have become commonplace. Is this kind of internal conflicts caused by internal division of economic, political, and social-class interests temporary？ Will the AI movement become a force of compromise and equal benefit among all? [Mark Wain 09-16-2025]
漢語譯文 人工智能往何處去？第一部分
https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTI2MTU5
https://www.facebook.com/andrew.colesville https://x.com/mwsansculotte
“害怕錯過（FOMO 即Fear Of Missing Out）”——經濟達爾文主義的 “害怕錯過——一些競爭對手會失敗，而另一些則會發展得很好，這就是資本主義的運作方式。” https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/technology/what-exactly-are-ai-companies-trying-to-build-heres-a-guide.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mU8.OtwT.CqgSvXUOkG8-&smid=url-share 人工智能應該被視為一種工具，用來增強人類對新知識的永無止境的追求。我的定義是：“人工智能是‘基於機器進化的智能百科全書’ 即Smart Encyclopedia Based On Machine Evolution （S.E.B.O.M.E.）”或賽博梅。見： https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTEyMDM0 隨着人工智能成為一種自我吹捧的信條，很少有評論是批判性的或開放的。上述兩篇評論更是鳳毛麟角。 毫無疑問，資本誘導和信仰的人工智能必須被謹慎對待。當然，隨着人工智能的本質和特性逐漸清晰，人們會將人工智能的自我吹噓理解為一種帶有宗教色彩的賣點。見： https://blog.creaders.net/u/12901/202508/522235.html 人工智能帶來的危險之一是，正如上文所述，它未能獲得足夠的發展動力來證明其數萬億美元的投資是合理的，導致曾經輝煌過的數據中心成為雜草叢生的草坪。為了維持良好的盈利，資本家會將所有投資損失的負擔以通貨膨脹的商品和服務的形式轉嫁給勞動人民。如果失業率因為人工智能或世俗運動而飆升，比如說25%，相當於大蕭條時期的失業率，那麼社會動盪只會加劇。 資本主義制度已經持續存在了五百年，從未被外來力量或內部反對力量所撕裂，它會自行毀滅嗎？如果不相信，就不得不問，為什麼這些國內的政治和社會力量會如此分崩離析，以至於它們之間的暴力和敵對行為變得司空見慣。這種由經濟、政治和社會階層利益分裂造成的內部衝突是暫時的嗎？ 人工智能運動會成為一股讓所有人妥協、互惠互利的力量嗎？[馬克·韋恩2025-09-16] *
|
