世界史：生命自組織交互共生的再平衡進程

World History: A Symbiotic Process of Life’s Self-Organizing Balance and Rebalancing

錢  宏（Archer Hong Qian）

前 言

旅途筆記：全部歷史的第一個前提，無疑是生命自組織連接平衡與再平衡的交互主體共生。世界史，當然就是這樣發軔的。先是斯堪的納維亞半島維京人發軔，接着伊比利亞、亞平寧、巴爾幹三大半島得天獨厚的人們，這裡歷史形成的國家，分別書寫了16世紀之前世界歷史，然後上場的才是從尼德蘭半島到英倫島國開創的近代化進程，然後，法國、德國、蘇聯先後試圖美利堅合眾國主導的現代化登場，陸地國家從來都是被書寫的，雖然中間夾雜着法國、德國、蘇聯、中國先後試圖擴張陸權世界，但並沒有在語言、制度、技術、經濟、文化上表現出更多的創新與糾錯能力而表現平平且難以持續，那麼接下來將如何……

Travel Notes: The first premise of all history is undoubtedly the intersubjective symbiosis of life’s self-organizing connection, balance, and rebalancing. World history, of course, originated in this way. It began with the Vikings of the Scandinavian Peninsula, followed by the uniquely advantaged peoples of the Iberian, Apennine, and Balkan peninsulas, whose nations shaped world history before the 16th century. Then came the modernizing process initiated by the Low Countries and the British Isles. Subsequently, France, Germany, and the Soviet Union successively attempted to join the modernization led by the United States, while land-based nations have always been the subjects written about. Though interspersed with efforts by France, Germany, the Soviet Union, and China to expand a land-power world, they showed little innovation or corrective capacity in language, institutions, technology, economy, or culture, resulting in mediocre and unsustainable outcomes. So, what comes next?

第一節：維京航行者與主體流動的原型

I. The Vikings: Proto-Mobility and Subjectual Awakening

斯堪的納維亞半島的維京人是最早打破陸地封閉秩序的“主體流動者”。他們通過遠征、貿易、定居，傳播語言、貨幣、文化與技術，開啟了歐洲跨區域共生網絡的早期雛形，代表了“由靜入動”的轉型，從地方性向全域網絡的主體擴散。

The Vikings of the Scandinavian Peninsula were the earliest "mobile subjects" to break the enclosed order of land-based systems. Through expeditions, trade, and settlement, they spread language, currency, culture, and technology, laying the foundation for an early cross-regional symbiotic network in Europe, marking a shift from stasis to motion and a diffusion of subjects from local to global scales.

第二節：地中海三半島的共生實踐

II. The Three Peninsulas: Mediterranean Symbiotic Civilizations

伊比利亞、亞平寧、巴爾幹三大半島孕育了羅馬法、伊斯蘭哲學、東正教文明、文藝復興與大航海。這些文明在衝突中相互學習，在分裂中形成互補，通過平衡信仰、法制、技術與地緣利益，在“再平衡”過程中創造了文藝復興與航海時代，書寫了16世紀之前的世界歷史。

The Iberian, Apennine, and Balkan peninsulas gave rise to Roman law, Islamic philosophy, Orthodox Christianity, the Renaissance, and the Age of Exploration. These civilizations learned from each other amid conflicts and complemented one another despite divisions, balancing faith, law, technology, and geopolitical interests to create the Renaissance and the maritime era, shaping world history before the 16th century.

第三節：北海諸島的制度創新與主體獨立

III. The North Sea Isles: Institutional Innovation and Subjectual Independence

尼德蘭與英倫島國的興起，標誌着“去神權化”的文明飛躍。通過議會制、宗教改革與航海金融，它們確立了主體之間的“相對自治”模式，完成了一次信息與治理結構的“再編碼”，適應了全球交互密度上升的需求，開啟了近代化進程。

The rise of the Low Countries and the British Isles marked a civilizational leap from divine sovereignty to secular autonomy. Through parliamentary systems, religious reforms, and maritime finance, they established a model of "relative autonomy" among subjects, re-encoding information and governance structures to meet the rising density of global interactions, initiating the modern era.

第四節：美利堅的示範型交互主體

IV. America: The Demonstrative Interactive Subject

美國的現代化路徑超越了技術領先，確立了“生活方式+治理理念”的全球共生模板。從法治到創新，從個人自由到國家競爭，美國成為全球主體模仿或對抗的參照物，作為首個以“示範性自組織系統”自居的國家，通過制度樣板、技術接口與生活方式，誘發他國的“自我模仿”與“協同再平衡”。

The United States’ modernization path went beyond technological leadership, establishing a global symbiotic template of lifestyle and governance ideals. From the rule of law to innovation, from individual freedom to national competition, it became a model for others to emulate or challenge. As the first nation to position itself as a "demonstrative self-organizing system," it sparked self-imitation and collaborative rebalancing in other countries through institutional models, technological interfaces, and ways of life.

第五節：陸權國家的內向型阻抗

V. Continental Powers: Resistant Systems Struggling for Internal Rebalancing

傳統陸權國家（如法國、德國、蘇聯、中國）由於地理與結構上的“封閉性自組織”模式，早期具備穩定性，但隨着全球交互密度升高，其內向型結構難以完成快速再平衡，表現為滯後、焦慮甚至極端反應。儘管試圖擴張陸權世界，但它們在語言、制度、技術、經濟、文化上缺乏創新與糾錯能力，表現平平且難以持續。

Traditional land-based powers (e.g., France, Germany, the Soviet Union, China) adopted a "closed self-organizing" model, offering early stability. However, as global interaction density increased, their inward-looking structures struggled to achieve rapid rebalancing, resulting in lag, anxiety, and even extreme reactions. Despite attempts to expand a land-power world, they lacked innovation and corrective capacity in language, institutions, technology, economy, and culture, leading to mediocre and unsustainable outcomes.

第六節：新北約與《海牙宣言》的集體再平衡

VI. The New NATO and the Hague Declaration: A Collective Rebalancing in Action

2025年《海牙聯合宣言》標誌着北約的一次“集體再平衡行為”。各國主動承擔更多安全支出，不再依附美國，卻保持互動系統。這不是解構，而是一次自組織結構的演化升級，體現了交互主體的成熟與平等，邁向多元主體共生的新時代。

The 2025 Hague Joint Declaration marks a "collective rebalancing action" for NATO. Member states have taken on greater security responsibilities, reducing dependence on the U.S. while maintaining an interactive system. This is not a dismantling but an evolutionary upgrade of self-organizing structures, reflecting the maturity and equality of interactive subjects in a multipolar age of symbiosis.

結語：共生的未來與全球化3.0的再平衡

Conclusion: The Future of Symbiosis and Rebalancing in Globalization 3.0

從維京航行者到地中海半島，再到海洋主導與美利堅的示範，人類歷史正逼近一個“多元主體共生”的新時代。未來不再是“誰統治誰”，而是“誰能成為值得共生的對象”，誰能喚醒他者的自組織能力，推動系統進入下一輪再平衡。錢宏教授指出，全球化從2.0（以跨國公司主導的生產網絡和互害機制為特徵）進入3.0（以技術驅動、區域化和去中心化為特徵），需要超越傳統的權力主導，轉向基於共生哲學的交互網絡。“Minds Bank”與“Amorsophia MindsNetworking”正是在這一背景下提出的，旨在通過“共生鏈”激活全球思想的再平衡（參看《The Simplest Triad of Globalization最簡明的全球化三段論》 http://symbiosism.com.cn/9985.html）。這也是“以實力求和平”的深層含義：不是強迫他者屈服，而是激發一個多主體共生的生態系統。那麼，接下來將由誰書寫這一共生的未來？

From Viking voyages to Mediterranean peninsulas, maritime dominance, and America’s demonstration, human history approaches a multipolar age of symbiosis. The future is no longer about "who rules whom," but "who can become a worthy co-subject." It will be determined by those who awaken others’ self-organizing potential and guide the system into the next round of rebalancing. Professor Archer Hong Qian argues that globalization has transitioned from 2.0—characterized by multinational corporate-driven production networks and mutual harm mechanisms—to 3.0, marked by technology-driven, regionalized, and decentralized dynamics, requiring a shift from traditional power dominance to interaction networks based on symbiotic philosophy. "Minds Bank" and "Amorsophia MindsNetworking," supported by the "Symbiosis Chain," are proposed in this context to activate global thought rebalancing. This is the deeper meaning of "peace through strength"—not forcing submission, but igniting a multi-subject symbiotic ecosystem. So, who will write the next chapter of this symbiotic future?

Archer Hong Qian

June 28, 2025, Pto to Santiago de Compostela to Porto, Portuorgal-Spain-Portugal

附錄：

人類本可和解共生，只需懂一點放棄（特權）的藝術

從新加坡、西班牙、摩洛哥、葡萄牙大街小巷和鄉間行走，你會看見不同膚色、語言、衣着、宗教標識的人們，相擁於同一個時空意間的常態。大家相互打招乎，禮讓，微笑，做生意，共進晚餐，鍛煉身體⋯⋯幾乎沒有任何阻隔，我不由得想到，在自然生態愛之智慧（調節）下，人們對英國、法國、德國會被外來民族（生育優勢、政治特權）吞噬的擔憂，也許是多餘的或被誇大其詞了？

由此，我也不能不想到川普推動的《亞伯拉罕協議》，將可望成為促進民族宗教融合交互主體共生（Intersubjective Symbiosism）的一個範例。

造物主大愛全能，大自然足夠慷慨（參考大獨裁者里理髮師查理最後的感言），生命自組織連接平衡與再平衡真假、善惡、美醜、智愚、聖魔、天堂地獄！

以地中海沿岸各國為例，大部份國家都建設得很美，人們各從其類生活自在，凡事搞不好的國家，特別是本來搞得不錯卻突然被搞砸了的國家，都是那裡發生了一些小問題未能智慧地及時處理好，而被追求特權卻以美麗的名義、謊言、話術包裝，煽動情緒，得手之後高壓➕愚民堅持！

其實，人類所有不能與自然、社會、自我和解共生的阻隔（言行舉止和制度），無不來自特權意識及特權階層操縱政權和壟斷資源所致，這也是在阿根廷會出現米萊式糾偏、美國會出現川普式糾偏的原由！

人類沒有解不開的結，只要懂一點放棄特權的藝術（如1974葡萄牙康乃馨革命、1975佛朗哥還權於推行民主的西班牙王室），只是有時候確實需要霹靂手段，快刀斬亂麻。

這是共生經濟學（Symbionomics）的觀察。

2025.6.20晨於
Lisbon the 7 Hotel 101