俄烏第三和平方略：五項基本原則、十一條和平框架 The Third Peace Strategy for Russia and Ukraine: Five Fundamental Principles and an Eleven-Point Peace Framework ——交互主體共生視野下的地緣政治出路 — A Geopolitical Pathway under the Vision of Intersubjective SymbiosismArcher Hong Qian （Global Symbiosism Society）
俄烏戰爭三年多，形勢越發錯綜複雜，但無論多麼複雜，已經不是“誰贏誰輸”的問題，而是簡單到如何結束“荼毒生命，毀滅文明”的問題，否則結果必是“不共生，就共死”。 那麼，導致歐洲乃至世界危機的俄烏戰爭如何終結？ 請允許我本着基於“生命自組織連接平衡與再平衡”的交互主體共生（Intersubjective Symbiosism）哲學，重申一年前提出的解決導致歐洲危機的俄烏戰爭之第三方略（參看《俄烏止戰/止盈的第三條思路》，刊於香港《文化中國》總第118期）。現略去戰爭態勢分析，微調後再次發布。 從自然法的視角，人類戰爭是一種特殊的生態戰爭。 尤其是熱兵器時代人類的生態戰爭，一旦開打，就有一種超強裹挾力，不但可能把整個人類，還會把整個地球生靈裹挾進來，且戰爭手段無所不用其極，非常殘忍而慘烈！一旦開打，就沒有人可以“叫停戰爭”，總是開打容易（往往是一念之間），結束難（不可收拾），而且，迄今為止，人類戰爭從來沒有通過某個人某個機構“仲裁”終結一場戰爭的先例！ 人類戰爭，尤其是現代戰爭的止戰方式，只有五種：1、徹底勝負方式；2、打打談談方式；3、以打促談方式；4、同歸於盡方式；5、覺悟共生方式。 
這裡只說第五種方式。戰爭久拖不決，參戰方都難以取勝，都深感“疲憊不堪”，到了各方面可承受的極限，突然發現：戰爭，其實一開始就非必要，而完全是某些觀念作祟和誤判，導致一場曠日持久的生靈塗炭，大家翻轉極限，覺悟後坐下來“議和”，最典型的例子，就是三十年戰爭（1618－1648），議出了一個奠定此後“主權（民族）國家”世界秩序的《威斯特伐利亞和約》。 這就是“交互主體共生”哲學的最鮮明案例！ 那麼，我要說的是：俄烏“三年戰爭”的終結方式，有沒有仿效覺悟共生的“議和”方式，從而結出一個“化解衝突重建世界新秩序”的歷史性新成果呢？ 我想，熱核+AI時代的當代人，只要當事方，有足夠的愛之智慧（Aomrsophia）、勇氣擔當和能力，擱置捲入戰爭是主動/被動，直接/間接，比如在“議和”並實施基礎上，最後有沒有可能朝着簽訂一份的《全球共生公約》方向邁進呢？ 對於俄烏三年戰爭的終結方式，我不但不排除這“第五種方式”的可能性，而且認定，“翻轉極限，覺悟共生”，是當今國際社會主流，應當且最值得努力爭取的結果！ 這就是我們為什麼提出直接交戰的俄烏雙方止戰條件之外的第三方略：五項基本原則，十一條和平框架“時空意間”背景。 五項基本原則 1.烏克蘭作為一個有效治理的主權獨立國家，其國家地位不可動搖、不可剝奪； 2.生命安全優先於領土幻覺，人的尊嚴高於任何歷史敘事和利益訴求； 3.“小即是美”“社區大於國家”的多元獨立共生體制，是中東歐與俄羅斯緩衝區與未來世界和平的共生法則； 4.俄羅斯的“安全感”，應被納入共生協商機制，但不得以毀滅本國人民和他國存在為代價； 5.歐美不以徹底摧毀俄羅斯，而以“技術—經濟繁榮—人文共生網絡”引導其脫離帝國思維，重新融入全球文明秩序。 
十一條和平框架 1.實現美國總統50天內停火建議，100天內完成俄烏雙方有序撤出烏東與庫爾斯克地區，建立和談平台； 2.和平談判由烏克蘭與俄羅斯主談，歐盟、英國參與，美國主導主持； 3.烏東四州（頓涅茨克、盧甘斯克、扎波羅熱、赫爾松）在全民公投、國際監督下，建立“小即是美”原則下的獨立國家，脫離雙方控制，採取中立政策； 4.加里寧格勒州（俄羅斯飛地）在區域公投下轉型為“柯尼斯堡共和國”，不再受俄聯邦直接控制； 5.克里米亞維持現狀由俄羅斯託管，但國際承認其原則上為“獨立待定”，由未來烏俄共商解決主權歸屬； 6.俄羅斯須歸還在戰爭中擄走的所有烏克蘭兒童、平民及其財物資產； 7.歐洲設立聯合維和部隊，由英國與歐盟共同領導，派駐至烏東四州與柯尼斯堡地區，監督其安全建國進程； 8.確立烏克蘭中、西部“東儀天主教”文化與烏克蘭民族傳統基礎，俄羅斯及國際社會承認，以基輔為首都，領土完整主權獨立的“新烏克蘭”共和國； 9.俄羅斯用於戰爭所被凍結資產一部分將以戰後重建資金形式補償新烏克蘭，歐美同時取消對俄羅斯的全面經濟制裁； 10.新烏克蘭共和國是否加入歐盟與北約為其主權選擇，俄羅斯不得干預，同時，歐盟與北約對俄羅斯開放談判大門； 11.和平協議簽署，邀請以下7國作為地緣安全共生體見證人：白俄羅斯、波蘭、立陶宛、芬蘭、羅馬尼亞、摩爾多瓦、土耳其。 
戰略意義簡析 
1.維護烏克蘭國家主體性：從起點就確認其獨立主權與治理合法性，打破任何“去國化”幻想； 2.終結帝國邏輯：將領土爭議轉化為中立小國網絡，實現歷史負擔的和平“孵化”與文明轉譯； 3.構建共生安全帶：圍繞俄歐之間的地理張力，建立若干中立地帶作為文明緩衝器，避免俄羅斯與北約直接對撞； 4.孞態網（Minds Network）AI-TRUST基礎設施：在三網融合（互聯網、物聯網、孞態網）生態獎抑機制等變革性技術倫理的支撐下，實現“人-AI（工具理性）-TRUST（組織）”交互主體共生，改變和平衡人類生產、生態、生活方式。短期內，亦可協助歐洲維和部隊完成監督停火、透明治理、公投信任與戰爭創傷療愈工作； 5.全球共生範式試驗場：首次在歐陸危機中嘗試以“生命—主權—共生”的三元結構替代“武力—制裁—談判”的舊世界秩序，“讓任何統治全世界的帝國政治企圖都成為不可能”（康德《論永久和平》）。 2024年3月提出，2025年7月更新於溫哥華 聯繫方式： hongguanworld@gmail.com +1 604 690 6088 The Third Peace Strategy: Five Fundamental Principles and an Eleven-Point Peace FrameworkA Geopolitical Pathway under Intersubjective Symbiosism
By Archer Hong Qian
(Global Symbiosism Society)
More than three years into the Russia-Ukraine war, the situation has become increasingly entangled. Yet, no matter how complex it appears, the core issue is no longer about “who wins and who loses,” but rather how to end a war that devastates life and destroys civilization. Otherwise, the only possible outcome will be: no symbiosis, then mutual destruction. So, how can this war, which has triggered a crisis in Europe and the world at large, be brought to an end? Drawing from the philosophy of Intersubjective Symbiosism, which is grounded in the self-organizing connectivity and dynamic rebalancing of life, I hereby reaffirm a solution proposed one year ago—a Third Peace Strategy to address the war and its consequences for Europe (see “The Third Path to Ending or Profiting from the Russia-Ukraine War,” Cultural China, Issue 118, Hong Kong). This updated version skips battlefield analysis and focuses directly on the revised proposal. A Natural Law Perspective: Human Warfare as Ecological ConflictEspecially in the era of thermal weapons, war has become a form of ecological conflict, capable of sweeping not only all of humanity, but all life on Earth into its fold. The means of destruction have become virtually unlimited—brutal and merciless. Once war begins—often sparked by a single thought—there is no one capable of simply "calling it off." Beginning is easy, ending is chaos. And to date, there has never been a case where a war has been arbitrated and ended by a single person or institution. Modern warfare typically ends in one of five ways: Total victory and defeat; Alternating war and negotiation; Using war to pressure negotiation; Mutually assured destruction; Awakening to symbiosis.
Our Focus: The Fifth Way — Awakening to SymbiosisWhen war drags on and no side can achieve a decisive victory, and all participants feel exhausted and stretched to their limits, they may come to a sudden realization: this war, from the outset, was unnecessary, born out of entrenched ideologies and misjudgments. And so, a moment of awakening arrives. The participants turn from destruction to peace talks. The most iconic example: the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648), which led to the Peace of Westphalia, establishing the sovereign nation-state system that defines the modern world. This is the most vivid historical embodiment of Intersubjective Symbiosism. So the question becomes: Can the Russia-Ukraine war—three years long—be brought to an end through a similar process of enlightened negotiation and become a historical achievement that resolves conflict and rebuilds a new world order? Toward a Global Symbiosism PactIn the age of nuclear heat and AI, if the relevant parties can draw on sufficient Amorsophia (the wisdom of love), courage, responsibility, and competence—regardless of whether they were actively or passively, directly or indirectly involved—then, on the foundation of a peace agreement, is it not possible that they could one day sign a Global Symbiosism Pact? I firmly believe not only that this fifth path is possible, but that it is the most realistic, mainstream, and worthwhile outcome that the international community should pursue. This is why we propose, in addition to the conditions for a direct ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, a Third Peace Strategy composed of:
Five Fundamental Principles and an Eleven-Point Peace Framework,
under a background of Spatio-Temporal Interspace (時空意間). Five Fundamental PrinciplesUkraine is a sovereign and effectively governed independent nation.
Its national status is non-negotiable and cannot be revoked. The safety of human life takes precedence over territorial illusions.
Human dignity outweighs any historical narratives or interest claims. A pluralistic and symbiotic system of “small is beautiful” independent states
is the guiding law for peace in the buffer zone between Central/Eastern Europe and Russia. Russia’s sense of security must be addressed within a symbiotic consultation mechanism,
but must never come at the cost of destroying its own people or the existence of other nations. Western countries must not aim to destroy Russia completely,
but rather guide it out of imperial thinking through a network of technological, economic, and humanistic symbiosis,
allowing it to rejoin the global civilizational order.
Eleven-Point Peace FrameworkImplement the U.S. President’s proposal for a ceasefire within 50 days,
and complete the orderly withdrawal of both sides from eastern Ukraine and the Kursk region within 100 days,
with a peace negotiation platform established. Peace talks will be primarily conducted between Ukraine and Russia,
with the European Union and the United Kingdom participating, and the United States leading and hosting. The four eastern Ukrainian regions (Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson)
will, under international supervision and public referendums, become independent neutral states based on the “small is beautiful” principle,
free from control by either Ukraine or Russia. Kaliningrad (Russian exclave) will, through a regional referendum,
be transformed into the Republic of Königsberg, no longer directly governed by the Russian Federation. Crimea will remain under Russian trusteeship,
but will be internationally recognized as “independently undetermined”,
with its final sovereign status to be negotiated jointly by Ukraine and Russia in the future. Russia must return all Ukrainian children, civilians, and private property abducted during the war. A European peacekeeping force, jointly led by the UK and the EU,
will be stationed in the four eastern regions and Königsberg to oversee their peaceful nation-building processes. The cultural foundation of “Eastern Rite Catholicism” and Ukrainian national identity
in central and western Ukraine shall be affirmed,
and both Russia and the international community shall recognize the new sovereign, territorially complete Republic of New Ukraine, with Kyiv as its capital. A portion of Russia’s frozen wartime assets shall be used as reconstruction funds for New Ukraine,
while the West concurrently lifts comprehensive economic sanctions on Russia. Whether New Ukraine joins the EU or NATO is its sovereign choice;
Russia shall not interfere. At the same time, EU and NATO must open dialogue with Russia for potential cooperation. Upon signing the peace agreement, seven countries shall be invited to serve as witnesses and symbiotic security guarantors:
Belarus, Poland, Lithuania, Finland, Romania, Moldova, and Turkey.
Strategic Significance OverviewAffirms Ukraine’s national sovereignty from the outset,
dispelling any illusions of “denationalization.” Ends imperial logic by transforming territorial disputes
into a network of neutral microstates, thereby “incubating peace” and translating historical burdens into civilizational transitions. Builds a symbiotic security buffer zone between Russia and Europe,
avoiding direct confrontation between NATO and Russia through a chain of neutral states. Minds Network (孞態網) AI-TRUST Infrastructure: Supported by the integration of three networks—Internet, Internet of Things (IoT), and the Minds Network—along with transformative techno-ethical reward–restraint mechanisms, this infrastructure enables intersubjective symbiosis among Humans, AI (instrumental reason), and TRUST (organizations), thereby reshaping and rebalancing modes of human production, ecology, and lifestyle. In the short term, it can also assist European peacekeeping forces in ceasefire monitoring, transparent governance, referendum trust-building, and trauma healing.
In the short term, this infrastructure can assist peacekeeping forces in overseeing ceasefires, transparent governance, referendum credibility, and trauma healing. A global pilot for the symbiosis paradigm:
For the first time in European crisis history, this framework replaces the old global order of Force – Sanctions – Negotiation
with a triadic structure of Life – Sovereignty – Symbiosis,
echoing Kant’s vision in Perpetual Peace to “make any attempt at world domination by empire politically impossible.”
Proposed: March 2024
Updated: July 2025 in Vancouver Contact:
📧 hongguanworld@gmail.com
📞 +1 604 690 6088
|
