国运的转捩点

A Turning Point in National Destiny

——简评2025美国《国家安全战略》

— A Brief Commentary on the United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy

（重要附录：《白皮书White Paper：重构全球化3.0战略洞察与行动指南 Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0》）

钱宏（Archer Hong Qian）

2025年12月7日于温哥华

1、NSS 战略重构的核心：灵活现实主义（Flexible Realism）

2、三个根本战略问题的回答

3、深远影响（multipolarity, great-power rivalry, alliances, uncertainty）

4、战略回归与全球化 3.0 架构

5、国运的转捩点：各国面临抉择

关键术语：

• “灵活现实主义” → Flexible Realism

• “自组织责任” → self-organizing responsibility

• “权力真空” → power vacuum

• “实力和平，和平繁荣” → peace-through-strength, prosperity-through-peace

• “单极幻象” → unipolar illusion

• “国运的转捩点” → A Turning Point in National Destiny

• “主权在民”→ sovereignty resides in the people

• “阻击型门罗主义”→Defensive Monroe Doctrine

美国总统唐纳德·川普（Donald Trump）已于近日（2025年12月4日晚）发布了他第二任期的首份《国家安全战略》（National Security Strategy, NSS）报告。

《国家安全战略》报告，可谓美国五十年来第一次在大战略上进行系统重构：既重新审视并卸下过去五十年特别三十年来，美国肩上不断堆积的义务、期待，及其制度惰性、财政负担与政治正确幻象，又是一场塑造未来世界三十年的战略重心再组织再布局——以“美国优先”（America First）为责任政策示范，强调放弃“永久主导世界”的“灵活现实主义”！但也绝不是美国全球角色的消极撤退，当然就不是什么孤立主义宣言。

这种灵活现实主义，在思维方式上，清晰地摆脱了21世纪初那种道德先行、意识形态优先的战略幻象，直接宣布“美国像阿特拉斯般支撑整个世界秩序的时代已经结束”，而回到了三个清晰判断：第一，美国究竟应当追求什么目标？第二，美国现有和潜在的资源与手段能够支撑什么？第三，如何在现实能力、国力结构与战略目标之间建立可持续的连接？

三个关键判断——追求目标、资源支撑、目标与能力的可持续连接——正是这份报告试图解决的根本问题。这份报告的内涵与影响体现在以下几个方面：

一、NSS战略重构的核心：“灵活现实主义”

“灵活现实主义”（Flexible Realism）是这份报告的灵魂。它标志着美国外交政策从后冷战时代试图建立单极世界秩序、推广普世价值的“理想主义干预”转向更务实、更克制，也更明晰的国家责任。

  摆脱道德与意识形态优先：报告明确不再将推广民主或干预他国内政作为首要任务，而是专注于保护“We the People”的切身利益，并强调这是一种责任示范。强调私下个国家，尤其是盟友，首先要对本国人民负责，保障发挥社区经济生活自组织连接平衡的活力。

  国家核心利益重新定位：战略重心回归“美国优先”，意味着所有政策都围绕如何最有效地保障美国的安全、经济繁荣和全球地位展开，美国不再做“世界警察”，而是实行一种“阻击型门罗主义”，这是“灵活现实主义”的题中应有之义。

二、NSS报告试图通过以下方式回答三个问题

1. 美国究竟应当追求什么？

追求一个“美国示范下的平衡秩序”：报告放弃了“永久主导世界”的野心和“全球自由贸易”幻象，转而寻求一种能够确保美国利益最大化的“产业链、供应链、价值链通畅的零关税、零壁垒、零歧视规则”全球平衡状态。核心目标从“塑造全球秩序”变为“确保美国在关键领域的首要地位并遏制挑战者”，特别是将中国和俄罗斯定位为主要战略竞争对手。这意味着放下以Subject自居而視他国为Object的传统思维，进入Intersubjective Symbiosism当代思维的价值取向。

1. 美国现有的资源与手段能够支撑什么？

报告承认美国国力并非无限，必须聚焦资源，进行战略把控和资源再分配。通过降低欧洲和中东的战略权重，并重申新“门罗主义”，美国得以将有限的资源集中投入到它认为最关键的西半球和印太地区，以确保资源与战略目标相匹配。这里意味着在经济价值参量上，改变二战以来延用了80多年的以资本增值/减值为标准的GDP价值参量，而采用以资源能效/能耗为标准的GDE价值参量。

1. 如何在现实能力、国力结构与战略目标之间建立可持续的连接？

战略收缩与责任调整：NSS报告通过系统性地“卸下不断堆积的义务”，如减少对国际组织的资助、要求盟友自强自立，承担更多责任，来减轻“财政负担与制度惰性”。这种调整，并非放弃美国领导力，而是旨在构建一种更可持续的战略态势，让盟友明白“天助自助者”的根本意义，确保美国的能力能够长期支撑其示范性的核心战略目标——MAGA-MAHA。

三、深远影响

NSS报告的影响将是深远的，它不仅重塑了美国自身的战略方向，也深刻改变了全球地缘政治格局：

1. 全球秩序加速多极化：美国的战略收缩留下了一些“权力真空”，加速了全球多极秩序的形成，区域大国的作用日益凸显。

2. 大国博弈成为主轴：中美关系进入一个长期、全面的战略博弈阶段，焦点集中在印太地区、关键技术和全球经济规则的制定上。

3. 盟友体系的调整：美国对盟友的要求更高，更加务实。盟友关系不再是基于共同价值观的无条件支持，而是基于明确的利益交换和自组织责任分担，这也表明美国对盟友自强的信任。

4. 挑战与不确定性：战略的实施将取决于川普政府能否克服美国“深层政府”和两党外交政策精英的阻力。各国正密切关注并调整自身政策以适应这一新的国际格局变化。

综上所述，NSS报告确实是一次深刻的战略回归，它标志着美国告别了后冷战时代的“单极幻象”，回归到一种更加冷静、务实且以国家利益为导向的自组织的“灵活现实主义”轨道上来。可以说，川普的安全战略中，找不到“忘我之心不死”的动机和叙事动机。因为回归“主权在民”的国家叙事，“实力安全，和平繁荣”，是包括美国在内的国际社会必由之路，也是亚当斯密“经济学”三重和平的要义。所以，接下来，包括中国在内的各个国家明确认知什么是自己的“核心利益”，乃决定其政权“存立法理”的关键所在，容不得半点偏蔽！

最后我想说，当值美国总统川普刚刚签署的2025《国家安全战略》报告，是一份以“实力和平，和平繁荣”化解内外冲突重建世界秩序的“国家安全战略”（参看钱宏主编《全球共生：化解冲突重建世界秩序的中国学派》，晨星出版社，2018）。

因此，这也是一种关乎所有国家安全的新版全球化（3.0）布局。尽管在这个务实的“自组织交易”全球化3.0（相对于“自由贸易”幻像的全球化2.0）布局中，强调了国际竞争，尤其是大国竞争，地缘政治影响深远，但具体到每个国家，无论是否美国的盟友，无论身处西半球还是东半球，是印太大西洋还是南北极，包括美国自身在内，实际情况很可能都是一次别无选择的历时性与共时性选择，是各国国运的转捩点，即：

要么有智慧、有勇气、有能力争取入局，一起安全繁荣；要么成为愚蠢、怯懦、“一念之差”连累本国人民吃苦的麻烦制造者（千万别钻所谓可能的“权力真空”的牛角尖），而自甘出局！

阿特拉斯也会耸耸肩，而不会推开天穹不管，所以，我把NSS调整称之为“阻击型门罗主义”⋯⋯

A Turning Point in National Destiny

A Brief Commentary on the United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy

(Important Appendix: White Paper — Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0)

Archer Hong Qian (钱宏)
Vancouver, December 7, 2025

Outline

I. The Core of the NSS Strategic Reconfiguration: Flexible Realism
II. Answers to Three Fundamental Strategic Questions
III. Far-Reaching Implications (multipolarity, great-power rivalry, alliances, uncertainty)
IV. Strategic Reversion and the Architecture of Globalization 3.0
V. A Turning Point in National Destiny: Choices Facing All Nations

Key Terms

• Flexible Realism

• Self-organizing responsibility

• Power vacuum

• Peace-through-strength, prosperity-through-peace

• Unipolar illusion

• A Turning Point in National Destiny

• Sovereignty resides in the people

• Defensive Monroe Doctrine

Main Text

U.S. President Donald Trump released the first National Security Strategy (NSS) of his second term on the evening of December 4, 2025.

This NSS can be regarded as the first systematic grand-strategic restructuring undertaken by the United States in more than fifty years. It not only re-examines and deliberately sheds the accumulated obligations, expectations, institutional inertia, fiscal burdens, and political-correctness illusions that have piled onto America’s shoulders—especially over the past three decades—but also represents a re-organization and re-deployment of strategic priorities intended to shape the next thirty years of the world order.

With America First as a model of responsible policy conduct, the strategy explicitly abandons the notion of permanent global dominance and embraces Flexible Realism. This shift does not signify a passive retreat from America’s global role, nor does it amount to an isolationist declaration.

Flexible Realism: A Clear Strategic Reset

At the level of strategic thinking, Flexible Realism decisively breaks away from the early-21st-century illusion that moral primacy and ideological expansion should guide grand strategy. It openly declares that the era in which the United States acted like Atlas, bearing the entire world order on its shoulders, has come to an end.

Instead, the NSS returns to three clear judgments:

1. What objectives should the United States pursue?

2. What can its existing and potential resources realistically support?

3. How can sustainable alignment be established between national capabilities, power structures, and strategic goals?

These three judgments—objectives, resource support, and sustainable alignment between goals and capabilities—constitute the core problems this NSS seeks to resolve. The substance and impact of the report unfold across several dimensions.

I. The Core of the NSS Strategic Reconfiguration: Flexible Realism

Flexible Realism is the soul of this NSS. It marks a transition in U.S. foreign policy—from post-Cold War attempts to construct a unipolar world order and export universal values through idealistic intervention—toward a more pragmatic, restrained, and clearly defined conception of national responsibility.

Moving beyond moral and ideological primacy.
The report no longer treats democracy promotion or intervention in other countries’ internal affairs as primary objectives. Instead, it focuses on safeguarding the concrete interests of “We the People”, presenting this focus as a form of responsible leadership by example. It emphasizes that all nations—especially allies—must first be accountable to their own people and must ensure the vitality of their communities’ economic and social self-organizing capacities.

Re-defining core national interests.
The strategic center of gravity returns to America First. All policies are evaluated by how effectively they protect U.S. security, economic prosperity, and global standing. The United States no longer positions itself as the “world’s police officer,” but instead practices a Defensive Monroe Doctrine, an intrinsic expression of Flexible Realism.

II. How the NSS Addresses Three Fundamental Questions

What should the United States seek to achieve?

The strategy aims for a balanced order under U.S. demonstration leadership. It abandons the ambition of permanent global dominance and the illusion of unrestricted global free trade, instead seeking a global equilibrium that maximizes U.S. interests through zero-tariff, zero-barrier, zero-discrimination rules that keep industrial, supply, and value chains unblocked.

The core objective shifts from “shaping the global order” to “ensuring U.S. primacy in key domains while constraining challengers”, explicitly identifying China and Russia as principal strategic competitors. This implies abandoning the traditional mindset in which the United States positions itself as the sole Subject while treating other nations as Objects, and moving toward the contemporary value orientation of Intersubjective Symbiosism.

What can existing resources and instruments support?

The NSS acknowledges that American power is not unlimited. Resources must be focused, strategically controlled, and re-allocated. By reducing the strategic weight of Europe and the Middle East and reaffirming a renewed Monroe Doctrine, the United States concentrates its limited resources on what it deems most critical: the Western Hemisphere and the Indo-Pacific.

At the level of economic value metrics, this implies a shift away from the GDP standard—used for over eighty years since World War II and centered on capital appreciation and depreciation—toward a GDE value parameter, measured by resource energy efficiency and energy consumption.

How can sustainable alignment be built between capabilities and goals?

Strategic contraction and responsibility re-balancing.
The NSS systematically “unloads accumulated obligations” by reducing funding for international organizations and requiring allies to become more self-reliant and shoulder greater responsibility. This is not an abandonment of U.S. leadership, but an effort to construct a more sustainable strategic posture.

Allies are reminded of a fundamental truth: Heaven helps those who help themselves. Only in this way can U.S. capabilities sustainably support its demonstrative core strategic objectives—MAGA-MAHA.

III. Far-Reaching Implications

The implications of the NSS are profound. It reshapes not only America’s strategic direction but also the global geopolitical landscape:

• Accelerated multipolarity: U.S. strategic contraction creates certain power vacuums, accelerating the emergence of a multipolar order and increasing the prominence of regional powers.

• Great-power rivalry as the main axis: U.S.–China relations enter a prolonged, comprehensive strategic competition focused on the Indo-Pacific, critical technologies, and the formulation of global economic rules.

• Adjustment of alliance systems: Alliances become more pragmatic and demanding, grounded in explicit interest exchanges and shared self-organizing responsibility rather than unconditional value-based support.

• Challenges and uncertainty: Implementation depends on whether the Trump administration can overcome resistance from the U.S. “deep state” and bipartisan foreign-policy elites. Nations worldwide are adjusting their policies accordingly.

Conclusion

In sum, the NSS represents a genuine strategic reversion. It signals America’s departure from the post-Cold War unipolar illusion and its return to a calmer, more pragmatic, and nationally grounded path of self-organizing Flexible Realism.

There is no trace of self-sacrificial moralism in Trump’s security strategy. By restoring the national narrative that sovereignty resides in the people, and by affirming peace-through-strength, prosperity-through-peace, it aligns with the essential meaning of Adam Smith’s threefold peace economics.

Going forward, every country—including China—must clearly recognize its own core interests, for these determine the very legitimacy and survivability of its governing order. There is no room for self-deception.

President Trump’s 2025 National Security Strategy is a document aimed at resolving internal and external conflicts and rebuilding world order through peace-through-strength and prosperity-through-peace (see Archer Hong Qian, ed., Global Symbiosis: Resolving Conflicts and Rebuilding World Order, Morning Star Press, 2018).

A Globalization 3.0 Turning Point

This NSS therefore constitutes a new globalization (3.0) configuration that concerns the security of all nations. In this pragmatic, self-organizing, transaction-based Globalization 3.0—as opposed to the “free-trade illusion” of Globalization 2.0—international competition, especially among great powers, remains intense and geopolitically consequential.

Yet for each individual country—whether allied with the United States or not, whether located in the Western or Eastern Hemisphere, the Indo-Pacific, the Atlantic, or even the polar regions—the situation represents a simultaneous diachronic and synchronic choice, a genuine turning point in national destiny:

Either possess the wisdom, courage, and capacity to enter the game and share in security and prosperity;
or become a foolish, timid trouble-maker whose single misguided decision condemns its own people to suffering—never fall into the delusion of chasing so-called power vacuums—and thus willingly exit the game.

Atlas may shrug his shoulders, but he will not simply abandon the sky.
For this reason, I describe the NSS adjustment as a Defensive Monroe Doctrine.

重要附录：

白皮书White Paper

重构全球化3.0的战略洞察与行动指南

Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0

錢 宏

By Archer Hong Qian

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation

2025·Vancouver

Unleashing Life’s Self-Organizing Connectivity with the Great Power of Rebalancing!

——The Interpersonal and International General Rule of Symbionomics

Undoubtedly, Trump’s “Riyadh Speech” heralds where the new world order will lead humanity! However, the world must remember: existing political and economic philosophies—be it the “omnipresent Keynesian economics beast,” the “wise old man” of Austrian economics who speaks but does not act, or the “schoolmaster” of mainstream economics dominating university classrooms and various media—cannot fully comprehend the profound implications of Trump’s MAGA practical economics!

I once said, “With the aspiration of a fool, the wisdom of a saint, and the courage of a knight, Trump has opened a new chapter of world peace and global restructuring.” (January 20, 2021, Height Weekly, four full pages)

Now, as the president of the world’s most influential nation, Trump’s actions merely proclaim: the Creator has endowed every individual, family, community, nation, and the international community with the capacity to unleash Life’s Self-Organizing Connectivity through the Great Power of Rebalancing. By doing so, humanity will “pursue possible worlds and create a perfect life within the spatiotemporal realm of intersubjective symbiosis”!

Trump’s own growth exemplifies the model of an “Intersubjective Symbiotic Gentleman”! Donald J. Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize and is truly worthy of the “Global Symbiotic Gentleman Award”!

Based on this, I have written Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0, hoping to assist the MAGA spirit (which could also be Milei’s MAGA in Argentina, Meloni’s MEGA in Italy, Japan’s MJGA, or even China’s MCGA) in becoming a paradigm for ending Globalization 2.0 and advancing into the era of Globalization 3.0.

Indeed, Globalization 2.0 (1945–2024) achieved much but has become a memory, and its three major flaws are now compelling the U.S. to lead in reconstructing Globalization 3.0:

First, the obsession with free trade, constrained by the Triffin-Rodrik-Qian trilemma, often emphasizes most-favored-nation treatment without addressing rights and responsibilities equally, exploiting the “double-standard” dividends of rules, causing long-term losses to other nations, especially the U.S. (even the biggest brother will be depleted if continually exploited), making it unsustainable. A more encompassing and rigid world order is necessary;

Second, globalism, as a packaged ideology, manipulates the American public into endorsing politically correct narratives, but its essence lies in the mutual dealings and rivalries between national (sovereign) capital and power. Through large-scale transactions, they offload excess capacity, hollowing out societal resources and creating a mutually harmful model of structural imbalance (e.g., the decline of American manufacturing and urban hollowing-out, alongside the erosion of Chinese workers' rights and rural decay, leading to "full-scale rent-seeking by officials and tenantization of the populace"). Incidentally, Trump’s new policy of "non-interference in domestic affairs" effectively undercuts the nationalist rhetoric that evades responsibility and turns its own people into sacrificial pawns;

Third, Globalization 2.0’s race to maximize GDP growth exacerbates structural imbalances across nations, harms societal health, leads to civilizational conflicts and a global crisis of trust and faith, urgently requiring a new value standard to emerge.

Only the U.S. can lead this change, spearheading the return of “production to life, life to ecology, and ecology to inspire life” through Life’s Self-Organizing Connectivity and the Great Power of Rebalancing, reconstructing the economic health golden rule of Globalization 3.0 with the Symbionomics GDE value—a five-factor interactive (cost reduction, empowerment, health, trust, peace) symbiotic reward-punishment mechanism, thereby:

Rendering rule double-standards and distortions of free trade untenable; making ideologies that package unequal transactions nowhere to hide; and leaving excessive growth that masks the scarcity of health and trust with no recourse.

Only then can MAGA lead the world, striving unceasingly, upholding virtue to bear all things, moving the heavens with virtue, reaching far and wide!

Finally, reconstructing the new world order in Globalization 3.0 forces all nations to either unconditionally restructure themselves to earn the qualification to “re-enter the game,” or stubbornly cling to a dominant structure with heavy rights and light responsibilities, dragging their people into “self-imposed exclusion”!

This is the interpersonal and international general rule of Symbionomics: “Live and let others live; do not be evil nor cause others to be evil”—a contemporary proclamation of the Everything Intersubjective Symbiosism philosophy!

Archer Hong Qian, May 15, 2025, Vancouver

生命自组织连接再平衡之伟力

——共生经济学的人际、国际关系通用法则

毫无疑问，川普的“利雅得演讲”，预示了世界新秩序将会把人类带向何方！但是，世人切记：现成的政治经济哲学——无论是“无处不在的凯恩斯主义经济学畜生”，还是光说不练的奥派经济学“智叟”，抑或占据大学课堂和各色媒体的主流经济学“教师爷”，都不可能理喻川普MAGA实操经济学的全部内涵！

我说过，“川普以傻子般的发心、圣人般的智慧、骑士般的勇气，开启了世界和平与全球化重组的新篇章。”（2021.1.20《高度周刊》4个整版）

现如今，作为这个世界最具影响力的国家总统，川普所做的一切，仅仅昭示了：造物主赋予每个人、每个家庭、每个社区、每个国家，以及国际社会，只需发挥生命自组织连接再平衡之伟力，人类必将“在交互主体共生的时空意间，追寻可能的世界，创建臻美的生活”！

川普本人的成长，正是“交互共生绅士”的典范！

基于此，我写了《重构全球化3.0的战略洞察与行动指南》，愿以此助MAGA精神（还可是阿根廷米莱的MAGA、意大利的梅洛尼的MEGA或日本的MJGA，乃至中国的MCGA）转化为终结全球化2.0而迈进3.0时代的典范。

是的，全球化2.0（1945-2024）成就不小，但已成回忆，而其三大弊端，也已在倒逼美国，率先重构全球化3.0：

第一，自由贸易的执念，受特利芬-罗德里克-钱宏三重悖论的制约，在实施中往往只讲最惠，不讲权责对等，吃规则“双标”的红利，让他国特别是美国，长期吃亏（大哥块头再大也会被坐吃山空）不可持续，必须有涵盖力更大且刚性的世界秩序；

第二，全球主义包装，裹挟美国大众，为政治正确意识形态买单，本质是主权国家资本与权力勾兑博弈做大买卖转嫁过剩产能，掏空社会，实为结构性失衡的互害模式（如美国制造衰败、城市空心化，中国劳工工作生活权益受损、乡村败落而从容“全官寻租化、全民佃户化”），顺便说一句，川普的“不干涉内政”新政策宣示，等于对逃避责任让本国人民作炮灰的民族主义煽情，釜底抽薪；

第三，全球化2.0追赶GDP增长极限竞赛，加剧各国结构性失衡，损害社会机体健康，导致文明冲突和全球性信任信仰危机，亟需全新的价值标准问世。

这世界，也只有美国率先改变，带头让“生产回归生活，生活呈现生態，生態激发生命”自组织连接再平衡，重构全球化3.0经济健康黄金率的共生经济学GDE价值——五因交互（降本、赋能、健康、信任、和平）共生奖抑机制，从而：

让规则双标，扭曲自由贸易，无机可趁；让意识形態，包装不对等交易，无处遁形；让过剩增长，掩盖健康信任稀缺，无计可施。

才能让MAGA引领全球，自强不息，厚德载物，惟德动天，无远弗届！

最后，全球化3.0重构世界新秩序，就是倒逼世界各国，要么无条件自行结构性改变，赢得“重新入局”的资质，要么冥顽不化坚持权重责轻的独大结构，连累本国人民“自甘出局”！

这就是共生经济学（Symbionomics）“自己活也要别人活，不要自己邪恶也让别人邪恶（Live and let others live; do not be evil nor cause others to be evil）”的人际国际通律——Everything Intersubjective Symbiosism哲学的当代昭示！

重构全球化3.0战略洞察与行动指南

Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0

钱 宏（Archer Hong Qian）
Archer Hong Qian
Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation（CANADA）·2025

内容提要

本报告提出：川普总统团队“对美利坚20项承诺”，不仅是政策主张，更具备构建“全球化3.0可能三角”的实践价值。通过GDE共生指数评估，美国当前六项核心政策的健康黄金率达85.1%，表明其高度可感性，并具有全球结构性改变的引领力。

报告重点包含：

1. 全球化2.0的结构悖论与制度错位；

2. 川普新政六项政策的健康黄金率实证；

3. GDE共生指数对11国的结构转型评估；

4. “仨自组织人”替代“理性经济人”的治理跃迁模型；

5. 10项建议与行动指南

6. 孞態网——作为地球人-AI-TRUST生活方式创新奖抑机制的伦理基础设施

7. 发起“共生经济全球博览会”，展示全球化3.0生活方式，重塑全球治理想象

8. 全球化3.0回归生产、生活、生態的常识、常情与常道

最终目标是：重建全球共生秩序，以结构性交互承兑取代话语权力，以健康黄金率的GDE（Gross Domestic Efficiency）价值标准代替增长黄金率的GDP博弈，开辟全球共生永续和平的新时代。

Executive Summary

This report proposes that the Trump administration’s “20 Promises to America” are not merely policy commitments but hold practical value in constructing the "Possible Triangle" (可能三角) of Globalization 3.0. Through the GDE Symbiosis Index (GDE共生指数), the Golden Rate of Health (健康黄金率) of the U.S.’s six core policies currently stands at 85.1%, demonstrating high perceptibility and global leadership in structural transformation.

Key Focus Areas of the Report:

1. Structural paradoxes and institutional misalignments of Globalization 2.0.

2. Empirical analysis of the Golden Rate of Health for six Trump administration policies.

3. GDE Symbiosis Index assessment of structural transformation in 11 countries (11国结构转型评估).

4. Governance leap model replacing the "rational economic man" with the "Threefold Self-Organizing Persons" (仨自组织人).

5. Ten recommendations and action guidelines (10项建议与行动指南).

6. Mindset Network (孞態网) as the ethical infrastructure for the Earthlings-AI-TRUST lifestyle innovation reward-constraint mechanism (孞態奖抑机制).

7. Launch of the Symbionomic Global Expo (共生经济全球博览会, SGE) to showcase Globalization 3.0 lifestyles and reshape global governance imagination.

8. Globalization 3.0’s return to the common sense, common sentiment, and common path (常识、常情、常道) of production, life, and ecology.

Ultimate Goal: Rebuild a global symbiotic order, replacing discursive power with structural interactive endorsement, substituting the GDE（Gross Domestic Efficiency） value standard of the Golden Rate of Health for the GDP competition of the Golden Rate of Growth, and ushering in a new era of global symbiotic and sustainable peace (全球共生永续和平).

关键词中英文对照 Keywords Glossary

 目录

I. 开题：全球化2.0的深层矛盾与川普新政的破局之道

Introduction: The Deep Contradictions of Globalization 2.0 and the Trump Administration’s Breakthrough Approach

II. 全球化2.0的三重不可能三角：结构性矛盾

The Triple Impossible Triangle of Globalization 2.0: Structural Contradictions

III. 全球化3.0的可能三角：历时性与共时性（上）

The Possible Triangle of Globalization 3.0: Diachronic and Synchronic Transition(Part 1)

1、历时性：货币形態与规则体系的跃迁

Diachronic Perspective: The Evolution of Currency Forms and Rule Systems

IV.  全球化3.0的可能三角：历时性与共时性（中）

The Possible Triangle of Globalization 3.0: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives (Part 2)

2、共时性：川普互惠关税与三零规则的实践

Synchronic Perspective: Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs and the Triple Zero Rules in Practice

IV. 全球化3.0的可能三角：历时性与共时性（下）

The Possible Triangle of Globalization 3.0: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives (Part 3)

3、三元悖论解释不了顺差国的差异变化

The Trilemma Cannot Fully Explain Variations Among Surplus Countries

V. 全球化3.0核心：生命价值、社会稳定与全球共生

The Core of Globalization 3.0: Life Value, Social Stability, and Global Symbiosis

1、生命自组织连接价值（三零规则的哲学基础）

Life Self-Organization Connection Value (Philosophical Foundation of the Triple Zero Rules)

2、社会生活稳定繁荣（GDE价值参量的实践目标）

Social Stability and Prosperity (Practical Goal of GDE Value Metrics)

3、全球共生公约和平（共生币价值承兑终极使命）

Permanent Peace of the Global Symbiosism Convention (Ultimate Mission of Symbiotic Tender Value Endorsement)

4、仨自组织人：全球化3.0“可能三角”的结构主体

Threefold Self-Organizing Persons: Structural Agents of Globalization 3.0’s Possible Triangle

5、哲学结构意义：从不可能三角到可能三角的跃迁机制

Philosophical Structural Significance: The Leap Mechanism from Impossible to Possible Triangle

6、GDE价值参量评估川普新政的健康黄金率

GDE Value Metrics Assessment of Trump’s New Policies: The Golden Rate of Health

7、GDE“五因交互指数”定义与公式

Definition and Formula of the GDE Five-Factor Interaction Index

8、GDE评估川普新政：健康黄金率的实践价值

GDE Assessment of Trump’s New Policies: Practical Value of the Golden Rate of Health

9、GDE对11国转型评估：全球化2.0到3.0的可行性

GDE Assessment of 11 Countries’ Transformation: Feasibility from Globalization 2.0 to 3.0

VI. 10项建议与行动指南：川普新政推进全球化重组

Recommendations and Action Guidelines: Pathways for Trump’s New Policies to Advance Globalization 3.0

1、建立三零规则的多边试点机制，保障生命价值

Establish a Multilateral Pilot Mechanism for the Triple Zero Rules to Safeguard Life Value

2、采用GDE价值参量，引领社会稳定繁荣

Adopt GDE Value Metrics to Lead Social Stability and Prosperity

3、推动共生币的实验性应用，促进全球共生公约

Promote Experimental Application of Symbiotic Tender to Foster the Global Symbiosism Convention

4、建立GDE三大指数体系，提升新价值的操作性

Establish the GDE Three-Index System to Enhance the Operability of New Values

5、构建愛之智慧孞態网，生成交互主体共生场

Build the Amorsophia Minds Network to Generate an Intersubjective Symbiotic Field

6、优化互惠关税和川普金卡政策，提升社会稳定

Optimize Reciprocal Tariffs and Trump Green Card Policies to Enhance Social Stability

7、提升贸易伙伴的制度透明度，保障生命价值

Enhance Trade Partners’ Institutional Transparency to Safeguard Life Value

8、加强跨文化信任建设，支持全球化3.0的文明公约

Strengthen Cross-Cultural Trust Building to Support Globalization 3.0’s Civilizational Convention

9、牵头举办共生经济全球博览会，提升MAGA运动自豪感

Lead the Hosting of the Symbionomic Global Expo to Enhance MAGA Movement Pride

10、重新考虑加入CPTPP，扩容印太战略动能

Reconsider Joining CPTPP to Expand Indo-Pacific Strategic Momentum

VII. 共生经济学价值重构：全球化3.0的文明新秩序

Symbionomics’ Value Reconstruction: The New Civilizational Order of Globalization 3.0

VIII. 全球化2.0到3.0的历时性、共时性、必由性

The Diachronic, Synchronic, and Inevitable Transition from Globalization 2.0 to 3.0

历时性：全球化3.0通过货币（德币→法币→共生币）和规则（单向规则→三零规则）的跃迁，化解三重不可能三角。

Diachronic Perspective: Globalization 3.0 resolves the Triple Impossible Triangle through the evolution of currency (Morality Tender → Legal Tender → Symbiotic Tender) and rules (unidirectional → Triple Zero Rules).

共时性：川普新政以互惠关税为起点，推动全球化3.0的落地，提供全球范例。

Synchronic Perspective: Trump’s new policies, starting with reciprocal tariffs, drive the implementation of Globalization 3.0, providing a global model.

必由性：GDE和孞態网的引入，为全球化3.0提供了量化和技术保障。以生命价值为本的全球化3.0，推动社会稳定繁荣，通过交互主体共生和全球共生公约，开启公平共生与永久和平的新阶段，让任何企图统治世界的帝国政治构想成为不可能。

Inevitability: The introduction of GDE and the Mindset Network provides quantitative support and technological assurance for Globalization 3.0. Globalization 3.0, rooted in life value, promotes social stability and prosperity, ushering in a new phase of fair symbiosis and permanent peace through intersubjective symbiosis and the Global Symbiosism Convention, making any imperial political ambition to dominate the world impossible.

川普新政不仅回应了全球化2.0的矛盾，还通过全球化3.0的重构和GDE的引领，为全球共生秩序提供了历史性启示。世界秩序从来不是“谁控制资本，谁定规则”，而是“谁（复数）能定义价值承兑方式，谁一起交互重构文明新秩序”。

Trump’s new policies not only address Globalization 2.0’s contradictions but, through Globalization 3.0’s restructuring and GDE’s leadership, offer a historic revelation for the global symbiotic order. World order has never been about “who controls capital, who sets the rules,” but “who (plural) can define the method of value endorsement, and who together interactively restructures the new civilizational order.”

GDE价值参量的引入，以“1.0”为结构健康判断的均衡参照。这一参照不是一个静态点，而是一个方向——万物交互中以最小能耗、公平、信任为特征的动态中衡路径。这是宇宙生命从“负N↔0.1↔0↔1↔N”结构跃迁中追求的“动中衡点”，体现“无限趋0”的动态交互转换过程，是交互主体共生秩序稳定进化与可持续跃迁的哲学内核，也是全球化3.0中生产、生活、生態的常识、常情、常道——既激荡又安宁。

The introduction of Symbionomics’ GDE value metrics establishes “1.0” as the equilibrium reference for structural health judgments. This reference is not a static point but a direction—a dynamic balance path of minimal energy consumption, equity, and trust in the interaction of all things. It is the “dynamic equilibrium point” (动中衡点) pursued in the structural leap of universal life from “negative N ↔ 0.1 ↔ 0 ↔ 1 ↔ N,” embodying a “convergence to zero” (无限趋0) dynamic interactive transformation process. It serves as the philosophical core for achieving stable evolution and sustainable leaps in the intersubjective symbiotic order, and the common sense, sentiment, and path of production, life, and ecology—both turbulent and serene—in Globalization 3.0.

总之，“全球化3.0不是结构再分配，而是结构再生”的文明叙事。

In summary, “Globalization 3.0 is not about structural redistribution but structural regeneration”—a civilizational narrative.

2025年4月29日-5月3日于温哥华

Archer Hong Qian

Vancouver, April 29–May 3, 2025

About Archer Hong Qian, See Author Biography in the Appendix

A Paradigm Shift in UN Narrative, available at http://www.symbiosism.org; http://symbiosism.com.cn

Contact Information:  

Phone: +1 604 690 6088；Email: hongguanworld@gmail.com