國運的轉捩點

A Turning Point in National Destiny

——簡評2025美國《國家安全戰略》

— A Brief Commentary on the United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy

（重要附錄：《白皮書White Paper：重構全球化3.0戰略洞察與行動指南 Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0》）

錢宏（Archer Hong Qian）

2025年12月7日於溫哥華

1、NSS 戰略重構的核心：靈活現實主義（Flexible Realism）

2、三個根本戰略問題的回答

3、深遠影響（multipolarity, great-power rivalry, alliances, uncertainty）

4、戰略回歸與全球化 3.0 架構

5、國運的轉捩點：各國面臨抉擇

關鍵術語：

• “靈活現實主義” → Flexible Realism

• “自組織責任” → self-organizing responsibility

• “權力真空” → power vacuum

• “實力和平，和平繁榮” → peace-through-strength, prosperity-through-peace

• “單極幻象” → unipolar illusion

• “國運的轉捩點” → A Turning Point in National Destiny

• “主權在民”→ sovereignty resides in the people

• “阻擊型門羅主義”→Defensive Monroe Doctrine

美國總統唐納德·川普（Donald Trump）已於近日（2025年12月4日晚）發布了他第二任期的首份《國家安全戰略》（National Security Strategy, NSS）報告。

《國家安全戰略》報告，可謂美國五十年來第一次在大戰略上進行系統重構：既重新審視並卸下過去五十年特別三十年來，美國肩上不斷堆積的義務、期待，及其制度惰性、財政負擔與政治正確幻象，又是一場塑造未來世界三十年的戰略重心再組織再布局——以“美國優先”（America First）為責任政策示範，強調放棄“永久主導世界”的“靈活現實主義”！但也絕不是美國全球角色的消極撤退，當然就不是什麼孤立主義宣言。

這種靈活現實主義，在思維方式上，清晰地擺脫了21世紀初那種道德先行、意識形態優先的戰略幻象，直接宣布“美國像阿特拉斯般支撐整個世界秩序的時代已經結束”，而回到了三個清晰判斷：第一，美國究竟應當追求什麼目標？第二，美國現有和潛在的資源與手段能夠支撐什麼？第三，如何在現實能力、國力結構與戰略目標之間建立可持續的連接？

三個關鍵判斷——追求目標、資源支撐、目標與能力的可持續連接——正是這份報告試圖解決的根本問題。這份報告的內涵與影響體現在以下幾個方面：

一、NSS戰略重構的核心：“靈活現實主義”

“靈活現實主義”（Flexible Realism）是這份報告的靈魂。它標誌着美國外交政策從後冷戰時代試圖建立單極世界秩序、推廣普世價值的“理想主義干預”轉向更務實、更克制，也更明晰的國家責任。

  擺脫道德與意識形態優先：報告明確不再將推廣民主或干預他國內政作為首要任務，而是專注於保護“We the People”的切身利益，並強調這是一種責任示範。強調私下個國家，尤其是盟友，首先要對本國人民負責，保障發揮社區經濟生活自組織連接平衡的活力。

  國家核心利益重新定位：戰略重心回歸“美國優先”，意味着所有政策都圍繞如何最有效地保障美國的安全、經濟繁榮和全球地位展開，美國不再做“世界警察”，而是實行一種“阻擊型門羅主義”，這是“靈活現實主義”的題中應有之義。

二、NSS報告試圖通過以下方式回答三個問題

1. 美國究竟應當追求什麼？

追求一個“美國示範下的平衡秩序”：報告放棄了“永久主導世界”的野心和“全球自由貿易”幻象，轉而尋求一種能夠確保美國利益最大化的“產業鏈、供應鏈、價值鏈通暢的零關稅、零壁壘、零歧視規則”全球平衡狀態。核心目標從“塑造全球秩序”變為“確保美國在關鍵領域的首要地位並遏制挑戰者”，特別是將中國和俄羅斯定位為主要戰略競爭對手。這意味着放下以Subject自居而視他國為Object的傳統思維，進入Intersubjective Symbiosism當代思維的價值取向。

1. 美國現有的資源與手段能夠支撐什麼？

報告承認美國國力並非無限，必須聚焦資源，進行戰略把控和資源再分配。通過降低歐洲和中東的戰略權重，並重申新“門羅主義”，美國得以將有限的資源集中投入到它認為最關鍵的西半球和印太地區，以確保資源與戰略目標相匹配。這裡意味着在經濟價值參量上，改變二戰以來延用了80多年的以資本增值/減值為標準的GDP價值參量，而採用以資源能效/能耗為標準的GDE價值參量。

1. 如何在現實能力、國力結構與戰略目標之間建立可持續的連接？

戰略收縮與責任調整：NSS報告通過系統性地“卸下不斷堆積的義務”，如減少對國際組織的資助、要求盟友自強自立，承擔更多責任，來減輕“財政負擔與制度惰性”。這種調整，並非放棄美國領導力，而是旨在構建一種更可持續的戰略態勢，讓盟友明白“天助自助者”的根本意義，確保美國的能力能夠長期支撐其示範性的核心戰略目標——MAGA-MAHA。

三、深遠影響

NSS報告的影響將是深遠的，它不僅重塑了美國自身的戰略方向，也深刻改變了全球地緣政治格局：

1. 全球秩序加速多極化：美國的戰略收縮留下了一些“權力真空”，加速了全球多極秩序的形成，區域大國的作用日益凸顯。

2. 大國博弈成為主軸：中美關係進入一個長期、全面的戰略博弈階段，焦點集中在印太地區、關鍵技術和全球經濟規則的制定上。

3. 盟友體系的調整：美國對盟友的要求更高，更加務實。盟友關係不再是基於共同價值觀的無條件支持，而是基於明確的利益交換和自組織責任分擔，這也表明美國對盟友自強的信任。

4. 挑戰與不確定性：戰略的實施將取決於川普政府能否克服美國“深層政府”和兩黨外交政策精英的阻力。各國正密切關注並調整自身政策以適應這一新的國際格局變化。

綜上所述，NSS報告確實是一次深刻的戰略回歸，它標誌着美國告別了後冷戰時代的“單極幻象”，回歸到一種更加冷靜、務實且以國家利益為導向的自組織的“靈活現實主義”軌道上來。可以說，川普的安全戰略中，找不到“忘我之心不死”的動機和敘事動機。因為回歸“主權在民”的國家敘事，“實力安全，和平繁榮”，是包括美國在內的國際社會必由之路，也是亞當斯密“經濟學”三重和平的要義。所以，接下來，包括中國在內的各個國家明確認知什麼是自己的“核心利益”，乃決定其政權“存立法理”的關鍵所在，容不得半點偏蔽！

最後我想說，當值美國總統川普剛剛簽署的2025《國家安全戰略》報告，是一份以“實力和平，和平繁榮”化解內外衝突重建世界秩序的“國家安全戰略”（參看錢宏主編《全球共生：化解衝突重建世界秩序的中國學派》，晨星出版社，2018）。

因此，這也是一種關乎所有國家安全的新版全球化（3.0）布局。儘管在這個務實的“自組織交易”全球化3.0（相對於“自由貿易”幻像的全球化2.0）布局中，強調了國際競爭，尤其是大國競爭，地緣政治影響深遠，但具體到每個國家，無論是否美國的盟友，無論身處西半球還是東半球，是印太大西洋還是南北極，包括美國自身在內，實際情況很可能都是一次別無選擇的歷時性與共時性選擇，是各國國運的轉捩點，即：

要麼有智慧、有勇氣、有能力爭取入局，一起安全繁榮；要麼成為愚蠢、怯懦、“一念之差”連累本國人民吃苦的麻煩製造者（千萬別鑽所謂可能的“權力真空”的牛角尖），而自甘出局！

阿特拉斯也會聳聳肩，而不會推開天穹不管，所以，我把NSS調整稱之為“阻擊型門羅主義”⋯⋯

A Turning Point in National Destiny

A Brief Commentary on the United States’ 2025 National Security Strategy

(Important Appendix: White Paper — Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0)

Archer Hong Qian (錢宏)
Vancouver, December 7, 2025

Outline

I. The Core of the NSS Strategic Reconfiguration: Flexible Realism
II. Answers to Three Fundamental Strategic Questions
III. Far-Reaching Implications (multipolarity, great-power rivalry, alliances, uncertainty)
IV. Strategic Reversion and the Architecture of Globalization 3.0
V. A Turning Point in National Destiny: Choices Facing All Nations

Key Terms

• Flexible Realism

• Self-organizing responsibility

• Power vacuum

• Peace-through-strength, prosperity-through-peace

• Unipolar illusion

• A Turning Point in National Destiny

• Sovereignty resides in the people

• Defensive Monroe Doctrine

Main Text

U.S. President Donald Trump released the first National Security Strategy (NSS) of his second term on the evening of December 4, 2025.

This NSS can be regarded as the first systematic grand-strategic restructuring undertaken by the United States in more than fifty years. It not only re-examines and deliberately sheds the accumulated obligations, expectations, institutional inertia, fiscal burdens, and political-correctness illusions that have piled onto America’s shoulders—especially over the past three decades—but also represents a re-organization and re-deployment of strategic priorities intended to shape the next thirty years of the world order.

With America First as a model of responsible policy conduct, the strategy explicitly abandons the notion of permanent global dominance and embraces Flexible Realism. This shift does not signify a passive retreat from America’s global role, nor does it amount to an isolationist declaration.

Flexible Realism: A Clear Strategic Reset

At the level of strategic thinking, Flexible Realism decisively breaks away from the early-21st-century illusion that moral primacy and ideological expansion should guide grand strategy. It openly declares that the era in which the United States acted like Atlas, bearing the entire world order on its shoulders, has come to an end.

Instead, the NSS returns to three clear judgments:

1. What objectives should the United States pursue?

2. What can its existing and potential resources realistically support?

3. How can sustainable alignment be established between national capabilities, power structures, and strategic goals?

These three judgments—objectives, resource support, and sustainable alignment between goals and capabilities—constitute the core problems this NSS seeks to resolve. The substance and impact of the report unfold across several dimensions.

I. The Core of the NSS Strategic Reconfiguration: Flexible Realism

Flexible Realism is the soul of this NSS. It marks a transition in U.S. foreign policy—from post-Cold War attempts to construct a unipolar world order and export universal values through idealistic intervention—toward a more pragmatic, restrained, and clearly defined conception of national responsibility.

Moving beyond moral and ideological primacy.
The report no longer treats democracy promotion or intervention in other countries’ internal affairs as primary objectives. Instead, it focuses on safeguarding the concrete interests of “We the People”, presenting this focus as a form of responsible leadership by example. It emphasizes that all nations—especially allies—must first be accountable to their own people and must ensure the vitality of their communities’ economic and social self-organizing capacities.

Re-defining core national interests.
The strategic center of gravity returns to America First. All policies are evaluated by how effectively they protect U.S. security, economic prosperity, and global standing. The United States no longer positions itself as the “world’s police officer,” but instead practices a Defensive Monroe Doctrine, an intrinsic expression of Flexible Realism.

II. How the NSS Addresses Three Fundamental Questions

What should the United States seek to achieve?

The strategy aims for a balanced order under U.S. demonstration leadership. It abandons the ambition of permanent global dominance and the illusion of unrestricted global free trade, instead seeking a global equilibrium that maximizes U.S. interests through zero-tariff, zero-barrier, zero-discrimination rules that keep industrial, supply, and value chains unblocked.

The core objective shifts from “shaping the global order” to “ensuring U.S. primacy in key domains while constraining challengers”, explicitly identifying China and Russia as principal strategic competitors. This implies abandoning the traditional mindset in which the United States positions itself as the sole Subject while treating other nations as Objects, and moving toward the contemporary value orientation of Intersubjective Symbiosism.

What can existing resources and instruments support?

The NSS acknowledges that American power is not unlimited. Resources must be focused, strategically controlled, and re-allocated. By reducing the strategic weight of Europe and the Middle East and reaffirming a renewed Monroe Doctrine, the United States concentrates its limited resources on what it deems most critical: the Western Hemisphere and the Indo-Pacific.

At the level of economic value metrics, this implies a shift away from the GDP standard—used for over eighty years since World War II and centered on capital appreciation and depreciation—toward a GDE value parameter, measured by resource energy efficiency and energy consumption.

How can sustainable alignment be built between capabilities and goals?

Strategic contraction and responsibility re-balancing.
The NSS systematically “unloads accumulated obligations” by reducing funding for international organizations and requiring allies to become more self-reliant and shoulder greater responsibility. This is not an abandonment of U.S. leadership, but an effort to construct a more sustainable strategic posture.

Allies are reminded of a fundamental truth: Heaven helps those who help themselves. Only in this way can U.S. capabilities sustainably support its demonstrative core strategic objectives—MAGA-MAHA.

III. Far-Reaching Implications

The implications of the NSS are profound. It reshapes not only America’s strategic direction but also the global geopolitical landscape:

• Accelerated multipolarity: U.S. strategic contraction creates certain power vacuums, accelerating the emergence of a multipolar order and increasing the prominence of regional powers.

• Great-power rivalry as the main axis: U.S.–China relations enter a prolonged, comprehensive strategic competition focused on the Indo-Pacific, critical technologies, and the formulation of global economic rules.

• Adjustment of alliance systems: Alliances become more pragmatic and demanding, grounded in explicit interest exchanges and shared self-organizing responsibility rather than unconditional value-based support.

• Challenges and uncertainty: Implementation depends on whether the Trump administration can overcome resistance from the U.S. “deep state” and bipartisan foreign-policy elites. Nations worldwide are adjusting their policies accordingly.

Conclusion

In sum, the NSS represents a genuine strategic reversion. It signals America’s departure from the post-Cold War unipolar illusion and its return to a calmer, more pragmatic, and nationally grounded path of self-organizing Flexible Realism.

There is no trace of self-sacrificial moralism in Trump’s security strategy. By restoring the national narrative that sovereignty resides in the people, and by affirming peace-through-strength, prosperity-through-peace, it aligns with the essential meaning of Adam Smith’s threefold peace economics.

Going forward, every country—including China—must clearly recognize its own core interests, for these determine the very legitimacy and survivability of its governing order. There is no room for self-deception.

President Trump’s 2025 National Security Strategy is a document aimed at resolving internal and external conflicts and rebuilding world order through peace-through-strength and prosperity-through-peace (see Archer Hong Qian, ed., Global Symbiosis: Resolving Conflicts and Rebuilding World Order, Morning Star Press, 2018).

A Globalization 3.0 Turning Point

This NSS therefore constitutes a new globalization (3.0) configuration that concerns the security of all nations. In this pragmatic, self-organizing, transaction-based Globalization 3.0—as opposed to the “free-trade illusion” of Globalization 2.0—international competition, especially among great powers, remains intense and geopolitically consequential.

Yet for each individual country—whether allied with the United States or not, whether located in the Western or Eastern Hemisphere, the Indo-Pacific, the Atlantic, or even the polar regions—the situation represents a simultaneous diachronic and synchronic choice, a genuine turning point in national destiny:

Either possess the wisdom, courage, and capacity to enter the game and share in security and prosperity;
or become a foolish, timid trouble-maker whose single misguided decision condemns its own people to suffering—never fall into the delusion of chasing so-called power vacuums—and thus willingly exit the game.

Atlas may shrug his shoulders, but he will not simply abandon the sky.
For this reason, I describe the NSS adjustment as a Defensive Monroe Doctrine.

重要附錄：

白皮書White Paper

重構全球化3.0的戰略洞察與行動指南

Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0

錢 宏

By Archer Hong Qian

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation

2025·Vancouver

Unleashing Life’s Self-Organizing Connectivity with the Great Power of Rebalancing!

——The Interpersonal and International General Rule of Symbionomics

Undoubtedly, Trump’s “Riyadh Speech” heralds where the new world order will lead humanity! However, the world must remember: existing political and economic philosophies—be it the “omnipresent Keynesian economics beast,” the “wise old man” of Austrian economics who speaks but does not act, or the “schoolmaster” of mainstream economics dominating university classrooms and various media—cannot fully comprehend the profound implications of Trump’s MAGA practical economics!

I once said, “With the aspiration of a fool, the wisdom of a saint, and the courage of a knight, Trump has opened a new chapter of world peace and global restructuring.” (January 20, 2021, Height Weekly, four full pages)

Now, as the president of the world’s most influential nation, Trump’s actions merely proclaim: the Creator has endowed every individual, family, community, nation, and the international community with the capacity to unleash Life’s Self-Organizing Connectivity through the Great Power of Rebalancing. By doing so, humanity will “pursue possible worlds and create a perfect life within the spatiotemporal realm of intersubjective symbiosis”!

Trump’s own growth exemplifies the model of an “Intersubjective Symbiotic Gentleman”! Donald J. Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize and is truly worthy of the “Global Symbiotic Gentleman Award”!

Based on this, I have written Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0, hoping to assist the MAGA spirit (which could also be Milei’s MAGA in Argentina, Meloni’s MEGA in Italy, Japan’s MJGA, or even China’s MCGA) in becoming a paradigm for ending Globalization 2.0 and advancing into the era of Globalization 3.0.

Indeed, Globalization 2.0 (1945–2024) achieved much but has become a memory, and its three major flaws are now compelling the U.S. to lead in reconstructing Globalization 3.0:

First, the obsession with free trade, constrained by the Triffin-Rodrik-Qian trilemma, often emphasizes most-favored-nation treatment without addressing rights and responsibilities equally, exploiting the “double-standard” dividends of rules, causing long-term losses to other nations, especially the U.S. (even the biggest brother will be depleted if continually exploited), making it unsustainable. A more encompassing and rigid world order is necessary;

Second, globalism, as a packaged ideology, manipulates the American public into endorsing politically correct narratives, but its essence lies in the mutual dealings and rivalries between national (sovereign) capital and power. Through large-scale transactions, they offload excess capacity, hollowing out societal resources and creating a mutually harmful model of structural imbalance (e.g., the decline of American manufacturing and urban hollowing-out, alongside the erosion of Chinese workers' rights and rural decay, leading to "full-scale rent-seeking by officials and tenantization of the populace"). Incidentally, Trump’s new policy of "non-interference in domestic affairs" effectively undercuts the nationalist rhetoric that evades responsibility and turns its own people into sacrificial pawns;

Third, Globalization 2.0’s race to maximize GDP growth exacerbates structural imbalances across nations, harms societal health, leads to civilizational conflicts and a global crisis of trust and faith, urgently requiring a new value standard to emerge.

Only the U.S. can lead this change, spearheading the return of “production to life, life to ecology, and ecology to inspire life” through Life’s Self-Organizing Connectivity and the Great Power of Rebalancing, reconstructing the economic health golden rule of Globalization 3.0 with the Symbionomics GDE value—a five-factor interactive (cost reduction, empowerment, health, trust, peace) symbiotic reward-punishment mechanism, thereby:

Rendering rule double-standards and distortions of free trade untenable; making ideologies that package unequal transactions nowhere to hide; and leaving excessive growth that masks the scarcity of health and trust with no recourse.

Only then can MAGA lead the world, striving unceasingly, upholding virtue to bear all things, moving the heavens with virtue, reaching far and wide!

Finally, reconstructing the new world order in Globalization 3.0 forces all nations to either unconditionally restructure themselves to earn the qualification to “re-enter the game,” or stubbornly cling to a dominant structure with heavy rights and light responsibilities, dragging their people into “self-imposed exclusion”!

This is the interpersonal and international general rule of Symbionomics: “Live and let others live; do not be evil nor cause others to be evil”—a contemporary proclamation of the Everything Intersubjective Symbiosism philosophy!

Archer Hong Qian, May 15, 2025, Vancouver

生命自組織連接再平衡之偉力

——共生經濟學的人際、國際關係通用法則

毫無疑問，川普的“利雅得演講”，預示了世界新秩序將會把人類帶向何方！但是，世人切記：現成的政治經濟哲學——無論是“無處不在的凱恩斯主義經濟學畜生”，還是光說不練的奧派經濟學“智叟”，抑或占據大學課堂和各色媒體的主流經濟學“教師爺”，都不可能理喻川普MAGA實操經濟學的全部內涵！

我說過，“川普以傻子般的發心、聖人般的智慧、騎士般的勇氣，開啟了世界和平與全球化重組的新篇章。”（2021.1.20《高度周刊》4個整版）

現如今，作為這個世界最具影響力的國家總統，川普所做的一切，僅僅昭示了：造物主賦予每個人、每個家庭、每個社區、每個國家，以及國際社會，只需發揮生命自組織連接再平衡之偉力，人類必將“在交互主體共生的時空意間，追尋可能的世界，創建臻美的生活”！

川普本人的成長，正是“交互共生紳士”的典範！

基於此，我寫了《重構全球化3.0的戰略洞察與行動指南》，願以此助MAGA精神（還可是阿根廷米萊的MAGA、意大利的梅洛尼的MEGA或日本的MJGA，乃至中國的MCGA）轉化為終結全球化2.0而邁進3.0時代的典範。

是的，全球化2.0（1945-2024）成就不小，但已成回憶，而其三大弊端，也已在倒逼美國，率先重構全球化3.0：

第一，自由貿易的執念，受特利芬-羅德里克-錢宏三重悖論的制約，在實施中往往只講最惠，不講權責對等，吃規則“雙標”的紅利，讓他國特別是美國，長期吃虧（大哥塊頭再大也會被坐吃山空）不可持續，必須有涵蓋力更大且剛性的世界秩序；

第二，全球主義包裝，裹挾美國大眾，為政治正確意識形態買單，本質是主權國家資本與權力勾兌博弈做大買賣轉嫁過剩產能，掏空社會，實為結構性失衡的互害模式（如美國製造衰敗、城市空心化，中國勞工工作生活權益受損、鄉村敗落而從容“全官尋租化、全民佃戶化”），順便說一句，川普的“不干涉內政”新政策宣示，等於對逃避責任讓本國人民作炮灰的民族主義煽情，釜底抽薪；

第三，全球化2.0追趕GDP增長極限競賽，加劇各國結構性失衡，損害社會機體健康，導致文明衝突和全球性信任信仰危機，亟需全新的價值標準問世。

這世界，也只有美國率先改變，帶頭讓“生產回歸生活，生活呈現生態，生態激發生命”自組織連接再平衡，重構全球化3.0經濟健康黃金率的共生經濟學GDE價值——五因交互（降本、賦能、健康、信任、和平）共生獎抑機制，從而：

讓規則雙標，扭曲自由貿易，無機可趁；讓意識形態，包裝不對等交易，無處遁形；讓過剩增長，掩蓋健康信任稀缺，無計可施。

才能讓MAGA引領全球，自強不息，厚德載物，惟德動天，無遠弗屆！

最後，全球化3.0重構世界新秩序，就是倒逼世界各國，要麼無條件自行結構性改變，贏得“重新入局”的資質，要麼冥頑不化堅持權重責輕的獨大結構，連累本國人民“自甘出局”！

這就是共生經濟學（Symbionomics）“自己活也要別人活，不要自己邪惡也讓別人邪惡（Live and let others live; do not be evil nor cause others to be evil）”的人際國際通律——Everything Intersubjective Symbiosism哲學的當代昭示！

重構全球化3.0戰略洞察與行動指南

Strategic Insights and Action Plan for Rebuilding Globalization 3.0

錢 宏（Archer Hong Qian）
Archer Hong Qian
Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation（CANADA）·2025

內容提要

本報告提出：川普總統團隊“對美利堅20項承諾”，不僅是政策主張，更具備構建“全球化3.0可能三角”的實踐價值。通過GDE共生指數評估，美國當前六項核心政策的健康黃金率達85.1%，表明其高度可感性，並具有全球結構性改變的引領力。

報告重點包含：

1. 全球化2.0的結構悖論與制度錯位；

2. 川普新政六項政策的健康黃金率實證；

3. GDE共生指數對11國的結構轉型評估；

4. “仨自組織人”替代“理性經濟人”的治理躍遷模型；

5. 10項建議與行動指南

6. 孞態網——作為地球人-AI-TRUST生活方式創新獎抑機制的倫理基礎設施

7. 發起“共生經濟全球博覽會”，展示全球化3.0生活方式，重塑全球治理想象

8. 全球化3.0回歸生產、生活、生態的常識、常情與常道

最終目標是：重建全球共生秩序，以結構性交互承兌取代話語權力，以健康黃金率的GDE（Gross Domestic Efficiency）價值標準代替增長黃金率的GDP博弈，開闢全球共生永續和平的新時代。

Executive Summary

This report proposes that the Trump administration’s “20 Promises to America” are not merely policy commitments but hold practical value in constructing the "Possible Triangle" (可能三角) of Globalization 3.0. Through the GDE Symbiosis Index (GDE共生指數), the Golden Rate of Health (健康黃金率) of the U.S.’s six core policies currently stands at 85.1%, demonstrating high perceptibility and global leadership in structural transformation.

Key Focus Areas of the Report:

1. Structural paradoxes and institutional misalignments of Globalization 2.0.

2. Empirical analysis of the Golden Rate of Health for six Trump administration policies.

3. GDE Symbiosis Index assessment of structural transformation in 11 countries (11國結構轉型評估).

4. Governance leap model replacing the "rational economic man" with the "Threefold Self-Organizing Persons" (仨自組織人).

5. Ten recommendations and action guidelines (10項建議與行動指南).

6. Mindset Network (孞態網) as the ethical infrastructure for the Earthlings-AI-TRUST lifestyle innovation reward-constraint mechanism (孞態獎抑機制).

7. Launch of the Symbionomic Global Expo (共生經濟全球博覽會, SGE) to showcase Globalization 3.0 lifestyles and reshape global governance imagination.

8. Globalization 3.0’s return to the common sense, common sentiment, and common path (常識、常情、常道) of production, life, and ecology.

Ultimate Goal: Rebuild a global symbiotic order, replacing discursive power with structural interactive endorsement, substituting the GDE（Gross Domestic Efficiency） value standard of the Golden Rate of Health for the GDP competition of the Golden Rate of Growth, and ushering in a new era of global symbiotic and sustainable peace (全球共生永續和平).

關鍵詞中英文對照 Keywords Glossary

 目錄

I. 開題：全球化2.0的深層矛盾與川普新政的破局之道

Introduction: The Deep Contradictions of Globalization 2.0 and the Trump Administration’s Breakthrough Approach

II. 全球化2.0的三重不可能三角：結構性矛盾

The Triple Impossible Triangle of Globalization 2.0: Structural Contradictions

III. 全球化3.0的可能三角：歷時性與共時性（上）

The Possible Triangle of Globalization 3.0: Diachronic and Synchronic Transition(Part 1)

1、歷時性：貨幣形態與規則體系的躍遷

Diachronic Perspective: The Evolution of Currency Forms and Rule Systems

IV.  全球化3.0的可能三角：歷時性與共時性（中）

The Possible Triangle of Globalization 3.0: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives (Part 2)

2、共時性：川普互惠關稅與三零規則的實踐

Synchronic Perspective: Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs and the Triple Zero Rules in Practice

IV. 全球化3.0的可能三角：歷時性與共時性（下）

The Possible Triangle of Globalization 3.0: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives (Part 3)

3、三元悖論解釋不了順差國的差異變化

The Trilemma Cannot Fully Explain Variations Among Surplus Countries

V. 全球化3.0核心：生命價值、社會穩定與全球共生

The Core of Globalization 3.0: Life Value, Social Stability, and Global Symbiosis

1、生命自組織連接價值（三零規則的哲學基礎）

Life Self-Organization Connection Value (Philosophical Foundation of the Triple Zero Rules)

2、社會生活穩定繁榮（GDE價值參量的實踐目標）

Social Stability and Prosperity (Practical Goal of GDE Value Metrics)

3、全球共生公約和平（共生幣價值承兌終極使命）

Permanent Peace of the Global Symbiosism Convention (Ultimate Mission of Symbiotic Tender Value Endorsement)

4、仨自組織人：全球化3.0“可能三角”的結構主體

Threefold Self-Organizing Persons: Structural Agents of Globalization 3.0’s Possible Triangle

5、哲學結構意義：從不可能三角到可能三角的躍遷機制

Philosophical Structural Significance: The Leap Mechanism from Impossible to Possible Triangle

6、GDE價值參量評估川普新政的健康黃金率

GDE Value Metrics Assessment of Trump’s New Policies: The Golden Rate of Health

7、GDE“五因交互指數”定義與公式

Definition and Formula of the GDE Five-Factor Interaction Index

8、GDE評估川普新政：健康黃金率的實踐價值

GDE Assessment of Trump’s New Policies: Practical Value of the Golden Rate of Health

9、GDE對11國轉型評估：全球化2.0到3.0的可行性

GDE Assessment of 11 Countries’ Transformation: Feasibility from Globalization 2.0 to 3.0

VI. 10項建議與行動指南：川普新政推進全球化重組

Recommendations and Action Guidelines: Pathways for Trump’s New Policies to Advance Globalization 3.0

1、建立三零規則的多邊試點機制，保障生命價值

Establish a Multilateral Pilot Mechanism for the Triple Zero Rules to Safeguard Life Value

2、採用GDE價值參量，引領社會穩定繁榮

Adopt GDE Value Metrics to Lead Social Stability and Prosperity

3、推動共生幣的實驗性應用，促進全球共生公約

Promote Experimental Application of Symbiotic Tender to Foster the Global Symbiosism Convention

4、建立GDE三大指數體系，提升新價值的操作性

Establish the GDE Three-Index System to Enhance the Operability of New Values

5、構建愛之智慧孞態網，生成交互主體共生場

Build the Amorsophia Minds Network to Generate an Intersubjective Symbiotic Field

6、優化互惠關稅和川普金卡政策，提升社會穩定

Optimize Reciprocal Tariffs and Trump Green Card Policies to Enhance Social Stability

7、提升貿易夥伴的制度透明度，保障生命價值

Enhance Trade Partners’ Institutional Transparency to Safeguard Life Value

8、加強跨文化信任建設，支持全球化3.0的文明公約

Strengthen Cross-Cultural Trust Building to Support Globalization 3.0’s Civilizational Convention

9、牽頭舉辦共生經濟全球博覽會，提升MAGA運動自豪感

Lead the Hosting of the Symbionomic Global Expo to Enhance MAGA Movement Pride

10、重新考慮加入CPTPP，擴容印太戰略動能

Reconsider Joining CPTPP to Expand Indo-Pacific Strategic Momentum

VII. 共生經濟學價值重構：全球化3.0的文明新秩序

Symbionomics’ Value Reconstruction: The New Civilizational Order of Globalization 3.0

VIII. 全球化2.0到3.0的歷時性、共時性、必由性

The Diachronic, Synchronic, and Inevitable Transition from Globalization 2.0 to 3.0

歷時性：全球化3.0通過貨幣（德幣→法幣→共生幣）和規則（單向規則→三零規則）的躍遷，化解三重不可能三角。

Diachronic Perspective: Globalization 3.0 resolves the Triple Impossible Triangle through the evolution of currency (Morality Tender → Legal Tender → Symbiotic Tender) and rules (unidirectional → Triple Zero Rules).

共時性：川普新政以互惠關稅為起點，推動全球化3.0的落地，提供全球範例。

Synchronic Perspective: Trump’s new policies, starting with reciprocal tariffs, drive the implementation of Globalization 3.0, providing a global model.

必由性：GDE和孞態網的引入，為全球化3.0提供了量化和技術保障。以生命價值為本的全球化3.0，推動社會穩定繁榮，通過交互主體共生和全球共生公約，開啟公平共生與永久和平的新階段，讓任何企圖統治世界的帝國政治構想成為不可能。

Inevitability: The introduction of GDE and the Mindset Network provides quantitative support and technological assurance for Globalization 3.0. Globalization 3.0, rooted in life value, promotes social stability and prosperity, ushering in a new phase of fair symbiosis and permanent peace through intersubjective symbiosis and the Global Symbiosism Convention, making any imperial political ambition to dominate the world impossible.

川普新政不僅回應了全球化2.0的矛盾，還通過全球化3.0的重構和GDE的引領，為全球共生秩序提供了歷史性啟示。世界秩序從來不是“誰控制資本，誰定規則”，而是“誰（複數）能定義價值承兌方式，誰一起交互重構文明新秩序”。

Trump’s new policies not only address Globalization 2.0’s contradictions but, through Globalization 3.0’s restructuring and GDE’s leadership, offer a historic revelation for the global symbiotic order. World order has never been about “who controls capital, who sets the rules,” but “who (plural) can define the method of value endorsement, and who together interactively restructures the new civilizational order.”

GDE價值參量的引入，以“1.0”為結構健康判斷的均衡參照。這一參照不是一個靜態點，而是一個方向——萬物交互中以最小能耗、公平、信任為特徵的動態中衡路徑。這是宇宙生命從“負N↔0.1↔0↔1↔N”結構躍遷中追求的“動中衡點”，體現“無限趨0”的動態交互轉換過程，是交互主體共生秩序穩定進化與可持續躍遷的哲學內核，也是全球化3.0中生產、生活、生態的常識、常情、常道——既激盪又安寧。

The introduction of Symbionomics’ GDE value metrics establishes “1.0” as the equilibrium reference for structural health judgments. This reference is not a static point but a direction—a dynamic balance path of minimal energy consumption, equity, and trust in the interaction of all things. It is the “dynamic equilibrium point” (動中衡點) pursued in the structural leap of universal life from “negative N ↔ 0.1 ↔ 0 ↔ 1 ↔ N,” embodying a “convergence to zero” (無限趨0) dynamic interactive transformation process. It serves as the philosophical core for achieving stable evolution and sustainable leaps in the intersubjective symbiotic order, and the common sense, sentiment, and path of production, life, and ecology—both turbulent and serene—in Globalization 3.0.

總之，“全球化3.0不是結構再分配，而是結構再生”的文明敘事。

In summary, “Globalization 3.0 is not about structural redistribution but structural regeneration”—a civilizational narrative.

2025年4月29日-5月3日於溫哥華

Archer Hong Qian

Vancouver, April 29–May 3, 2025

About Archer Hong Qian, See Author Biography in the Appendix

A Paradigm Shift in UN Narrative, available at http://www.symbiosism.org; http://symbiosism.com.cn

Contact Information:  

Phone: +1 604 690 6088；Email: hongguanworld@gmail.com