Discuss the "Foreign Policy" magazine 

 Translator:God has eyes 

"Foreign policy" or 《外交政策》 is recognized
 as one of the world's most influential
 international affairs publication, the founder of
 the American Political Science dean Huntington.
 "Foreign Policy" magazine was born in 1970
 specifically to encourage all of the controversy
 triggered by the crucial issues facing U.S.
 foreign policy. So far, this magazine is
 headquartered in Washington, DC has become a
 source of information gathered in-depth
 discussion forums and new ideas, new ideas.
 Went to the annual one hundred global thinkers
 selection, as the selection of the organizers of
 the "Foreign Policy" magazine, specifically the
 Internet search, you will see such a message.
 "Foreign Policy" magazine dedicated to encourage
 all of the United States ... (omitted). Simple
 point, a small area to understand: to encourage
 the foreign policy of the United States finds
 fault; wide range of understanding: Welcome
 criticized, questioned, to promote freedom of
 expression.
 Review "Foreign Policy" magazine, not natural to
 look at the founding of the "Foreign Policy"
 magazine.
 As a founding people (one of) Huntington
 "caused huge controversy in academic, political
 and media theory, often published, stubborn,
 but there is no lack of rigor. Mr. Gu Xiaojun
 guess what, people can live forever, this
 "political science dean moment will surely be
 offering himself for selection of great interest, or
 talking to the last hero minds think alike.
 Or, in the case of the Americans, "Huntington",
 limited by their own factors, after all, only the
 study of international relations or political
 science scholars, the creation of a "foreign
 policy" to encourage people to and bold public
 comment the biggest names in American foreign
 policy, foreign policy and brainstorming for the
 the service of politics.
 "Foreign policy" after the old man died in 2008,
 the situation seems to be getting worse, a great
 "Wang Xiaoer New Year, year after year," the
 dilemma.
 Why do you say that?
 Still enjoys a huge influence, but the results of
 the vote "one hundred global thinkers", or clues
 police, seen some prospect.
 2009, one hundred global thinkers ", the
 People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan
 assessment into the ranks of the" thinkers ";
 This is not a economist named a feeling how
 with all the world: Got others bribe, dare not offend others.
 2010, one hundred global thinkers ", the
 Shanghai writer Han Han assessment into; Han
 has proved ghostwriter fraud, could get no ideas
 and theories on the table, and Mr. Gu Xiaojun
 expose cultural undercover. Selected reasons
 more funny: one of the most popular writers in
 the world, his blog of wide public concern in
 China.
 2011 "one hundred global thinkers", the artist Ai
 Weiwei included in the 18. The selection of the
 reason is unclear what, this will not be detained
 because the license tax evasion and other
 economic issues, rights, etc.?
 If tax evasion, not punishable? Which countries
 tax evasion without being punished? Serious jail
 should be the!
 Rights? Celebrities, wealthy throughout the
 mansion, to say the intersection of fine, and
 then asked human rights lawyers to fight
 lawsuits should not be so, as a human rights
 activist dimension own rights? Results back their
 good friends contributions to pay the fine, his
 rights so? The fine paid half of the remaining
 millions not chase this Inland Revenue
 Department, which country? A pseudo-activist Ai
 Weiwei is to look just like the, a swindler it?
 Well-known as an influential global magazine, so
 continuous these pseudo-democracy, pseudo-
 activist or cultural undercover vote for one
 hundred global thinkers ", not only to ask
 repeatedly: as editor of the magazine or the
 Director, misconstruction, mistake sentence, you
 may consider the consequences?
 Some people, not mid-assessment he thinkers,
 he is a real thinker, you practice as a "foreign
 policy" just in self-destructive reputation! To the
 big, because you inpublic impartiality is not rigorous,
 misleading the world countries on China's
 foreign policy, and that is you in on the entire
 Chinese people, crime!
 Do not understand, "Foreign Affairs magazine!
 Now know the "China Sina microblogging is the
 disinformation machine of the world's best."
 Network publicity in the end is how is it, do not
 understand! Said Western democracy and
 freedom from public impartiality, any of you, "the world's
 most influential international affairs publication
 will descend rumor garbage people ridiculed,
 absurd,!
 Worth mentioning, let "Wang Xiaoer New Year,
 year after year," the dilemma of history, an
 opportunity is put before you, and that is to ask
 you to publish:
 Recommended to the United States' foreign
 policy thinkers (topics): http://blog.sina.com.cn/
 s/blog_ae4ac38501018l6t.html
 Do public impartiality to China! Just to vote one hundred
 global thinkers! public impartiality to Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
 public impartiality first! public impartiality Hooray!

No democracy 2012-11-01