|
Discuss "Foreign Policy" magazine publisher(2) --- No democracy Translator:God has eyes In the same paper on "Foreign Policy" magazine
publishers believe that the reader already knows
the Carnegie Foundation in the 1970s, perhaps
in the 1980s after the ownership of the "foreign
policy" is responsible for the magazine's
publishing. Only in 2008, two years before
"foreign policy" of the 40th anniversary of the
Washington Post Company bought the ownership
of this magazine, and "network version is open to
readers around the world interested in foreign
policy." .
See: Yeeyan network "the 40th anniversary of
the" foreign policy ": Chief-editor" http://
article.yeeyan.org/view/116907/164073 or
cultural aspect Network: http://www.21bcr.com/
a/ shiye/yuwai/2011/0307/2420.html
Two years ago, also experienced a new round of
transformation in the Washington Post Company
purchased the ownership of this magazine, we
have the whole world is open to readers
interested in foreign policy network version. In
spite of the change, but "foreign policy" has
been trying to uphold the magazine founded by
the critical spirit of hope - especially strong
determination to be resisted foreign policy of
non-critical thinking. 】
I never know why, of the Carnegie Foundation "to
sell" foreign policy "search the online edition of
the" foreign policy "on the network, no results,
no more independent way to verify the
authenticity of this information, or leave it users
to identify it.
Founded in 1970 "40th Anniversary" and "Chief-
editor Published look at January 2011, there are
two pieces of information in it:" Two years ago,
that is, in 2008, completed the acquisition; and
away from But two years, the ownership of the
"foreign policy" should be all of the Washington
Post Company, the company also owns the
"Washington Post" reported "Watergate" fame
and later sold Newsweek.
Return to the "foreign policy" up; "one hundred
global thinkers" selection should be operated by
the publisher or owner. All aspects of the search
results and the 2010 winner of the reported "It
is the second" Foreign Policy "magazine selected
annual thinkers" information point of view, in
the Washington Post Company to purchase
foreign policy began later. (Note: web search
Award in 2008 and the previous record.)
Washington Post Company is a "foreign policy"
after the acquisition, non-stop start again to
operate one hundred global thinkers "vote, it
really is a" foreign policy "has been trying to
uphold the magazine founded by hope critical
spirit - especially on the foreign policy of non-
critical thinking be resisted strong
determination. "? Can be read in more and more
information about you, no matter how also can
not figure out this selection of one hundred
global thinkers "with original founding purpose
and adhering to" how much the association.
Why the Washington Post after the completion of
the acquisition, the company operating a slick
one hundred global thinkers selection? Look at
this vote thinkers list three years, from a
"thinker" Zhou Xiaochuan, Han, Ai Weiwei and
other contributions to the community point of
view, without substance or flashy, foreign policy,
have to admit is not.
Is this a highly developed, the freedom of the
United States as much as the "Washington Post"
this selfless, not for profit, only for the sake of
the name in mid-to engage in the world's top
thinkers vote big companies? Contingent alone,
since in recent years, traditional paper media
because of the economic crisis, the rapid decline
in advertising volume Annual losses have
vigorously develop the digital version of view, at
least I do not believe!
As a possible loss of U.S. companies, so the
operation of a vote, would not people have
questioned the reasons for this?
You believe belong to the Washington Post's
"foreign policy in the August 2, 2010, the United
States," Newsweek "mid-loss price of $ 1, sold to
Sidney Harman, founder of Harman International
Industries Group "contrarian own money, flower
human and material resources to carry out his
the an absolute controversial selection? The in
height fair market system and improve the
corporate system of the United States, anyway,
do not believe it!
Zhou Xiaochuan, vote for the acquisition of a
paper media in the case of the poor economic
environment, "Foreign Affairs magazine, for three
consecutive years, the United States spent a few
thousand trillion foreign exchange thinkers
Although it is impossible to know whether one
hundred global thinkers" vote predecessor the
planning of the Foundation, but after the
acquisition of the Washington Post Company,
such operations, foreign policy, "so named can
not let the people of the world do not doubt!
After reading Mr. Gu Xiaojun Gu Xiaojun most
news: a new generation of hacks thousands
Engineering Exposure "in retrospect" a mortal
scam "," a big scam to deceive the whole world ",
the network media understand wall can
manufacture "foreign garbage and foreign
language China" had to learn to think like Mr.
Gu Xiaojun as, Is this traditional paper media
"foreign policy" has also been the fall in the fair
outside?
Compared to the Foundation, the Washington
Post's "foreign policy" more irrational, more
doubt, leave it to users to think about it!
If the Washington Post or the "foreign policy" in
order to vote one hundred global thinkers "to
expand the magazine's sales in the global
market, the reader may be a plausible reason. As
long as justice to the real thinker Mr. Gu
Xiaojun, we can put the past turned over not to
mention, look to the future, then this year's one
hundred thinkers should Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
"To American foreign policy" recommend Gu
Xiaojun (thematic) issued a half years to go, and
in today's information era, the Washington Post
Company has numerous channels of information
and "foreign policy" does not know is not!
Next, you Washington Post or the "foreign policy"
to make a choice when! --- No democracy 2012-11-04 |
|
