|
Gu Xiaojun ism democratic Economic Thought
- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred fifty-three Translator:God has eyes Economic thinking is that economic thinking, is
it also points democratic, non-democratic? Yes.
Economic thinkers of the ancient Chinese Guan
Zhong, the famous "Simin separation of theory",
that is, non-democratic economic thought. He
advocated disabilities, agricultural, industrial,
commercial Simin Separating separation, and its
order to facilitate the management, so that
people in small monasteries, easy to learn, and
thus achieve the purpose of to live and work;
but, in fact, form the scholars, farmers, of
workers, providers of professional hereditary. This
Is not feudal?
From the above it can be seen in front of the
"economic thinking" as a "democracy", is
reasonable. Well, why should emphasize "Gu
Xiaojun '? So they simply called "Gu Xiaojun
democracy Democratic economic thought" I want
to say today is the economic ideology of populist
democracy; "populist democracy" and
"democratic economic thinking" belong "Gu
Xiaojun ' economic thought, but also to save a
mouthful, around people.
Next, say - "Romney defeat the real reason I said
that has published the" support of the United
States of the opposition came to power! , Obama
ousted. Obama ousted due to his participation
in the international political elite alliance "to
participate in the the fake star Han and around
the pseudo the defenders tree pseudo hero Ai
Weiwei, Chen Guangcheng, forced upon the
Chinese people, the democratic process delayed
oppose his economic policy, rather than its
reaction out of economic thought.
Precisely, Obama's economic policy, relatively
close to the "Gu Xiaojun democracy Economic
Thought. Long-term follow-read my articles know
that: the beginning of January 2009, I wrote a
series of "counseling Obama. In 2010, frequented
my blog generation blog readers are accustomed
to what I call the "Obama teacher. Is not the
case? Therefore, I am disgusted with Obama, he
was involved in the international political elite
alliance ", false star and pseudo-hero, to deceive
the Chinese people, and has nothing to do with
its economic policies and ideas.
Well, the economic thinking is reflected in
Obama's economic policy look like? What is
relatively close to the "Gu Xiaojun democracy
Economic Thought"? Below, I briefly Romney in
the 2012 U.S. presidential election, with Obama
in the economic policy, through the main points
in their campaign speeches and debates,
comparison and analysis, to make it clear that -
Romney's economic policies - tax cuts, savings,
reduce government regulation. Support the
corporate income tax rate from 35% to 25%,
support a family are exempt from the dividend
and capital gains tax annual income of less than
$ 250,000 to support the abolition of the real
estate tax. Simply put: low tax rates, to revive
the American economy, that "more employment,
less debt, government policy in favor of. Grouped
into economic thinking, two words: development.
Obama's economic policies - a windfall profits
tax on oil companies, immediately allocated $ 25
billion for the construction and maintenance of
roads, bridges, schools and other infrastructure,
increase home heating costs subsidies ... and so
on. Overall: reform of the tax system, giving
benefits to low-and middle-income class;
increase investment in public infrastructure,
stimulate consumption growth. Grouped into two
words: spend money. As for the low and middle
income who is: send money.
Romney and Obama's economic policies, I
exported the two concepts (ie economic thought)
: "development" and "giving away money". In
fact, this "development" and "giving away money"
will be the democratic stage of human society
(in the future for a long time, some thousands of
years) economic policy measures, struggle and
mutual checks and balances, and constantly
repeated the performance until generate new
elements for the development of technology and
society; Otherwise, this "development" and
"giving away money" will be accompanied by
mankind for ever.
These two concepts of "development" and "giving
away money" into China's contemporary
economic is - since Deng Xiaoping's "southern
tour", the emphasis in China has been
"development". "Development", and then
"development"; almost rarely "giving away
money, even longed to" distribute money. This
violation of economic laws of modern society;
Therefore, the gap between the rich and the
poor is expanding, deepening social
contradictions, groups, events become
increasingly frequent ... to the point where the
possessor of a huge police force had to safeguard
stability.
In fact, the society itself is stable and easy life,
the vast majority of people. Social instability,
people wanted change, managers asked for. Gu
Xiaojun democracy Economic Thought "to resolve
social contradictions now is very simple, only two
words: giving away money. Of course, giving away
money is a learned, rather than according to the
head of hair thousands or tens of thousands. So,
exactly how fat, how fat can the economy into a
virtuous circle, and to resolve social conflicts, to
facilitate the final political settlement of it?
Here are a few "giving away money" program.
The first is to children, "giving away money". I
always think: less arable land and a large
population of Chinese family planning policy is
not necessarily wrong, but wrong on the specific
policy. To sign a contract IPPF family "giving
away money", according to the current standard
of living, a 3000 is issued, it is not difficult to
implement child policy. And supporting policies,
such as the one-child free kindergarten, primary,
junior and senior high. "Giving away money"
hard hair, the hair of the people did not dare,
and do not want to have a second child, the
implementation of child policy, there is what
hard could it be?
"Giving away money to the elderly." Once the 60-
year-old, whether you have no or the amount of
income or social security gave you distribute
money, 1000. Doctor, whether serious illness or
minor illnesses, by 95% of the national burden.
If there is no housing, the provision of low-cost
housing, $ 300 Danshi Tao. In this way, people
can also save money doing it? Worry about how
many billions of savings, not to slowly defuse it?
According to this line of thinking, to laid-off
workers, elderly farmers, the disabled, the
unemployed, and so "made money", and also how
possible social instability? It is also how much
contradiction? The problem, of course, to the
money come from? Gu Xiaojun said as I also very
simple: First, cut to stimulate economic
investment. Has been changed to stimulate
consumption. Second, the redemption of U.S.
Treasury bonds, and so on overseas investment.
Because the Chinese people are still very poor,
how can his people were very poor, but lent rich
rationale spent?
In fact, among this election, the people of the
United States has committed a very serious
mistake - the collective unconscious, just look at
the immediate benefits. 4 years of Obama "sent
money, issued a 5 trillion deficit, should it not
be so Romney came to power" development "and
to balance financial? Moreover, it should be
"forced" slowly spit U.S. Treasury bonds - As far
as China is concerned, you should take it back
so that people consumed; For the United States,
is a kind of economic security. Speaking from the
point of view of the global economy, but also to
balance - to prevent the emergence of an
economic superpower.
To sum up, "Gu Xiaojun democracy Economic
Thought: First, the future of human society, is a
contradiction of" development "and" money ".
Second, the basic, dominated by the elitist and
thinking "development", led by the populist and
ideological "giving away money. Three
"development" and "giving away money", the
long-term struggle, and checks and balances.
The reason is so simple, the complexity of
economic thought, in essence, is the Fudge
exclusion of the people involved in management. Gu Xiaojun 2012-11-12 Nanjing |
|
