设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
无民主的博客  
每个人都应该关心自己的家园!  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/6957/ > 复制 > 收藏本页
网络日志正文
To "foreign policy": Solution for your chess game 2012-11-13 10:14:38

To "foreign policy": Solution for your chess game

 

Translator:God has eyes

 

Earth people know, the world's largest two power
 elite groups in the next dish of great chess "(see
 Gu Xiaojun, a great chess, Australia old music"
 the United States in the next set big chess ").
 This game has a great layout, there are a lot of
 details may seem complicated, in fact, there is
 something that can be at a glance, can also gave
 away the.
 For example, both goals can hit the nail: that is
 power - and the gradual expansion of the power
 of unlimited expansion - continue to strengthen
 the national and world influence and control of
 power.
 By examining both consistently as acting style,
 the two sides chess Road glance.
 Such as the Chinese elite, their large ones
 simply: to strengthen domestic controls to
 increase the international influence, the turn
 Youyi increasing international influence to flicker
 to frighten domestic opposition, the two
 complement each other.
 Specific operation is: very hard "hands" (violence
 in the maintenance of stability and ideological
 governance) to strengthen domestic control,
 relying on ideological uniformity and "of one
 mind" billions of creatures and billions of
 creatures to create wealth (claims) "Order the
 world, to gain and increased global influence, in
 turn, strengthen the control of the domestic as
 capital, the core of sovereignty to China's long-
 term goal is still to keep.
 U.S. side elite (whether Democrat or Republican)
 has always been the ones: the party in power to
 strengthen international influence to get the
 ballot appeal, and as a re-election and called for
 the ballot capital, ad infinitum, the formation of
 "positive feedback", so that the two parties in
 the election more and more emphasis on foreign
 policy Competition.
 The specific operation is: strong "three
 measures" ("hard power" show muscles, maintain
 the impact of "soft power" and "smart power" to
 make up for the lack of the first two) to
 strengthen the global control of, maintain the
 initiative in the international distribution of
 benefits brought tangible benefits (such as
 energy supply, and the transfer of the debt
 crisis, etc.), in order to win votes, to win control
 of the world, playing with the powers of the
 earth, the core objective of the ballot for the the
 pragmatic American people directly.
 We can see, the elites really fine over the years
 Jieyou extraordinary performance in the Grand
 Chessboard wonderful again and again, but it
 has a fatal - are only around the domestic power
 to maintain and obtain "playing around.
 This is the limitations of the elites, their lack of
 play for the future of mankind, in this sense,
 they are not considered true elite.
 Cardiovascular system before the thinkers of the
 future of humanity, they are some political small
 reptiles, even look up only to see below the
 knee.
 Gossip put off, or that chess game.
 At the moment, both chess have been down to
 the key points, according to both the target and
 the large ones. The next step is to "shift" (party
 party elections, party for inter-party election) to
 do a last ditch attempt.
 China's elite to keep public opinion always
 eliminate noise, more conducive to "fake reform"
 action after the shift, and shift, in particular, can
 not be any better than their own "guiding
 ideology" (see Gu Xiaojun "to the 48 large to
 provide several guiding ideology "), sealing to kill
 Gu Xiaojun its ideas became" network stability
 maintenance the front "celebrate" Eighteen, "one
 of the major tasks.
 Elite U.S. side, is around the next presidential
 large spaces PK China policy has become heavy,
 to cater to the Chinese side (with the
 maintenance of stability) Value (such as the U.S.
 dollar holdings, counter-terrorism cooperation,
 trade compromise), or to insist on value
 (promotion of democracy and freedom) to force
 the Chinese political reform, which is more likely
 to get more votes?
 This, of course, depends on the value of the
 trade-offs of American voters, if pragmatism first,
 the damage to the Chinese people - democracy
 must be postponed; able to hold the value, and
 put pressure on the Chinese side, the benefit of
 the Chinese people - democracy will be taken a
 welcome step.
 The American people how they will vote, as the
 popular American conservatism trust media, you
 "foreign policy" voice is key. If you hold high the
 banner of "democracy and freedom" idealism,
 then the American people will certainly ballot
 vote for willingness to promote political reform
 candidate, the future president will also promote
 China to democratic direction forward. If you let
 short-sighted pragmatism payable to the votes of
 the American people and the future president is
 inevitably again with the Chinese elite
 confluence hinder the the Chinese democratic
 process.
 Go from here, "one hundred global thinkers" vote
 ballot in your hands.
 To let Gu Xiaojun selected Gu Xiaojun out of the
 ban, the idealistic choice, so the American voters
 and the president have a China policy direction,
 and that is to promote political reform (Gu
 Xiaojun China maintains that the authorities,
 through political reform towards democracy flag
 banner characters, the thinker actively promote
 the practice of democracy in China), and let
 them move towards democracy, the United
 States less "and uncertain temper." Earth's
 neighbor (authoritarian never moody).
 Let Gu Xiaojun selected choice of pragmatism,
 with the maintenance of stability of the Chinese
 elite, so the American voters and the next
 president must adhere to in recent years China
 policy wrong direction, he was appointed in
 power elite in the country fucks, as long as the
 short-term economic interests and not be able to
 honor of "strategic interests" (such as "no
 confrontation with the United States' unilateral
 commitment), will suffer in the end is still the
 American people, because a grow strong enough
 to authoritarian regimes, regardless of their own
 people or on the same earth with them other
 peoples, is a hidden threat (Hitler, Stalin, are
 good examples).
 The assessment was made on an incorrect
 assessment Gu Xiaojun, really at stake, you do
 not ponder Cautious, okay?

The Chinese netizens wave heart projection 2012
 11 days 11 hours 00

 

浏览(238) (0) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
无民主
来自: 中国
注册日期: 2012-11-12
访问总量: 465,652 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 好大的一盘棋
· 郝前锋是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 「没有某某某就没有新什么」
· 老前锋与方方
· 老前锋踢球门的故事
· 方方的拥趸们的无知
· 方方们在走下坡路
分类目录
【时评】
· 郝前锋是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 老前锋与方方
· 一草博主:方方有良心吗?
· 对“方方日记”你得学会质疑
· 方方是在愚弄谁
· 很大很大的一盘棋
· 转载:吹捧方方的声音被我打压了
· 转载:「方方日记」无卖点 Harper
· 顾晓军、石三生及刘刚
· 马拉拉·优素福扎伊的枪击
【杂谈】
· 郝前锋是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 老前锋与方方
· 一草博主:方方有良心吗?
· 对“方方日记”你得学会质疑
· 方方是在愚弄谁
· 很大很大的一盘棋
· 谁会拒绝“公正第一”
· 为何不倡导“公正第一”呢?
· 谁挖了我妈的老房子
· 我们需要“公正第一”
【读书看报】
· 中央日报:新價值觀《公正第一》
· 新价值观《公正第一》在台湾出版
· “运作诺贝尔文学奖”
· 阎连科的炒作
· 刘刚事件(四)
· 回忆与思考(二)
· 回忆与思考
· 撒切尔夫人与预言
· 推、诺奖和石三生
· 刘刚事件
【所见所闻】
· 好大的一盘棋
· 「没有某某某就没有新什么」
· 老前锋踢球门的故事
· 方方的拥趸们的无知
· 方方们在走下坡路
· 给方方的拥趸们
· 请问方方的拥趸们
· 方方的「恨国」与「良知」
· 方方是个局、谁的局?
· 于方方,一草为何装疯卖傻?
存档目录
2020-06-01 - 2020-06-09
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-30
2020-04-13 - 2020-04-30
2016-05-03 - 2016-05-05
2016-04-02 - 2016-04-21
2016-03-02 - 2016-03-28
2016-02-06 - 2016-02-27
2016-01-05 - 2016-01-25
2015-04-29 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-21 - 2015-03-21
2015-02-07 - 2015-02-07
2014-12-05 - 2014-12-26
2014-11-05 - 2014-11-23
2014-10-02 - 2014-10-26
2014-09-30 - 2014-09-30
2014-07-06 - 2014-07-06
2014-06-09 - 2014-06-09
2014-05-02 - 2014-05-08
2014-04-27 - 2014-04-27
2014-02-01 - 2014-02-02
2014-01-30 - 2014-01-30
2013-12-20 - 2013-12-22
2013-11-04 - 2013-11-24
2013-10-02 - 2013-10-30
2013-09-11 - 2013-09-29
2013-08-03 - 2013-08-31
2013-07-01 - 2013-07-30
2013-06-02 - 2013-06-29
2013-05-04 - 2013-05-30
2013-04-05 - 2013-04-25
2013-03-07 - 2013-03-20
2013-02-03 - 2013-02-25
2013-01-03 - 2013-01-28
2012-12-02 - 2012-12-29
2012-11-12 - 2012-11-30
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.