Wrong is foreign policy and political elite alliance

- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred forty-six

Translator:God has eyes

2012-11-03, no democracy "Foreign Policy
 magazine publishers wrote the chapter" On
 "detective" out "foreign policy" is a publication
 of the Carnegie Endowment for International
 Peace Foundation's; 2012-11-05 he "Detective"
 out "foreign policy" ownership should be the
 Washington Post Company. Therefore, he wrote
 articles "Notice to readers and Mr. Gu Xiaojun
 Gu dough" to express his feelings of remorse.
 I thought: the attentive nature is should be.
 But, since the responsibility is not necessary.
 Because the times we live in, it is not like
 Obama saying; Moreover, we are in the continent
 (not the body in the mainland and dogged, is
 difficult to understand the words mean).
 The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
 Foundation, I also do not faint seasoned Look at
 the point where the disciples of the article
 referenced.
 At the Carnegie Endowment for International
 Peace Foundation, I searched Baidu
 Encyclopedia, interactive encyclopedia, has been
 confirmed, wrote "foreign policy we supposed to
 do? . " And quoted text are pasted down directly
 from the Baidu Encyclopedia.
 Written my article, "Carnegie Endowment for
 International Peace Foundation entry is masked
 (I wanted" foreign policy we supposed to do?
 "After filling, but I do not want to destroy the
 whole of the article atmosphere). What does this
 mean? First, the search process, there is a
 "tracker" (anti-virus software has been so remind
 me, I can to expulsion not it). My writing is to
 monitor the entire process (my computer archive
 text often be modified into a completely
 opposite meaning, and also proved that it was
 free to enter the computer system).
 We live in such and such times and
 environment, then we have nothing to remorse?
 Should blame themselves, not us, but the
 foreign policy are (see Dan Sansheng the "Asked
 Foreign Policy: you know how to repent it?") With
 the foreign policy of the Chinese political elite
 league.
 If there is nothing wrong, is the foreign policy
 are wrong (Obama only uttered beautiful. Chen
 Guangcheng is a fake, Obama sent survey,
 Obama has concealed a large number of
 findings), foreign policy of China's political elite
 league wrong (yesterday, friends posts on my
 blog Obama on freedom of speech and the blog
 of the speech, I replied to more than one
 meaning, thread and replies have been deleted,
 and the curse my bad language but still in).
 Yesterday, I visited the "crimes against
 humanity" entry, I think their acts, many of them
 in line with "crimes against humanity"
 qualitative (in fact, the alliance with the
 unspoken rules of the political elite world is
 against humanity, Hitler also Hitler - Hitler, so
 that the people of a State or States in a helpless
 state; while the country's political elite alliance,
 so that people around the world in a helpless
 state).
 The face of the world political elite league with
 the unspoken rules (see the projection of wave
 heart "To" foreign policy ": Solution for your
 chess game"), we are not wrong, nor the self-
 blame; contrary, we are heroes, is full human
 hero. Is not it?

Gu Xiaojun 2012-11-5 Nanjing