转载：

Democratic deficit

- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred fifty-eight 

Translator:God has eyes 

Democratic deficit is not "the public impartiality is the first " , and did not, as
 the "the public impartiality is the first values"
 Since the fair is not the first, public impartiality not the first
 values, the elites can do whatever they want,
 fraud, cheating people.
 The United States, that is, to do so.
 The United States, Han Han, China's pampered
 "Time magazine's" Person of the Year ", but did
 not dare to tell the American people - Han Han
 fakes - Han article he wrote; behind his back,
 the interests of Group, a dedicated team
 responsible for speculation.
 The United States, China's Chen Guangcheng,
 hailed as "rights hero", but did not dare to tell
 the American people - Chen Guangcheng is a
 fake - Chen Guangcheng, leave the blind is false
 escape, fake lawyers. (Obama, was commissioned
 by the U.S. private sector demonstration: Chen
 Guangcheng, Is it possible in 10 seconds, over
 the four-meter high wall? While the conclusion
 is - absolutely impossible.)
 Germany, "Deutsche Welle", but also to do so -
 they somehow interests, leading to speculation
 the so-called "Ai Weiwei events" in the world; Ai
 Weiwei, was originally a Chinese agents - to
 gratuitous missing for 81 days to intimidate the
 Chinese people, grounds of fraud and good
 friends again false penalty tax of more than 800
 million.
 I said these are the facts - I Gu Xiaojun, Gu
 powder with hundreds of the disciple Shi
 Sansheng and dozens of other disciples Gu and
 Gu dough (nine groups), has long been the
 author questioned the argumentation and
 accused of Han Chen Guangcheng Ai Weiwei, has
 never been their response or request to court.
 This shows that: they have been the default.
 Not "public impartiality", ignoring the "public impartiality the first values" of
 democracy, and the result is this.
 Free democratic world can not speak public impartialityice, CPC
 will naturally want: they do not speak public impartialityice, we
 can also talk about public impartialityice. Were not going to
 scrutinize: the free democratic world,
 categorically not in the country do not speak
 public impartialityice in international affairs only or do not
 speak on his country public impartialityice.
 Whether'm worth mentioning, not worth
 mentioning, both domestic or international
 affairs, or his country worth mentioning, do not
 speak a fair democratic deficit!
 Is not "public impartiality" democracy as the "public impartialityice is the
 first values" of democracy, not a good democracy,
 neither reason, nor to be promoted to the world.
 Led by the U.S., the elites in the free democratic
 world, I say right, is not it?
 I look forward to worldwide elites refute. 

Gu Xiaojun 2012-11-17 Nanjing