Three important values

- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred and sixty

Translator:God has eyes 

Yesterday, the Taiwanese fans true feelings, keep
 abreast of the top of my overseas blog article
 "the public impartiality first" to express his support,
 keep abreast of "support" directly after in
 another article. If so, I turned over to visit his
 blog. He seemed to engage in the arts, but the
 title of the first article of "democracy, freedom,
 equality, fraternity".
 Obviously, democracy, freedom, equality,
 fraternity "," democracy "and" liberty, equality,
 fraternity ". "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity", is
 formed by the French Revolution thought
 outdated; in the West, has also been replaced
 by "freedom, democracy, human rights, the rule
 of law".
 In addition, I would have said: that human
 society has never been equal, even if it is short,
 instant; future, may never have equality.
 Because human society is built on the basis of
 private ownership. While if it can be
 transformed into human society - the
 establishment of public ownership basis, then,
 became a tool or pig. Therefore, the "equality" is
 a malignant tumor of the uterus, thinking of
 communism.
 The "love", the same as the ideological product
 of the French Revolution, based on "equality",
 meaning "extensive love, the love of equality, not
 arithmetic of love level". I ask you: Is it
 possible? If not, not a slogan?
 Users in Taiwan, of course, true feelings, not a
 professional fighter for democracy, not only may
 not be solution slogans connotation universal
 values, it may not be clear alternation in
 different eras.
 Today, the free world say accurate to say that in
 a democratic society: freedom, democracy,
 human rights, the rule of law are core values.
 In fact, "the public impartiality first" I have said very
 clearly: human rights, but the re-expression of
 "freedom", human society after the formation of
 individual people continue to be squeezed, the
 emphasis on free and re-appeal.
 Left of freedom, human rights no meaning; "fair
 values, emphasis on human rights is nonsense,
 ulterior motives. Ai Weiwei, Chen Guangcheng,
 clearly Chinese agents (see me and Shi
 Sansheng large demonstration article), why is
 the American tree as the so-called "rights" hero?
 Today, I finally want to understand - Ai Weiwei,
 Chen Guangcheng, China and the United States
 of double spy. The U.S. side with them in the
 political and economic interests of blackmail
 Communist China; Chinese Communists, happy
 to honor the power of the people in the face of
 the struggle of individual rights, you can get rid
 of.
 In fact, human rights are not ideological
 significance, not the weight of the core values.
 Emphasis on "human rights" in the "free" after
 the waste and cumbersome. The reason why
 people are willing to burdensome because they
 see a possible extortion to benefit, so far they
 are still in the Request. This is also in China's
 domestic issues, let us see where China and the
 United States seems to collaborate with each
 other because.
 The rule of law, the same is not eligible to
 become the core values. Communist China also
 stressed the "rule of law", and there is much
 difference between the "rule of law" and "rule of
 law"? Can anyone explain the clear? While still
 allowing ordinary people to understand?
 Moreover, there is method in the beginning of
 human society. The rule of law for thousands of
 years, human progress can be attributed to the
 constraints of the "rule of law"?
 Pursuit of trends, the future of human society on
 three values: the public impartiality , freedom, democracy.
 the public impartiality is the foundation of human society.
 the public impartiality , about social orientation, and talk about
 the relationship between people, but also to
 speak each individual of the society, the attitude
 of others.
 Freedom, not "born free", "natural rights" like
 shit. People born without freedom! Born doomed
 to parents tubes, "Born Free" How can there be?
 And parents no matter, baby, how to survive?
 Days, more visible, intangible things, it confers
 how our human rights? Of "natural rights" and
 "kingship the Tianshou" What? Tone is a pack of
 lies to deceive the people!
 The freedom of a people yearning for a degree of
 freedom to maximize the ideal spiritual things.
 The higher the degree of social welfare, the
 smaller the degree of freedom of the individual
 in society people; the contrary, the larger the.
 Freedom, social and political expression.
 Democracy, is an idea in ancient times; today is
 not what great ideas, but a social framework, a
 safeguard system of the public impartiality and freedom. If,
 the public impartiality and freedom, both belonging to
 epistemology, also belong to the methodology,
 then, democracy has the world's "consensus"
 belongs only to the methodology. Willing to
 implement a democratic system, there was no
 question of understanding, willing, and
 interests. Democracy as errors of the road, but to
 pretend that a clear understanding of the
 loaded Pitt.
 Whether Eastern or Western, also regardless of
 advocating what what doctrine of thought or
 innovation, today and the future of human
 society, all must admit that the three values -
 the public impartiality , freedom and democracy. This has
 nothing to do with me, but human society song
 twists and turns to go today, walked the streets
 of new understanding.

Gu Xiaojun 2012-11-18 Nanjing

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_ae4ac3850101964y.html