To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group "Shi Sansheng Kyushu comment · one hundred sixty-one

Translator: God has eyes 

See the multi-dimensional foreign policy: how to
bring democratic China "did not pay particular
attention to of Yasheng its people. Even in
subsequent foreign policy why should abandon
Chen Guangcheng, "paranoid conspiracy of
Americans may exist.
After some understanding of the author,
although not clear all their doubts. But on
foreign policy at this time the intention of this
article, a positive view of a sharp increase in
many. Of course, Mr. Huang Yasheng further: or
directly expose the true face of Chen
Guangcheng; found that the most important
force in China's democratic factions ---- Gu
Xiaojun doctrine or the same as Mr. Lei Da. The
foreign policy of "fair view" abunShitly clear
also!
Originally, this author really is not mortal, but
authentic Maoist descenShit --- had been Mao
Zedong "Hunan Hesen Hubei Huang negative
raw" yellow Negative Health grandson, "airwaves"
never disappear of Huang Gang's son, and Ai
Weiwei with Yasheng Huang went to the
American Empire in 1981 studies. , Baidu
Encyclopedia, 2010 edition of the South
"hundred the Archduke known" biography, very
authentic. The obviously red three generations of
Liuyang learning, it seems as though the whole
people has always been a "Chinese" in general.
Look at the Old Man, Mr. Wong's knowing
economic theory, or useful set is also very biased
people. My teacher Mr. Gu Xiaojun unfortunately
not been coaching, a cavity blood, it turned into
a Ukrainian --- spade are white torn. Such as
Long as the dispute, such as to a people money
initiatives, such as the U.S. policy toward China
the Chinese people disgusted.
Contrast Mr. Huang's Old Man, "how to bring
democratic China" argument is not unexpected,
in its conversations with the Chinese people ",
has been created. Mr. Wong rehash error, blame
his "nerd" gas, if he really did not mean to play
the fool, then. Chinese people talk or
recommendations to the U.S. government to
adjust its China policy or Mr. Huang's error,
failed to recognize the nature of things ----
Washington's China policy is a conspiracy.
Mr. Wong is a special foreign policy writer's
identity, and very conceited ---- think they are
well aware of China's Harvard professor. Indulge
in empty talk economic theory, and not a
speculation the blind, Ai large stay noted that
the foreign policy of the Times, the Han three
cheat absurd, it is somewhat surprising. Do not
know it when Mr. Gu Xiaojun Han questioned for
more than three years, did not know Mr. Gu
Xiaojun more than a year of Ai Weiwei
questioned. How you can not know Mr. Gu
Xiaojun Chen Guangcheng "fake" expose it? This
is alarmed Chinese Vice Foreign Minister
personally visit Gary's blog and message of the
big event! Even foreign policy should, by the
mouth of the congressmen, said Chen blind
"made history" big event ah! Do not know how
the nerve to say that they are understanding of
China's human children?
Foreign policy and its false Yasheng mouth of the
review of Washington's China strategy. Why not
just review a long fatuous Yasheng pass headed
diplomacy experts? Mr. Wong well done article,
the why so has only GeshanShiiu to the people
no benefit? Why foreign policy to make its own
experts to look in the sitting real no a scholar
with it? The "failure" of Washington's China
strategy (the failure of the Chinese people, but
it can not be denied that the success of the
American people), to what extent is dependent
on international affairs publication "is
recognized as the world's most influential
"influence?
Can it be said: the failure of Washington and
the strategy of China, that is judged that the
failure of the foreign policy of China issues? This
failure, In addition to was blinded (Yasheng this
expert, will be blinded by it?), The missing
elements of the foreign policy of their own
conscience? Foreign policy will be a tax evasion
7,000,000 Ai stay sought after as a thinker. Is
not advocate crime?
Of course, regardless of how democracy to China,
"the starting point is what? In this case, the
value published on the occasion of the Chinese
Communist Party 18 big, I believe the real China
or benefit. Although not laid bare the fake blind
the true face of Chen blind, but able to
recognize the the fakes role has been "minimal",
can be considered slightly better than no
progress! But have to point out is that the
foreign policy of this article, in the progress of a
little while. And the birth of a greater fallacy ----
Chinese political elite certainly understand that
democracy provides property and personal
safety. Both of the foreign policy of the quasi-
criminals Ai stayed hailed as thinkers, western
democratic countries is still dominated by the
United States Government to open the door, and
wantonly accepted China's corrupt, the bare
Officer relatives. All these are to instill the
concept of China's political elite.
But China's political elites are not fools, they
understand that the United States and other
Western world can help harboring stolen goods
ill-gotten gains, and also natural understanding
of these ill-gotten gains if they are in a
democratic country, barely. Democratic countries,
and tolerance for their crime, than Autocratic
countries and more harsh. Whether Yasheng
example, the number of Chinese Communist
Party leaders, Crown Dali XingJu death penalty,
can not stop the autocratic love of Chinese
political elites. This point, the views of ordinary
people than the Chinese foreign policy wise a
million times: the net of impartiality, sparse and will
drain. Eighty million troops, bad luck always just
a handful. The key is to stand a good team, with
the right people.
Therefore, the foreign policy of trying to explain
the benefits of democracy, still howling at the
moon with the CCP's political elites. Democracy
bad North Korea as standard authoritarian
country would not advertised himself as a
democratic country. Let alone see the Chinese
political elite knowledge and more widely.
Nevertheless, Shi Sansheng still very grateful to
the reflection of the foreign policy. Also grateful
to the foreign policy insincerely bravely ants
step forward to "impartiality". If Yasheng Huang, the
so-called China hand is not blinders seen this
monster Gu Xiaojun doctrine. Shi Sansheng my
thanks and gratitude, and I'm afraid it will as
the surging Yangtze River water, rushing is not
no way out.
On a small step forward, Mr. Gu Xiaojun
included into the TOP100 it! If foreign policy
really want to promote democracy would come
soon to the magical land.

[Shi Sansheng Sunday, November 25, 2012 03:09 China] 

http://iwanshi.blogchina.com/1387917.html