设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
无民主的博客  
每个人都应该关心自己的家园!  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/6957/ > 复制 > 收藏本页
网络日志正文
Civilian ism democratic society 2012-12-14 14:37:36

Civilian ism democratic society

- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred eighty-seven

 

Translator:God has eyes

 

 Output "populist democracy" ideas and
concepts, and have been for a long time. Should
not Athens Academy re-opened, Pegasus or not
Gordon keep abreast of, I can not remember the
"populist democracy is the way out, this article
will temporarily have.

 No Gordon abreast: the 'clear' go elitism to
the elite 'democracy, populist democracy ----
another solution my confusion. "So, I think of
the disciples Gu Gu powder group of warrior who
text, sometimes hard to tell the "populist
democracy" and "populist and democratic
society". Of course, they can not tell, because I
do not have to say. Well, today I come to talk
about "populist democratic society -
The
 "democracy" is the Westerners put
forward; the preceded not dubbed "elite", but,
its actually elitist democracy or "elitist
democracy". Status and fact the elitism
democracy and no "socialism" and "communism"
from the theoretically overcome, I gradually
concludes with a "populist democracy" from the
"great democracy", "people 'to.

 "Clear 'go elitism, go elite' democracy, populist
democracy" is not wrong, it can not be wrong. It
is like - go kingship, democracy is democracy or
elitism. But "go elitism to elite democracy, not a
populist democracy all. This is just a simple
statement. All of populist democracy, scattered
in all my discourse on the "populist democracy",
not repeated here.

 Today, I need to clarify: 1, populist democracy
is more advanced than the elitism democracy. 2,
populist democratic than democratic elitism
more care for the majority of the human society.

 1, of populist democracy is more advanced
than the elitism democracy, due to populist
democratic core values, determined by three
values - justice, freedom, democracy. Its just,
only to find the origin and development of
human society, the fundamental, is the only
means to solve today's society and the
international social conflicts. Elitism democracy,
now the most advanced and recognized core
values of freedom, democracy, human rights, the
rule of law ". Such values do not emphasize just,
it must be the law of the jungle, the law of the
jungle. Emphasize such ofvalues human rights,
is a pseudo-human rights (say). Emphasis on the
rule of law does not make sense, mankind has
the rule of law for thousands of years; nest with
robbers and bandits, not the rule of law?

 "Freedom, democracy, human rights, the rule
of law" appears to be clear, in fact, did not say
even the most basic cleared.

 2, populist democracy more than elitism
democracy care for the majority of human
society, because of populist democracy is' clear
'to elitism, go elite' democracy ". Democracy,
better care for the majority of human society.
The (1), everyone knows: nothing, has a position
on the issue. Democratic society must be built
by elitism elitism eat too much of, and the
opportunities they occupy to line their own
pockets. The (2), to elite populist democracy,
more competition for worshipers of socialism and
communism, and thus better able to eradicate
and can be more powerful Marxist heresy.

 Thinking should debate the method to solve,
rather than using Cold War methods to solve;
Cold War, is the incompetence of the elitist.

 Clear populist democracy is more advanced
than the elitism democracy better care after
most of the human society, to elaborate: the
relationship of democratic elitism democratic
populism.

 In the past, I may have said a populist
democracy will replace elite democracy; This is
not correct, because the the populist democratic
elitism democratic will coexist for a long time.
This is to say to my Gu Xiaojun ism democratic
Economic Thought
"Leads to" development "and" money "these two
concepts.

 I first affirmed: elitism democracy made
indelible historic contributions go kingship, to
advance to a new era of human society, and will
also promote social advance. Elitist who pay
attention to maximize the benefits, material
development of human society in the process of
seeking to maximize the objective, and therefore
referred to as the "development".

 However, the desire of the individual is unable
to temperate and therefore need social dynamic
equilibrium. This is the reason of "giving away
money". Populist democratic thinking, speaking
just talk about the interests of the majority of
society. This thought, it should be the formation
of the Group, advocating social welfare - "giving
away money", and "development" in the
formation of the offensive and defensive;
offensive and defensive, and the formation of
social homeostasis. Then the dynamic
equilibrium of society, to curb the selfish desires
of the individual compound interest.

 (Often populist democratic thinkers) and
"development" (elitist) "giving away money" to
each other offensive and defensive (ie democratic
society turns in power with the dominant
society), is a populist and democratic society.

 So, why do we have stressed that go elitism to
the elite? Due to elitism democracy, itself born
out of the monarchy - although they go to
kingship, but with its own many monarchy's
shadow, such stupefying conspiracy politics,
pseudo-human rights.

 Stupefying conspiracy political and pseudo-
human rights they poison people, also framed
the populace is not high quality. This creates a
vicious circle - in any case, the wrong people,
bad; no matter what, they always right, good,
not suddenly missing. Let people dependent on
them; while, but dependent on, and then they
talk about "development", rather than talk about
"giving away money".

 Typical theory: "Development is the last word",
"scientific concept of development". Typical case
of Ai stay big, Chen blind Bi, Han the
ghostwriter, Mo pig, -

 Why pipe Ai Weiwei name big to stay? In fact,
he is mentally retarded. Everyone knows: the
work of art is not copy, only the value of the
collection. His famous works, but it is to copy
the animal heads of Yuanmingyuan twelve, one
hundred million ceramic seeds. Copy twelve
animal heads, called a fake, how a work of art?
One hundred million ceramic seeds, the
excessive build, how can a collection value?
Which the mentally retarded, he was the so-
called Sino-US elites hailed as activists, thinkers,
era figures, not obscurantism and conspiracy
political and pseudo-What are human rights?

 Chen blind Pitt is Chen Guangcheng, and Dan
Sansheng questioned expose has been a long
time. Simple sentence: 4 m high walls, a blind
man how to turn? Who says can turned thine
eyes turned to for everyone to see, is empty-
handed in within 10 seconds. Pig you? Not
mindless? U.S. politicians has also been
connected to? The politicians also are pig brain?
This is not a stupefying conspiracy political and
pseudo-human rights what? Who can reply?

 Han, obviously ghostwriter Xiaodai Pitt on a
middle school have not read down, non-China-
US elites holding: known, when the presidential
election Han, thinkers, era figures ... can say this
is not obscurantism and conspiracy politics? We
are not in high school, this community is not on
them at the mercy?

 Mo Yan went to accept the award, said the
Chinese into a pigsty, he does not is the pig? So
anti-communist the CCP propaganda Writers
culture, but also to send a delegation to
accompany to accept the award (in fact, collar
scolded, others anti-Communist China's position
is so obvious) Is this not of obscurantism and
conspiracy politics?

 This is the elitism democracy in the United
States with the Nobel statesman and writer and
news and media participation around us, used to
fool our people and the world famous event.

 Populist democratic society, any good? The
very least, everyone will not result in a few so-
called elites Dang Houshua play!

 

Gu Xiaojun 2012-12-13 Nanjing

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_ae4ac38501019p9c.html

浏览(156) (0) 评论(0)
发表评论
我的名片
无民主
来自: 中国
注册日期: 2012-11-12
访问总量: 465,514 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 好大的一盘棋
· 郝前锋是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 「没有某某某就没有新什么」
· 老前锋与方方
· 老前锋踢球门的故事
· 方方的拥趸们的无知
· 方方们在走下坡路
分类目录
【时评】
· 郝前锋是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 老前锋与方方
· 一草博主:方方有良心吗?
· 对“方方日记”你得学会质疑
· 方方是在愚弄谁
· 很大很大的一盘棋
· 转载:吹捧方方的声音被我打压了
· 转载:「方方日记」无卖点 Harper
· 顾晓军、石三生及刘刚
· 马拉拉·优素福扎伊的枪击
【杂谈】
· 郝前锋是雪崩中的一片雪花
· 老前锋与方方
· 一草博主:方方有良心吗?
· 对“方方日记”你得学会质疑
· 方方是在愚弄谁
· 很大很大的一盘棋
· 谁会拒绝“公正第一”
· 为何不倡导“公正第一”呢?
· 谁挖了我妈的老房子
· 我们需要“公正第一”
【读书看报】
· 中央日报:新價值觀《公正第一》
· 新价值观《公正第一》在台湾出版
· “运作诺贝尔文学奖”
· 阎连科的炒作
· 刘刚事件(四)
· 回忆与思考(二)
· 回忆与思考
· 撒切尔夫人与预言
· 推、诺奖和石三生
· 刘刚事件
【所见所闻】
· 好大的一盘棋
· 「没有某某某就没有新什么」
· 老前锋踢球门的故事
· 方方的拥趸们的无知
· 方方们在走下坡路
· 给方方的拥趸们
· 请问方方的拥趸们
· 方方的「恨国」与「良知」
· 方方是个局、谁的局?
· 于方方,一草为何装疯卖傻?
存档目录
2020-06-01 - 2020-06-09
2020-05-01 - 2020-05-30
2020-04-13 - 2020-04-30
2016-05-03 - 2016-05-05
2016-04-02 - 2016-04-21
2016-03-02 - 2016-03-28
2016-02-06 - 2016-02-27
2016-01-05 - 2016-01-25
2015-04-29 - 2015-04-29
2015-03-21 - 2015-03-21
2015-02-07 - 2015-02-07
2014-12-05 - 2014-12-26
2014-11-05 - 2014-11-23
2014-10-02 - 2014-10-26
2014-09-30 - 2014-09-30
2014-07-06 - 2014-07-06
2014-06-09 - 2014-06-09
2014-05-02 - 2014-05-08
2014-04-27 - 2014-04-27
2014-02-01 - 2014-02-02
2014-01-30 - 2014-01-30
2013-12-20 - 2013-12-22
2013-11-04 - 2013-11-24
2013-10-02 - 2013-10-30
2013-09-11 - 2013-09-29
2013-08-03 - 2013-08-31
2013-07-01 - 2013-07-30
2013-06-02 - 2013-06-29
2013-05-04 - 2013-05-30
2013-04-05 - 2013-04-25
2013-03-07 - 2013-03-20
2013-02-03 - 2013-02-25
2013-01-03 - 2013-01-28
2012-12-02 - 2012-12-29
2012-11-12 - 2012-11-30
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.