Civilian ism democratic society - Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred eighty-seven Translator:God has eyes Output "populist democracy" ideas and concepts, and have been for a long time. Should not Athens Academy re-opened, Pegasus or not Gordon keep abreast of, I can not remember the "populist democracy is the way out, this article will temporarily have. No Gordon abreast: the 'clear' go elitism to the elite 'democracy, populist democracy ---- another solution my confusion. "So, I think of the disciples Gu Gu powder group of warrior who text, sometimes hard to tell the "populist democracy" and "populist and democratic society". Of course, they can not tell, because I do not have to say. Well, today I come to talk about "populist democratic society - The "democracy" is the Westerners put forward; the preceded not dubbed "elite", but, its actually elitist democracy or "elitist democracy". Status and fact the elitism democracy and no "socialism" and "communism" from the theoretically overcome, I gradually concludes with a "populist democracy" from the "great democracy", "people 'to. "Clear 'go elitism, go elite' democracy, populist democracy" is not wrong, it can not be wrong. It is like - go kingship, democracy is democracy or elitism. But "go elitism to elite democracy, not a populist democracy all. This is just a simple statement. All of populist democracy, scattered in all my discourse on the "populist democracy", not repeated here. Today, I need to clarify: 1, populist democracy is more advanced than the elitism democracy. 2, populist democratic than democratic elitism more care for the majority of the human society. 1, of populist democracy is more advanced than the elitism democracy, due to populist democratic core values, determined by three values - justice, freedom, democracy. Its just, only to find the origin and development of human society, the fundamental, is the only means to solve today's society and the international social conflicts. Elitism democracy, now the most advanced and recognized core values of freedom, democracy, human rights, the rule of law ". Such values do not emphasize just, it must be the law of the jungle, the law of the jungle. Emphasize such ofvalues human rights, is a pseudo-human rights (say). Emphasis on the rule of law does not make sense, mankind has the rule of law for thousands of years; nest with robbers and bandits, not the rule of law? "Freedom, democracy, human rights, the rule of law" appears to be clear, in fact, did not say even the most basic cleared. 2, populist democracy more than elitism democracy care for the majority of human society, because of populist democracy is' clear 'to elitism, go elite' democracy ". Democracy, better care for the majority of human society. The (1), everyone knows: nothing, has a position on the issue. Democratic society must be built by elitism elitism eat too much of, and the opportunities they occupy to line their own pockets. The (2), to elite populist democracy, more competition for worshipers of socialism and communism, and thus better able to eradicate and can be more powerful Marxist heresy. Thinking should debate the method to solve, rather than using Cold War methods to solve; Cold War, is the incompetence of the elitist. Clear populist democracy is more advanced than the elitism democracy better care after most of the human society, to elaborate: the relationship of democratic elitism democratic populism. In the past, I may have said a populist democracy will replace elite democracy; This is not correct, because the the populist democratic elitism democratic will coexist for a long time. This is to say to my Gu Xiaojun ism democratic Economic Thought "Leads to" development "and" money "these two concepts. I first affirmed: elitism democracy made indelible historic contributions go kingship, to advance to a new era of human society, and will also promote social advance. Elitist who pay attention to maximize the benefits, material development of human society in the process of seeking to maximize the objective, and therefore referred to as the "development". However, the desire of the individual is unable to temperate and therefore need social dynamic equilibrium. This is the reason of "giving away money". Populist democratic thinking, speaking just talk about the interests of the majority of society. This thought, it should be the formation of the Group, advocating social welfare - "giving away money", and "development" in the formation of the offensive and defensive; offensive and defensive, and the formation of social homeostasis. Then the dynamic equilibrium of society, to curb the selfish desires of the individual compound interest. (Often populist democratic thinkers) and "development" (elitist) "giving away money" to each other offensive and defensive (ie democratic society turns in power with the dominant society), is a populist and democratic society. So, why do we have stressed that go elitism to the elite? Due to elitism democracy, itself born out of the monarchy - although they go to kingship, but with its own many monarchy's shadow, such stupefying conspiracy politics, pseudo-human rights. Stupefying conspiracy political and pseudo- human rights they poison people, also framed the populace is not high quality. This creates a vicious circle - in any case, the wrong people, bad; no matter what, they always right, good, not suddenly missing. Let people dependent on them; while, but dependent on, and then they talk about "development", rather than talk about "giving away money". Typical theory: "Development is the last word", "scientific concept of development". Typical case of Ai stay big, Chen blind Bi, Han the ghostwriter, Mo pig, - Why pipe Ai Weiwei name big to stay? In fact, he is mentally retarded. Everyone knows: the work of art is not copy, only the value of the collection. His famous works, but it is to copy the animal heads of Yuanmingyuan twelve, one hundred million ceramic seeds. Copy twelve animal heads, called a fake, how a work of art? One hundred million ceramic seeds, the excessive build, how can a collection value? Which the mentally retarded, he was the so- called Sino-US elites hailed as activists, thinkers, era figures, not obscurantism and conspiracy political and pseudo-What are human rights? Chen blind Pitt is Chen Guangcheng, and Dan Sansheng questioned expose has been a long time. Simple sentence: 4 m high walls, a blind man how to turn? Who says can turned thine eyes turned to for everyone to see, is empty- handed in within 10 seconds. Pig you? Not mindless? U.S. politicians has also been connected to? The politicians also are pig brain? This is not a stupefying conspiracy political and pseudo-human rights what? Who can reply? Han, obviously ghostwriter Xiaodai Pitt on a middle school have not read down, non-China- US elites holding: known, when the presidential election Han, thinkers, era figures ... can say this is not obscurantism and conspiracy politics? We are not in high school, this community is not on them at the mercy? Mo Yan went to accept the award, said the Chinese into a pigsty, he does not is the pig? So anti-communist the CCP propaganda Writers culture, but also to send a delegation to accompany to accept the award (in fact, collar scolded, others anti-Communist China's position is so obvious) Is this not of obscurantism and conspiracy politics? This is the elitism democracy in the United States with the Nobel statesman and writer and news and media participation around us, used to fool our people and the world famous event. Populist democratic society, any good? The very least, everyone will not result in a few so- called elites Dang Houshua play! Gu Xiaojun 2012-12-13 Nanjing http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_ae4ac38501019p9c.html |