- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's one thousand nine hundred ninety-four

   Translator:God has eyes

    At the moment, the overseas media chaptertext, entitled "Reform and Opening to the publicimpartiality becomes fair? . " I say this, not hisproposition of "reform and opening up whatinterested, but to tell you that:" the publicimpartiality ", is a step by step into the line ofsight of people.

    However, the author (I did not point to opento see, I do not know who I'm afraid that lookedfamiliar with the event, but embarrassed batch)was installed in Pitt, insisted in front of "thepublic impartiality" and "fair "it seems" fair "ismore important than" the public impartiality ".

    In fact, I would have to tell you: the publicimpartiality, for the community as a whole,human gregarious, forming social fundamental.And fair, mainly used for the transaction; fair,equal and sisters. Equality, even more fantasyand dream raving. Human society, there hasnever been equal. Past today, and will neverhave.

    Why do I have to say that human society willnever equal it? Because born and inequality! Wego without On each birth families vary widely,single say: people, smart and stupid, beautifuland ugly of the points, as well as the height ofgrading. People, in fact, had been formed in thewomb of inequality; birth, inequality has becomea reality. Here, have to the community to giveequality of smart, beautiful and excellent, not aflat two tone ", not predatory, not moreunequal.?

    For the balance of the original ecology ofinequality, and create new inequalities, it is notan unwise? Is not one kind of antisocialthinking? As a result, the inevitable anti-human.

    Equality derived from primitive Christianity,communism's uterus. In the 19th century, theidea equalityof of the resurgence in the West byMarx used in his communism results harm ahuman than a hundred years.

    Equality, is the ideology of the cancer societycancer. Equality, fair sister. Fair, commonly usedin trading, transaction, and family heritagesegmentation. Overall, for society, for the public,shall never talk about fairness, to prevent theslide into the abyss of equality.

    Self-three years ago, is often talked about inthe article, just, and later "the publicimpartiality is the first values" since - mydisciples Dan Sansheng, no less than the dozensof articles mentioned in or expound the publicimpartiality. The projection of the wave heartjoin Gu dough, also love the public impartiality,commenced in the form of writing to explain thepublic impartiality. Therefore, the forces I hadwrote Jane on the public impartiality "," how tomeasure justice ", the public impartiality" and soon.

    Today, the in Gu disciples, Gu dough, "Gu",the public impartiality "," democratic democracy"," questioned the school "has become almosteveryone's mantra.

    However, there is Chen Guangcheng blatantplagiarism "the public impartiality", Kingdomsinto what fairness and justice without borders ";more Wen Jiabao plagiarism" the publicimpartiality ", defuse why" fairness and justiceshine even brighter than the sun ".

    Also begins with the writer of "fair and thepublic impartiality", as well as the People'sDaily, the party media of all kinds of abuse ......

    "Justice" What is it? Justice, poetic justice,cause and effect, is the reincarnation. I do notunderstand: how these celebrities are soignorant it?

    Thinker, is not easy! First, more ideologicalthan the common people, to be willing toloneliness, from humans, from society, fromlife ... from all aspects to mention practice outthinking.

    Such as "the public impartiality", from thehuman herd, starting from the formation ofhuman society, summarized, mentioningpractice. Rather summarized, mentioning ofpractice, but also the real social significance, butalso be able to take care of in the future, andeven mankind forever.

    How plagiarism plagiarism, says plagiarism onplagiarism, even the "reference" are unwilling tolabel it? If you say that you think that, pleasecome up with can be identified social article toprove it!

    If it is not, you is not plagiarism, plagiarism,but also what it?

    If social celebrities such plagiarism, copyingthe things of our people, then, the axiom lie?

    If the social celebrities are relying onplagiarism things of our people to become socialcelebrities, then, is this what public figures?

    Shi Sansheng and Gu disciples, Gu doughhave been asking: Gu Xiaojun output to Westernideas what is wrong? I now finally understand:why the CCP blocked me? Because their socialcelebrities plagiarism my thoughts.

    Gu Xiaojun 2012-12-19 Nanjing