To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (c)
　
"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred seventeen
　
Translator: God has eyes
　
The saying goes, this moment was. The 18 big Chinese Communists before the Nobel Peace
Prize to grant Liu Xiaobo proud. So, in 2013, the
new leader of the Chinese Communist Party,
headed by Xi Jinping vowed to "emancipate the
mind", "life lies in the implementation of the
Constitution, lip country, hard work, and
prosperous country" after the Nobel Peace Prize
should be converted ideas, to give up simply
creating contradictions, add a little "positive
energy" (the Xi Jinping language) the progress of
democracy, human rights, the Chinese society in
a positive manner.

Although we are not sure how sincere ambition
of the Chinese Communist Party''''s new leaders,
but also how far. After all, China is a big country
with a population of 1.3 billion, has stimulated
the "three years have seen the greatest changes,
natural and ultimately, the national calamity
frequent, difficult. Fortunately, the Nobel Prize
has lasted for centuries, not care overnight gains
and losses, time, opportunity waiting to see the
Chinese Communist Party in the coming days,
whether as Mr. Gu Xiaojun 2013 first guess "is
willing to?

Why request the judges do not just earlier
conclusions, wait see CCP practitioner.? For is to
see whether "the public impartiality is the first
values" Gu Xiaojun thinking with the Chinese
Communist Party''''s governing philosophy positive
interaction: the effective promotion of the
peaceful evolution of Chinese society, and
promote the cause of democracy, human rights
progress. If the next ten months (ending Peace
Award is limited), Mr. Gu Xiaojun "first guess"
completely a lie. Shi Sansheng Although I would
feel very sad, but at least I would be willing to
see the Nobel Peace Prize to go your own way,
loyal picking those characters can discredit the
Chinese Communists won.

Naturally, if the Chinese Communists dishonesty.
In order to discredit it does not matter what the
honorable means. From this point of view,
whether it is "fake" Chen Guangcheng, or
donation fraud false tax revolt of Ai Weiwei, can
become a weapon in the hands of the judges is
not? Although some not on the table, but in the
end is someone heartless, we just do not care a
sense of obligation. " With Chinese counsel,
called "fair in war? Even if it is 2013, the Peace
Prize of the judges to fish, granted to the Nobel
Gu Chen, Ai dubious authenticity Democrats, but
also what the fuss?

Having said that openly. CPC loyal dippy, the
governing philosophy paradoxical, as the
"Constitution" but I personally feel that no
matter the era is likely gone. The situation will
be repeated, but the general direction is sure to
go towards the total learning "renaissance
dream". Because revival is not just the Chinese
Communist Party''''s own desire, or the Chinese
people''''s dream, not to mention boasted to
"serve the people" of Communist China, is
China''''s feudal dynasties, including those
headed, they all know that popular who in the
world. Response to public opinion, but the rulers
of human society have everlasting, since
opponents.

I believe that not only the wish of the Chinese
people, Xi total rejuvenation Dream "also is a
major positive for the world. Any normal country,
including Norway, are not willing to see the dire
need of economic recovery in the world, need
elephants contribute, see China fall into
infighting? The original intention of the Nobel
Peace Prize, is the hope of human world peace?
If China continues to go its own way, the judges
come to their senses, reverted to Masayuki
continued during the Cold War thinking, will
become trigger the fuse of the Chinese
Communist Party infighting? Really occur again
as the Tiananmen Square tragedy, whether those
behind-the-scenes supporters should feel guilty
conscience it?

Reason why the Peace Prize awarded to Aung
San Suu Kyi, are not precisely because of his
"non-violent" thinking? The reason why the
Peace Prize awarded to Liu Xiaobo, is it not
because of his "I have no enemies"?

I do not know the judges have not thought
about: why the same is to promote peace, there
is no hostile struggle of life and death, will play
the role of Liu Xiaobo, and Aung San Suu Kyi in
their respective countries the wrong way round?
Is this because of Aung San Suu Kyi of Myanmar
military is moving with affection; Liu Xiaobo was
the name of the "I have no enemies" as a front,
but vain attempt to pre-empt the PRC side, or
even a constitutional amendment for the
Chinese people it? When we saw the cost of Liu
Xiaobo, who for eighty-nine experienced suffering
and even loss of life, no one thought: If not
1989, Chinese Communist Party in power since
the unprecedented freedom, civilized society,
why suddenly vanished, beyond redemption?
Communist China is certainly heartless, Chinese
people should pay the price of a small group of
people to bear no freedom of speech eighty-nine
after this? Just because of this lack of freedom of
speech, and how many people become victims of
the Chinese Communist authoritarian?

Distinguished judges, how I envy you a pair of
eye awarded the honor of the Peace Prize to
Aung San Suu Kyi ah! Wish you can reproduce
the miracle, are focusing on China, focusing first
further than Aung San Suu Kyi, the creation of
"the public impartiality is the first values",
"Civilian ism Democracy" Mr. Gu Xiaojun mode!

Ask you to give China a little "positive energy", a
little "positive energy" to the human society it!
We believe that as long as the Peace Prize was
awarded to Mr. Gu Xiaojun, human society is
bound by far the most advanced form of the
birth of the first to lead by the Nobel Prize ----
Civilian ism Democracy. This will be the honor of
Mr. Gu Xiaojun, also a Nobel Prize for the
greatest contribution to human society!
　
[Shi Sansheng Thursday, January 3, 2013 03:54 China]

 http://www.yadian.cc/blog/114137/