The business of the "uphold rights" can be laid to rest

- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's two thousand and eighty-six

Translator: God has eyes

This world, almost everyone knew: Martin Luther
King, Jr., is the most famous leaders of the
Ethiopian Human Rights in the United States. It
can be said, is through his audience with U.S.
President John F. Kennedy, the request by the
new Civil Rights Act of fight for equal rights for
blacks.

Therefore, the slogan of "rights" called out the
slogan;, or screamed louder.

However, it was ignored, the United States is a
democratic society; sixties of the last century,
after World War II, the United States, are on the
rise among. (In human society along the trend of
the world community, especially among the
rising period of their people all the
requirements are generally more open-minded.)

Humans are clever and, at the same time, the
human is the most stupid. Especially under the
influence of empiricism, it can be said that when
the man is stupid as pigs.

Americans.

Americans see the benefits of the Martin Luther
King Jr., the promotion of human rights, on
selling human rights everywhere, not wait for the
world like the United States. (Note: At this time,
the intention is good.)

However, the stupidity of Americans is - they
forgot themselves in a democratic society - that
is: a democratic society, the case of human
rights issues raised and resolved, followed by
analogy, affect others. In other words: the cases
of human rights, universal or universal
significance.

Autocratic country's human rights cases, is not
universal - Law with a law, the implementation is
different, the result will be quite different. Such
as rape, which is a common problem of the
individual class society it? In China, can be
interpreted as a "temporary rape" Daitao not
rape "," girl sex "and so on.

Rape of a simple, the fancy open to
interpretation. You said, to talk about "human
rights" issues, what is it in China? Therefore, in
China's practice of "rights", "rights" are generally
engage people rich hair, does not solve the
problem and of the same nature; not get to
solve the problem of the people, have to embark
on the arduous and lengthy petition Road .

Well, people who engage in "rights" will be how
the rich made it? American fund to give money.

U.S. fund money come from? Never you mind.
Why U.S. funds to give the people of China to
engage in "rights" money? Because they are
active, to help Americans earn a lot of money.

I do not spread rumors, Baidu "," human rights
leaders, I have no intention of being seen "world
human rights leaders fighter worship China
purse - Zhu old rifle's blog - the Fenghuang
blog", it looked open. We can also take a look at.
The last sentence of the article: "Please Luopei
Xi also remember that if human rights in
marriage and money, and the number of Chinese
to give you money to measure how much the
quality of the current human rights situation in
China, and only let people see that a champion
of human rights hypocrisy. "

At this point, we understand, right? "Rights,
commercial, business behavior is to do business.
China's "rights" typical Chen Guangcheng, Ai
Weiwei, is to do business. China's "rights" lawyer
Pu Zhiqiang Teng Biao business. Pakistan's
human rights girl Malala Yousafzai, is also a
business. Of Belarus Ales Belyatski, Russia
Lyudmila Alexeyeva, etc., are in business. So I
said: "rights" business should cease! Because
this business, damage to the interests of its own
people.

Gu Xiaojun 2013-2-13 Nanjing