Peace and "the public impartiality first" - Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's two thousand and eighty-eight Translator: God has eyes What is peace? Peace, it usually refers to the act
or state of no war or other hostile violence. Not
riot, people, but excited, and so, it can be said
for peace. Then, the status of the peace to get and how to
maintain it? "The public impartiality"! Only "the
public impartiality first." As we all know: the war, is not impartiality. Both
the initiator or counterattack by the war, there
is always a party is not impartiality; while the
other, to fight for the public impartiality. Also,
no matter how objective and subjective on at
least one thought that way. Non-hostile to the state of war confrontation,
based on security. Why is there an insecure
feelings? Also feel all sorts of non-impartiality. Impartiality, social unrest; impartiality, it was
radical. Thus, it is not difficult to see that "the public
impartiality" peace, stability and human society,
and the harmony between social groups and
social groups, with the people and between the
people, but excited ...... and so the relationship,
right? "The public impartiality first" important, "the
public impartiality" understanding and mining is
equally important. If I do not say that, people
always think that the core values of freedom,
democracy, human rights, the rule of law "is a
universal value. In fact, this understanding is
the shit! I have said many times: Rousseau shouted "born
free" is one level; Nietzsche shouted "God is
dead", is also advancing a level. Well, the "born
free", meaning "God is dead" Where is it?
Clearly tell you: "Man is born free, is to deny
the Kingship! "God is dead", whether to pull
oneself together the right! Because of the denial of kingship, before
opening the era of elitism capital; completely
negate the theocratic find "freedom of
conscience" that makes its solid foothold. In other words: the developed capitalist society,
including the machine age, are standing on the
shoulders of Rousseau's thought. The marathon
democratic era, based on Nietzsche's "God is
dead." For the starting gun. So, Rousseau became an era of a great thinker;
Therefore, so far still digging Nietzsche value. However, Rousseau and Nietzsche are starting
from the human body or said based thinking,
does not solve the complex relationships of
various people, groups, and groups, the state
and country, as well as individual and overall
composite. Therefore, the times call for great
thinker; contradictions between the various
state-to-state, population groups, interpersonal,
and also calls for big thinkers. The generation of great thinkers, not by artificial
elitist. The Chinese society artificial Han, without
thinking, only petty theft. American Society for
artificial Chen Guangcheng, is semi-literate, only
blatant plagiarism. Thinker is thinking products produced, and was
called thinkers. Gu Xiaojun, precisely because he
produced the first of "the public impartiality",
produced the "the plebs ism democratic",
produced "challenged school was only Gu dough
called thinkers; his knowledge, but also called
Care for Caibei. Because it is a big thinker, because GU Xue, his
ideological product is not solidified, but the
liquid form, his knowledge, is also available at
any time, constantly moving forward. For example: the relationship between the
public the impartiality the first "free, democratic
relations - Have said in the past, today advancing layer:
First of all, deny "the public impartiality metric
is because Once the Chengfa into law,
mechanical past;" the public impartiality "must
now when - to the fact that the premise of the
bottom line objective for the backbone,
conscience, public impartiality party for
impartiality, social consensus. Because it is now, the premise of social
consensus, the public impartiality can be
adjusted contradiction with the relationship
between the various free. In other words, social
relations determine "the public impartiality". Or,
all kinds of freedom for the reasonable and
legitimate to protect its own freedom,
impartiality push "the public impartiality is the
first values. With "the public impartiality" elitism will
subside, open the elitism capital era as "born
free" - "the public impartiality" will make "the
plebs ism democratic" stage, and the elite 'Da
Lei "(such as elitism and the throne, on the
same stage). At this time, Democracy is no longer just to protect freedom,
but must first protect the public impartiality. If
democracy can not be guaranteed the "the
public impartiality", it is bound to have a better,
superior system to replace democracy, "the
public impartiality" escort. This is the impartiality of the public, free,
democratic relations among the three. Come
back to say, "freedom, democracy, human rights,
the rule of law" will give way to "the public
impartiality, freedom, democracy. A result,
human rights is just a re-expression of freedom
(and the expression is not redundant, ulterior
motives, such as a business trend or blackmail,
etc.); while the rule of law, since there are law
permanent ancient rule, it was also not
necessary to emphasize. Come back to me and said, "the public impartiality First, can there be peace. The public
impartiality of human society, no peace at all.
Even the so-called peace, is also the surface,
temporary, and will certainly be war or riots or
aggressive behavior to break, in order to achieve
a fair and reasonable the public impartiality. Objective, is extremely cruel and merciless. The
world is such a world. I do not know the judges
of the Nobel Peace Prize, in view of "the public
impartiality", whether with the same or similar
cognitive, if it is different, being out of the
human society, the Nobel Peace Prize and never
could be the first thought of "the public impartiality. Gu Xiaojun 2013-2-15 Nanjing
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_ae4ac3850101b2qq.html |
