美国总统与众院议长为自己的民主制度打起来了！
“佩洛西(Nancy Pelosi)说，让选民决定特朗普的命运是危险的。换句话说，她认为我会赢，不想冒险让选民来决定。和艾尔·格林一样，她想要改变我们的投票制度。哇, 她疯了!“ 唐纳德·特朗普总统周二在推特上写道。
(附Yahoo news) 
【不想冒险让选民来决定。和艾尔·格林一样，她想要改变我们的投票制度】
这不是公开挑战美国的民主制度吗？
众院议长，公开声称让选民决定特朗普的命运是危险的？决心用另外的系统，改写民主选举制度系统，这架打的有档次！档次是高，但是有点情急之下，气火攻心的自打脸，不仅打了自己的脸，也是对美国民主制度的打脸！并且，简单明了，公开表示，选民不靠谱而且是危险的？这个，这个。。。。。。 这还是那个民主斗士佩洛西女士吗？那个曾经到天安门广场去举标语，打横幅的民主激进派佩洛西老太太吗？下面这张图不仅是她的政治资历，也成为她后来的政治资本，现在她权掌众院议长之位，公开声称要尽一切努力，要防止让选民决定特朗普的命运，老太太是被气糊涂了吗？
我曾写过一篇文章，民主选举制度，没有纠错机制，如同赌博摇骰子，摇出什么是什么，而且不能纠错！ 从管理学角度讲，一个不能自我纠错的系统，是不科学的，也是有问题的系统！ 从某种意义上说，佩洛西老太太，阻止问题继续发生，发现问题要纠正问题的做法，是应该受到尊敬的，总比为了维护自己的政治理念，罔顾事实的睁眼说瞎话要有理性，是有担当，也是作为政治家应有的责任感！ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yahoo News Nancy Pelosi just stated that ‘it is dangerous to let the voters decide Trump’s fate.’ @FoxNews In other words, she thinks I’m going to win and doesn’t want to take a chance on letting the voters decide. Like Al Green, she wants to change our voting system. Wow, she’s CRAZY!” tweeted President Donald Trump Tuesday. Well, not exactly. Trump’s tweet quotes a Fox News reporter summarizing Pelosi’s position, not the speaker’s statement verbatim. Left-wing Twitterverse, of course, immediately jumped all over the president’s clumsy wording and acted as if the substance of his contention was wholly untrue. It wasn’t. In her “Dear Colleague” letter pushing back against Republican anti-impeachment talking points, Pelosi wrote this: “The weak response to these hearings has been, ‘Let the election decide.’ That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because the President is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections.” Is he? If a Republican had suggested that a presidential election was a “dangerous” notion, he would have triggered around-the-clock panic-stricken coverage on CNN and a series of deep dives in The Atlantic lamenting the conservative turn against our sacred democratic ideals. What Pelosi has done is even more cynical. She’s arguing that if Democrats fail in their efforts to impeach Trump—and, I assume, remove him from office—then the very legitimacy of the 2020 election will be in question before any votes are cast. Though most liberals have long declared the 2016 contest contaminated, as far as we know, absolutely nothing—not even the most successful foreign efforts in “interference” or “meddling”—damaged the integrity of the election results. Notwithstanding the belief of more than 60% of Democrats, precipitated by breathless and often misleading media coverage, not one vote was altered by Russian President Vladimir Putin, nor was a single person’s free will purloined by a Russian Twitter bot or Facebook ad. And, contra Pelosi’s implication, whatever you make of Trump’s request from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate Joe Biden’s shady son, not one voter will be restricted from casting a ballot for whomever they please in 2020. In truth, voters will know more about the inner workings of Trump’s presidency than they have about any other administration in memory. Maybe they care, maybe they don’t, but that’s not up to Pelosi.
|
