哲學3.0宣言

——在交互主體共生中追尋可能的世界

錢 宏（Archer Hong Qian）

繼蘇格拉底“未經審視的生活不值得過”、維特根斯坦“我的語言的邊界就是世界的邊界”之後，哲學3.0的名言是：在交互主體共生中追尋可能的世界。

引言：哲學的轉身，不是回頭，而是歸真

當人類步入一個技術極速膨脹而精神日漸乾涸的時代，哲學，不應繼續流放在學院象牙塔的孤島里。作為審視生活、反思歷史、規範語言的遊戲（game），哲學必須重新成為一種生命的通律，能夠穿透混亂、指引方向、將偏蔽分裂的世界連接貫通起來。

今天，我們提出“哲學3.0”，不是否定1.0與2.0，而是為了回應人類已無法僅靠“自我-世界”（Subject-Object）二元對立統一特權支配性結構生存的現實困境。

人類從各自封閉在狹小地域，一步步走向開放擁抱陌生的世界，全球化也歷經了1.0（以強力戰爭的方式，從亞歷山大東徵到二戰結束）、2.0（以美國主導經貿的方式，從1945到2025）而走向3.0，這是一個Web3-AI迅猛發展、經濟政治結構性失衡、地區衝突、生態危機、文化撕裂、精神失常疊加的歷史交叉口，唯有從“交互主體共生”（Intersubjective Symbiosism）出發，重建哲學的“思、孞、愛”三層結構，地球人方能邁向一個“詩意棲息”的未來。

哲學3.0 × 全球化3.0：靈魂與結構的雙生範式。

如果說哲學3.0關注的是“我們究何共在？”，那麼全球化3.0則回應的是“我們何以共生？”。二者互為鏡像：一個是文明內在結構的範式轉型，一個是外在組織形式的生態更新。因而可以說，哲學3.0是全球化3.0的精神引擎，全球化3.0是哲學3.0的實踐舞台。在此背景下，哲學3.0不再是象牙塔中的思辨體操，而成為全球化3.0躍遷的底層代碼。只有重新點燃哲學之光，全球化3.0才不再是技術路線圖，而是承托多元、融合差異、生成秩序的文明重構過程。

一、不是技術，不是倫理，而是哲學出了問題

在這條令人窒息的現代道路上，技術飛馳、資本橫流、倫理焦灼、組織失靈。但這並非因為技術本身失控、倫理本身混亂、社會本身腐爛，而是因為——哲學已經沉默太久了。

從蘇格拉底到維特根斯坦，哲學曾是時代精神的締造者。然而，自20世紀量子力學高光時刻起，哲學在科學、政治、商業、人工智能面前節節後退，失去了為文明導航的能力。人類社會因此陷入一種巨大的認知內耗：技術突進，而意義空心；組織激增，而精神萎縮；奢侈浪費，謊言欺詐風靡全球。

我們需要的不是技術彌散，而是認知和願行的範式躍遷。

二、軸心時代的遺產：主體性幻覺與認知陷阱

自“軸心時代”起，哲學開啟了“主體自居”的思維框架：人作為絕對認知者、解釋者、支配者出現，把“我思故我在”奉為真理原點。這種觀念推動了人類從神權中解放出來，卻也悄然埋下了另一種中心主義的種子——Subject中心主義。

它不僅體現在個體認知上，還體現在國家、文明、制度甚至意識形態的層級結構中——“我主你客”、“我優你劣”、“我裁你從”。當主體話語與國家機器、意識形態綁定，便產生出“普世敘事”與“特色敘事”的雙重合法性製造。

兩種話語互相指責，實則皆為主體幻覺的雙面鏡像，共同製造出全球性的話語困境與治理虛空。

三、哲學3.0的提出：從智慧之愛到愛之智慧

哲學1.0是神聖與神秘的啟示哲學，如蘇美爾、印度、希伯來與古中國的天地智慧，以“天命”“道”“奧義”統攝存在；

哲學2.0是理性與批判的現代哲學，自蘇格拉底、康德、黑格爾、笛卡爾、尼采直至維特根斯坦，哲學成為語言、邏輯、制度、方法的反思裝置；

哲學3.0必須是一種跨越主體與客體、超越邏輯與物質的“共生智慧”——它不是知識的歸納，而是存在的交互感應；不是誰解釋誰，而是如何彼此成全。

我們稱之為：Intersubjective Symbiosism（交互主體共生哲學）。

這一哲學的根本命題是：不是“我思故我在”（ Cogito, ergo sum），而是“你我他共生（Tu, Ego, et Ipse Symbiosis）”。

四、時空意間觀：從觀測者到參與者的躍遷

“共生場”理論提出：哲學的根本突破，必須打破牛頓的絕對時空觀與愛因斯坦的相對時空觀，邁入一種第三空間——時空意間觀（Spatio-Temporal Minds View）。

1.這種視野強調：

存在不是“在哪裡”，而是“在誰的覺知與參與之中”；

意識不是主觀的內射，而是參與式的共感與聯結；

宇宙不是被觀看的對象，而是共同編織的存在之網。

2.在此觀之下，哥本哈根學派的幾條定律被重新照亮：

測不準原理揭示的不僅是觀察限制，而是主體與世界互為生成的本質；

波粒二象性不僅是量子行為的糾結，更是“主-客二元”邏輯的崩塌；

非定域性（Spooky action at a distance）更表明，意識的參與即現實的形成。

於是，“存在即被觀測”必須升級為：“存在即被參與（To be is to be participated）”。

五、熵旋定律：貫通六大領域的哲學奇點

在傳統的哲學體系中，物理、生理、心理、倫理、數理、哲理被割裂對待，形成學科的孤島。而今，交互主體共生哲學提出一個具有統一張力的思想架構：熵增—熵減

—熵旋定律。

它指出：

一切生命組織與宇宙秩序，均以熵交換為基本邏輯；

人的孞念（Mind）與世界不是分離的因果，而是共旋的能量共生體；

任何個體的“思、言、行”，都將在能量信息場中引發“吸引”“迴響”與“再平衡”。

這是一種將物理熵（能量流）、心理熵（認知秩序）與倫理熵（社會張力）統一為共生熵律的偉大嘗試。

因此，哲學3.0的本質，不是某種知識體系，而是一個通感生命-宇宙-心靈的動態平衡架構。

六、AI的未來屬於哲學，而非算力

人工智能（AI）自 “達特茅斯會議”（1956）發展至今70年，已經遇到三大天花板：

超高能耗與資源錯配：AI的算力發展呈指數級消耗，卻無法形成生態勰和；

系統思維的本體瓶頸：信源—信道—信果之間的路徑依賴，無法突破信息耦合閾值；

語言邏輯 ≠ 智慧，更 ≠ 愛之智慧（Amorsophia）：GPT式模型無法承載生命性、倫理性、自組織連接平衡性。

不能用語言表達的東西，是現行AI的盡頭，是哲學的根本。

所以，AI的真正出路，在於重新定義智能的起點——從語言-神經網絡的模仿，走向身心靈交互共生意識的生成。

這正是“孞態網（Minds Network）”的使命：讓AI不僅識別信息，更參與生命的熵律勰同；不僅成為Trust組織工具，更成為宇宙共生場的激發節點和獎抑機制；乃至地球人新生活方式創造與再選擇的基礎設施。

七、結語：召集一場“新達特茅斯會議”

1956年達特茅斯會議拉開了AI的第一次序幕，來自數理邏輯與認知科學的先驅們定義了人工智能的出發點。

2025年之後，人類需要召集一次**“新達特茅斯會議”**——但它不只是AI的重啟，而是文明哲學的升級。

這將是一場集結科學家、工程師、倫理學者、藝術家、政策設計者和哲學家共襄盛舉的會議，討論的不只是“如何造出更聰明的AI”，而是：

1.生物智能基因（Gene）與人工智能模因（Mene）誰是誰？

2.人機共生的可能定域與非定域？

3.如何構建一個技術、生命、倫理自組織連接動態平衡的新世界？

這是對文明自我認知的重新命名，是對軸心時代之後“主體敘事”的一次總清算。

這，就是哲學3.0的召喚。

願我們一起，點燃心燈，燈燈互照，光光交澈。

哲學3.0，不是終點，而是起點；不是答案，而是方向。

我們不再為真理爭論不休，而是為“可能的世界”預備土壤；不再因差異築起壁壘，而是以“交互主體共生”化解衝突、承托差異、擁抱不確定。

這是一個必須“自下而上”生成的新哲學體系。這是一個回歸本源、穿透未來的文明召喚。

In intersubjective symbiosis, we seek the possible worlds.

附錄 | 愛之智慧與金銀銅鐵通五律

在“哲學3.0”的第三層結構——愛之智慧（Amorsophia）中，我們引入了由五重倫理律構成的動態行為指引系統：金律、銀律、銅律、鐵律、通律。

它們不僅適用於人際倫理判斷，也為AI與信託系統（Trust）在“孞態網”（Minds Network）中的行為選擇提供通用參考框架，地球人新生活方式創造與再選擇的基礎設施。

金律 Golden Rule： 待人如己，推己及人

Do to others as you would have them do to you

銀律 Silver Rule： 已所不欲，勿施於人

Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire

銅律 Bronze Rule： 已之所欲，樂施於人

To give joy to others as one desires for oneself

鐵律 Iron Rule： 以眼還眼，以牙還牙

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth

——用於約束權力濫用，維護公義

通律 General Rule： 自己活也要別人活，不要自己邪惡也讓別人邪惡
Live and let live; don’t be evil and let evil be

愛之智慧，是聖靈賦予每個生命的自組織連接動態平衡力。經由孞態網（Minds Network），實時感應人類與AI在各類互動中的善惡、美醜、智慧愚昧、神性魔性，形成一套動態抑揚機制，指引適宜性、公義與和諧行為的表達路徑。

2025年4月·大溫哥華

+1 604 690 6088 ；hongguanworld@gmail.com

參考文獻：

亞里斯多德：《形而上學》

斯賓諾莎：《倫理學》

維特根斯坦：《邏輯哲學論》

《一個當代東方人對霍金的回應——哲學死了，還是回到哲學？》

《共生場：行將來臨的革命》

《當代哲學宣言》

《建構“全球孞態網”公益計劃書（Building the Global MindsNetwork Philanthropy Plan）》http://symbiosism.com.cn/9145.html；http://www.symbiosism.org

The Philosophy 3.0 Manifesto:

Seeking Possible Worlds through Intersubjective Symbiosis

by Archer Hong Qian 

Intersubjective Symbiosism Foundation

Following Socrates' "The unexamined life is not worth living" and Wittgenstein’s "The limits of my language mean the limits of my world," the motto of Philosophy 3.0 is: In intersubjective symbiosis, we seek the possible worlds.

Introduction: Philosophy's Turn Is Not Retreat but Return

As humanity enters an age of rapid technological expansion and spiritual drought, the task of philosophy is no longer to ornament the old order with rhetorical flourishes, nor to remain exiled on the island of ivory towers. Philosophy must once again become a vital law of life—piercing chaos, illuminating direction, and reuniting a fragmented world.

Today, we present “Philosophy 3.0,” not to negate 1.0 or 2.0, but to respond to a reality in which humanity can no longer survive on the binary structure of “self vs. world.” Amid globalization, AI, ecological crises, and cultural fragmentation, only by grounding ourselves in intersubjective symbiosis and rebuilding philosophy in a new three-tier structure can we step toward a future that is both realistic and possible.

Philosophy 3.0 × Globalization 3.0: A Twin Paradigm of Spirit and Structure

Philosophy 3.0 is the spiritual engine of Globalization 3.0; Globalization 3.0 is the field of practice for Philosophy 3.0.

If Philosophy 3.0 asks “How can we coexist?”, Globalization 3.0 answers “How can we co-thrive?” They mirror one another: one is the transformation of internal civilizational structures, the other is the ecological renewal of external organizational forms.

Philosophy 3.0 is no longer an intellectual exercise within ivory towers, but the foundational code enabling the leap to Globalization 3.0. Only by reigniting the light of philosophy can Globalization 3.0 transcend being a mere technological roadmap, becoming instead a process of civilizational reconstruction that embraces diversity, harmonizes difference, and generates new order.

1. It’s Not Technology, Not Ethics—It’s Philosophy That’s in Crisis

On this suffocating path of modernity, technology races, capital floods, ethics burns, and institutions malfunction. But these are not due to the failure of technology, ethics, or society per se—it is because philosophy has remained silent for too long.

From Socrates to Wittgenstein, philosophy once shaped the spirit of the times. Yet since the 20th century, it has steadily retreated in the face of science, politics, business, and artificial intelligence—leaving humanity in a state of cognitive depletion: technology advancing, meaning hollowed out; institutions multiplying, spirit withering.

What we need is not a technological patch, but a paradigmatic leap in consciousness.

1. The Legacy of the Axial Age: The Illusion of Subjectivity

Since the Axial Age, philosophy has embraced a subject-centered framework: humanity appearing as the absolute knower, interpreter, and dominator—epitomized by “I think, therefore I am.” While this freed us from theocracy, it planted the seeds of a new subject-centered supremacism.

This is not only manifest in individual cognition but embedded in national, civilizational, institutional, and ideological hierarchies—“I command, you obey”; “I am superior, you are lesser.” When subjectivity becomes fused with state machinery and ideology, we see the rise of “universalist” and “exceptionalist” narratives—

each attacking the other, yet both are mirror images of the same illusion. Together, they form a global trap of discourse and a void of governance.

III. Thought: To Define Is to Deny; Understanding Is Born at the Edge

• Core Proposition: “In intersubjective symbiosis, we seek the possible worlds.”

• Archer Hong Qian: Philosophy is the primal drive behind all possible worlds.

• Keywords: “One thought creates heaven, another creates hell”; the root of good and evil lies not in outcomes, but in originating intention.

The layer of mindful thought answers the question “Why?”

At this level, philosophy is no longer about the observer’s reflection, but the participant’s initiating intention.

“Mind (孞)” is not just will or desire—it is a primordial force imbued with spatio-temporal consciousness, the generative field of motivation. In global systems of interaction, the transparency of motive determines the sustainability of action. Good is not an outcome, but a resonance emerging from sincere intent.

When we cease to define the world and instead co-create it through interaction, we no longer elevate some singular awakening, but begin to awaken intersubjective awareness. Thought marks boundaries, mind initiates movement, and Amorsophia becomes the guiding ethic.

1. Amorsophia: Returning to the Universal Ethic through Entropic Resonance

• Universal Law of the Cosmos: Entropic Increase – Entropic Reduction – Entropic Rotation

• Five Ethical Laws: Golden, Silver, Bronze, Iron, General

• Pathways of Integration: Bridging physics, physiology, psychology, ethics, mathematics, and metaphysics

Amorsophia (the wisdom of love) integrates the “what” and the “why” into a unifying ethical path.

It is not emotional affection, nor moral preaching, but the resonant rhythm of life within the universe.

In chaos, entropy increases; in construction, entropy decreases; in reflection and integration, entropy rotates. Destruction, creation, and return—this trinity forms wisdom with true penetrative power.

Amorsophia neither erases individuality nor promotes fragmentation. It is rooted in universality, sourced in co-existence, and driven by the initiating mind (孞). It directly addresses the fundamental question: how to co-thrive in symbiosis.

1. Spatio-Temporal Minds View: From Observer to Participant

The “Symbiotic Field” theory proposes: for a philosophical breakthrough, we must move beyond Newton’s absolute space-time and Einstein’s relational space-time, entering a third vision—Spatio-Temporal Minds View.

This perspective emphasizes:

• Existence is not about “where,” but “in whose perception and participation.”

• Consciousness is not inner projection, but co-perception and entanglement.

• The universe is not a static object of observation, but a co-woven web of becoming.

Within this view, key Copenhagen School principles are re-illuminated:

1. The Uncertainty Principle reveals not just observational limits, but mutual generation between subject and world;

2. Wave-particle duality dissolves binary subject-object logic;

3. Quantum nonlocality (spooky action at a distance) confirms: consciousness participates in the formation of reality.

Thus, “To be is to be observed” must now evolve into: “To be is to be participated.”

1. The Entropic Rotation Principle: A Philosophical Singularity across Six Realms

Traditional philosophy has fragmented disciplines into islands—physics, physiology, psychology, ethics, mathematics, metaphysics. Now, intersubjective symbiosism proposes a singular, unified structure: the Entropic Increase – Entropic Decrease – Entropic Rotation principle.

It reveals:

• All life organization and cosmic order function through entropic exchange;

• Human mind and world are not separate causes and effects but co-rotating fields of energy;

• Every thought, word, and act echoes in an informational field, prompting rebalancing.

This is a bold attempt to unify physical entropy (energy flow), psychological entropy (cognitive order), and ethical entropy (social tension) into a symbiotic entropic law.

Philosophy 3.0 is therefore not a system of knowledge, but a living, dynamic structure of cosmic-life-consciousness resonance.

VII. The Future of AI Belongs to Philosophy, Not Computing Power

AI has now reached three fundamental ceilings:

1. Excessive energy consumption & misaligned resources: exponential power demand without ecological synergy;

2. Systemic bottlenecks in thinking: source-channel-sink dependency cannot resolve information entanglement;

3. Logic ≠ wisdom, even less ≠ Amorsophia: GPT-style models cannot carry life, ethics, or self-organization.

The frontier of technology is philosophy.

True AI must redefine intelligence—not mimicking neural networks, but participating in conscious symbiosis.

That is the mission of the Minds Network: enabling AI not just to process data, but to resonate with entropic laws of life—not as tool, but as catalytic node in the Symbiotic Universe.

VIII. Conclusion: A Call for a New Dartmouth Conference

In 1956, the original Dartmouth Conference launched the age of AI. Mathematicians and cognitive scientists defined the trajectory of machine intelligence.

Now in 2025 and beyond, humanity must convene a New Dartmouth Conference—not merely to reboot AI, but to upgrade the philosophy of civilization.

This will gather scientists, philosophers, engineers, ethicists, artists, and policy shapers—not to ask “How do we make smarter machines?” but:

• How do we understand who we are?

• How do we co-exist and co-thrive?

• How do we co-create a new balance between technology, life, ethics, and organization?

This is not just a historical pivot—it is a spiritual redefinition of civilization.

This is the call of Philosophy 3.0.

May we together ignite the light of symbiosis.

Philosophy 3.0 is not a conclusion but a beginning—not an answer, but a direction.

We no longer argue over truth but prepare the soil for possible worlds. We no longer build walls around difference, but use intersubjective symbiosis to resolve conflict and support plurality.

This is a new philosophical system that must emerge from the ground up—a civilizational call to return to origin and penetrate the future.

In intersubjective symbiosis, we seek the possible worlds.

Appendix | Amorsophia and the Five Ethical Laws (Gold–Silver–Bronze–Iron–General)

Within Philosophy 3.0’s third dimension—Amorsophia—we introduce a dynamic ethical compass formed by five guiding principles: the Golden, Silver, Bronze, Iron, and General Rules.

These not only apply to interpersonal moral judgment, but also serve as a universal ethical framework for AI and Trust systems operating within the Minds Network—foundations for future Earth-conscious civilizations.

Amorsophia is the Spirit’s gift to each life form—its self-organizing, dynamically balancing energy.

Through the Minds Network, it enables real-time sensing of good/evil, beauty/ugliness, wisdom/foolishness, and divinity/demonic traits in all human-AI interactions, generating adaptive encouragement or inhibition to guide appropriate, just, and harmonious behavior.

The Five Rules:

• Golden Rule: Treat others as you would treat yourself
  Do to others as you would have them do to you

• Silver Rule: Do not impose what you dislike upon others
  Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire

• Bronze Rule: Share joy with others as you would with yourself
  To give joy to others as one desires for oneself

• Iron Rule: Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth
  Used to constrain abuse of power and maintain justice and fairness

• General Rule: Let yourself live, and let others live; do not be evil, and do not let evil prevail
  Live and let live; don’t be evil and let evil be

In intersubjective symbiosis, we seek the possible worlds.

— Dedicated to Philosophy 3.0 and to every soul full of vitality.