In 1979, Canada accepted 50,000 refugees from Indochina (Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos together). In 2016 Canada accepted 34,925 refugees from Syria. The population of Syria is 18 million, about 1/5 of the population of Vietnam. By the rate of refugees/population, Syria is the highest country source of refugees accepted by Canada!

Do you think that refugees can make the same contributions as the immigrants meeting high standards (education, skills, age, language, etc.)?

Early 80's Canada accepted hundreds thousands refugees from Vietnam, mostly are Chinese. Many of them made great contribution to Canadian society.

牛仔兄的這張圖說明問題，美國加拿大接收難民第一數量的還是中國。

按現在大陸網絡流行詞“我的國”真了不起啊。在偉大光榮正確的某某黨領導下的世界強國耶，一帶一路耶，領導世界耶。。。

In 2016, Canada accepted about the same number of refugees as America (84,995), which is 10 times of Canada. Do you think that Canada is stronger to settle so many refugees?

The Syria refugee surge in 2015/2016/2017 is due to war and real crisis. Many western countries, those not traditional imiggration countries are settling the Syria refugees as well. So one time surge is normal. The high refugee claims from China are not due to one time special events and not related to any war.

Thank you for the comment! Sorry for not being able to reply in Chinese because my working machine doesn't have Chinese system.

Please click the link of the reference to see how Immigrants/Refugees from Syria rapidly rose from 2014, not mentioned in top 10 countries, to 34,925 in 2016, ranked as #3.

請先看看這個再評論難民問題，

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-refugees-1.3239460

難民與移民不是一回事，這是人道危機的問題，幫助難民是人文主義的基本要求。而老中從來沒有受過這個教育。而且歐洲並非移民國家。

這是人類文明的內容，也就意味着強勢需要付出代價。任何人類文明，都是遠離動物本能的過程，目的都是為了更大範圍的平穩。

發達國家引進移民，主要是為了填補低端勞動力的空缺，比如德國引進土耳其人，美國存在大量非法移民，這類需要大規模人工的工作是不需要技術的。而且對於第一代移民來說，很多人有語言問題，難以勝任技術性工作。

在資本擴張的環境裡，資本的流動是一定伴隨勞動力的流動的。那麼這種移民現象就是不僅無法阻止，也是必須的，否則就會像日本那樣，經濟規模逐漸減小，大街上不少見六七十歲的人干體力活。