與這裡的討論有關。轉， " As you well remember, many judges dismissed Republicans’ elections cases in 2020, holding that evidence of fraud was irrelevant since the procedural lawsuits could have been brought before the election, so that procedural changes could have been made before voters relied on the challenged rules. In other words, sorry, but you should have brought this to me before the election.
Now, four years later, judges must wrestle with their own rules. They must rule now, before the vote, and before there can be any evidence of voting fraud. These judges want to say “come back after the election with your evidence of fraud,” but they can’t, since they sagely opined the precise opposite last time.
In essence, judges invited these pre-election challenges. Now the judicial chickens have come home to roost. " https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/burger-king-monday-october-21-2024 ---- 第三個topic。這個律師從法律上解釋了為何很多2020大選作弊的案子沒有被法院受理。 |
