What had been achieved came to be regarded as a secure and imperishable possession, acquired once and for all. The eyes of the people became fixed on the new demands, the rapid satisfaction of which seemed to be barred by the adherence to the old principles. It became more and more widely accepted that further advance could not be expected along the old lines within the general framework which had made past progress pOSSible, but only by a complete remodelling of society. It was no longer a question of adding to or improving the existing machinery, but of completely scrapping and replaCing it. And as the hope of the new generation came to be centred on something completely new, interest in, and understanding of, the functioning of the existing society rapidly declined; and with the decline of the understanding of the way in which the free system worked our awareness of what depended on its existence also decreased.
True justice is sprung from genuine equality of individuals under the rule of the law. Distributive equality is another matter. True justice is impartial and impersonal. Different condition among individuals or groups which are not the result of interference do not imply an electal social injustice!
還有一點我想在錄像中以及我在你文章後的留言也提到了。就是哈所秉持的人類知識的不完全性決定了division of knowledge的本性。正因為如此任何人都知識都是localized的。從而決定了人類整體社會的進步是由個體的發展帶動的。具有很大的不可預測性。這也就是為何整體進步的不可計劃性。這個是哈耶克論證為何對自由的保護會最有利於社會發展。
