設萬維讀者為首頁 萬維讀者網 -- 全球華人的精神家園 廣告服務 聯繫我們 關於萬維
 
首  頁 新  聞 視  頻 博  客 論  壇 分類廣告 購  物
搜索>> 發表日誌 控制面板 個人相冊 給我留言
幫助 退出
俞先生的博客  
俞先生創造了一個宏大社會科學理論體系,無論學術界是否鑑定,可確信此理論體系成立。  
https://blog.creaders.net/u/6944/ > 複製 > 收藏本頁
我的名片
俞先生
註冊日期: 2012-11-10
訪問總量: 2,928,133 次
點擊查看我的個人資料
Calendar
我的公告欄
最新發布
· 人工智能評論本人的國家理論
· 人工智能回覆:霍布斯的理論跟我
· 神探李昌鈺故居占用我外公家的房
· 學術自由:真理面前人人平等
· Umberto Eco的符號哲學研究證明
· 我的社會科學研究在歐洲得到迴響
· 從哲學家尤爾根.哈貝馬斯去世想
友好鏈接
分類目錄
【政治類】
· 人工智能評論本人的國家理論
· 人工智能回覆:霍布斯的理論跟我
· 神探李昌鈺故居占用我外公家的房
· 學術自由:真理面前人人平等
· Umberto Eco的符號哲學研究證明
· 我的社會科學研究在歐洲得到迴響
· 從哲學家尤爾根.哈貝馬斯去世想
· 自由、平等和效率概念的簡單辨析
· 中國為什麼不去救伊朗
· 推廣哲學社會科學理論被禁止的悲
存檔目錄
03/01/2026 - 03/31/2026
02/01/2026 - 02/28/2026
01/01/2026 - 01/31/2026
12/01/2025 - 12/31/2025
11/01/2025 - 11/30/2025
10/01/2025 - 10/31/2025
09/01/2025 - 09/30/2025
08/01/2025 - 08/31/2025
07/01/2025 - 07/31/2025
06/01/2025 - 06/30/2025
05/01/2025 - 05/31/2025
04/01/2025 - 04/30/2025
03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025
02/01/2025 - 02/28/2025
01/01/2025 - 01/31/2025
09/01/2024 - 09/30/2024
08/01/2024 - 08/31/2024
07/01/2024 - 07/31/2024
05/01/2024 - 05/31/2024
04/01/2024 - 04/30/2024
03/01/2024 - 03/31/2024
02/01/2024 - 02/29/2024
01/01/2024 - 01/31/2024
12/01/2023 - 12/31/2023
10/01/2023 - 10/31/2023
09/01/2023 - 09/30/2023
08/01/2023 - 08/31/2023
07/01/2023 - 07/31/2023
06/01/2023 - 06/30/2023
05/01/2023 - 05/31/2023
04/01/2023 - 04/30/2023
03/01/2023 - 03/31/2023
02/01/2023 - 02/28/2023
01/01/2023 - 01/31/2023
12/01/2022 - 12/31/2022
11/01/2022 - 11/30/2022
10/01/2022 - 10/31/2022
09/01/2022 - 09/30/2022
08/01/2022 - 08/31/2022
07/01/2022 - 07/31/2022
06/01/2022 - 06/30/2022
05/01/2022 - 05/31/2022
04/01/2022 - 04/30/2022
03/01/2022 - 03/31/2022
02/01/2022 - 02/28/2022
01/01/2022 - 01/31/2022
12/01/2021 - 12/31/2021
11/01/2021 - 11/30/2021
10/01/2021 - 10/31/2021
09/01/2021 - 09/30/2021
08/01/2021 - 08/31/2021
07/01/2021 - 07/31/2021
06/01/2021 - 06/30/2021
05/01/2021 - 05/31/2021
04/01/2021 - 04/30/2021
03/01/2021 - 03/31/2021
02/01/2021 - 02/28/2021
01/01/2021 - 01/31/2021
12/01/2020 - 12/31/2020
11/01/2020 - 11/30/2020
10/01/2020 - 10/31/2020
09/01/2020 - 09/30/2020
07/01/2020 - 07/31/2020
06/01/2020 - 06/30/2020
05/01/2020 - 05/31/2020
04/01/2020 - 04/30/2020
03/01/2020 - 03/31/2020
02/01/2020 - 02/29/2020
01/01/2020 - 01/31/2020
12/01/2019 - 12/31/2019
11/01/2019 - 11/30/2019
10/01/2019 - 10/31/2019
09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019
08/01/2019 - 08/31/2019
07/01/2019 - 07/31/2019
06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019
05/01/2019 - 05/31/2019
04/01/2019 - 04/30/2019
03/01/2019 - 03/31/2019
02/01/2019 - 02/28/2019
01/01/2019 - 01/31/2019
12/01/2018 - 12/31/2018
11/01/2018 - 11/30/2018
10/01/2018 - 10/31/2018
09/01/2018 - 09/30/2018
08/01/2018 - 08/31/2018
07/01/2018 - 07/31/2018
06/01/2018 - 06/30/2018
05/01/2018 - 05/31/2018
04/01/2018 - 04/30/2018
03/01/2018 - 03/31/2018
02/01/2018 - 02/28/2018
01/01/2018 - 01/31/2018
12/01/2017 - 12/31/2017
11/01/2017 - 11/30/2017
10/01/2017 - 10/31/2017
09/01/2017 - 09/30/2017
08/01/2017 - 08/31/2017
07/01/2017 - 07/31/2017
06/01/2017 - 06/30/2017
05/01/2017 - 05/31/2017
04/01/2017 - 04/30/2017
06/01/2016 - 06/30/2016
12/01/2015 - 12/31/2015
11/01/2015 - 11/30/2015
02/01/2015 - 02/28/2015
01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015
12/01/2014 - 12/31/2014
11/01/2014 - 11/30/2014
10/01/2014 - 10/31/2014
09/01/2014 - 09/30/2014
08/01/2014 - 08/31/2014
07/01/2014 - 07/31/2014
06/01/2014 - 06/30/2014
05/01/2014 - 05/31/2014
04/01/2014 - 04/30/2014
03/01/2014 - 03/31/2014
02/01/2014 - 02/28/2014
12/01/2013 - 12/31/2013
11/01/2013 - 11/30/2013
10/01/2013 - 10/31/2013
09/01/2013 - 09/30/2013
06/01/2013 - 06/30/2013
05/01/2013 - 05/31/2013
12/01/2012 - 12/31/2012
11/01/2012 - 11/30/2012
發表評論
作者:
用戶名: 密碼: 您還不是博客/論壇用戶?現在就註冊!
     
評論:
日本人的扭曲歷史觀試圖打入英語世界
    

最近,美國一家學術出版社計劃出版一本由一名日本學者和一名旅日中國學者合寫的一本書,書名是《不情願的戰鬥員》。該書的主題是,有證據表明在中日戰爭期間日本政治領導人不情願與中國發生全面衝突。該書提出幾個方面的內容,包括中國內部反日陣線非常脆弱,日本人認為蘇俄是主要的潛在對手以及可能與中國進行持久戰對日本國防的威脅等。該書還透露,共產黨、國民政府、地方紳士、農民和土匪有時與日軍合作以便擴大勢力範圍。請見以下出版社網站上的英文說明。

The Reluctant Combatant offers proof that Japanese political leaders were reluctant to engage China in a full-scale conflict during the Second Sino-Japanese War. This book identifies several key aspects of the political context surrounding the Second Sino-Japanese War, including the extreme fragility of the national united front against Japan, the view of Soviet Russia as Japan’s principal potential adversary, and the potential threat to Japanese national defense a protracted war with China would pose. This book reveals that the Communists, the National Government, local gentry, peasants, and bandits occasionally collaborated with the enemy—Japanese troops—to expand their spheres of influence.


該書作者中一位華人應該是個漢奸。至少有漢奸嫌疑。請看以下說明。


Kitamura Minoru graduated Kyoto University in 1973. He is now a professor at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto where he teaches Modern Chinese History.

Lin Si-Yun graduated Nanjing University in 1985. He has authored several books in Japanese on the cultural differences between Japan and China.


日本京都大學一位教授發表書評稱,關於第二次中日戰爭的主流觀點是,日本想摧毀中國。但是,仔細地研究全局,可發現,中國人不是現在人們所說的無辜的侵略受害者。請看以下的英文說明。

The mainstream view on the Second Sino-Japanese War is that Imperial Japan was bent on destroying China, and the rest of Asia, for purely selfish reasons. However, careful analysis of the global situation, particularly of the social and political development of China and the attitudes of the Chinese leadership, indicates that the Chinese were not the innocent victims of ‘aggression’ as is currently claimed.

— Terumasa Nakanishi, Kyoto University

日本國防研究院的一位人士表示,該書對導致中日戰爭的原因的研究表明,戰爭既不是日本人的野蠻戰爭,中國也不是一個無助的受害者。請看下面的說明。


Authors Kitamura and Lin recount the circumstances that ultimately lead to the Second Sino-Japanese War, demonstrating that the war was neither a Japanese ‘brutal war of aggression’ or that China was a ‘helpless’ victim.
— Haruo Tohmatsu, National Defense Academy of Japan

日本人非常不老實。他們想歪曲歷史,以便為歷史翻案。這樣的人怎麼可信,怎麼可能走和平主義道路。完全是騙人的!

 
關於本站 | 廣告服務 | 聯繫我們 | 招聘信息 | 網站導航 | 隱私保護
Copyright (C) 1998-2026. Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.