设万维读者为首页 万维读者网 -- 全球华人的精神家园 广告服务 联系我们 关于万维
 
首  页 新  闻 视  频 博  客 论  坛 分类广告 购  物
搜索>> 发表日志 控制面板 个人相册 给我留言
帮助 退出
 
叔涵畅谈  
叔涵畅谈博议天下事,实话实说,实事求是!  
网络日志正文
台湾从来不属于中共国 2022-05-18 01:59:40

陈叔涵 2022年5月18日


众所周知,中华人民共和国,也就是俗称的中共国,成立于一九四九年十月,自其成立至今,从未占领过台湾,从未统治过台湾。换句话说,中共国从来不曾拥有过台湾。既然从来不曾拥有,那么,台湾与中共国就不存在统属关系。就好比美国从未拥有过天安门广场,天安门广场也从来都不是美国的领土一样。任何人对于自己从来不曾拥有过的东西,都无资格声称所有权。若中共可以声称台湾是中共国的一部分,那么,世界上任何一个人都可以声称北京是他家财产的一部分。


中共之所以一直宣称台湾是中共国的一部分,那是因为中共自认为中共国能够代表历史上的中国。然而,铁的事实就是:中共国无权代表历史上的中国!


中国历史悠久,朝代众多,其疆域从秦始皇时代开始,一直到今天,都是一个动态的概念,不是静态的。也就是说,中国的疆域不是固定的,一直处在变化之中。秦朝的疆域,不要说与清朝相差悬殊,就是与汉朝相比,也不可同日而语。若说当今的中华人民共和国可以代表历史上的中国,那就非常荒谬。因为不管中共国说它代表历史上的哪个王朝,它都必须先复原那个王朝的领土。没有占据那个王朝的领土,就不可言主权,自然也就不能代表。比方说,若中共国代表历史上的唐王朝。那么,唐王朝时,贝加尔湖属于中国的领土,史称小海。但是,如今的贝加尔湖早就不是中国的领土了,中共能把贝加尔湖收回来吗?可见,对于任何一个政权来说,领土和统辖权都是必不可少的,正所谓皮之不存毛将焉附?对于一块既没有占领又没有统辖权的领土,一个政权是无法代表它的。有鉴于此,当今的中共国所能代表的仅限于被中共占据的领土,即,被中共政权所统辖的领土;那些在历史上曾经属于中国,但没有被中共占据的领土,中共国均无权代表,更无资格声称对这些领土拥有主权。很简单,中共不曾拥有过的领土,中共怎么可以声称对其拥有主权呢?!


由上可知,中共国外交部动不动就说,某某地方自古就是中国的领土,本身就很荒唐!自古,何为古?以哪一年为界?若不能界定古自何始,当中共国这样说的时候,蒙古国就笑了。因为在元朝的时候,不要说整个中国,就是半个欧洲以及当今的俄罗斯,都属于蒙古国的领土。所以,提自古就一定会闹笑话。那么,中国的疆域究竟以何时的为准呢?要不然,动不动就说自古以来,那样争吵下去,肯定没完没了!


中国的疆域,只能是以大清王朝为准。大清是中国最后一个王朝,最后一位皇帝也因此被称为末代皇帝。通俗地说,无论一个女人结婚多少次,只能以她的最后一任丈夫为合法配偶。大清以前的任何一个王朝都不能作为中国疆域的界定标准,要么是疆域太狭小,如秦朝,当今的新疆、西藏都不包含在内;要么是疆域太庞大,如元朝,几乎五分之一的地球都是中国的领土。最关键的是,清朝是中国政体由帝制转型为民国的一个划时代的时间节点,并且政权的移交方式也是独一无二的,即,中华民国继承了大清王朝的领土和主权,这是其它任何王朝都无法代替的。因此,中国的疆域只能以清代为依据。


当今的中共国显然不能代表历史上的清朝。首先,中共国的领土比清朝少叁百多万平方公里,其次,在法理上,中共国的领土与大清不存在继承关系。与大清领土存在继承关系的国家政权是中华民国,有清帝退位诏书为证。目前中共国所占有之领土,是中共在境外敌对势力的扶持下,依靠暴力从中华民国手中抢夺过来的一大部分,并不是中华民国领土的全部。然而,中共国却拒不承认中华民国并且刻意否定中华民国的历史。有鉴于此,中共国不光在疆域上不能代表清朝,就连其占有的领土也不是从大清王朝继承,那就更不能代表历史上的清朝了,因为缺少继承性。中国人常常引以为傲的是中国历史的完整性,然而,完整性从何而来?那就是继承性和连续性。没有继承性,也就没有连续性,没有连续性,何来完整性?中共政权不是继承自大清,更不是继承自民国。因此,中共国就更不够资格代表历史上的大清!


综上所述,以清王朝界定的中国的疆域,无论是历史意义上的中国还是地理意义上的中国,中共国都不够资格代表。中共国所能代表的只能是中共自一九四九年建立政权之后所占据的领土。根据国际法和国际惯例,对于中共国从来没有占据过的领土,中共国无权代表,更无资格声称拥有这些领土的主权。如,中共国就无权代表本属于大清的库页岛和海参崴,无权对库页岛和海参崴声称拥有主权,因为中共国从未占领过库页岛和海参崴。一言以蔽之,原本属于清朝而今不被中共所占据的领土,均不属于中共国,中共国不够资格声称对其拥有主权!

Taiwan has never belonged to the CCP state

 Chen Shuhan May 18, 2022

As we all know, the People's Republic of China, commonly known as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) State, was founded in October 1949, and since its inception, it has never occupied or ruled Taiwan. In other words, the CCP state has never owned Taiwan. Since it has never possessed it, there is no relationship of domination between Taiwan and the CCP state. It is just like the United States has never owned Tiananmen Square, and Tiananmen Square has never been a territory of the United States. No one is qualified to claim ownership of something he or she has never owned. If the CCP can claim that Taiwan is part of the CCP state, then anyone in the world can claim that Beijing is part of his family's property.

The reason why the CCP keeps claiming that Taiwan is part of the CCP state is because the CCP thinks that the CCP state can represent historical China. However, the hard fact is that the CCP state has no right to represent historical China!

China has a long history and many dynasties, and its boundaries, starting from the time of Emperor Qin Shi Huang and continuing up to the present day, are a dynamic concept, not a static one. In other words, China's boundaries are not fixed and they are always in a state of flux. The boundaries of the Qin Dynasty, not to mention the vast difference with the Qing Dynasty, are not comparable to those of the Han Dynasty. To say that the present-day People's Republic of China (PRC) can represent China in history would be very absurd. This is because no matter which dynasty in history the People's Republic of China declares it represents, it must first restore the territory of that dynasty. Without occupying the territory of that dynasty, it cannot claim sovereignty and naturally cannot represent it. For example, if the CCP state represents the Tang dynasty in history, then the Baikal region, which was under the Tang dynasty, will be under the control of the CCP state. Then, during the Tang Dynasty, Lake Baikal belonged to China's territory, which was known as Xiaohai. But nowadays, Lake Baikal has long since ceased to be China's territory; anyway, can the CCP state take Lake Baikal back? It can be seen that for any regime, both territory and jurisdiction are essential, just as the saying goes if the skin does not exist, where will the hair be attached to? A regime cannot represent a territory that it neither occupies nor has jurisdiction over. Because of this, the CCP state today can only represent the territories occupied by the Chinese Communist state, i.e., the territories under the CCP state's jurisdiction; the CCP state has no right to represent the territories that used to be part of China in history but were not occupied by the CCP state, let alone claiming sovereignty over these territories. In a word, how can the CCP claim sovereignty over territories that the CCP has never possessed?

Based on the facts above, we can see that it is absurd for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the CCP state to say that such and such a place has been China's territory since ancient times! Since ancient times, what is ancient? Which year is the boundary? If it is not possible to define the beginning of ancient times, Mongolia laughs when the CCP state says so. Since during the Yuan Dynasty, not to mention the whole of China, half of Europe as well as present-day Russia belonged to the territory of Mongolia. Therefore, mentioning ancient times is bound to be a joke. Therefore, when on earth did the boundaries of China actually prevail? Otherwise, if people always mention starting from ancient times, the argument will be endless!

China's boundaries can only be based on the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911). The Qing Dynasty was the last in China, and the last emperor was therefore called the Emperor of the last dynasty. In layman's terms, no matter how many times a woman has been married; she can only take her last husband as her legal spouse. No dynasty before the Qing Dynasty can be adopted as a criterion for defining China's boundaries; either the boundaries were too narrow, such as the Qin Dynasty, which excludes today's Xinjiang and Tibet, or too vast, such as the Yuan Dynasty, in which almost one-fifth of the earth was the territory of the Yuan Dynasty. Most crucially, the Qing Dynasty was an epochal point in time when the Chinese system of government was transformed from an imperial system to a civil type-Republic of China (ROC), and how the transfer of power took place was unique, i.e., the ROC inherited the territory and sovereignty of the Qing Dynasty, which could not be replaced by any other dynasty. Therefore, the boundaries of China can only be based on the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911).

The present-day CCP state obviously cannot represent the Qing dynasty in history. Firstly, the territory of the CCP state is more than three million square kilometers less than that of the Qing dynasty, and secondly and legally, the territory of the CCP state does not have a succession relationship with the Qing dynasty. The sovereignty that has a succession relationship with the Qing Dynasty is the Republic of China, as evidenced by the abdication edict of the Qing Emperor. The territory currently occupied by the Chinese Communist Party is a large part of the territory that the CCP seized from the Republic of China by violence, and it is not the entire territory of the Republic of China. However, the CCP refuses to recognize the Republic of China and deliberately denies the history of the Republic of China. Given this, not only does the CCP fail to represent the Qing Dynasty in terms of territory, but even the territory it occupies is not inherited from the Qing Dynasty, and it is quite far away from representing the Qing Dynasty in the historical sense because it lacks the inheritance. Chinese people often take pride in the completeness of Chinese history, however, where does completeness come from? That is inheritance and continuity. Without inheritance, there is no continuity, and without continuity, how can there be integrity? The CCP regime was not inherited from the Qing Dynasty, much less from the Republic of China. Therefore, the CCP state is absolutely unqualified to represent the Qing Dynasty in history!

To summarize, the CCP state is not qualified to represent the boundaries of China as defined by the Qing Dynasty, whether it is China in the historical sense or in the geographical sense. What the CCP state can represent is only the territory occupied by the CCP since the establishment of its power in 1949. According to international law and practice, the Chinese Communist Party has no right to represent, let alone claim sovereignty over territories that the Chinese Communist Party has never occupied. For example, the Chinese Communist Party has no right to represent the Kuril Islands and Vladivostok, which originally belonged to the Qing Dynasty, and has no right to claim sovereignty over the Kuril Islands and Vladivostok because the Chinese Communist Party has never occupied the Kuril Islands and Vladivostok. In short, the territories that originally belonged to the Qing Dynasty but are not occupied by the Chinese Communist Party today do not belong to the Chinese Communist Party and the Chinese Communist Party is not qualified to claim sovereignty over them!

 



浏览(13104) (190) 评论(18)
发表评论
文章评论
作者:阿妞不牛 回复 城里的老农 留言时间:2022-06-03 17:46:31

你这倒是抓住了一个根本,但是你也无法继续保持发挥这个根本。台湾属于中国, 是二战结局最重要的一个结果, 整体上属于中国人抗日的成果。这与海南岛同属中国性质一样也不一样:毛共政权与中华民国内战,假如毛没有拿下海南岛, 两个中国就如同两个朝鲜两个德国一样。但是, 中共至今都没有拿下台湾,本质上就是中国内战没有结束。到今天,无论台湾还是中共继续发动进行内战,除了荼毒中国民众,都是挑战世界潮流与国际秩序。历史证明,共产党当年的“打倒蒋介石解放全中国”,比斯大林的“解放东欧人民”更荒诞,如今的武统台湾,比普京“解放乌克兰”更荒唐甚至无耻!美国对台湾以及中华民国的保护维护, 维护的不单是国际和平秩序, 更重要的保护全体中国人再次血腥内战与世界大战!台湾人要通过独立来永久脱离共产党威胁以及中国内战的愿望与驱动,比反攻大陆以及中共统一台湾,从人类道义正义来说, 无懈可击, 只是现实政治会导致近乎不可收拾的血腥战争。因此,蛮横的台独也是与维护和平以及两岸民众福祉背道而驰的。这都是美国与世界都要尽力防范制止的。

回复 | 1
作者:城里的老农 留言时间:2022-05-24 12:08:59
你文章的第1句话就站不住脚。中共国成立的时候,海南岛属于谁?现在又属于谁?你如果能弄清这个问题的话,你的文章就有可看性。
回复 | 0
作者:frank_ly 留言时间:2022-05-24 05:23:44

没错,“自古以来”是占不住脚的。中国国的边界,只能以中共接手国土时的国土为准。

回复 | 0
作者:llyismyson 留言时间:2022-05-22 19:57:15

最好是中华民国台湾在美国人支持下光复大陆。

回复 | 1
作者:双不 回复 渚清沙白 留言时间:2022-05-22 19:53:50

美国下令修宪,台湾才可以修宪。美国不会被台湾单边的行动拖入战争。

反之如果美国下令修宪,说明美国准备承受一定的风险。

离开美国的军事支持,台湾独立毫无希望。是否修宪改变不了什么。

回复 | 0
作者:叔涵心语 回复 g2j2 留言时间:2022-05-21 06:59:45

博主的知识欠缺倒是无妨,只可惜有些人不仅知识欠缺,连德行也欠缺,居然把中国的历史给阉割了,连元朝和清朝都是中国历史上的朝代都视而不见,这只不过是历史常识而已!

回复 | 0
作者:渚清沙白 留言时间:2022-05-21 06:06:22

关键问题还是修宪。台湾应尽快把宪法界定的主权领土范围与实际管辖范围一致起来。不然,你把人家管辖的中国大陆也划在你的主权领土范围,中国大陆的宪法把台澎金马也划在它的主权领土范围。这不说明双方都一致承认同属一个中国吗?

美国不应当再阻挠台湾修宪了,只要一修宪,然后美国带头与台湾一建交,就万事大吉了。否则台湾永远处于不伦不类的状态。

回复 | 0
作者:天雅 留言时间:2022-05-21 00:42:12

赞。

回复 | 0
作者:天雅 留言时间:2022-05-21 00:40:09

在法理上,中共国的领土与大清不存在继承关系。与大清领土存在继承关系的国家政权是中华民国,有清帝退位诏书为证。

---- Exactly right!

回复 | 1
作者:双不 留言时间:2022-05-20 11:39:50

没办法,台湾对大陆只能委屈求全。其实台湾有其幸运的一面因为大陆不轻易动武,台海才得以持续几十年的和平。不然台湾早变成了盆盆罐罐粉碎的乌克兰。

回复 | 3
作者:tintin9999 留言时间:2022-05-20 07:57:23

中共建国后一天没有管过香港, 为什么英国就乖乖地把香港交还给了中共而不是台湾?

回复 | 5
作者:春晓漫谈 留言时间:2022-05-20 07:23:48

这种没有法律意识的文章都敢发,真服你了。你根本没有搞得台湾的地位,更不知道中华民国和中华人民共和国是什么关系。果然无知者,无畏。

回复 | 6
作者:一冰 留言时间:2022-05-20 02:40:01

属于这个词有点荒诞,台湾属于它自己,台湾人的未来当然由2300万台湾人民说了算,那些个吃饱了撑的没事干,以霸凌别人寻找存在感的二杆子们,还是回家洗洗睡吧,不然就带上儿孙上前线,才算恁有种。

回复 | 11
作者:模糊人生 留言时间:2022-05-19 22:37:33

中国不是中共国。中共国是49年才成立的,而中国已经有很长历史了。

回复 | 6
作者:七号洞 留言时间:2022-05-19 22:04:51

说的有道理!中共一直认为它是代替中华民国政权。既然台湾在民国手里,自然会像小孩一样叫喊,那也是我的。老蒋当年不脱出联合国而以台湾保留会籍就好啦!

回复 | 3
作者:g2j2 留言时间:2022-05-19 20:26:40

博主的认知还是欠缺,元朝是蒙古人的,大清是满人的。(怯以为你是我大汉民族)

回复 | 4
作者:巴黎老高 留言时间:2022-05-18 05:04:39

美国北约正企图群殴,肢解,大俄罗斯。

台湾的陆地总面积才可怜巴巴的3.6万平方公里。等俄熊倒下,扒皮,剁掌,瓜分,美国拿十几倍五六十万平方公里,中国以北的俄土跟北京换。

开个好头,四川合伙云南,奔向自由!

回复 | 3
作者:巴黎老高 留言时间:2022-05-18 04:51:57

当今台湾人与大陆离心离德,只会越来越远,

希望让他们干脆;申请做美国的一个州算了。

回复 | 9
我的名片
叔涵心语
注册日期: 2022-01-17
访问总量: 697,448 次
点击查看我的个人资料
Calendar
最新发布
· 庆丰帝治国恰似他扛麦子!
· 中共的本质是邪恶
· 闻《罗刹海市》有感
· 秦刚的出路与活路
· 武统台湾,为何李毅比习近平还猴
· 中共才是史无前例的最大汉奸
· 中共的神经为何如此敏感?
分类目录
【国际时政】
· 丧钟为普京而鸣!
· 中美开战纯属扯澹!
· 北约东扩的真相
· 俄乌战争最体面的结束方式
【民族问题】
· 中间道路和中共极权的邪恶
【台湾问题】
· 武统台湾,为何李毅比习近平还猴
· 台湾独立已愈七十载
· 中共的台湾牌还能打多久?
· 台海之战纯属笑谈
· 台湾是名符其实的主权独立国家!
· 再次祭出“战犯”名单,凸显中共无
· 究竟是谁在分裂中国?
· 中共的底线就是无底线!
· 台湾从来不属于中共国
· 武统台湾是赤裸裸的强盗行径
【中共国时政】
· 庆丰帝治国恰似他扛麦子!
· 中共的本质是邪恶
· 闻《罗刹海市》有感
· 秦刚的出路与活路
· 中共才是史无前例的最大汉奸
· 中共的神经为何如此敏感?
· 没有苏俄就没有中共国
· 要有多缺心眼才会相信中共!
· 言论自由是人和牲口的根本区别
· 中共政权是彻头彻尾的土匪政权
存档目录
2024-03-29 - 2024-03-29
2023-09-06 - 2023-09-06
2023-08-12 - 2023-08-12
2023-07-20 - 2023-07-20
2023-06-07 - 2023-06-11
2023-05-12 - 2023-05-21
2023-04-12 - 2023-04-24
2023-03-07 - 2023-03-07
2023-02-02 - 2023-02-22
2023-01-13 - 2023-01-16
2022-12-02 - 2022-12-16
2022-11-07 - 2022-11-10
2022-10-04 - 2022-10-30
2022-09-01 - 2022-09-29
2022-08-03 - 2022-08-20
2022-07-05 - 2022-07-24
2022-06-03 - 2022-06-19
2022-05-18 - 2022-05-18
2022-04-04 - 2022-04-23
2022-03-04 - 2022-03-28
2022-02-01 - 2022-02-28
2022-01-17 - 2022-01-30
 
关于本站 | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站导航 | 隐私保护
Copyright (C) 1998-2024. CyberMedia Network /Creaders.NET. All Rights Reserved.